Study shows accelerated action in key area could boost economy: 'Anyone who dismisses ... cannot count'
A new study by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the United Nations Development Programme found that the global GDP could increase by 0.2% if the UN commits to accelerated climate action.
According to their findings, well-designed climate policies could cut pollution and enhance efficiency, productivity, and innovation.
The study found that the economic impact of policy-driven price and consumption changes would be offset by the productivity and innovation produced by these actions.
While a 0.2% increase may not seem like a lot on the surface, on a global level, according to Reuters, this increase would be equivalent to the size of Sweden's economy.
This study comes in light of the gathering of ministers from around 40 countries in Berlin for the Petersberg Climate Dialogue, which is set to focus on preparations for the UN climate conference in Brazil later this year.
The study warns that poorly constructed climate policies could delay private investment and cut GDP by 0.75% within the next five years.
These findings are a hopeful sign that the UN will reach agreements to enact meaningful, clear, and effective climate action.
Many of these world leaders ultimately care primarily about their bottom line, and with data to support that there are real financial benefits to be gained from enacting climate change policies, it is more likely than ever that these leaders will work together to focus on climate action.
These findings are also huge for getting world leaders who are pro-climate activism but worried about the financial ramifications to get fully on board with accelerating climate action.
German foreign minister Annalena Baerbock said in a statement, "Anyone who dismisses climate action in these turbulent times as being expensive, onerous, or superfluous cannot count."
How often do you feel hopeful about the future of the planet when you read news stories or watch entertainment content?
Often
Sometimes
Rarely
Never
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Baerbock has also stated that the Petersberg conference would focus on implementing the goals set at the Dubai climate summit in 2023, which include a deal to transition away from dirty fuels and an agreement to triple global renewable energy capacity.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Relatives struggle to find last 1,000 Srebrenica victims 30 years on
Sadik Selimovic's relief at surviving the Srebrenica massacres 30 years ago did not last long. When he found out that his father and three brothers had not been so lucky, his life took the "only possible turn" -- to find them. Three decades on, the 62-year-old, who was driven to become an investigator at the Bosnian Institute for Missing Persons, cannot hide his anguish that the remains of around 1,000 of the victims have yet to be found. More than 8,000 Muslim men and boys were killed within a matter of days in July 1995 after Bosnian Serb forces captured Srebrenica, which was supposed to have been a UN "protected zone" watched over by Dutch peacekeepers. "Over the past three years, we have searched 62 locations" hoping to discover mass graves from the slaughter -- since declared a genocide under international law -- "but we have not found a single body," Selimovic told AFP. "Those who know (where the graves are) do not want to say," he said. Selimovic spends his time searching for witnesses among the Serbs living in and around Srebrenica, often his neighbours, school friends or those he worked with before the war at the Potocari battery factory, now a genocide memorial centre. "How can they live with what they know?" he said. "I can't understand it. But it has to be said, there are people who have talked." - Mass graves - The last mass grave of Srebrenica victims, which held 10 bodies, was discovered in 2021 in the Dobro Polje area, 180 kilometres (111 miles) southwest of the town. More than 6,800 of the dead, some 80 percent, have been identified, said Dragana Vucetic, a forensic anthropologist at the International Commission for Missing Persons (ICMP). But that work has been complicated by the gruesome way the perpetrators tried to cover up their crimes. The ICMP morgue and the Bosnian Missing Persons Commission in Tuzla hold the remains of "90 cases whose genetic fingerprint has been isolated" but who have not yet been identified. There are also about 50 identified victims whose "families do not wish to validate the identification and bury them, most often because skeletal remains are incomplete", said the expert, who has worked investigating the genocide for more than two decades. Initially, the victims' bodies were thrown into mass graves near the "five mass execution sites". "A few months later, these graves were opened, and the corpses, already in the early stages of decomposition, were transported to other locations, sometimes hundreds of kilometres (miles) away," said Vucetic. - Hiding the evidence - The bodies were then "torn to pieces" by mechanical shovels and bulldozers and transported, often to two or three different locations, in an attempt to conceal the crime. "Only 10 percent of bodies found during exhumations were complete," said Vucetic. DNA testing has allowed some skeletons to be reconstructed, sometimes from parts found in four different