
PSA Welcomes Withdrawal Of Suspension Of Disability Workers At Te Roopu Taurima
Te Roopu Taurima o Manukau Trust is the country's largest provider of kaupapa Māori-based support for people with disabilities in residential facilities in Northland, Auckland, Waikato and Canterbury.
"We welcome the withdrawal of the harsh and oppressive suspension and lockout and as a result the PSA also withdraws strike action in support of the collective agreement," said Fleur Fitzsimons National Secretary Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi.
Te Roopu Taurima told the PSA it would suspend 38 workers late Friday without pay for six weeks in response to low level strike action taken in support of their collective agreement.
Last year the trust also locked out Kaitaataki (house leaders for residential disability support) preventing them from working the extra hours they rely on to earn enough to support themselves and their whānau, this forms part of legal action in the Employment Court.
The PSA and Te Roopu Taurima attended facilitation run by an Employment Relations Authority member recently. The Authority member then provided recommendations to settle the collective agreement.
"The PSA did not get everything we wanted but nevertheless agreed that we would recommend the outcomes to our members. Te Roopu Taurimu now needs to come to the party and accept the recommendations, this is the basis on which the PSA attends mediation. We will now return to mediation with the hope of settling this dispute.
"Our members want to put this dispute behind them, get the fair wages and conditions they deserve, and get on with their important work of supporting tangata."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Ōhau wall issues raise Lake Rotoiti water quality concerns
The $11 million structure was expected to last 50 years but showed signs of corrosion as early as 2014. Chairman Wallace Haumaha said the ongoing issues with the Ōhau Channel diversion wall were 'yet another symptom of a broken, Crown-led water management system that continues to ignore our role as kaitiaki'. Earlier this year, the Bay of Plenty Regional Council said it would 'accelerate' trials to address the problem. Haumaha welcomed this progress but said all voices, especially those of mana whenua, needed to be part of the decision-making process. 'As we work together to find solutions, it is vital that all voices, especially those of kaitiaki and local communities, are included in the decision-making processes that impact our waterways and the wellbeing of our people,' he said. Under the Te Arawa Lakes Settlement Act, the trust is responsible for the rights and obligations that come with lakebed ownership, including existing structures, commercial activities and public utilities. In June, over 60 Māori land trusts, representing more than 150,000 landowners, hapū and iwi, filed legal proceedings in the High Court against the Crown. They allege the Government has repeatedly failed to uphold Māori rights and responsibilities over freshwater. Te Arawa Lakes Trust is a part of this claim. 'This is about restoring balance and our ability to exercise proper kaitiakitanga. Māori have never relinquished our relationship with our ancestral waters,' Haumaha said. 'This collaborative approach is the driving force behind the coalition Wai Manawa Whenua, which brings together Māori landowners, hapū, iwi collectives and national organisations such as the Federation of Māori Authorities (FOMA) who together have filed legal proceedings in the High Court to hold the Crown accountable to ensure that Māori rights and responsibilities over freshwater are upheld, fostering a responsible stewardship that benefits everyone,' Haumaha said. In a statement to RNZ, Toi Moana Bay of Plenty Regional Council chief executive Fiona McTavish said the Ōhau diversion wall remained 'structurally sound and is compliant with its resource consent', though microbial corrosion has created holes in the top metre of the sheet piling. 'It continues to divert most of the flow from the Ōhau Channel [Lake Rotorua] to the Kaituna River, bypassing Lake Rotoiti.' Potentially toxic algae bloom was found near Ōhau Channel. Photo / Bay of Plenty Regional Council McTavish said the water quality of Lake Rotorua has 'markedly improved' since the Ōhau wall was installed in 2008, because of alum dosing, catchment land use and land management change. 'This means that even without the corrosion, the wall would not be having the same water quality benefit as it did when it was installed.' Last week, McTavish said the regional council adopted a strategy which uses a 'dynamic adaptive pathway approach to decision making,' focusing on making decisions in a flexible way that adapts to changing circumstances, rather than relying on rigid, long-term plans. 'This enables regional council to make the best informed and most timely decisions about the ongoing investment in the wall, ensuring those decisions are good environmental decisions that will deliver water quality benefits, but are also financially practical. 