logo
10 Everyday Foods You'd Never Guess Contain Synthetic Dyes

10 Everyday Foods You'd Never Guess Contain Synthetic Dyes

Yahoo12-05-2025

Synthetic food dyes like Red 40 and Yellow 5 are found in nearly 24,000 U.S. food products, including unexpected items like yogurt, pickles, and oatmeal.
These dyes, often used to enhance appearance, are petroleum-based and may pose health concerns like hyperactivity, allergic reactions, and gut issues.
Experts and health officials are urging greater transparency and regulation, with growing momentum to phase out synthetic dyes and help consumers make more informed food choices.The human eye is a miraculous thing, especially when it helps us choose the foods we eat. As one 2016 study in the journal Brain and Cognition explains, trichromatic color vision — which gives us the ability to see the whole rainbow of colors — may have developed in primates as "an adaptation that facilitated the selection of more energy-rich (and likely red) fruits from amongst the dark green forest canopy."Humans have always loved bright, colorful foods, as they signal that they could be the food we need to survive. However, this lifestyle of "eating with our eyes" could finally be catching up to us, as the need for identifying a crispy red apple among the branches of a leafy green tree has been replaced by the choice of vibrant pink yogurts, impossibly yellow mustards, and candy that's bluer than the sky, thanks to artificial food dyes. And while you may think you know which foods contain artificial color, these dyes could be lurking in foods you'd never expect."According to NIQ data, Red Dye 40 is by far the most common food additive, found in nearly 24,000 food and beverage items in the U.S.," Sherry Frey, the vice president of Total Wellness at NielsenIQ, shared with Food & Wine. Frey noted that categories where synthetic dyes are most prevalent include candy, gum, mints, snacks, desserts, baking supplies, and beverages. However, consumers might be surprised to learn that these additives are also found in items that seem otherwise 'healthy' or simple."Here's what you need to know about dyes and some surprising foods you can find them in.
Artificial food dyes are synthetic chemicals added to food to enhance or stabilize color. "Most artificially colored foods are colored with synthetic petroleum-based chemicals — called dyes — that do not oc­cur in nature," according to the Center for Science in the Public Interest.In late April, Robert Kennedy Jr., Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), announced his department's plans to phase out petroleum-based artificial colors from the nation's food supply, including Red 40, Blue 1 and 2, Yellow 5 and 6, and Green 3. (The U.S. Food and Drug Administration under the Biden administration had already banned Red 3 in January, but RFK Jr. noted they would like to move the timeline of that ban up.) RFK Jr. didn't go into specifics on how this will happen; however, it's a move that is receiving plenty of praise.
Related: Are Natural Food Dyes Better? Experts Weigh In on the Pros and Cons
"While the FDA considers approved dyes safe within regulated limits, emerging evidence continues to raise questions about hyperactivity in children, allergic reactions, and long-term exposure risks," Jonathan Poyourow, chef and professor at Johnson & Wales, who also specializes in nutrition, shared. You don't need to panic over every processed bite, but awareness is key.
"This moment offers both a challenge and an opportunity," Ashley Cornell, the director of regulatory affairs and Policy at Canadian Health Food Association, added. "We have a chance to reexamine what we prioritize in our food, and to push for greater clarity, safety, and simplicity. The good news is that change is already happening. Bright, beautiful food can still delight the senses without compromising your well-being. When we know better, we can choose better."
"You should definitely proceed with caution," Lindsay Malone, a nutrition instructor at Case Western Reserve University, shared, also citing studies that link food dyes to hyperactivity. "Food dyes are commonly in ultra-processed foods, which come with their own negative health baggage, including blood sugar instability, changes in the gut microbiome, and crowding out other healthy foods."
However, Malone added, "My gut feeling is that dyes probably aren't the only problem here. Most people can limit their dye exposure by eating more whole, minimally processed foods at the grocery store.
Related: This Food Safety Bill Would Require Food Companies to Fess Up About Food Additives
