Philippines President receives ceremonial welcome at Rashtrapati Bhavan
On his arrival at Rashtrapati Bhavan, Philippines President was received by President Droupadi Murmu in the presence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
This is President Marcos Jr.'s first official visit to India since assuming office in 2022. His visit carries added significance as it coincides with the 75th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties between India and the Philippines.
During the ceremonial reception today, President Marcos was also accorded a guard of honour.
Accompanied by first lady Louise Araneta Marcos and a high-level delegation that includes several Cabinet ministers, President Marcos arrived in New Delhi yesterday.
Upon his arrival, he was warmly received by Minister of State for External Affairs Pabitra Margherita.
"India & the Philippines are celebrating the 75th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties. This visit will lead to further strengthening of India-Philippines relations," the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) posted on X.
The Philippines President met External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar in the national capital yesterday and said that he is confident that the bilateral talks between PM Modi and Philippines President will significantly deepen the bilateral partnership.
Several dignitaries, including External Affairs Minister Jaishankar and Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, were present at the occasion.
President Marcos is scheduled to lay a wreath at Rajghat, followed by formal bilateral talks with Prime Minister Modi at Hyderabad House. The leaders are expected to witness the exchange of key Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) and deliver press statements.
Later in the day, President Marcos will meet Union Health Minister JP Nadda and subsequently call on President Droupadi Murmu.
He is also scheduled to travel to Bengaluru, where he will meet Karnataka Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot.
Diplomatic relations between India and the Philippines were established in November 1949. Over the decades, the two countries have developed a robust partnership spanning trade and investment, defence and maritime cooperation, healthcare, agriculture, digital technologies, and education.
India's ties with the Philippines form a key pillar of its Act East Policy and its broader Indo-Pacific strategy.
President Marcos' visit in India at the invitation of PM Modi is expected to elevate bilateral ties and open new avenues for strategic cooperation between the two democratic and maritime neighbours.
UNI AAB PRS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
4 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Accel-backed Bluestone Jewellery cuts India IPO size
India's Bluestone Jewellery and Lifestyle has trimmed the size of its initial public offering, a prospectus showed on Tuesday. ADVERTISEMENT The Accel India-backed company will now issue fresh shares worth 8.2 billion rupees (about $93 million), down from 10 billion rupees earlier. Its existing shareholders, including venture capital firms Accel India and Kalaari Capital, will now sell 13.9 million shares in the offering, lower than the 24 million shares proposed earlier. Bluestone will launch the IPO on August 11 and close bids on August 13. Anchor investors will bid for the share sale on August 8. The jeweller was seeking a valuation of at least 120 billion rupees ($1.37 billion) in the IPO, Reuters reported in December, citing sources. The overall IPO size was slated to be around 30 billion rupees, the sources had said. The company may consider issuing specified securities, in consolidation with bookrunning lead managers, aggregating up to 2 billion rupees in pre-IPO placement, its draft prospectus from December said. ADVERTISEMENT The company, which sells diamond, gold, platinum and studded jewellery, competes with Titan, Kalyan Jewellers and Tribhovandas Bhimji Zaveri among listed firms in India. Proceeds from the offering will be used to fund working capital requirements and general corporate purposes, the Bluestone prospectus showed. ADVERTISEMENT Axis Capital, IIFL Capital and Kotak Mahindra Capital are its bookrunning lead managers. ($1 = 87.7790 Indian rupees) ADVERTISEMENT (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
For Pakistan & US, it is back to doing business
There is a discernible sense of satisfaction within Pakistan's strategic fraternity at the undeniable uptick in the US-Pakistan interface over the past few months. Some may dispute the extent, but given how the relationship had eroded in the past decade-and-a-half, any improvement represents a big change. Given the transactional nature that dominates the US, there is the temptation to find direct factors for the upswing in US-Pakistan relations. (AP) The principal milestones of the US-Pakistan downturn are well known. For Pakistan, the US detection and killing of Osama bin Laden in 2011 in Abbottabad was a betrayal and a public humiliation. For many Pakistanis, that the US acted clandestinely deep inside Pakistan superseded the enormity of the fact that Osama had been living there all the time under the very noses of the Pakistan military. The free fall continued with mounting US frustrations over Pakistan's double game in Afghanistan. President Trump's 2018 New Year Day tweet exemplified this view. The tweet underlined US foolishness in giving Pakistan billions of dollars in aid in return for deceit and lies! This was consistent with emergent US narratives about Pakistan, but that it was from the President himself made it doubly significant. Through the Biden tenure matters crystallised at a low plateau of bad blood and mutual recriminations. The US's final withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021 in disorder and disarray added another layer to the deep strategic mistrust and suspicion that now characterised the relationship. President Biden did not have even a telecon with Imran Khan during the time he was PM and Imran Khan in turn blamed the US for his premature ouster from power. In the meantime, most US military and security assistance was suspended. What perhaps hurt Pakistan the most was the impact this had on training programmes for Pakistan military officers in the US. All this happened also when the India-US relationship seemed effortlessly to go from strength to strength. This further highlighted the distance between Washington and Islamabad. The past few months appear quite different. The change was animated quite dramatically by Field Marshal Asim Munir being hosted by President Trump in June 2025 in the immediate aftermath of Operation Sindoor. It is most unusual — perhaps even unprecedented — for a US president to host a chief of a foreign military who is not a head of State or government. This shift also coincides with new ambiguities in the US-India interface — perhaps triggered by President Trump's constant