
Three-Quarters Of UN Members Support Palestinian Statehood
Three-quarters of UN members have already or soon plan to recognise Palestinian statehood, with Australia on Monday becoming the latest to promise it will at the UN General Assembly in September.
The Israel-Hamas war, raging in Gaza since the Palestinian group's attack on October 7, 2023, has revived a global push for Palestinians to be given a state of their own.
The action breaks with a long-held view that Palestinians could only gain statehood as part of a negotiated peace with Israel.
According to an AFP tally, at least 145 of the 193 UN members now recognise or plan to recognise a Palestinian state, including France, Canada and Britain.
Here is a quick recap of the Palestinians' quest for statehood:
1988: Arafat Proclaims State
On November 15, 1988, during the first Palestinian intifada, or uprising against Israeli rule, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat unilaterally proclaimed an independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.
He made the announcement in Algiers at a meeting of the exiled Palestinian National Council, which adopted the two-state solution as a goal, with independent Israeli and Palestinian states existing side-by-side.
Minutes later, Algeria became the first country to officially recognise an independent Palestinian state.
Within a week, dozens of other countries, including much of the Arab world, India, Turkey, most of Africa and several central and eastern European countries followed suit.
The next wave of recognitions came in late 2010 and early 2011, at a time of crisis for the Middle East peace process.
South American countries, including Argentina, Brazil and Chile, answered calls by the Palestinians to endorse their statehood claims.
This came in response to Israel's decision to end a temporary ban on Jewish settlement-building in the occupied West Bank.
2011-2012: UN Recognition
In 2011, with peace talks at a standstill, the Palestinians pushed ahead with a campaign for full UN membership.
The quest failed, but in a groundbreaking move on October 31 of that year, the UN cultural agency UNESCO voted to accept the Palestinians as a full member, much to the dismay of Israel and the United States.
In November 2012, the Palestinian flag was raised for the first time at the United Nations in New York after the General Assembly overwhelmingly voted to upgrade the status of the Palestinians to "non-member observer state".
Three years later, the International Criminal Court also accepted the Palestinians as a state party.
2024-2025 New Push
Israel's offensive in Gaza after the October 7, 2023 attack has boosted support for Palestinian statehood.
Four Caribbean countries (Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados and the Bahamas) and Armenia took the diplomatic step in 2024.
So did four European countries: Norway, Spain, Ireland and Slovenia, the latter three EU members.
Within the European Union, this was a first in 10 years since Sweden's move in 2014, which resulted in years of strained relations with Israel.
Other member states, such as Poland, Bulgaria and Romania, had already done so in 1988, long before joining the EU.
On the other hand, some former Eastern bloc countries, such as Hungary and the Czech Republic, do not or no longer recognise a state of Palestine.
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Monday that "Australia will recognise the right of the Palestinian people to a state of their own" at the UN General Assembly.
France said last month it intends to recognise a Palestinian state come September, while Britain said it would do the same unless Israel takes "substantive steps", including agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza.
Canada also plans to recognise a Palestinian state in September, Prime Minister Mark Carney said, marking a dramatic policy shift that was immediately rejected by Israel.
Among other countries that could also formally express recognition, Malta, Finland and Portugal have raised the possibility.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
After Asim Munir, Pakistan PM Shehbaz Sharif threatens India over Indus Waters Treaty
In a fresh threat to India, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Tuesday said the "enemy" would not be allowed to snatch 'even one drop' of water belonging to Pakistan. Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif.(AFP file) India took a series of punitive measures against Pakistan that included putting the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) of 1960 in 'abeyance' on April 23, a day after the Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 lives. Pakistan has repeatedly cautioned that any attempt to block the water flow would be considered an act of war. "I want to tell the enemy today that if you threaten to hold our water, then keep this in mind that you cannot snatch even one drop of Pakistan,' news agency PTI quoted Shehbaz Sharif as saying at a ceremony in Islamabad. The Pakistani prime minister also warned that if India attempted such an act, 'you will be again taught such a lesson that you will be left holding your ears.' There was no immediate comment from India on Shehbaz Sharif's threat. Sharif's statement comes a day after former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari made similar comments, terming the Indus Waters Treaty's suspension an attack on the Indus Valley Civilisation and said Pakistan would not back down if India forced it into war. Actor-turned-Bharatiya Janata Party leader Mithun Chakraborty on Tuesday reacted sharply to the Pakistan People's Party chairman's comment and warned that India will respond with a series of Brahmos missiles. His fiery retort was also accompanied by a bizarre one: a dam will be built, and 140 crore Indians will relieve themselves there before that reservoir will be opened to unleash a tsunami in the neighbouring nation. Chakraborty, however, emphasised that he had nothing against the ordinary people of Pakistan who are peace-loving and do not want war and that his ire was directed only at the Pakistani establishment. Meanwhile, in an address to the Pakistani diaspora in Tampa, Florida, Pakistani Army chief Asim Munir reportedly said Islamabad would destroy any dam if it cut off water flow to Pakistan. "We will wait for India to build a dam, and when they do so, we will destroy it,' Asim Munir was quoted as saying by the Dawn newspaper. 'The Indus River is not the Indians' family property. We have no shortage of resources to undo the Indian designs to stop the river," he added. Hitting back, the ministry of external affairs said on Monday that Munir's fresh nuclear threat against India reinforced the well-held doubts about the integrity of nuclear command and control in that country, where the military is "hand-in-glove" with terrorist groups and New Delhi will not give in to any nuclear blackmail. Nuclear sabre-rattling is Pakistan's 'stock-in-trade', the MEA said, adding that India will continue to take all steps necessary to safeguard its national security. In an apparent message to the US, the ministry said it is also regrettable that these remarks were made from the soil of a 'friendly third country'. India carried out Operation Sindoor on May 7, striking terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in response to the April 22 Pahalgam attack that claimed 26 civilian lives. After four days of heavy cross-border drone and missile exchanges, India and Pakistan agreed on May 10 to end the hostilities. (With inputs from agencies)


