Teenager ‘fools' AIFF, pretends to be Barcelona legend Xavi Hernandez to apply for India's football coach position
AIFF national team director Subrata Paul initially confirmed Xavi's application to The Times of India. A video shared on social media later showed the prank email from 'xaviofficialfcb@gmail.com'.
AIFF rejected this application, citing affordability issues. Sports journalist Naman Suri has revealed on social media that it was actually a prank by the teenager.
'It wasn't Xavi who applied to coach India. It was a 19-year-old who used a fake email ID. I spoke to him and he showed me a screen recording from his Sent folder,' Suri posted on Twitter (now X).
'Yes, this might've been the email AIFF thought came from Xavi. Indian football deserves better,' he added.
Barca Times also claimed on social media that Xavi had never applied for the post.
'People close to Xavi insist that he never applied for the head coach position of the Indian NT. They believe the All India Football Federation intentionally used his name to boost the profile of the role during their search for a new manager,' the independent fan media platform, with 1 million followers on Twitter, posted.
Many social media users slammed AIFF for being 'corrupt and liars'.
'Legends don't chase roles, they attract narrative. And, right now, Xavi's story feels far from finished… especially in the Barça orbit,' wrote another.
Another user wrote, 'If this is true it's a very shameful behaviour from All India Football Federation intentionally using a legend for clout chasing. Xavi deserves better!'
'The crooks at AIFF have gone down to a new low helped by some fake journalists. The person who claimed Xavi applied was actually accused of murder on a football field (though later cleared). Xavi should sue the AIFF for the truth to come out,' came from another.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
16 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Like Bumrah, Siraj's workload needs care to avoid injury: RP Singh
Mohammed Siraj is in the same league as premier pacer Jasprit Bumrah and it is important to manage his workload carefully to keep him injury-free, said former Indian fast bowler RP Singh. Siraj bowled 185.3 overs in the recently-concluded five-match Test series in England and finished as the highest wicket-taker with 23 wickets, emerging as the most utilised bowler in the series. The 31-year-old from Hyderabad claimed nine wickets, including a five-wicket haul in the second innings of the fifth Test, playing a key role in India's six-run victory that helped the visitors level the series 2-2. Workload management will be crucial to prevent Siraj from getting injured in the future," Singh said in an interview with PTI-Bhasha. "Fast bowlers are at higher risk of injury when they play too many matches in a short time. His workload should be managed just like we did with Bumrah." Citing Jasprit Bumrah's example, Singh said: "It's because of better workload management, Bumrah bowled brilliantly in both ODI and T20 World Cups. "Siraj is also in the same league. To protect him from injuries, we need to seriously focus on his workload, sooner or later." Singh, who played 82 matches for India including 14 Tests, praised Siraj for his lion-hearted performance during the England tour. Siraj was the only bowler who played all five Tests and bowled with full energy and intensity in each match," said Singh, a JioHotstar' Cricket expert. "The last ball of the series, which bowled out the batsman, was one of his top five fastest deliveries in the series. Siraj delivered a 143 kmph yorker to clean up Gus Atkinson and seal India's win in the fifth Test. It was the fifth-fastest ball he bowled in the series. "This shows that he never lacked effort. He focused on bowling with the right line and length and contributed beyond expectations for the team. His fitness and rhythm were excellent throughout, Singh said. Having bowled largely under Bumrah's leadership until now, Siraj carved his own identity during the England series. Singh noted that even Bumrah's success has been supported by Siraj. "Just like batsmen need partnerships, bowlers also prefer bowling in pairs. Bumrah tends to take more wickets and his unique action troubles batters more," the former left-arm bowler said. "Siraj's role is to build pressure from his end, and he does that very well. Their partnership has been special and delivered great performances. When Bumrah is not in the team, Siraj automatically becomes our lead fast bowler." On the debate over Bumrah featuring in only three matches on the England tour due to workload management, Singh said: "That was already planned. The good thing about Bumrah is that whenever he's in the team, he gives you wickets. "Captains always expect breakthroughs from him. He usually bowls more than others in any match he plays." Singh also praised skipper Shubman Gill, who led from the front with 754 runs in the series. No one thought India would come back and level the series 2-2. Gill was impressive as captain. He made good decisions and his personal performance was outstanding. "When a captain performs well in his role, it positively influences his decision-making." The series also saw moments of grit as injured players had to bat to save matches. Rishabh Pant came out to bat in Manchester despite a fractured leg, while England's Chris Woakes batted with his left arm in a sling after suffering a shoulder fracture. Singh said in such situations, teams should be allowed like-for-like injury replacements. In my opinion, there should be a neutral doctor or physio during every match who decides the severity of a player's injury and whether the player is fit to play. If not, the team should be allowed to bring in a replacement of similar ability, he said. Kuldeep Yadav and Arshdeep Singh did not feature in any of the Tests, and Singh attributed this to the team management's preference for all-rounders. There's no doubt that every player wants to be in the playing XI. From the first match of the series, India decided to strengthen the batting. To deepen the batting lineup, the team preferred all-rounders. That's why Kuldeep didn't get to play," he said. If the team had prioritized bowling strength, then Kuldeep would have played. Washington Sundar partially filled the spin bowler role. But I believe there were two or three pitches where Kuldeep could have been very effective. But these things happen in cricket, if not today, then there will be opportunities in the future.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
