
Crude Oil ‘s Seasonal And Technical Outlook
The NYMEX launched the West Texas Light Crude oil contract in 1983. Soon, their price action, as well as that of the T-Bond and gold futures became a regular part of my analytical routine. This led to instructional presentations for oil traders in Singapore and London. WTI is now traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) which provided a 40-year history.
Many crude oil traders use fundamental data to measure supply and demand in order to forecast prices. In my technical approach, I look at the actual futures price data as well as the volume and open interest to determine where prices are heading.
Crude Oil Monthly
This monthly chart goes back to early 2021 as the monthly DTS (created by my colleague Jerry A) generated a buy signal (see arrow) in January 2021. Crude oil prices traded higher until peaking in June 2023 after a high of $123.68. Crude oil had spent several months above the starc+ band, so it was in a high-risk buy area.
The monthly sell signal came in August (see arrow) and prices subsequently declined $25 before a low in May of 2023. The new monthly buy was generated in July 2023 as crude oil closed back above its 20- month EMA. The rally terminated three months later as it acted like a bear market rally as crude oil failed to overcome the 50% resistance at $93.82.
In 2024, crude oil prices drifted lower, and then in April of 2025, WTI closed below the support line A, at $65.41. The three-month rally from the low at $55.12 peaked at $78.40 and briefly moved above the yearly pivot at $74.94 (in purple), but was not able to close above it, which kept the yearly trend negative
On the bottom of the chart is the Aspray Insight indicator, a derivation of the relative performance, developed by Jerry A. This indicator has been in a downtrend since late 2023, indicating that WTI was going to be weaker than the S&P 500. So far in 2025, WTI is down 8.9% year-to-date while the S&P 500 is up 7.9%.
Crude Oil Weekly
This weekly chart shows that the recent WTI move above the yearly pivot at $74.94 (in purple) reached or exceeded the weekly starc+ band before it turned lower. Below the chart is plotted the Seasonal Trend, which is calculated using the WTI data since 1984. Based on this data, WTI prices typically bottom on December 13th and then typically will top out on July 4th.
It has always been my approach that the Seasonal Trend analysis should only be followed when it agrees with the technical outlook. The negative monthly analysis of crude oil and the current signs of failing rallies in the Energy Select (XLE) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration (XOP) mean that August may be a tough month for oil prices and the oil stocks. A drop in crude oil or the energy ETFs below the July lows should confirm a new decline.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China's soymeal glut raises demand doubts ahead of US soybean export season
By Ella Cao and Naveen Thukral BEIJING/SINGAPORE (Reuters) -China's appetite for soybeans is likely to weaken during the peak U.S. marketing season later this year, as record imports earlier in 2025 and tepid demand from animal feed producers have pushed up soymeal inventories at home, trade sources said. The world's biggest soybean importer has yet to book U.S. cargoes for the fourth quarter, with traders closely monitoring talks in Stockholm aimed at resolving longstanding economic disputes at the centre of the U.S.-China trade war. A slowdown in Chinese demand could pressure Chicago soybean futures, which are already down for a second consecutive week on expectations of a bumper U.S. harvest. [GRA/] China's soymeal futures fell for a fourth straight session on Tuesday amid ample supplies. In the physical market, spot soymeal in north China was quoted at 2,925 yuan ($408) per metric ton, down 6.5% from 3,130 yuan a year ago, said Wang Wenshen, an analyst at Shandong province-based consultancy Sublime China Information. "If third-quarter prices stay weak and crushers face losses, fourth-quarter soybean purchases may fall short of expectations," Wang said. The last quarter of the year is typically the main U.S. soybean marketing season. China's overall soybean imports hit a record high in May and their second-highest level in June, boosting oilseed processing and leading to a buildup in soymeal inventories, traders said. CRUSHER SHUTDOWNS The surplus is straining China's crushing plants, with some already shutting down due to storage constraints. "Small-scale shutdowns have already begun at crushing plants in regions like south China primarily because soybean meal has accumulated with no room for more stock," said a Shanghai-based trader, adding that a broader suspension was "highly likely". Crush margins in Rizhao, China's main processing hub, have been negative since mid-May. The glut has been worsened by weak demand from animal feed producers amid sluggish meat consumption in the world's top pork market. Crushers will face "huge soymeal stock pressure" over the next one to two months, said Cheang Kang Wei, vice president at StoneX in Singapore. Authorities have pledged to cut breeding sow numbers, curb new capacity, and reduce soymeal use in feed to stabilise meat prices after steep declines this year, measures analysts say will further limit soymeal consumption. China's purchases of Argentine soymeal, amid high tariffs of U.S. beans, in the last few weeks are likely to add to the glut. "Even with such big supply of soymeal in the local market, it is profitable to import meal from Argentina," said a Singapore-based trader at an international trading company. "This will only add to the stocks of soymeal." A trade deal with Washington could shift buying patterns. "If a trade deal is reached, Chinese buyers could resume U.S. purchases for the fourth quarter, as prices are favourable without tariffs," said Johnny Xiang, founder of Beijing-based AgRadar Consulting. ($1 = 7.1767 Chinese yuan)
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Barclays posts profit beat and announces £1bn share buyback