"Think of these as single-ingredient foods or foods with very few ingredients. When you do eat processed food, choose the most simply prepared and avoid the dyes when you can."
Still, nutritionist Seyma Turan agrees with Malone, adding, 'Consistent exposure — especially through ultra-processed foods — can increase cumulative health stress, particularly for those with gut issues, sensitivities, or autoimmune conditions.'
It's not always easy to decipher what exactly is in our food. But if you're in the U.S., look for names like Red 40, Yellow 5, or Blue 1 on ingredient lists. Terms like 'artificial color' or 'color added' can also indicate synthetic dyes. Additionally, there are apps like Yuka and the Environmental Working Group's Food Scores that can help you decode ingredient lists.
Want to avoid these dyes? You may already be aware of the common culprits, but here are 10 products containing food dyes that might surprise you.
That vibrant green hue on bread and butter pickles is often thanks to Yellow 5. "A natural cucumber's color can fade during processing and storage," Cornell said. "To compensate, synthetic color is commonly added to intensify the green hue of shelf-stable pickles. This gives the illusion of freshness, even after long periods in brine or on store shelves."
You may think you're getting a fruity punch by picking up fruit-on-the-bottom yogurt, but be warned that those berry tones can come from Red 40 or Yellow 6 to make strawberry, peach, or cherry colors pop. "One that surprises many people is 'healthy-looking' items like plant-based yogurts or fruit juices — some still use colorants to appear fresher or more vibrant," Turan explained.
The Environmental Working Group highlights another popular snack that may have added colors: Wasabi peas. The group explained that they "get their green from artificial dye. It's likely not from Green 3, which isn't widely used but is in the bill California lawmakers are considering. Instead, you can thank Blue 1 and Yellow 5 in combination — maybe with some Red 40 thrown in — for the leafy color, whether the peas are in a mix of snack items or on their own."
Again, you may feel as though you're doing your best by avoiding brightly colored cake mixes, but even "plain" cakes can contain Yellow 5 to give the batter a richer and more buttery appearance. "Products marketed as creamy, white, or lightly colored often rely on additives to enhance appearance," Cornell said. "Common examples include vanilla yogurt, vanilla cake mix, mayonnaise, non-dairy creamers, marshmallows, light-colored soft drinks, powdered sugar, and frosting."
Before you swap your cake mix for a different dessert, take a little time to look closely at those labels, too. Certain flavors of pudding, including butterscotch, can contain Yellow 6 and Yellow 5 to create a brighter, creamier-looking color.
Before you top that salad, you may want to peek at the ingredients list on your dressing. According to Cornell, "Natural oils and acidic ingredients can cause color separation or fading, especially in light-exposed bottles. Synthetic colors are often added to standardize the look of creamy dressings, and maintain a consistent visually appealing color." That can include titanium dioxide, "used in white or light-colored dressings (like Caesar or ranch) to achieve opacity and brightness," or Yellow No. 5, which "adds a warm yellow hue and often used in French, honey mustard, or ranch dressing." Cornell added that Yellow No. 6 is often used to give that deep orange hue to Thousand Island dressing.
Just like that flavored yogurt, anyone who wants to avoid added synthetic food coloring may want to forgo pre-packed flavored applesauce, particularly strawberry-flavored packets, which can contain Red 40 to enhance their appearance.
During breakfast time, Poyourow says you should also check your instant oatmeal packet, "especially strawberry or maple-brown sugar," as it may contain dyes that signal flavor cues to your brain, including Red 40.
"Food coloring helps replicate the look of ripe fruit, even when color from real fruit is minimal, is lost during cooking, or fades over time," Cornell said. Red No. 40, she added, is commonly used to "enhance or standardize color in strawberry, raspberry, or cherry spreads," while Yellow No. 6 is sometimes "added to orange marmalades, peach, or apricot jams to intensify the warm orange tone."
According to Cornell, Red No. 3 is "occasionally used to deepen red in deli meats." The Environmental Working Group notes that it is possible the same ingredient could have been used to enhance the color of smoked salmon, including salmon cream cheese, too.
Read the original article on Food & Wine