Hate crime in Ireland: Mother Irish citizen, 6-year-old girl assaulted by boys, told to 'go back to India'
A six-year-old girl of Indian origin was allegedly attacked by a group of boys in Ireland who racially abused her and told her to 'go back to India'. Her mother, an Irish citizen and nurse, said the family no longer feels safe. read more Police stand at the front of the Richmond Road Baptist Church as other officers maintain a perimeter following a shooting at the church in Lexington, Ky. AP In a disturbing incident in Ireland, a six-year-old girl of Indian origin was reportedly assaulted by a group of boys who hurled racist abuse at her, telling her to 'go back to India'. The girl's mother, an Irish citizen and nurse who has lived in the country for eight years, said the family now feels unsafe. Speaking to The Irish Mirror, the mother said the attack happened outside their home when she briefly went inside to feed her 10-month-old son. 'It was around 7:30 pm and she was playing inside the house. She wanted to play outside and go cycling. I let her outside for a few seconds,' she recalled. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Soon after, the girl was allegedly attacked by a group of boys aged between 12 and 14. One of her friends told the mother that the boys hit her on her private parts with a bicycle and punched her in the face. 'One of the boys pushed the bicycle wheel onto her private parts and it was really sore. They said the F word and 'Dirty Indian, go back to India'. She told me today they punched her neck and twisted her hair,' the friend said. The mother, visibly shaken, said her daughter had been happy after moving into the house until the assault on Monday. 'I feel so sad for her. I could not protect her. I never expected that such an incident would happen. I thought she would be safe here,' she said. She added that after the incident, she saw the gang of boys staring and laughing at her. The matter has been reported to Gardaí (Irish police), but the mother said she is not seeking punishment for the boys. Instead, she hopes they are given counselling.
Business Standard
16 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Chappell takes dig at England's Bazball: 'Reckless isn't positive cricket'
"Positive cricket doesn't mean reckless cricket," said Australian great Greg Chappell, lambasting England's 'Bazball' philosophy during the high-intensity drawn Test series against India. In his column for 'ESPNCricinfo', Chappell, while lavishing praise on the young Indian team for being fearless, criticised the Englishmen, particularly Harry Brook, for failing to read situations which required perseverance instead of flashy strokeplay. "England's own journey in this series presents a cautionary subplot - one embodied by the brilliant but mercurial Harry Brook, whose virtues I have extolled publicly before," Chappell, a former India head coach, said. "He has time, range, confidence, and that rare gift of making batting look effortless. But cricket, particularly Test cricket, is not just about shot-making. It's about judgement. About recognising when the moment demands attack - and when it demands restraint," he added. England were 301/3 in pursuit of 374 when the 26-year-old Brook's dismissal triggered a collapse on the fourth day of the fifth Test in London that the home side lost by six runs on Monday. With that result, India tied the series at 2-2. "Brook's dismissal at The Oval, with the game finely poised, was symptomatic of the conundrum that is facing the England setup. The "Bazball" philosophy - of fearless, attacking cricket - has revitalised their Test side. But it cannot become an excuse to avoid doing the hard yards. "...all England needed was for one batter to hold his nerve. To absorb pressure. Brook went for the glory shot - and perished," he pointed out. "There's nothing wrong with positivity. But positive cricket doesn't mean reckless cricket. It means confident, calculated risk-taking." Chappell said a more restrained approach in challenging match situations would help Brook establish himself as a worthy successor to Joe Root, England's most prolific run-getter. "Brook is emerging, and he will learn. But to become the match-winner England need, he must embrace the grind along with the glamour. Root didn't become England's most prolific batter by always playing pretty strokes. "He earned it with grit. Brook will need to do the same if he is to fulfil his vast potential," he said. Giving his overall assessment of the series, Chappell said the showdown will be long remembered for not just the result but also the "theatre" it created. The two teams engaged in on-field verbal altercations during the hard-fought contests, all of which lasted five days. There were also gladiatorial displays by the likes of Rishabh Pant and Chris Woakes who took the field despite serious injuries to help their respective team's cause. "The subplots. The redefinition of roles. Both sides were tested -- physically, tactically, emotionally. "But it was India who emerged as moral victors. They won clarity. Identity. Purpose," he said.
