Building Democracy: Voices of the Youth Vital for South Africa's Future
Youth voter turnout remains inconsistent, partly due to disillusionment with political parties, lack of trust in leadership, and limited awareness about how to influence policy effectively, says the writer.
Image: Shelley Kjonstad/IndependentNewspapers
Dr. Paul Kariuki
South Africa's history is deeply embedded in a legacy of struggle and resilience, particularly among its youth. During the pre-independence era, colonial and apartheid policies systematically marginalized Black South Africans, with youth often at the forefront of resistance movements. In the 1940s and 1950s, student organizations like the South African Students Organisation (SASO), led by figures such as Steve Biko, advocated for Black consciousness and empowerment, laying the groundwork for political activism rooted in identity and liberation.
Post-1960s, the Sharpeville Massacre intensified youth involvement, fueling protests and underground resistance activities that challenged apartheid's brutal system. The 1976 Soweto Uprising marked a pivotal moment, where young students publicly protested against Afrikaans-medium instruction, symbolizing the youth's refusal to accept oppressive policies. This activism highlighted the vital role of youth in driving societal change, both as catalysts for resistance and as agents of social transformation.
Following South Africa's transition to democracy in 1994, the focus shifted from liberation struggles to nation-building and developmental challenges. While formal political structures were established, the engagement of youth in these processes remained inconsistent, compounded by socio-economic disparities, unemployment, and limited access to education—factors that continue to shape youth participation today.
Youth Engagement in Electoral and Democratic Processes
The 2024 South African elections marked a significant juncture in youth political engagement. In the lead-up to the elections, efforts by civil society, political parties, and youth organisations aimed to mobilise young voters through social media campaigns, youth forums, and civic education programs. Initiatives like the South African Youth Council and various youth branches of political parties sought to increase awareness about electoral rights, policies affecting youth, and the importance of active participation.
Post-2024, youth engagement has extended beyond voting to encompass a broader spectrum of democratic participation. Young people are increasingly involved in advocacy, protests, and social movements addressing critical issues such as climate change, unemployment, education reform, and social justice. Digital platforms play a central role, enabling youth to organize campaigns, hold leaders accountable, and participate in policy dialogues. Some youth-led initiatives have influenced policymakers to prioritize youth concerns, and young representatives are beginning to hold positions in local councils and parliamentary committees.
However, despite these encouraging developments, challenges persist. Youth voter turnout remains inconsistent, partly due to disillusionment with political parties, lack of trust in leadership, and limited awareness about how to influence policy effectively. Moreover, youth participation is often superficial, with many young people engaging predominantly through symbolic acts rather than sustained engagement in governance processes.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Challenges in Engaging Democratic Processes
Several intertwined challenges hinder meaningful youth participation in South Africa's democracy. Firstly, socio-economic hardships—high unemployment rates (notably among youth), poverty, and inadequate educational access—limit the capacity of young people to actively participate in civic life. Economic dependency often compels youth to prioritize immediate survival over political engagement.
Secondly, political disillusionment and mistrust towards existing institutions and parties pose significant barriers. Many young South Africans perceive politicians as disconnected from their realities, fostering apathy and disengagement. This sentiment is exacerbated by corruption scandals and a perceived lack of accountability.
Thirdly, structural barriers such as limited political literacy, inadequate civic education, and exclusion from decision-making forums diminish youth influence. Legal and institutional frameworks often do not facilitate youth involvement beyond voting, neglecting avenues for continuous engagement in policy formulation, oversight, and community development.
Additionally, societal issues like violence, substance abuse, and gender inequality disproportionately impact youth, further distracting them from political participation and reinforcing cycles of disempowerment. The digital divide—limited access to online resources—also restricts many youths from leveraging digital platforms for activism.
Strategies for Overcoming Challenges and Enhancing Youth Engagement
To address these challenges, a multifaceted approach is essential. First, educational reforms must embed civic education into school curricula, fostering a culture of active citizenship from an early age. Equipping youth with knowledge about their rights, political processes, and leadership skills is fundamental.
Second, creating inclusive platforms for youth participation is critical. Governments and political parties should establish youth councils, advisory committees, and participatory chambers at local and national levels, ensuring youth voices are integral to decision-making. Mentorship programs and leadership development initiatives can empower young leaders.