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr. has promoted 'freedom of choice' while limiting vaccines, food
RFK Jr. has promoted 'freedom of choice' while limiting vaccines, food

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Jr. has promoted 'freedom of choice' while limiting vaccines, food

Prior to becoming Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had espoused the idea of "medical freedom," the ability of people to make personal health decisions for themselves and their families without corporate or government coercion. It's an idea supported under Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement to reduce the prevalence of chronic disease in the U.S. by making healthier lifestyle choices. On topics, such as vaccines, Kennedy has said he wouldn't prevent children from being able to receive vaccines but would leave the choice up to parents. MORE: CDC official who oversaw COVID vaccine recommendations resigns "I'm a freedom-of-choice person," Kennedy told Fox News host Sean Hannity during an interview in March. "We should have transparency. We should have informed choice, and if people don't want it, the government shouldn't force them to do it." Some public health experts told ABC News, however, that the HHS has been limiting choices on some products for many Americans despite Kennedy's talk about "freedom of choice." Just last week, Kennedy announced the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would no longer recommend the COVID-19 vaccine for certain groups. Additionally, Kennedy has called on states to ban recipients of food stamps from being able to use them to purchase soda. He has also praised states for banning fluoride from public drinking water and indicated he will change federal guidance on recommending adding fluoride. The public health experts said Kennedy's actions are setting up a dichotomy on public health. "I think that RFK Jr. has done a really good job of identifying some of the problems [in public health], but it's the solutions that are problematic," Dr. Craig Spencer, an associate professor of the practice of health services, policy and practice at Brown University School of Public Health, told ABC News. "What you're seeing with RFK Jr. and his approach to health is an individualization of public health. It's this idea that you can make decisions for your health, and that's always been true." He went on, "We need to be able to follow their guidance, not just have them tell us, 'Follow your own science.' As the focus shifts from community to individuals, we're losing a lot of that underpinning, which has led to a lot of the gains in public health." Kennedy has repeatedly stated that he is not anti-vaccine and that he supports vaccination. Shortly after Trump's election, Kennedy said in an interview with NBC News that "if vaccines are working for somebody, I'm not going to take them away. People ought to have choice, and that choice ought to be informed by the best information." MORE: CDC official who oversaw COVID vaccine recommendations resigns During his confirmation hearings, Kennedy said he supported the childhood vaccination schedule and that he would not do anything as head of HHS that "makes it difficult or discourages people from taking vaccines." Separately, in an opinion piece Kennedy wrote for Fox News in March on the nationwide measles outbreak, he said the measles vaccine helps protect individuals and provides "community immunity" but also called the decision to vaccinate a "personal one." However, last week, Kennedy announced the removal of the COVID-19 vaccine from the CDC's immunization schedule for "healthy children and healthy pregnant women." The CDC's immunization schedule is not just a guide for doctors but also determines insurance coverage for most major private plans and Medicaid expansion programs. Following Kennedy's announcement, the schedule was updated noting all children would be eligible for COVID vaccines, but now under a shared-clinical decision-making model -- allowing parents to choose whether their children are vaccinated alongside advice from a doctor. "Regarding the vaccines, HHS is restoring the doctor-patient relationship," HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon told ABC News in a statement. "We are encouraging those groups to consult with their health care provider to help them make an informed decision. This is freedom of choice." "If you restrict access, you necessarily restrict choice," Dr. Matthew Ferrari, a professor of biology and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics at Pennsylvania State University, told ABC News. "Those two things are antithetical. You can't do both. You can't say you're allowing choice if you're restricting access." Ferrari said the idea of "medical freedom" is catchy, but public health recommendations are made based on how to protect the most vulnerable individuals. "If you look at the outcomes, if you look at the consequences of that movement, it has been to disproportionately