mass graves. About 6,000 people were identified between 2012 and 2022, but since then the process has slowed, with only three this year so far. Mevlida Omerovic, 69, has been hoping since 2013 that more of her husband Hasib's skeleton would be found so she could lay him to rest. He was killed aged 33 with his brother Hasan. "There's just his jaw, but I have now decided to bury him" at the Srebrenica memorial centre during the commemoration of the genocide's 30th anniversary on July 11, she said. "We will know where his grave is and we will be able to go there and pray." Her brother Senad, who was 17 when he was killed, has never been found. The investigator Selimovic found the remains of his brothers and father. The last, his younger brother Sabahudin, was buried in 2023. But he has no intention of stopping looking for the others. "That's what keeps me alive. I know what it feels like when you're told your loved one has been found," he said. So he reads and re-reads testimonies and criss-crosses the area, revisiting the same places dozens of times. "We will find some (more) people," he insisted. "If other mass graves exist -- and I think they do -- we will find them." But he fears the Drina River, which flows near Srebrenica forming the border between Bosnia and Serbia, "is the biggest mass grave of all", he said. "No one will ever find those who ended up there." rus/cbo/fg/rlp
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote
VIENNA (AP) — Iran's nuclear program remains a top focus for inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, particularly as any possible deal between Tehran and the United States over the program would likely rely on the agency long known as the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. This week, Western nations will push for a measure at the IAEA's Board of Governors censuring Iran over its noncompliance with inspectors, pushing the matter before the U.N. Security Council. Barring any deal with Washington, Iran then could face what's known as 'snapback' — the reimposition of all U.N. sanctions on it originally lifted by Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, if one of its Western parties declares the Islamic Republic is out of compliance with it. All this sets the stage for a renewed confrontation with Iran as the Mideast remains inflamed by Israel's war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip. And the IAEA's work in any case will make the Vienna-based agency a key player. Here's more to know about the IAEA, its inspections of Iran and the deals — and dangers — at play. Atoms for peace The IAEA was created in 1957. The idea for it grew out of a 1953 speech given by U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower at the U.N., in which he urged the creation of an agency to monitor the world's nuclear stockpiles to ensure that 'the miraculous inventiveness of man shall not be dedicated to his death, but consecrated to his life." Broadly speaking, the agency verifies the reported stockpiles of member nations. Those nations are divided into three categories. The vast majority are nations with so-called 'comprehensive safeguards agreements" with the IAEA, states without nuclear weapons that allow IAE monitoring over all nuclear material and activities. Then there's the 'voluntary offer agreements' with the world's original nuclear weapons states — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the U.S. — typically for civilian sites. Finally, the IAEA has 'item-specific agreements' with India, Israel and Pakistan — nuclear-armed countries that haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. That treaty has countries agree not to build or obtain nuclear weapons. North Korea, which is also nuclear armed, said it has withdrawn from the treaty, though that's disputed by some experts. The collapse of Iran's 2015 nuclear deal Iran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, negotiated under then-President Barack Obama, allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran's stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran's compliance through additional oversight. But President Donald Trump in his first term in 2018 unilaterally withdrew America from the accord, insisting it wasn't tough enough and didn't address Iran's missile program or its support for militant groups in the wider Mideast. That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land. Iran now enriches up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs, should it choose to do so. Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, Western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organized weapons program up until 2003. IAEA inspections and Iran Under the 2015 deal, Iran agreed to allow the IAEA even greater access to its nuclear program. That included permanently installing cameras and sensors at nuclear sites. Those cameras, inside of metal housings sprayed with a special blue paint that shows any attempt to tamper with it, took still images of sensitive sites. Other devices, known as online enrichment monitors, measured the uranium enrichment level at Iran's Natanz nuclear facility. The IAEA also regularly sent inspectors into Iranian sites to conduct surveys, sometimes collecting environmental samples with cotton clothes and swabs that would be tested at IAEA labs back in Austria. Others monitor Iranian