'Under this strategy, decisions about the future of the wall are timed to consider updated science and engineering advice, community voices and alignment with central government expectations.' She said making good environmental decisions that were also financially sensible was critical. 'We want to ensure that any investment delivers the outcome the community desires, is based on the best information and is not unnecessarily rushed.' McTavish said Ngāti Pikiao Environmental Society, representing mana whenua Ngāti Pikiao and Te Takinga, had been briefed and 'continue to support the wall so long as it is providing benefit to lake water quality'. 'Regional council staff will continue to work with Ngāti Pikiao Environmental Society on the decision making in respect of the wall and ensure that decisions made about the wall are informed by the best available science regarding water quality.' The working relationship between Te Arawa Lakes Trust (TALT) and regional council governance, leadership and staff continues to be productive and positive, McTavish said. 'Regional council staff have briefed Te Arawa Lakes Trust kaimahi regarding the wall and sought their guidance on how Te Arawa Lakes Trust would like to provide advice regarding the issue. 'TALT staff have advised they will brief their Komiti Taiao as a first step, we have offered support for this briefing and await further direction from Te Arawa Lakes Trust kaimahi.' – RNZ

NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Zelenskyy rules out withdrawing from Donbas, saying it would open bridgehead for Russia
The Donbas encompasses the eastern Ukrainian regions of Lugansk and Donetsk, both of which Russia claims as its own and has sought to control since its invasion began in 2022. Zelenskyy said the summit would effectively postpone new US sanctions on Russia - sanctions that Trump had promised to impose if Putin refused to halt his war. 'First, he will meet on US territory, which I consider his personal victory. Second, he is coming out of isolation because he is meeting on US territory. Third, with this meeting, he has somehow postponed sanctions,' Zelenskyy said. Zelenskyy also said he had received a 'signal' from US envoy Steve Witkoff that Russia might agree to a ceasefire, without elaborating. 'This was the first signal from them,' Zelenskyy said. To prepare for the summit, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov held a call with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who told a US radio show earlier that Trump did not regard the meeting as a 'concession' to Russia. The White House confirmed that the meeting came about after Putin requested it. Trump's spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said the aim was 'for the President is to walk away with a better understanding of how we can end this war'. 'No equipment' On the battlefield, Zelenskyy warned Russia had made sharp advances near the coal mining town of Dobropillia and was planning new ground assaults on at least three different areas of the front line. 'Russian units have advanced 10km deep in several spots. They all have no equipment, only weapons in their hands. 'Some have already been found, some destroyed, some taken prisoner. We will find the rest and destroy them in the near future,' Zelenskyy said. A map published by Ukrainian battlefield monitor DeepState, which has close ties with Ukraine's military, showed Russia had made a double-pronged advance around 10km deep in a narrow section of the front line near Dobropillia. Dobropillia, home to around 30,000 people before the war, has come under regular Russian drone attacks. The advance also threatens the largely destroyed town of Kostiantynivka, one of the last large urban areas in the Donetsk region still held by Ukraine. Russian forces have been accelerating their advances for months, pressing their advantage against overstretched Ukrainian troops. The Ukrainian Army said today it was engaged in 'difficult' battles with Russian forces in the east, but denied Russia had a foothold near Dobropillia. 'The situation is difficult and dynamic,' it said in a statement. 'New offensive' The Institute for the Study of War, a US-based think-tank, said Russia was sending small sabotage groups forwards. It said it was 'premature' to call the Russian advances around Dobropillia 'an operational-level breakthrough'. A Ukrainian military group that oversees parts of the front in the Donetsk region also said Russia was probing Ukrainian lines with small sabotage groups, describing battles as 'complex, unpleasant, and dynamic'. Trump has described his summit with Putin as a chance to check the Russian leader's ideas for ending the war. European leaders have sought to ensure respect for Kyiv's interests. Russia, which invaded Ukraine in 2022, has made costly but incremental gains across the front in recent months and claims to have annexed four Ukrainian regions while still fighting to control them. Ukrainian police said that Russian attacks in the past hours had killed three people and wounded 12 others, including a child. -Agence France-Presse


Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Education minister bans Māori words from junior books
Education Minister Erica Stanford. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Education Minister Erica Stanford has imposed a near total ban on Māori in new additions to a series of books used to teach five-year-olds to read. An Education Ministry report shows Stanford decided in October last year to exclude all Māori words except for characters' names from any new books in the Education Ministry's Ready to Read Phonics Plus (RtRPP) series. The paper showed the decision was driven by concern Māori words were confusing for children learning to read English though evidence of that was mixed. Stanford told RNZ the decision affected only 12 books that would finish the series, after which the series, including 27 books with Māori words, could be reprinted. The ministry's report said: "Under this option, we would not include kupu Māori in all phases of the RtRPP scope and sequence for any future books. The 13 RtRPP books currently in development do not contain any kupu Māori, apart from character names." It was not clear in the paper whether the books would be reprinted. "As noted above, the RtRPP resources are expected to have a lifespan in schools of approximately 10 years, so it would take several years for the books containing kupu Māori that are currently in circulation to be replaced in practice." The document showed Stanford also instructed the ministry to develop a teaching sequence in the English curriculum to help teachers prepare children to read Māori words from their second year at school. Stanford told RNZ that would stop teaching children in mainstream classrooms to pronounce and read Māori from being "left to chance". The ministry's document said currently from Year 4, Māori words were included in the curriculum with increasing frequency and complexity. Stanford told RNZ she considered rewriting the 27 books that contained Māori words to retain only the proper nouns in Māori, but later decided against it. "These are very early readers that teach children to learn to read and there are already 'heart' words in there that children have to memorise in English and if there are some te reo words in there as well, then that's okay and we'll leave them as they are," she said. She described the decision as the middle position between conflicting advice. The minister's October decision included reprinting one of the books, 'At the Marae', as a big book but not as a 'reader' for children to take home - something that angered many teachers and principals in the past week. The document showed Stanford raised the issue after "experts in structured literacy approaches" told her that including two different languages in the books could confuse learners and make it harder for them to master English phonetics. The ministry's paper said evidence about that was mixed but there was a case to consider the amount of Māori words in books for children learning to read. Literacy experts told RNZ this week Māori words were part of everyday New Zealand English and did not present problems for beginning readers because their spelling was regular and their vowel sounds matched some of the English vowels. The document said 26 of the 75 Ready to Read books had up to three Māori words and a 27th, 'At the Marae', had six Māori words. A hand-written note on the document showed the minister wanted te reo Māori introduced when children stopped using "decodable" books like the Ready to Read series, usually at the end of their first year at school or early in their second year. "I want to include in the NZC (English) a section on Te Reo vowel sounds and pronunciation to ready students for reading te reo words in school journals as previously discussed," she wrote. Stanford also noted that: "Interestingly - I asked kura leaders if they would accept English words in te reo Māori decodable books and they no. So it would be consistent to keep one language only in very early Year 1 decodable books, except for names." The ministry's paper said the Ready to Read series was designed to teach the reading of English "and the sound-letter correspondences in English". "Our advice to schools is to teach kupu Māori in RtRPP books as "told" words. The foundational skill of phonic decoding within the resoruces is based on the English language and students are not expected to decode the kupu Māori," it said. The paper warned the options could result in pushback from schools. "If we discontinue the use of kupu Māori (apart from character names) in RtRPP books, there may be a negative response and media attention. [REDACTED] In particular, recalling existing books has the potential to generate pushback." The minister wrote in response: "It's only in Year 1 decodable books that teach English and it would align with the approach taken in te reo decodables. Te Reo would be introduced immediately after the use of decodable stops which is typically end of Year 1 early Year 2 where students move on to journals."