reiteration of having prevented further escalation in the India-Pakistan conflict during Operation Sindoor. To many in Pakistan, this has 'internationalised' Kashmir and highlighted the importance of third-party intervention as equally that even the US was skeptical about India's claims and demands. There had been earlier indicators of change beginning with President Trump's acknowledgement of Pakistan's counter-terrorism assistance in his State of the Union Address in March 2025. The allocation of a significant financial package as assistance to Pakistan for maintaining its F16 aircraft despite an otherwise stringent foreign aid cutback, was another. Alongside, more even-handed references to the India-Pakistan dynamic, meetings and telephone conversations between the US secretary of State and senior Pakistan leaders further underlined this shift. The announcement of a US-Pakistan Trade Agreement, albeit with a 19% tariff on imports from Pakistan, and Trump's enthusiastic references to hydrocarbon exploration and investment, are but the latest in this trend. The trade agreement may not be the best deal Pakistan could have got, but it is not as bad as could have been, and in any case some deal was better than no deal as far as the government of Pakistan was concerned. It may well be argued that there is nothing particularly significant in these transitions, but for most Pakistanis they suggest a return of their country to the US's radar after a long period of being out in the cold. What explains this shift? Given the transactional frame of mind that dominates the US, there is always the temptation to look for a direct and material factor. Numerous reasons are, therefore, assigned for this shift in US policy. Pakistan's counter-terrorism potential and the assistance it can offer is one. That the US is keen to have some relationship with Pakistan given the growing spread of China in the region is another. There is also the view that recommendations of the US Central Command on Pakistan's military potential vis-à-vis Iran in terms of its geographical location and the value of its air bases may have registered on the Presidency amid the current situation in West and South West Asia. Some argue that this shift in policy was also pushed along by crypto currency deals, and by US interest in potential Pakistani reserves of rare earth minerals. Each of these explanations may have some merit but perhaps the weight of any or all of these should not be exaggerated. Instead, it is useful to refocus on some basics. Pakistan is the fifth largest country in the world in terms of population with some 250 million people. It is riven by instability. It has nuclear weapons. It is situated in a sensitive geo-political location, almost in a global fault line. Given these attributes it was always only a matter of time that the long downturn in US Pakistan relations would reverse and US interest in Pakistan would reignite. We are at that stage now. All major powers decide on policies based on an appreciation of their own interests and their own understandings of evolving situations. To think that the long downturn in US Pakistan relations would have simply continued or that the US would see developments from our perspective alone is, and never was, a realistic assessment. We should take this shift in our stride. If some in India feel betrayed or dismayed at this turn of events, they have only themselves to blame. TCA Raghavan is a former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan. The views expressed are personal.
Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Baseless, deeply objectionable': Jaisalmer Royal slams new NCERT textbook depicting city as part of ‘Maratha Empire'
The newly released NCERT Class 8 Social Science textbook has run into controversy, with a member of the Jaisalmer royal family objecting to a map depicting Jaisalmer as part of the Maratha empire, calling it 'historically misleading.' Chaitanya Raj Singh of the erstwhile princely state of Jaisalmer wrote in a post on X on Monday: 'The map shown in the NCERT Social Science textbook for Class 8 (Unit 3, page number 71) depicts Jaisalmer as a part of the then Maratha Empire, which is historically misleading, factually baseless, and deeply objectionable.' 'In the context of the Jaisalmer princely state, no authentic historical sources mention any Maratha dominance, invasion, taxation, or authority. On the contrary, our royal records clearly state that the Marathas never had any interference in the Jaisalmer princely state,' he added. The map he referred to shows the extent of the Maratha empire, along with tributary states, in 1759. In addition to parts of the western coast, it shows the Maratha empire as covering a large part of the northern plains and present-day Gujarat, Rajasthan, Lahore, and Peshawar. 'Such unverified and historically unsubstantiated information not only raises questions about the credibility of institutions like NCERT but also hurts our glorious history and public sentiments. This issue is not merely a textbook error but appears to be an attempt to tarnish the sacrifices, sovereignty, and valorous saga of our ancestors,' Singh wrote in his post. कक्षा 8 की NCERT की सामाजिक विज्ञान विषय पाठ्यपुस्तक (Unit 3, पृष्ठ संख्या 71) में दर्शाए गए मानचित्र में जैसलमेर को तत्कालीन मराठा साम्राज्य का भाग दर्शाया गया है, जो कि ऐतिहासिक रूप से भ्रामक, तथ्यहीन और गम्भीर रूप से आपत्तिजनक है। इस प्रकार की अपुष्ट और ऐतिहासिक साक्ष्यविहीन… — Chaitanya Raj Singh (@crsinghbhati) August 4, 2025 He urged Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan to take 'such erroneous, malicious, and agenda-driven presentations by NCERT' seriously and called for their immediate correction. 'This is not just a matter of factual correction but is connected to our historical dignity, self-respect, and the integrity of the national curriculum. Prompt and concrete action is expected on this matter,' he wrote. The NCERT has not responded to a request for comment. The new Class 8 Social Science textbook, released last month, includes a separate chapter on the Marathas. Under the old curriculum, the Class 7 History textbook had a section on the Marathas as part of a chapter on 18th-century political formations. That chapter had two maps indicating state formations during that period. While it did not mark specific boundaries, it placed the Marathas in the region of present-day Maharashtra, with arrows pointing outward to indicate their expansion, and the Rajputs around present-day Rajasthan. The chapter in the old textbook stated: 'By the 1730s, the Maratha king was recognised as the overlord of the entire Deccan peninsula.' It added: 'After raiding Delhi in 1737, the frontiers of Maratha domination expanded rapidly: into Rajasthan and the Punjab in the north; into Bengal and Orissa in the east; and into Karnataka and the Tamil and Telugu countries in the South. These were not formally included in the Maratha empire, but were made to pay tribute as a way of accepting Maratha sovereignty.'