restrict access to -- and restrict support and infrastructure to allow people to access -- preventive medicine," he said. "It's sort of easy to say, 'Well, take the vaccine away. But [vaccines] prevent a future outcome of illness for yourself and for others in the community." Traditionally, the CDC's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices decides if there is a benefit to a yearly vaccine and who should get it. The independent advisory committee then makes recommendations to the CDC, which has the final say. The committee was set to meet in late June to vote on potential changes to COVID vaccine recommendations. Spencer said Kennedy's bypassing of traditional avenues when it comes to changing vaccine recommendations is also taking away choice from people. "This did not go through the normal process that it should have, and he basically just made a decision for people while at the same time saying that he's going to let people make a decision," Spencer said. Kennedy has also campaigned to prevent Americans from using food stamps -- provided under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program -- to buy candy and soda. "It's nonsensical for U.S. taxpayers to spend tens of billions of dollars subsidizing junk that harms the health of low-income Americans," Kennedy wrote in an opinion piece for The Wall Street Journal last September. MORE: RFK Jr. to tell medical schools to teach nutrition or lose federal funding At a MAHA event in late May, Kennedy said the governors of 10 states have submitted waivers to the United States Department of Agriculture requesting permission to ban SNAP recipients from using benefits to buy candy and soft drinks. "The U.S. government spends over $4 trillion a year on health care," Nixon said in a statement. "That's not freedom -- it's failure. Secretary Kennedy is unapologetically taking action to reverse the chronic disease epidemic, not subsidize it with taxpayer dollars. Warning Americans about the dangers of ultra-processed food isn't an attack on choice -- it's the first step in restoring it." Nutrition experts agree that sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are unhealthy. Frequent consumption of SSBs is linked to health issues such as weight gain, obesity, type 2 diabetes, tooth decay, heart disease and kidney diseases, according to the CDC. Kristina Petersen, an associate professor in the department of nutritional sciences at Pennsylvania State University, told ABC News there is a crisis of diet-related diseases in the U.S., which increase the risk of disability and reduces lifespan. However, she said there needs to be strong evidence of the benefits of restrictive policies if they are to be put in place. "In terms of limiting people's choices, it is important to consider all the different roles that food plays in someone's life, and so obviously we want people eating nutritious foods, but also we need to acknowledge that food is a source of enjoyment," Petersen said. "A lot of social situations revolve around food. So, when we're thinking about reducing people's access to given foods, we need to think about the consequences of that." One unintended consequence could be an eligible family not signing up for SNAP benefits because of the restrictions, she said. Even if a ban on buying candy and soda with SNAP benefits does occur, Petersen said she is not aware of any evidence that shows banning certain foods leads to healthier diets. She added that the nation's dietary guidelines are written to emphasize healthy foods like fruits and vegetable rather than telling people to avoid or restrict less healthy foods. "All foods can be consumed as part of a healthy dietary pattern. It's really just the amount and the frequency that determines whether that pattern is helpful overall or less helpful," Petersen said. "People can have small indulgences, but really, we're interested in what is their pattern over a period of time." Providing incentives for purchasing healthier foods may be more effective and still allow people to have choice, Petersen said. A 2018 study used a model simulation to study the effects of food incentives, disincentives or restrictions in SNAP. One of the simulations involving incentives for foods such as fruits, vegetables, nuts, whole grains, fish and plant-based oils found to have the most substantial health benefits and be the most cost-effective. "Things like fruits and vegetables, they do tend to be more expensive, so if you incentivize them by providing more benefits … that's making the dollar go further, and it's kind of making the economic piece of this a bit stronger," Petersen said. "A lot of this is framed around personal choice. Rather than restricting access to, how can we give people more access to healthy foods? I think that's going to have the greatest benefit here." ABC News' Youri Benadjaoud and Cheyenne Haslett contributed to this report. RFK Jr. has promoted 'freedom of choice' while limiting vaccines, food originally appeared on