Third, leveraging technology and social media responsibly can broaden reach and foster sustained engagement. Partnerships with civil society organizations can facilitate digital literacy campaigns, especially targeting marginalized communities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
South Africa's unknown regressive tax
South Africa, and pretty much all countries today, have a regressive tax, but it is a hidden one imposed by the government, so there is no outrage against it. Image: AI Lab. ACCORDING to reports from the SA Revenue Service (Sars), South Africa has a progressive tax system. This means that the more people make, the more they are taxed. The following table shows the various tax brackets, ranging from 18% to a monstrous 45%. In South Africa, the more you earn, the more the government takes from you. There are many who argue that this is fair, that those who make more money should pay more. I am not one of these people. However, I doubt there's any sane person who would argue for a regressive income tax, where the poor pay a higher percentage of their income to the government. Calling for such a tax would cause an outrage such as South Africa has never seen; the poor would take to the streets in protest and might even turn on the rich. Any government that proposes such a ridiculous tax is sure to lose future elections. What if I told you that South Africa does, in fact, have a regressive tax, one that puts a heavier burden on the lower class in society? South Africa, and pretty much all countries today, have a regressive tax, but it is a hidden one imposed by the government, so there is no outrage against it. As a matter of fact, 'progressive economists' who claim to stand for the poor cheer on this regressive tax and argue that it is required for the economy to grow. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The regressive tax is hidden, and so people don't know they are paying it. To understand how this is so, one must first understand the effects of taxes. Taxes come in many forms, but the effect is always the same: they leave you with less money. Whether it's income tax, value-added tax (VAT), or fuel levies, they reduce how much you can spend, save, or invest. There is one tax, however, that never appears on your payslip. It doesn't go through Parliament, and it doesn't need your vote. That tax is inflation, and in South Africa, just as with everywhere else, and is a regressive tax in its effects, it hits the poor hardest. Most people think inflation just means prices are going up. But that's only what we see. Inflation starts when more money is pumped into the economy. The more rands are created, the less each one is worth, and as money loses value, prices rise across the board. Now here's where it gets worse. When the government or the SA Reserve Bank (Sarb) adds new money into the system, it isn't handed out equally (not that this would be a good thing). It goes first to banks, big businesses, and government-linked insiders. These groups get to spend the new money before prices rise. By the time the money reaches the rest of the population — especially salary earners, pensioners, and the poor — prices have already gone up. Their salaries stay the same, but now they buy far less. This is known as the Cantillon Effect, and it's exactly how inflation becomes a regressive tax. The rich benefit first and dodge the damage. The poor are hit last and hardest. Their food costs more. Transport costs more. Rent goes up. But their income doesn't. Even if the number in their bank account stays the same, they are poorer in real terms. No one debates this tax. No one votes for it. Yet everyone pays it, especially those at the bottom, and because it doesn't show up as a line item or a deduction, people don't realise it's the government draining their wealth quietly, through money printing and credit expansion. Inflation is not just an unfortunate side effect of economic policy. It is a feature of the current system. Every time the money supply grows, value is taken from those who earn last and given to those who receive first. This is wealth transfer from the poor to the rich, and it happens every day. South Africans don't need more money that buys less. They need stable money that holds its value. They need to be free from the hidden tax that punishes them without their consent. Until that happens, the poorest in South Africa will continue to pay the highest price. If progressive activists take time off virtue signalling and fighting for things that not only don't matter, but will undoubtedly make society worse, and focus on this regressive tax stealthily imposed on the people by the government, they might actually help the poor. * Econ Bro is a Nigerian Austrolibertarian economist and an apprentice at the Mises Institute and an Associate of the Free Market Foundation. ** The views expressed here do reflect those of the Sunday Independent, IOL, or Independent Media.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Youth Month 2025: The Reversal of Democratic Gains in South Africa
The writer raises concerns about how the system has failed the youth as many are left jobless and have to fend for themselves. Image: File South Africa's democracy, born in 1994 amid hope and renewal, promised a future where every citizen could access opportunity, dignity, and prosperity. Yet, nearly three decades later, we face an alarming reality: the youth unemployment rate has soared to 46.1 percent among those aged 15 to 34. Nearly half of our young people are unemployed, their dreams deferred and potential wasted. This is the stark backdrop against which the current Government of National Unity—a coalition including the ANC, the Democratic Alliance, and others—is governing. Formed amid political tensions and aimed at fostering stability, this GNU promised collaborative governance and renewed focus on South Africa's challenges. But instead, the hard-won gains of democracy are being reversed. Coalition governments can offer a way forward in divided societies. But South Africa's current GNU risks becoming a symbol of political paralysis rather than progress. With competing party interests, policy disagreements, and fragile alliances, decisive action—especially on economic issues—has stalled. The youth, who stood to benefit most from this new political configuration, are bearing the brunt of this dysfunction. Instead of creating jobs, supporting skills development, and stimulating entrepreneurship, the coalition is mired in internal conflict, leading to delayed reforms and uncertainty that deter investment. High youth unemployment is more than a statistic; it represents a lost generation. It fuels poverty, crime, and social unrest, threatening the very stability the GNU seeks to uphold. The democratic promise of 'a better life for all' feels increasingly hollow when millions of young South Africans see no path forward. Furthermore, with