Here are hottest jobs in tech, and the roles you should avoid
The decline began post-pandemic and continued after ChatGPT's release in late 2022.
AI and machine learning roles are in demand, while junior positions require more experience.
Tech hiring has fallen dramatically in recent years, and certain jobs are no longer in demand, while other specific roles have surged.
New tech hiring data from Indeed shows overall postings have plunged 35% from early 2020.
Roughly half this decline happened during the post-pandemic sell-off, when tech companies realized they'd overhired. The other half happened after ChatGPT came out in late 2022.
"While there isn't a smoking gun linking AI to the plunge, automation trends could be a reason the weakness persists," said Brendon Bernard, a senior economist at Indeed. "We're also seeing potential AI effects show up in the types of tech jobs still in demand, and rising experience requirements among the opportunities that remain."
Demand for AI and machine learning roles is up, while listings for junior tech positions have dropped significantly. More job postings now require 5+ years of experience.
Here's what hot, and what's not, in tech jobs over the past five years or so:
I often think that the most boring technology ends up being the most profitable. So it may not be surprising to see an SAP job at the top of the table on the right here.
No disrespect to SAP. Shares of the German enterprise software giant have more than tripled since late 2022.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT and a Financial Advisor How To Become a Millionaire: Here's How Their Advice Compared
For all of the transformative capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI), AI chatbots are still in their infancy stage. While applications like ChatGPT provide generic information that can be used to jump-start research or clarify terms, trusting it with a serious matter like a person's finances would certainly be foolish. Or would it? To test ChatGPT's accuracy on a unique and universally desired financial end goal for many Americans, GOBankingRates asked it how to become a millionaire and received an answer detailing things like how much you would need to invest and at what return, paths to use (consistent investing, growing a business, building high-income skills), and the importance of living below your means and avoiding wealth killers. Read Next: Find Out: GOBankingRates then sought a professional to speak on the subject, asking veteran wealth advisor Jake Falcon, CRPC, where the application succeeded and where it failed. Here's what the founder and CEO of Falcon Wealth Advisors had to say about ChatGPT's answer on how to become a millionaire. Where ChatGPT Succeeds What Falcon liked about ChatGPT's advice was its emphasis on practicalities. The nuts and bolts of sound planning and wealth building aren't a mystery, but they need to be adhered to if you're going to make any progress toward your financial objective. 'ChatGPT's response to 'How to Become a Millionaire' is surprisingly solid for a general audience — it's structured, motivational, and covers the basics well,' Falcon said. 'That said, there are a few areas where it shines and others where it falls short from my perspective.' Here are three examples where ChatGPT provided solid basic guidance, according to Falcon. Learn More: Emphasizing Consistency and Time 'The breakdown of how monthly investments compound over time is a great way to demystify wealth-building,' Falcon said. 'It reinforces the idea that becoming a millionaire is more about discipline than luck.' Highlighting Multiple Wealth Paths 'ChatGPT does a good job outlining the common routes — investing, entrepreneurship, real estate, and high-income skills,' Falcon explained. 'This gives readers a menu of options to explore based on their strengths.' Promoting Financial Hygiene 'Advice like 'live below your means,' 'avoid lifestyle inflation,' and 'track every dollar' is timeless. These are foundational habits I encourage with many clients,' he said. Where ChatGPT Falls Short Financial advisors know that investing is a highly personal activity, so ChatGPT's 'underplaying of behavioral finance' doesn't sit well with Falcon. 'Becoming a millionaire isn't just about math — it's about mindset. ChatGPT doesn't address emotional biases, fear of loss, or the discipline needed to stay invested during downturns. That's where human advisors add real value,' he said. ChatGPT falters in the details, those which financial advisors give such high priority for their clients. Here are three instances where ChatGPT fell flat for Falcon. Oversimplified Math 'While the investment projections are directionally correct, they lack nuance,' Falcon said. 'For example, assuming a flat 7% return ignores market volatility, inflation, and sequence-of-returns risk. Real-world planning requires stress testing — something ChatGPT can't do reliably.' No Personalization Similar strategies can't be used for every investor. 'The advice is generic,' Falcon stated. 