RFK Jr. has promoted 'freedom of choice' while limiting vaccines, food

timean hour ago

RFK Jr. has promoted 'freedom of choice' while limiting vaccines, food

Prior to becoming Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had espoused the idea of "medical freedom," the ability of people to make personal health decisions for themselves and their families without corporate or government coercion. It's an idea supported under Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement to reduce the prevalence of chronic disease in the U.S. by making healthier lifestyle choices. On topics, such as vaccines, Kennedy has said he wouldn't prevent children from being able to receive vaccines but would leave the choice up to parents. "I'm a freedom-of-choice person," Kennedy told Fox News host Sean Hannity during an interview in March. "We should have transparency. We should have informed choice, and if people don't want it, the government shouldn't force them to do it." Some public health experts told ABC News, however, that the HHS has been limiting choices on some products for many Americans despite Kennedy's talk about "freedom of choice." Just last week, Kennedy announced the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention would no longer recommend the COVID-19 vaccine for certain groups. Additionally, Kennedy has called on states to ban recipients of food stamps from being able to use them to purchase soda. He has also praised states for banning fluoride from public drinking water and indicated he will change federal guidance on recommending adding fluoride. The public health experts said Kennedy's actions are setting up a dichotomy on public health. "I think that RFK Jr. has done a really good job of identifying some of the problems [in public health], but it's the solutions that are problematic," Dr. Craig Spencer, an associate professor of the practice of health services, policy and practice at Brown University School of Public Health, told ABC News. "What you're seeing with RFK Jr. and his approach to health is an individualization of public health. It's this idea that you can make decisions for your health, and that's always been true." He went on, "We need to be able to follow their guidance, not just have them tell us, 'Follow your own science.' As the focus shifts from community to individuals, we're losing a lot of that underpinning, which has led to a lot of the gains in public health." Limiting access to COVID-19 vaccines Kennedy has repeatedly stated that he is not anti-vaccine and that he supports vaccination. Shortly after Trump's election, Kennedy said in an interview with NBC News that "if vaccines are working for somebody, I'm not going to take them away. People ought to have choice, and that choice ought to be informed by the best information." During his confirmation hearings, Kennedy said he supported the childhood vaccination schedule and that he would not do anything as head of HHS that "makes it difficult or discourages people from taking vaccines." Separately, in an opinion piece Kennedy wrote for Fox News in March on the nationwide measles outbreak, he said the measles vaccine helps protect individuals and provides "community immunity" but also called the decision to vaccinate a "personal one." However, last week, Kennedy announced the removal of the COVID-19 vaccine from the CDC's immunization schedule for "healthy children and healthy pregnant women." The CDC's immunization schedule is not just a guide for doctors but also determines insurance coverage for most major private plans and Medicaid expansion programs. Following Kennedy's announcement, the schedule was updated noting all children would be eligible for COVID vaccines, but now under a shared-clinical decision-making model -- allowing parents to choose whether their children are vaccinated alongside advice from a doctor. "Regarding the vaccines, HHS is restoring the doctor-patient relationship," HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon told ABC News in a statement. "We are encouraging those groups to consult with their health care provider to help them make an informed decision. This is freedom of choice." "If you restrict access, you necessarily restrict choice," Dr. Matthew Ferrari, a professor of biology and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics at Pennsylvania State University, told ABC News. "Those two things are antithetical. You can't do both. You can't say you're allowing choice if you're restricting access." Ferrari said the idea of "medical freedom" is catchy, but public health recommendations are made based on how to protect the most vulnerable individuals. "If you look at the outcomes, if you look at the consequences of that movement, it has been to disproportionately restrict access to -- and restrict support and infrastructure to allow people to access -- preventive medicine," he said. "It's sort of easy to say, 'Well, take the vaccine away. But [vaccines] prevent a future outcome of illness for yourself and for others in the community." Traditionally, the CDC's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices decides if there is a benefit to a yearly vaccine and who should get it. The independent advisory committee then makes recommendations to the CDC, which has the final say. The committee was set to meet in late June to vote on potential changes to COVID vaccine recommendations. Spencer said Kennedy's bypassing of traditional avenues when it comes to changing vaccine recommendations is also taking away choice from people. "This did not go through the normal process that it should have, and he basically just made a decision for people while at the same time saying that he's going to let people make a decision," Spencer said. Restricting foods under SNAP Kennedy has also campaigned to prevent Americans from using food stamps -- provided under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program -- to buy candy and soda. "It's nonsensical for U.S. taxpayers to spend tens of billions of dollars subsidizing junk that harms the health of low-income Americans," Kennedy wrote in an opinion piece for The Wall Street Journal last September. At a MAHA event in late May, Kennedy said the governors of 10 states have submitted waivers to the United States Department of Agriculture requesting permission to ban SNAP recipients from using benefits to buy candy and soft drinks. "The U.S. government spends over $4 trillion a year on health care," Nixon said in a statement. "That's not freedom -- it's failure. Secretary Kennedy is unapologetically taking action to reverse the chronic disease epidemic, not subsidize it with taxpayer dollars. Warning Americans about the dangers of ultra-processed food isn't an attack on choice -- it's the first step in restoring it." Nutrition experts agree that sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are unhealthy. Frequent consumption of SSBs is linked to health issues such as weight gain, obesity, type 2 diabetes, tooth decay, heart disease and kidney diseases, according to the CDC. Kristina Petersen, an associate professor in the department of nutritional sciences at Pennsylvania State University, told ABC News there is a crisis of diet-related diseases in the U.S., which increase the risk of disability and reduces lifespan. However, she said there needs to be strong evidence of the benefits of restrictive policies if they are to be put in place. "In terms of limiting people's choices, it is important to consider all the different roles that food plays in someone's life, and so obviously we want people eating nutritious foods, but also we need to acknowledge that food is a source of enjoyment," Petersen said. "A lot of social situations revolve around food. So, when we're thinking about reducing people's access to given foods, we need to think about the consequences of that." One unintended consequence could be an eligible family not signing up for SNAP benefits because of the restrictions, she said. Even if a ban on buying candy and soda with SNAP benefits does occur, Petersen said she is not aware of any evidence that shows banning certain foods leads to healthier diets. She added that the nation's dietary guidelines are written to emphasize healthy foods like fruits and vegetable rather than telling people to avoid or restrict less healthy foods. "All foods can be consumed as part of a healthy dietary pattern. It's really just the amount and the frequency that determines whether that pattern is helpful overall or less helpful," Petersen said. "People can have small indulgences, but really, we're interested in what is their pattern over a period of time." Providing incentives for purchasing healthier foods may be more effective and still allow people to have choice, Petersen said. A 2018 study used a model simulation to study the effects of food incentives, disincentives or restrictions in SNAP. One of the simulations involving incentives for foods such as fruits, vegetables, nuts, whole grains, fish and plant-based oils found to have the most substantial health benefits and be the most cost-effective. "Things like fruits and vegetables, they do tend to be more expensive, so if you incentivize them by providing more benefits … that's making the dollar go further, and it's kind of making the economic piece of this a bit stronger," Petersen said. "A lot of this is framed around personal choice. Rather than restricting access to, how can we give people more access to healthy foods? I think that's going to have the greatest benefit here."