corruption allegations still looming and governance challenges unresolved, public trust in both the ANC and the DA is eroding. The coalition's inability to present a unified and effective strategy undermines confidence in democracy itself. For the GNU to fulfil its mandate, it must prioritize youth empowerment through concrete action. Job creation programs targeting youth must be implemented with urgency, including public works and private sector incentives. Education and vocational training need substantial investment to align skills with market demands. Entrepreneurship and innovation must be promoted by reducing barriers for young business owners. Government transparency and accountability are essential to rebuild public trust. Most importantly, genuine cooperation among coalition partners is necessary to ensure policy coherence and swift implementation. South Africa's democratic journey is at a crossroads. The current GNU, with its promise of unity, must rise above political differences to address the crisis facing our youth. If the nearly 50 percent unemployment rate among young people continues unchecked, the gains of democracy will have been reversed, and social cohesion will be at are we really celebrating if the future of our youth—and thus the future of South Africa—is so uncertain? The time for decisive, inclusive, and visionary leadership is now. * Mayalo is an independent commentator and writer *** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
MK Party has had 7 Secretaries-General in under a year - Analysts call it a 'One-Man Show'
Political analysts says the rotation of seven secretary-generals reflects instability and suggests MK Party is Jacob Zuma's project, managed as he wishes. Image: Tumi Pakkies / Independent Newspapers Political analysts have slammed Former President Jacob Zuma's Umkhonto weSizwe (MK Party) as a 'one-man show' after its leader said that the party has had seven secretaries general in under a year. Some were of the view that the party is Zuma's own 'personal project,' which he runs as he wishes. Zuma spoke at the launch of the MKP Youth Branch in Claremont on Monday, reigniting concerns over the party's internal instability, leadership style, and long-term viability. Zuma defended the party's decision to cycle through seven Secretaries-General in under a year. 'We're not here to play games,' he said. 'This is not an organisation to make money, it is an organization to liberate South Africa,' Zuma told supporters. 'If one of us goes off track, we don't beg them.' However, independent political analyst Goodenough Mashego said the turnover in senior leadership is less about discipline and more about Zuma's whims, pointing to a worrying pattern of autocratic control. Speaking to IOL News on Tuesday, Mashego said the repeated removal and replacement of secretary-generals reflects a deeper issue within the party's structure. 'Zuma is the one looking for a certain caliber of secretary-general,' said Mashego. 'It's not the party's membership that determines that. Skills and popularity with members don't matter; what matters is who Zuma wants.' 'If Zuma wants a secretary-general who can't even write the word 'tomorrow,' the MK Party will get one who can't write. If he wants someone who can't read, that's who will be appointed…,' Mashego said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Mashego described the secretary-general as the engine of any political organisation, responsible for managing membership, expanding structures, and coordinating development at provincial, regional, and branch levels. 'When the secretary-general is unstable, the entire party becomes unstable,' he said. 'Most of the people removed from that position weren't even given a chance to prove themselves. Some were removed within two weeks.' 'You can't build a political party on one man's whim,' he added. 'You need vision, a mission, and a democratic mandate. The MK Party, apart from the votes it got in the 2024 general election, has no such mandate. Its leadership was not elected, it was appointed.' Meanwhile, the latest demotion of Floyd Shivambu as the secretary-general for the party has raised eyebrows. Even though the party claimed Shivambu would be deployed to Parliament, IOL News previously reported that his name does not appear on the party's official list of Members of Parliament. This has raised speculation that he may have been quietly removed from the party. Mashego said this again points to the 'undemocratic structure' of the MKP. 'No one in MK's leadership was elected. All were appointed and continue to be shuffled based on Zuma's decisions. That's why it's so easy for the party to move people around,' he said. He argued that MKP is not a political party in the conventional sense. 'I've said many times, that MK is a project. Projects have a start date and an end date,' Mashego said. 'This party exists to reclaim the ANC. If the ANC's leadership in 2027 doesn't suit MK's ambitions, the party won't survive to 2029.' He warned that MKP is likely hoping a figure like Deputy President Paul Mashatile will emerge as ANC leader in 2027, someone they believe might recall President Cyril Ramaphosa, exit the GNU, and realign with MKP. 'That's their way of creeping back into power,' he said. Professor Theo Neethling echoed Mashego's concerns. He said while the MK Party claims to carry forward the liberation legacy of the ANC's former armed wing, the original Umkhonto weSizwe, Zuma's interpretation of democratic principles is troubling. 'Zuma's stance on the Constitution is often ambiguous, if not outright contradictory,' Neethling told IOL News. 'He publicly acknowledges the Constitution's role in protecting democracy and rights, but many of his actions suggest a willingness to sidestep or undermine it - particularly on land reform, corruption, and the rule of law.' Neethling said the MK Party has openly stated it will not hold elective conferences, which is something that sets it apart from even the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), often criticised for being tightly controlled by its leader, Julius Malema. 'Malema is accused of running the EFF like a personal project, but at least the party holds elective conferences. MK Party doesn't... That's extraordinary in a democracy,' said Neethling. Commenting on Shivambu's demotion, he said,'It's becoming clear that MK Party may be the most undemocratic party ever to win parliamentary seats in post-1994 South Africa.' Neethling said Zuma appears to believe in a form of democracy rooted in racial majoritarianism. 'Now that white minority rule is over, he seems to think that the party representing the black majority, according to him, MK Party, should have unchecked power. This raises real concerns about democratic backsliding,' he said. 'Zuma did not hesitate to attack the Constitution in recent years, and that shows clear signs of anti-constitutionalism.' IOL Politics