The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Mumbai police inform Bombay High Court of nod for CPI(M) Gaza crisis protest
Mumbai police on August 12, 2025, informed the Bombay High Court that it has agreed to allow the Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)], to hold a peaceful protest at Azad Maidan in Mumbai, condemning the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. 'The protest will be held on August 20, between 3 p.m. and 6 p.m., for the protesters to express their thoughts on the genocide purportedly occurring in Gaza,' the police told the Division Bench of justices, Ravindra Ghuge and Gautam Ankhad. Additional Public Prosecutor S.C. Gavand told the court that the protest must comply with the legal requirements and be confined to the designated demonstration area. Representing the petitioners, Senior Advocate Mihir Desai assured the Bench that the organisers will adhere to the draft regulations under the Maharashtra Police Act, which require organisers to ensure the event remains orderly and confined to designated protest areas and said, 'I hope neither of us comes back on the 21st.' On Monday (August 11, 2025), Mr. Desai had informed the court that the Pune police gave permission last week to hold a similar protest. To this, the court asked the APP to check if the protest can be allowed with some conditions in place to ensure law and order in the city. on Tuesday, after hearing that the permission is granted, the court disposed of the petition. The CPI(M) on X, shared, 'The permission by #MumbaiPolice to CPI(M) and acceptance of #BombayHighCourt to hold peaceful protest against ongoing genocide in #Gaza by Israel vindicated the correctness of CPI(M) stand and nullifies Court's own earlier ill remarks and earlier anti-democratic refusal of Police.' On July 25, 2025, the same Bench dismissed the CPI(M)'s petition and sharply criticized the party for concentrating on international events over domestic concerns. 'Our country has enough issues. Look at your own country. Be patriots. This is not patriotism,' the Bench noted, urging the political party to prioritize citizen-centric issues like garbage disposal, pollution, drainage, and flooding instead of distant geopolitical conflicts. Following the court's observation, the CPI(M) released a press note the same evening, 'The Polit Bureau of the CPI(M) strongly condemns the observations of the Bombay High Court Bench while rejecting an application by the party to challenge the Mumbai Police's refusal to allow a protest action against the ongoing Israeli genocide in Gaza. Ironically, the Bench appears to be unaware of either the provisions of the Constitution which enshrines the rights of a political party, or the history of our country and our people's solidarity with the Palestinians and their legitimate right to homeland. The observations smack of distinct political bias in line with the Central government.' CPI(M) had submitted multiple applications in June to hold a protest at Azad Maidan but all of them were rejected by police on grounds that the issue was international and could complicate law and order situations.


News18
16 minutes ago
- News18
Gaza terrorists caught using fake humanitarian logo, vests
Tel Aviv [Israel], August 13 (ANI/TPS): The US-based World Central Kitchen confirmed an Israeli accusation that Palestinian terrorists in Gaza were caught on video impersonating humanitarian aid staff.'WATCH: 5 Armed terrorists operated under the cover of a fake emblem of @WCKitchen placed on a vehicle in Gaza – and were eliminated from the air," tweeted the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT). COGAT is a unit of the Israeli Defence Forces that coordinates civilian issues in Judea, Samaria and tweet included aerial footage of armed men wearing yellow response, the WCK tweeted, 'WCK was contacted by Israel's Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT), and confirmed the vehicle and persons of interest were not affiliated with WCK."WCK added, We strongly condemn anyone posing as WCK or other humanitarians as this endangers civilians and aid workers. The safety and security of our teams are our top priority."A special report by The Press Service of Israel on Thursday in July found that, according to the UN's own numbers, a staggering 85% of the aid entering the Gaza Strip by truck since May 19 has been stolen. The investigation found that a combination of black market profiteers and inflation has made much of the aid in Gaza markets unaffordable for most on Tuesday, an Israeli academic study released by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem found that humanitarian aid intended to alleviate suffering in war zones often ends up prolonging the very conflicts it seeks to examination of prolonged conflicts in Somalia, Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Sudan, Ethiopia, and Gaza by Hebrew University law professor Netta Barak-Corren and Dr. Jonathan Boxman concluded that aid diversion is not a rare mishap but a systemic feature of the current humanitarian study drew on United Nations reports, NGO records and investigative accounts, documenting how humanitarian agencies often strike informal agreements with local power brokers or armed factions to maintain access. These deals, the authors argue, sometimes contradict the core humanitarian principles of neutrality, impartiality and independence, but are tolerated to keep aid flowing and operations 1,200 people were killed, and 252 Israelis and foreigners were taken hostage in Hamas's attacks on Israeli communities near the Gaza border on October 7. Of the 50 remaining hostages, around 30 are believed to be dead. (ANI/TPS)