MAHA Has a Pizza Problem
MAHA Has a Pizza Problem

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

MAHA Has a Pizza Problem

Every Monday and Wednesday, students at Channelview High School, outside Houston, are treated to Domino's for lunch. Delivery drivers from a local branch of the fast-food chain arrive at the school with dozens of pizzas fresh out of the oven, served in Domino's-branded cardboard boxes. Children can be picky eaters, but few foods are more universally enticing than freshly cooked pizza—let alone from a restaurant students are almost certainly already familiar with. 'For kids to be able to see Oh, they're serving Domino's, I think it makes a huge difference,' Tanya Edwards, the district's director of nutrition, told me. The deliveries are part of Domino's 'Smart Slice' initiative, which sends pizzas to school districts around the country—often at little or no cost to students themselves. 'Smart Slice' is part of the national school-lunch program, so taxpayers foot a portion of the bill to guarantee that every kid has lunch to eat. Despite kids' enthusiasm, you can see the problem: Students munching on free fast food might seem to embody everything wrong with the American diet. If school cafeterias can be thought of as classrooms where kids learn about food, giving them Domino's would be akin to teaching driver's-ed students how to drive by letting them play Grand Theft Auto. The days of school Domino's—and school pizza in general—are numbered. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his supporters are on a mission to overhaul school lunch. Late last month, the Trump administration's Make America Healthy Again Commission released a highly anticipated report on children's health that pointed to school meals as one venue where ultra-processed foods are offered to kids unabated, contributing to obesity and other kinds of chronic disease. Unless cafeteria workers make school pizza from scratch, nearly every kind contains industrial ingredients that qualify the meal as an ultra-processed food. In effect, ridding school lunch of ultra-processed foods means the end of pizza day as we know it. Many of the food reforms pushed by RFK Jr.'s movement are popular. Doing away with artificial food dyes, for example, is far more sensible than Kennedy's conspiracist views about vaccines. But in the case of banning most school pizza, RFK Jr. could be facing a tougher sell. MAHA's vision for food is about to run headfirst into a bunch of hungry kids in a school cafeteria. Even though Domino's school pizza is delivered by Domino's drivers carrying Domino's pizza boxes, the company's Smart Slice is different from what would arrive at your door should you order a pie for dinner tonight. Cafeteria pizza has to abide by nutrition standards for school meals that the Obama administration spearheaded in 2010. The overly cheesy rectangular pizza with a cracker-like crust that you might have eaten in school no longer cuts it. Consider Domino's Smart Slice pepperoni pizza: It's made with mostly whole-wheat flour, low-fat cheese, and pepperoni that has half as much sodium than typical Domino's pepperoni. It's not a green salad by any means, but school Domino's is far from the worst thing kids could eat. Other common cafeteria offerings—such as mini corndogs, mozzarella sticks, and chicken tenders—are also now more nutritious than in decades past. Those standards could still be improved (and we're still talking about corndogs, mozzarella sticks, and chicken tenders), but they have led companies to sell slightly healthier versions of their foods in schools. Research has shown that, on average, school meals are now the healthiest things kids eat in a day. In an email, HHS Press Secretary Vianca N. Rodriguez Feliciano said that 'while some of these products may technically meet outdated federal guidelines, they are still heavily engineered, nutritionally weak, and designed for corporate profit, not for the health of our kids.' Indeed, school lunch starts to look considerably less healthy if you account for the growing concern over ultra-processed foods. Many school lunches are made in factories with chemicals such as emulsifiers and flavor enhancers you wouldn't find in a home kitchen. Eating lots of ultra-processed foods is associated with a range of maladies, including Type 2 diabetes and heart disease, though nutritionists are deeply divided on just how much we should be fretting over these industrial ingredients. To some degree, whether school pizza should be avoided because it's ultra-processed is besides the point. By allowing Domino's into school cafeterias, the government also is essentially giving the company carte