Suspension of US International Aid Has Serious Consequences as Ukraine Marks Three Years of War
Humanitarian operations in the region were already functioning with limited resources and struggling to access frontline areas. With funding now slashed, around 20,000 people in these high-risk zones could face severe consequences. 'As a result of this suspension, access to healthcare could become very limited for 18,000 people living in remote areas and in precarious conditions. We had to interrupt psychological support sessions for displaced and traumatized children and teenagers, and around 1,800 people in highly vulnerable situations may no longer receive financial support to cover their basic needs,' explains Ionuț Raita, Director of Action Against Hunger in Ukraine.
Ukraine is experiencing one of the world's largest displacement crises, with 6.8 million people having fled the country and 3.6 million internally displaced since February 2022. More than 80% of the displaced have been dependent on humanitarian aid for more than a year, but are struggling to find sustainable solutions to their precarious situation.
'With the advance of Russian forces in the second half of 2024, more than 200,000 people had to be evacuated from their homes. Housing is difficult to access, leaving many people vulnerable,' explains Raita.
The destruction of agricultural and industrial infrastructure coupled with the closure of businesses has led to a 22% unemployment rate in regions close to the front line, and rising prices and loss of livelihoods in these areas threaten intense food insecurity.
The conflict has also severely disrupted access to healthcare services. Repeated attacks on health infrastructures and shortages of medicines and personnel are further limiting access to care. To meet these challenges, Action Against Hunger set up mobile health teams that travel to hard-to-reach areas in the Dnipro and Kharkiv regions. This team, made up of a doctor, a nurse, a midwife, and a gynecologist, provides health care and medicines to the most vulnerable people.
Mental health has plummeted, with the threat of air strikes, displacement, and the loss of loved ones and livelihoods causing deep distress. Ten million people are likely to suffer from mental disorders in the short to medium term, and the mental health of children, who have been deprived of formal education for four years due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the war, is particularly at risk.
'Every air raid alarm not only increases the anxiety of Ukrainian children, but also their loss of learning. For children who no longer have access to schools, distance learning is made difficult by unstable Internet connections and power cuts caused by air strikes', explains Raita.
Action against Hunger has been active in Ukraine since March 2022, focusing on the eastern part of the country and working in Dnipro, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhya, Kharkiv and Sumy oblasts. The organization supported 675,364 people in 2023, providing support for health, mental health and psychosocial care, water, hygiene and sanitation, as well as food security and livelihoods. The organization has also prioritized psychosocial support for people suffering from stress and trauma, reaching 12,457 people in 2023.
Action Against Hunger leads the global movement to end hunger. We innovate solutions, advocate for change, and reach 21 million people every year with proven hunger prevention and treatment programs. As a nonprofit that works across 59 countries, our 8,900 dedicated staff members partner with communities to address the root causes of hunger, including climate change, conflict, inequity, and emergencies. We strive to create a world free from hunger, for everyone, for good.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Six More States Ban Junk Food From SNAP Benefits
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Six more states have banned junk food purchases from being bought with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has announced. West Virginia, Florida, Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas have all had new waivers approved that allow each state to modify what can and can't be bought using food benefits. Across all of these states, the change will impact approximately 8.5 million people. It brings the total number of states banning junk purchases to 12, following similar waiver approvals earlier this year for Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Nebraska and Utah. Why It Matters SNAP benefits, also known as "food stamps," are paid to low- and no-income households across the U.S. that would otherwise struggle to afford groceries. Across the country, more than 40 million people receive the allowance. A customer shops for produce at an H-E-B grocery store on February 12, 2025, in Austin, Texas. A customer shops for produce at an H-E-B grocery store on February 12, 2025, in Austin, Texas. Brandon Bell/GETTY What To Know A waiver grants flexibility by modifying specific USDA program rules, enabling states to administer the SNAP program in different ways. Various states currently have SNAP waivers in place, and they were widely implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic to help Americans get better access to food benefits. The new waivers, while different for each state, mean that starting in 2026 certain types of foods can no longer be bought using electronic benefit transfer cards, which are loaded every month with payments to spend in participating grocery providers across the