sites via satellite images. In the years since Trump's 2018 decision, Iran has limited IAEA inspections and stopped the agency from accessing camera footage. It's also removed cameras. At one point, Iran accused an IAEA inspector of testing positive for explosive nitrates, something the agency disputed. The IAEA has engaged in years of negotiations with Iran to restore full access for its inspectors. While Tehran hasn't granted that, it also hasn't entirely thrown inspectors out. Analysts view this as part of Iran's wider strategy to use its nuclear program as a bargaining chip with the West. What happens next Iran and the U.S. have gone through five rounds of negotiations over a possible deal, with talks mediated by the sultanate of Oman. Iran appears poised to reject an American proposal over a deal this week, potentially as soon as Tuesday. Without a deal with the U.S., Iran's long-ailing economy could enter a freefall that could worsen the simmering unrest at home. Israel or the U.S. might carry out long-threatened airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. Experts fear Tehran in response could decide to fully end its cooperation with the IAEA, abandon the the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush toward a bomb. If a deal is reached — or at least a tentative understanding between the two sides — that likely will take the pressure off for an immediate military strike by the U.S. Gulf Arab states, which opposed Obama's negotiations with Iran in 2015, now welcome the talks under Trump. Any agreement would require the IAEA's inspectors to verify Iran's compliance. But Israel, which has struck at Iranian-backed militants across the region, remains a wildcard on what it could do. Last year, it carried out its first military airstrikes on Iran — and has warned it is willing to take action alone to target Tehran's program, like it has in the past in Iraq in 1981 or Syria in 2007. ___ Associated Press writer Stephanie Liechtenstein contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. ___ Additional AP coverage of the nuclear landscape:
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
How Liverpool should spend $171M if Florian Wirtz transfer collapses
Liverpool's pursuit of Florian Wirtz seems to be heading in the right direction — but the longer the transfer saga drags on, the twitchier Reds fans will get over whether the German is actually destined for Anfield. Advertisement It's been several weeks now since it emerged that Wirtz had decided that he wanted to join Liverpool over Bayern Munich, and the Merseyside club has been working on wrapping up a deal ever since. Wirtz confirmed his excitement at the prospect of joining Liverpool last week, but given the sums involved — the attacker could become the third most-expensive player of all time — there is a risk of the transfer breaking down until the deal is officially confirmed. READ MORE: Darwin Nunez transfer deadline emerges thanks to Viktor Gyokeres' snub READ MORE: Liverpool transfer news LIVE: Florian Wirtz medical, Milos Kerkez talks, Darwin Nunez future Advertisement If, for whatever reason, the transfer doesn't end up going through, the Reds will have to look elsewhere for alternative targets. Similar players to Wirtz There are few players in world soccer who can hold a candle to Wirtz in his position, and all of them would cost an absolute fortune — but Liverpool is willing to spend an absolute fortune on Wirtz, so the likelihood is that the Reds would also be willing to do exactly that to sign another player of the German's caliber. Of the world's attacking midfielders, only Jude Bellingham — who was previously linked with Liverpool — has a higher market value ($205 million) than Wirtz, according to Transfermarkt, and there is little chance of him leaving Real Madrid this summer. Liverpool is continuing to work on a deal for Florian Wirtz -Credit:2025 Ralf Ibing - firo sportphoto Bayern's Jamal Musiala and Wirtz are both valued at $160 million, and while a move for Musiala is also unlikely, the prospect of him moving on could increase if Wirtz ends up joining Bayern. Advertisement Cole Palmer and Martin Odegaard are among the best attacking midfielders in the Premier League but there is no chance Liverpool would be able to convince either Chelsea or Arsenal to part with either player. Aston Villa's Morgan Rogers and Crystal Palace's Eberechi Eze could be more attainable, while RB Leipzig's Xavi Simons has been linked with Liverpool in the past and the Reds could turn their attention to him. READ MORE: 3 Harvey Elliott landing spots after Liverpool midfielder's transfer hint READ MORE: Arsenal should've seen Martin Zubimendi twist coming with Xabi Alonso advice before Liverpool snub Other squad areas that require strengthening If Liverpool ends up pivoting from Wirtz to someone like Rogers, Eze or Simons, the club would save a significant amount of money on the transfer fee that they look set to spend on Wirtz, and that extra money could be put towards strengthening in other areas of the squad. Advertisement Liverpool has already signed a new right-sided player in Jeremie Frimpong, but a left-back — specifically Milos Kerkez — is also on the agenda. The Reds could also look to strengthen in the center of Arne Slot's defense amid the uncertainty over the futures of Ibrahima Konate, Joe Gomez and Jarell Quansah.