blanche to advertise its pizza. Serving Smart Slice out of a typical Domino's box gives 'the false impression to children and parents that the less-healthy products served in their restaurants are healthy choices,' Jennifer Harris, a food-marketing expert, told me in an email. Kennedy has called for schools to serve 'real food, whole food, farm-fresh food,' instead of anything ultra-processed. It would, of course, be better for school cafeterias to swap out the pepperoni pizza with salad and chicken breast. But for many kids, school lunch subsidized by the government may be their only real meal of the day. At Channelview, where such a large portion of students are eligible for public assistance that everyone eats for free, simply getting food in kids' bellies is top of mind. 'I can make a fancy little sweet-potato black-bean bowl, but I don't think my kids are going to eat it,' Tanya Edwards said. 'Instead, they are going to go home hungry, and I don't really know what they have at home.' The concern isn't theoretical. Evidence shows that when school meals are too healthy, a sizable portion of kids simply get off the lunch line. In the early 2010s, when the Los Angeles Unified School District overhauled its lunch offerings—an effort that included removing pizza from the menu—schools reported that massive amounts of food were landing in the trash. (The district later brought back pizza, and pepperoni pizza is now the district's most popular item, a spokesperson said.) Food waste is a perennial issue in school meal programs. A Department of Agriculture study of more than 100 schools found that an average of 31 percent of the vegetables included on observed school lunch trays were wasted. Pizza, however, was among the least wasted food, along with breaded and fried chicken patties and nuggets. Even advocates for healthier school meals admit that there's a limit to how much students will tolerate healthier offerings. 'We definitely need to harness school food to educate kids about healthy eating, but I don't think that means no pizza,' Janet Poppendieck, a professor emerita at Hunter College who wrote a book on fixing school meals, told me. 'We need to include healthy versions of kids' favorite foods; otherwise, I don't think they'll eat.' In part to ensure that kids actually eat lunch, many school districts seem to have pizza day at least once a week. A spokesperson for Florida's Hillsborough County Public Schools, the seventh-largest district in the country, told me that its first, second, fifth, and seventh most popular entrees are all in the pizza family (No. 5 is mini calzones; No. 7 is pizza sticks). All told, the district has doled out nearly 3 million servings this school year. If it wanted to, the Trump administration could simply force kids to suck it up and literally eat their vegetables. Technically the responsibility of overseeing the school-meal program falls to the USDA—which isn't under Kennedy's purview—but Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins has signaled that she is onboard with MAHA-ing school lunch. Still, any attempt to enact a ban would likely invite significant backlash. In 2023, when the federal government floated the idea of banning the sale of sugary chocolate milk in elementary and middle schools, many parents flooded the government with complaints. So did some students: Ben, a fourth grader who left only his first name, wrote in an official comment to the USDA that it should abandon the proposal 'because students are super MAD.' Members of Congress also put pressure on regulators to stop the reform. The USDA later abandoned the chocolate-milk ban. In 2011, after the Obama administration released its new guidelines for school lunch, Republicans in Congress tried to fight back against healthier pizza by classifying the dish as a vegetable. It's no wonder why MAHA has a problem with school pizza. Kennedy has pointed to corporate malfeasance as a leading source of America's diet problems. You don't have to be a fan of his to feel uneasy that Domino's, a fast-food company that sells philly-cheese-steak-loaded tater tots, is participating in a taxpayer-funded program meant to feed kids nutritious meals. But Kennedy's favored approach to food and, well, everything—big proposals and dramatic overhauls—isn't well suited to school meals. The health secretary might dream of kids eating from a salad bar stocked with seed-oil-free dressings five days a week, but ending school pizza day won't automatically make that happen. Telling kids what to eat is one thing; getting them to eat it is another. Article originally published at The Atlantic

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store