country. Junk food generally refers to foods that have lots of calories, particularly those high in macronutrients such as sugar and fat, but little nutritional value. In Texas, the ban will cover soda, energy drinks, candy, and prepared desserts, while in Louisiana, soft drinks, energy drinks, and candy will be banned. Some of the waivers are less restrictive: in Colorado and West Virginia, only soft drinks will no longer be eligible for purchase. The push to tighten rules around unhealthy purchases has been led by Republican states, with Colorado being the only Democratic state to join the throng. Proponents of limiting SNAP purchases have argued removing unhealthy foods from the program will improve health outcomes, while others have argued that it controls how America's poorest eat and fails to address wider problems regarding access to affordable, healthy food. What People Are Saying Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy: "For years, SNAP has used taxpayer dollars to fund soda and candy—products that fuel America's diabetes and chronic disease epidemics. "These waivers help put real food back at the center of the program and empower states to lead the charge in protecting public health. I thank the governors who have stepped up to request waivers, and I encourage others to follow their lead. This is how we Make America Healthy Again." Texas Governor Greg Abbott: "To ensure the health and well-being of Texans, we must promote better, healthier food habits. Earlier this year, I requested a waiver from the USDA to ensure SNAP benefits cannot be used to purchase junk food. "I applaud [Agriculture] Secretary [Brooke L.] Rollins and the Trump Administration for their approval of this waiver to support and promote healthy eating habits. The state of Texas will continue to consider innovative ways for Texans to lead healthy and productive lives." Kavelle Christie, a health policy and advocacy expert and director at the Center for Regulatory Policy and Health Innovation, previously told Newsweek: "The issue isn't about individuals misusing their benefits, but their limited choices. In many rural areas and food deserts, convenience stores and fast-food chains are often the only available options. "For many families, fresh produce and healthy meals are luxuries that are unattainable, not because they do not want these foods, but because they are unavailable or too expensive." A food desert refers to an area, usually a low-income community, where residents have limited access to affordable and nutritious food, particularly fresh fruits and vegetables. What Happens Next Each of the waivers will go into effect in 2026, meaning there will be no immediate changes for SNAP beneficiaries across the impacted states for now. Most come into effect early next year.
Boston Globe
4 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Congress should reauthorize Hospital-at-Home
Advertisement Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up The Congressional Budget Office scored the Hospital-at-Home Program as Advertisement But these programs are at risk if Congress doesn't act. That's because the at-home experiment was only possible because in 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services issued a waiver requiring Medicare to reimburse for Hospital-at-Home care at the same rate as inpatient care. The waiver also let states reimburse via Medicaid, and Massachusetts is one of around a dozen states where Medicaid pays the same rate for at-home and inpatient care, according to the American Hospital Association. The waiver was extended in 2022 and 2024. Federal regulators have approved Hospital-at-Home programs Now, though, the waiver is set to expire Sept. 30, unless Congress approves a Constantinos Michaelidis, medical director of Hospital at Home at UMass Memorial Health, said UMass started the program in August 2021 when patients were waiting hours for a hospital bed. Since then, around 3,600 patients have been cared for at home after presenting at one of three hospitals. According to data provided by UMass Memorial, compared to patients using its brick-and-mortar hospitals, Hospital-at-Home patients had 60 to 70 percent lower mortality, 15 to 30 percent higher patient satisfaction, 5 to 15 percent fewer readmissions, and 80 to 90 percent fewer transfers to skilled nursing facilities after discharge. Michaelidis said he wants to eventually offer Hospital-at-Home throughout the system, and a five-year extension would provide the financial certainty to expand. 'These programs take a lot of money to get off the ground,' Michaelidis said. 'We need Congress to make sure if we spend $3 million expanding the program, it won't go away in two months.' Advertisement A similar calculation is underway at Beth Israel Lahey Health, which started offering Hospital-at-Home in August 2023 at Lahey Hospital and Medical Center. The program has grown gradually, as specialists in different fields established protocols for who can be served at home. It now admits around 100 patients a month, and the hospital recently started offering physical therapy virtually to at-home patients. Sue Stempek, vice president of BILH Hospital at Home, said the system is considering expanding the program to additional hospitals, and a long-term waiver would allow for growth and for research studies to evaluate the model's effectiveness. An open question is the cost impact. Today in Massachusetts, some commercial insurers pay inpatient rates; some pay less. Lora Pellegrini, president of the Massachusetts Association of Health Plans, said some insurers balk at paying inpatient rates when home care doesn't have the same overhead costs. But hospital officials say start-up costs are hefty for staff, equipment, and technology. South Shore Health closed its Hospital-at-Home program May 17, after 11 months. Chief of Medicine Jason Tracy said participants loved the program. But it took time for patients and clinicians to adjust to the idea, and when serving only five or six patients a day, the program lost millions of dollars. 