Here's how Trump spared US taxpayers from paying for Ukraine military aid with long-awaited minerals deal
President Trump followed through on a promise to make Ukraine pay for its military aid with the new mineral rights agreement between Washington and Kyiv, which creates a new path for the US to send weapons to the eastern European nation — without spending a single taxpayer dollar.
The agreement, inked on Wednesday after months of negotiations, created a shared investment fund to which both nations will contribute — including through oil, gas and mineral rights licenses sold in Ukraine — with the profits split 50/50.
Instead of investing money into the fund, the United States reserves the option to earn credit toward their total contribution equal to the cost of any military equipment, technology or training it sends across the Atlantic, according to the deal.
'If, after the effective date, the Government of the United States of America delivers new military assistance to the Government of Ukraine in any form — including the donation of weapons systems, ammunition, technology or training — the capital contribution of the U.S. Partner will be deemed to be increased by the assessed value of such military assistance,' the mineral deal said.
The agreement does not preclude the US from dispatching remaining military aid approved by Congress under former President Joe Biden — which is expected to run out by next month — nor does it require the US to sell any military aid to Kyiv.
Exactly how much each side will be required to contribute to the fund has yet to be determined, as Ukraine's Economy Minister Yulia Svyrydenko said logistical talks are ongoing.
Once those talks conclude, a second document with 'all the formal details about the operation and how it would go,' will be sent to Ukraine's Verkhovna Rada parliament for ratification, a process Kyiv-based Center for European Policy Analysis senior fellow Hanna Shelest said could take about a month.
'What I heard from a few diplomats in Ukraine is that the US wanted us to sign it immediately,' Shelest said, 'so I understand that a draft is available, but [the] Ukrainian side said that we cannot sign it without ratification.'
Ukrainians hope the agreement might reverse Trump's refusal to sell critical air-defense systems as Russia has bombarded the country with massive drone, bomb and missile assaults.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky last month said he asked Trump if Ukraine could purchase up to 10 Patriot missile systems — which are only made by the US — for $15 billion, only to be turned down by the president.
Some Ukrainian observers say the the deal reflects their country's understanding of the transactional approach of the Trump administration.
'The Ukrainians' mistake was thinking that Trump wanted this so badly that they could leverage it,' one source familiar with Kyiv's strategy told The Post, noting that the deal was put on the back burner following an explosive Feb. 28 Oval Office argument involving Trump, Zelensky and Vice President JD Vance.
Lt. Denis Yaroslasvky, who commands a special reconnaissance unit for the Ukrainian Armed Forces, told The Post that the country's leaders must complement Trump's approach, which he said was 'immune to emotional appeals.'
'Only pragmatic economic proposals matter,' Yaroslavsky said. '… Today, Ukraine has a small but real chance to leverage this approach to achieve a swift cease-fire.
'The is the first step, hopefully it will entail a merger in the great alliance of our countries.'
Some analysts have noted that while the US is not required to sell any weapons to Ukraine, the provision acts as a check on Russia by reminding them that the Trump administration reserves the right to further equip Ukraine.
The Kremlin apparently recognized the significance Thursday, as Russian Security Council Deputy Chairman Dmitry Medvedev blasted Trump over the deal, sarcastically praising the US leader for making a deal with a nation that will soon 'disappear.'
'Trump has finally pressured the Kyiv regime to pay for US aid with mineral resources,' he posted to Telegram. 'Now, the country that is about to disappear will have to use its national wealth to pay for military supplies.'