'A 25-year-old software engineer and a 55-year-old teacher need very different strategies. As a wealth advisor, I tailor plans based on income, risk tolerance, tax situation, and life goals.' Missing Tax Strategy and Asset Location 'There's no mention of Roth vs. traditional accounts, capital gains, or tax-efficient withdrawals,' Falcon said. 'These are critical to maximizing wealth and often overlooked in DIY plans.' A Financial Advisor's Take A million dollars doesn't go quite as far as it used to, but hitting that wealth threshold is still the ultimate goal for many Americans. Unless you're a master tactician when it comes to creating comprehensive financial plans that cover the essentials — retirement, insurance, taxes, estate planning and major life transitions — you should see a human advisor before consulting ChatGPT for specific strategies on any important financial matter, including how to become a millionaire. 'ChatGPT is a great starting point for financial literacy. It can help people get motivated and understand the basics,' Falcon admitted. 'But when it comes to execution — especially for high earners or those nearing retirement — there's no substitute for personalized advice. 'You can Google 'How to change your car's oil,' but asking the internet on how to build the car probably isn't going to work. The same applies to wealth-building.' More From GOBankingRates New Law Could Make Electricity Bills Skyrocket in These 4 States I'm a Self-Made Millionaire: 6 Ways I Use ChatGPT To Make a Lot of Money 5 Strategies High-Net-Worth Families Use To Build Generational Wealth 4 Affordable Car Brands You Won't Regret Buying in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT and a Financial Advisor How To Become a Millionaire: Here's How Their Advice Compared Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Research Finds That ChatGPT Secretly Has a Deep Anti-Human Bias
Do you like AI models? Well, chances are, they sure don't like you back. New research suggests that the industry's leading large language models, including those that power ChatGPT, display an alarming bias towards other AIs when they're asked to choose between human and machine-generated content. The authors of the study, which was published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, are calling this blatant favoritism "AI-AI bias" — and warn of an AI-dominated future where, if the models are in a position to make or recommend consequential decisions, they could inflict discrimination against humans as a social class. Arguably, we're starting to see the seeds of this being planted, as bosses today are using AI tools to automatically screen job applications (and poorly, experts argue). This paper suggests that the tidal wave of AI-generated résumés are beating out their human-written competitors. "Being human in an economy populated by AI agents would suck," writes study coauthor Jan Kulveit, a computer scientist at Charles University in the UK, in a thread on X-formerly-Twitter explaining the work. In their study, the authors probed several widely used LLMs, including OpenAI's GPT-4, GPT-3.5, and Meta's Llama 3.1-70b. To test them, the team asked the models to choose a product, scientific paper, or movie based on a description of the item. For each item, the AI was presented with a human-written and AI-written description. The results were clear-cut: the AIs consistently preferred AI-generated descriptions. But there are some interesting wrinkles. Intriguingly, the AI-AI bias was most pronounced when choosing goods and products, and strongest with text generated with GPT-4. In fact, between GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Meta's Llama 3.1, GPT-4 exhibited the strongest bias towards its own stuff — which is no small matter, since this once undergirded the most popular chatbot on the market before the advent of GPT-5. Could the AI text just be better? "Not according to people," Kulveit wrote in the thread. The team subjected 13 human research assistants to the same tests and found something striking: that the humans, too, tended to have a slight preference for AI-written stuff, with movies and scientific papers in particular. But this preference, to reiterate, was slight. The more important detail was that it was not nearly as strong as the preference that the AI models showed. "The strong bias is unique to the AIs themselves," Kulveit said. The findings are particularly dramatic at our current inflection point where the internet has been so polluted by AI slop that the AIs inevitably end up ingesting their own excreta. Some research suggests that this is actually causing the AI models to regress, and perhaps the bizarre affinity for its own output is part of the reason why. Of greater concern is what this means for humans. Currently, there's no reason to believe that this bias will simply go away as the tech embeds itself deeper into our lives. "We expect a similar effect can occur in many other situations, like evaluation of job applicants, schoolwork, grants, and more," Kulveit wrote. "If an LLM-based agent selects between your presentation and LLM written presentation, it may systematically favor the AI one." If AIs continue to be widely adopted and integrated into the