'In this environment, you have to put your resources toward stronger financially performing programs that have greater patient demand,' Tracy said. There are efficiencies in bigger hospital systems. Mass General Brigham has treated over 7,000 patients since January 2022 in Hospital-at-Home programs run through five hospitals. The health system saved 35,000 'bed days,' a measure of how many days inpatient beds would have been filled by those patients. Advertisement Heather O'Sullivan, MGB's president of Healthcare at Home, said the program has expanded to new patient populations — like those in post-operative recovery — and the federal waiver lets the hospital scale up knowing it can recoup costs. Without the waiver, O'Sullivan worried that all but the largest health systems would be unable to make those investments. Congress should also ask federal regulators to study the costs associated with Hospital-at-Home, to determine whether insurance should continue to pay the same as for inpatient care or whether home hospital can achieve cost savings. The need to study costs shouldn't prevent Congress from reauthorizing the waiver for five years, though. Hospital-at-Home provides the care patients want with improved health outcomes, while preserving beds for patients who need inpatient care. That's a win-win-win. Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
Tom's Guide
5 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Strength and conditioning coach says ‘this is the best abs exercise you're probably not doing' — and no, it's not sit-ups
Coach Daniel Herman knows a thing or two about training strong core muscles, and he's got something better for you than sit-ups, crunches or Russian twists. You might already know it, but he's got a trick up his sleeve to make this abs exercise even more effective. 'After years of coaching athletes, clients, and everyday lifters, there's one abdominal movement I consistently return to — the hanging leg raise,' says Herman.'It's an advanced variation of a common exercise, but it's often done incorrectly or overlooked entirely. 'When performed with proper control and technique, it offers unmatched benefits for both aesthetics and function.' Here's how to do it — and one trick that will elevate this bodyweight exercise even more. Daniel is a NASM-qualified coach who has worked with a range of clients from athletes to the everyday gym-goer. He is also the founder of Bio Synergy. When it comes to core training, most people stick to what they know, like planks or crunches, but this is a move well worth investing in. 'The standard hanging leg raise involves lifting your legs while hanging from a bar,' Herman explains. 'But the key difference here is the posterior pelvic tilt at the top of the movement — a subtle but powerful action where you tuck your pelvis upward, rounding the lower back slightly. 'This small shift dramatically increases abdominal activation by engaging the lower fibers of the rectus abdominis and eliminating the momentum that often makes the movement less effective.' Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Herman tells us that most people don't realize the lower abdominals are notoriously difficult to target effectively. 'Movements that seem like they train them — like leg lifts or even planks — often recruit the hip flexors more than the abs,' he says. 'But when you incorporate the pelvic tilt, you're no longer relying on swinging or momentum. Instead, you're forcing your abs to contract through their full range of motion. That's where the magic happens.' Benefits include improved lower abdominal activation, strengthening the deep core stabilizers that support your spine and pelvis, better control and coordination during compound lifts, enhanced mobility and a reduced risk of hip flexor dominance or lower back pain. These benefits can translate directly to athletic movements like jumping, sprinting and changing direction. 'In my experience as a strength and conditioning coach, very few core exercises offer as much reward as this one, particularly when it comes to functional strength and body control. 'Whether you're a powerlifter, a field sport athlete, or simply someone trying to build a solid midsection, this movement delivers. It's also scalable — beginners can bend their knees and work their way up, while advanced athletes can add resistance or perform tempo-based reps.' Herman recommends prioritizing form over volume to get the most out of it. Herman recommends pairing the hanging leg raise with pelvic tilt with anti-rotation work (like the Pallof press) for a 'balanced, bulletproof core routine.' 'Not all abdominal exercises are created equal, and sometimes the lesser-known variations provide the biggest returns,' Herman explains. 'The hanging leg raise with posterior pelvic tilt isn't flashy, but it's brutally effective. Train it consistently, with intention and precision, and you'll not only see changes in your midsection, you'll feel stronger, move better and lift heavier across the board.' Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