Originally published as Here's how Trump spared US taxpayers from paying for Ukraine military aid with long-awaited minerals deal
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
30 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Potential agroterrorism weapon': US charges Chinese researchers with fungus smuggling
Washington: The US Justice Department has charged two Chinese researchers accused of trying to smuggle a fungus into America, bringing the case as the government pushes to keep more Chinese students out of the country. The students, Yunqing Jian, 33, and Zunyong Liu, 34, were in a romantic relationship in July, when US authorities say Liu arrived in the US carrying small bags of the fungus Fusarium graminearum, which causes a disease that can cripple wheat, barley, corn and rice. The disease, head blight, is a familiar problem for American farmers, particularly in northern and eastern states, according to research funded by the US Agriculture Department that has tracked it in 32 states last year. The fungus can be particularly damaging to winter wheat crops. Jian was arrested and booked in the federal courthouse in Detroit; Liu is believed to be in China. The criminal charges come as tensions mount between the US and China over the Trump administration's vow to 'aggressively' revoke student visas for Chinese nationals. Such students, the administration says, could siphon off sensitive technology or trade secrets from American labs for the benefit of their home country. Jerome F. Gorgon jnr, the interim US attorney in Detroit, said the researchers' alleged actions amounted to 'the gravest national security concerns'. He said they had tried to bring 'a potential agro-terrorism weapon' into 'the heartland of America'. For decades, US national security officials have worried about – and sometimes arrested – Chinese academics suspected of stealing scientific data from American universities and businesses. The Trump administration's new push goes further by stripping an unspecified number of students of visas.

Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australia spared Trump tariff letter as Ley says Albanese should secure special deal
Australia has been spared a letter from the Trump administration demanding countries cut trade barriers to US goods as the White House prepares to reinstate its 'Liberation Day' tariffs, but has not secured a UK-style exemption to increased steel and aluminium import taxes. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley pushed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to get the same treatment for Australia that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer won for UK steel to prevent it from being subject to a 50 per cent tariff in the US, saying the opposition would work with the government to make it happen. 'President [Donald] Trump's tariffs on our steelmakers are not in the spirit of our century-old partnership and we urge the Americans to give Australia a fair go and remove them,' Ley said. Trade Minister Don Farrell met his US counterpart Jamieson Greer in Paris overnight as Albanese prepares to hold his first meeting with Trump later this month. The meeting is expected to be dominated by Trump's tariff war and US requests for its allies to boost defence spending. The United States Trade Representative, the office primarily responsible for trade matters, sent a letter to countries asking them to provide their best offer for a trade deal by Wednesday, US time. The Trump administration confirmed the missive, which was first reported by Reuters. The letter suggests fresh urgency from the Trump administration as it looks to settle trade deals with partners ahead of July 8, which is when the 90-day 'pause' on Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs expires. An Australian government spokeswoman said Australia did not receive the letter because it was only sent to nations with a higher tariff rate than the baseline 10 per cent rate. 'Australia is in the lowest 'baseline' tariff tier of 10 per cent,' she said. 'As such, the US administration has confirmed Australia has not been sent a letter. 'We continue to engage with the US on our trade interests. Trade Minister Farrell met with his US counterpart today in Paris and pressed for the removal of unjustified tariffs imposed on Australian goods.'

The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Australia spared Trump tariff letter as Ley says Albanese should secure special deal
Australia has been spared a letter from the Trump administration demanding countries cut trade barriers to US goods as the White House prepares to reinstate its 'Liberation Day' tariffs, but has not secured a UK-style exemption to increased steel and aluminium import taxes. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley pushed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to get the same treatment for Australia that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer won for UK steel to prevent it from being subject to a 50 per cent tariff in the US, saying the opposition would work with the government to make it happen. 'President [Donald] Trump's tariffs on our steelmakers are not in the spirit of our century-old partnership and we urge the Americans to give Australia a fair go and remove them,' Ley said. Trade Minister Don Farrell met his US counterpart Jamieson Greer in Paris overnight as Albanese prepares to hold his first meeting with Trump later this month. The meeting is expected to be dominated by Trump's tariff war and US requests for its allies to boost defence spending. The United States Trade Representative, the office primarily responsible for trade matters, sent a letter to countries asking them to provide their best offer for a trade deal by Wednesday, US time. The Trump administration confirmed the missive, which was first reported by Reuters. The letter suggests fresh urgency from the Trump administration as it looks to settle trade deals with partners ahead of July 8, which is when the 90-day 'pause' on Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs expires. An Australian government spokeswoman said Australia did not receive the letter because it was only sent to nations with a higher tariff rate than the baseline 10 per cent rate. 'Australia is in the lowest 'baseline' tariff tier of 10 per cent,' she said. 'As such, the US administration has confirmed Australia has not been sent a letter. 'We continue to engage with the US on our trade interests. Trade Minister Farrell met with his US counterpart today in Paris and pressed for the removal of unjustified tariffs imposed on Australian goods.'