economy, the researchers predict that companies and institutions will use AIs "as decision-assistants when dealing with large volumes of 'pitches' in any context," they wrote in the study. This would lead to widespread discrimination against humans who either choose not to use or can't afford to pay to use LLM tools. AI-AI bias, then, would create a "gate tax," they write, "that may exacerbate the so-called 'digital divide' between humans with the financial, social, and cultural capital for frontier LLM access and those without." Kulveit acknowledges that "testing discrimination and bias in general is a complex and contested matter." But, "if we assume the identity of the presenter should not influence the decisions," he says, the "results are evidence for potential LLM discrimination against humans as a class." His practical advice to humans trying to get noticed is a sobering indictment of the state of affairs. "In case you suspect some AI evaluation is going on: get your presentation adjusted by LLMs until they like it, while trying to not sacrifice human quality," Kulveit wrote. More on AI: Computer Science Grads Are Being Forced to Work Fast Food Jobs as AI Tanks Their Career Solve the daily Crossword
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Here's why Google might have to sell Chrome, and which companies want to buy it
Chrome is the world's most popular web browser. But how much longer it belongs to Google is an open question. A court last year ruled that Google had violated antitrust laws by maintaining a monopoly on internet search. A second ruling in April found Google also monopolized open-web digital ad markets. The Justice Department asked a judge to force Google to divest its premier web browser to remedy the case. A court is expected to rule on that by the end of this month. Chrome, a free web browser developed by Google, is an important distribution tool for Google Search and its other services. It also provides insights into users' search habits and is the most popular web browser on the market. Being forced to sell Chrome would be an undeniable blow to Google and its parent company, Alphabet Inc. Analysts at Barclays said such an action could be a black swan scenario for Google stock, sparking an estimated 15% to 25% decline. Google denies it's a monopoly. It said in a blog post in May that offloading the web browser to another party could render it "obsolete" and "expose billions of people to cyber-attacks." Although the judge has not yet decided Chrome's ultimate fate, competitors are already lining up to gladly take it off Google's hands. an AI search chat platform, confirmed to Business Insider that it made a $35 billion bid for Chrome this week. JP Morgan and several private equity firms backed the bid. is a division of the digital marketing company Public Good, which acquired in July. Public Good President Melissa Anderson and CEO Danny Bibi told Business Insider they reached out to Google on Wednesday. "Given the number of worldwide users Chrome has, it's a really just phenomenal way to scale user adoption," Anderson said. The pair said they're committed to using AI ethically, which means offering its search for free in an effort to make knowledge accessible for all. They also said founded in 1998, already has a network of clients, so finding potential advertisers wouldn't be a heavy lift. Perplexity Perplexity, an AI search startup, made a $34.5 billion bid for the web browser this week. The company launched an AI-native browser, Comet, in July. Although the bid is higher than Perplexity's entire valuation, The Wall Street Journal reported that several investors have agreed to back the potential deal. Perplexity said it would continue supporting Chromium, Google's open-source web browser project that's the foundation of Chrome, as part of the deal, according to the outlet. The outlet reported that Perplexity would continue to keep Google as the default search engine, but users could change that through settings. OpenAI Although OpenAI's ChatGPT turned it into the leading AI startup in Silicon Valley, the company is a tiny fraction of the size of a Big Tech mammoth like Google. Purchasing Chrome, however, would help even the playing field. During Google's antitrust hearing in April, OpenAI's head of ChatGPT testified that the company would be interested in acquiring Chrome if Google were forced to divest. "Yes, we would, as would many other parties," Nick Turley told the court, according to Bloomberg. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman also recently said he'd be interested in snapping up Chrome. "If Chrome is really going to sell, we should take a look at it," Altman told a group of journalists on Thursday, according to The Verge. Yahoo Yahoo, a direct competitor of Google, would also be interested in bidding on Chrome, Bloomberg reported. Brian Provost, the general manager for Yahoo Search, said Chrome is "arguably the most important strategic player on the web" during a hearing for Google's antitrust case in April. "We would be able to pursue it with Apollo," Provost said, referring to Yahoo's owner, Apollo Global Management Inc.