Barclays (BARC.L) beat profit expectations in the second quarter and announced a further £1bn in share buybacks. Pre-tax profit rose 28% in the second quarter to £2.84bn, results released on Tuesday showed. That exceeded expectations of £2.24bn, according to consensus estimates provided by the bank. For the first half, profit before tax totalled £5.2bn, which was up 23% from the same period last year. Total income was up 14% in the second quarter at £7.19bn, which was also ahead of expectations of £7.01bn. Group net interest income — the gap between what the bank pays out to savers and receives from borrowers in interest — excluding Barclays Investment Bank and head office, came in at £3.1bn, up 13% year-on-year. Barclays also recorded a return on tangible equity — a key measure of profitability — of 12.3% in the second quarter, up from 9.9% for the same period in 2024. The bank announced a further share buyback of £1bn and a half-year dividend of 3p per share. This came after Barclays said on Friday that it had completed the £1bn share buyback programme it announced in its full-year results in February. Barclays CEO CS Venkatakrishnan, known as Venkat, said: "We remain on track to achieve the objectives of our three-year plan, delivering structurally higher and more stable returns for our investors. Read more: NatWest beats on profits and announces £750m share buyback "At the mid-point of the plan, with six quarters of consistent execution, we have achieved over half of the c.£30bn planned UK risk weighted assets (RWAs) growth, half of the target income growth and realised two-thirds of the £2bn planned gross cost efficiency savings." The bank had posted a stronger-than-expected 19% rise in first-quarter profits in results released at the end of April, as improved performance in its investment banking division helped the UK lender outpace analyst forecasts. Pre-tax profit for the three months to March rose to £2.7bn, exceeding analysts' expectations of £2.49bn, according to data from LSEG. Group revenues reached £7.7bn, also ahead of the consensus estimate of £7.33bn. Read more: Tesla disappoints while Alphabet tops expectations to kick off Mag 7 earnings The big tax change set to push vulnerable people out of work How to get the best currency exchange deal for your holiday moneySign in to access your portfolio


Entrepreneur
9 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Founders, Step Up
This Government has shown it is taking UK tech seriously, now founders need to step up too Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. For those that remember the heady days of David Cameron, George Osborne and the then Mayor of London Boris Johnson finding every opportunity to come to Old Street roundabout to celebrate the area's emerging startups, the first nine months of the new Labour administration gave the impression of a Government that was largely indifferent to tech. However, the last six weeks have changed that. Starting with some major AI commitments announced alongside Jenson Huang from NVIDIA at London Tech Week (a much more high profile tech leader than former PMs were able to bring to the UK's flagship tech event), followed by the Spending Review and the Modern Industrial Strategy, the Government has set out a clear roadmap for founders about where its priorities for policy and investment will lie. As a VC very active in the UK early-stage ecosystem, of course we don't look to Government for guidance on investment opportunities, or expect Government to have the power to dictate innovation. But the Government does play an important role in the ecosystem. Firstly, it has a loud voice. And anything the Government can do to showcase success, signal the scale of the opportunity for UK companies and demonstrate a real commitment to back British tech innovation sends a strong message to international investors and customers looking to work with new start-ups. But more importantly, the Government can create material commercial opportunities by unlocking the UK's massive public sectors for digital innovation. And this matters for start-ups. And that is what was most exciting about these policy announcements in recent weeks. They give a very clear sense of where Government will be focusing its funding, procurement and regulation. And these are big industries with huge potential for digital disruption that we're talking about. From the NHS to national defence, from education to green industries - there are billion-dollar opportunities for start-ups who know how to look for them. What caught my attention wasn't just the scale of investment, but how these announcements add up to something bigger - a government that finally understands tech isn't just about apps and algorithms, but about rebuilding Britain's industrial base: With a new £27.8bn National Wealth Fund prioritising clean energy, digital, manufacturing, the UK is now a major co-investor in climate infrastructure The UK now sees defencetech and dual-use innovation as core to its industrial future, not just its national safety, with a new £2bn+ annual defence R&D budget Dedicating £1bn+ for cross-government digital and AI transformation will unlock a new era of govtech innovation. The most important is the Government's push for Digital ID. This will have major repercussions for fintechs and the way individuals interact with public services The UK wants to lead in making the things that matter, from biomanufacturing to smart robotics to deeptech scale-up. With £2.5bn for quantum, £1bn for semiconductors and £1bn+ for compute, AI, and synthetic biology this is about scaling up national capabilities The NHS will undergo one of the biggest programmes of digital transformation the world has ever seen. £10bn committed to NHS tech and digital transformation will put tech at the heart of our NHS. The regions matter. The Government will be investing in clusters up and down the country, which is good news for founders based outside of the capital. Significant expansion of the British Business Bank (to £25.6bn) makes it one of the most important state-backed investors in Europe. Now, I know what you're thinking. Government promises are cheap, and Whitehall's track record on tech delivery is mixed at best. Fair enough. But here's what's different this time: these aren't moonshot commitments decades away. This is funding that's being deployed now, with departments that have clear mandates and Ministers who understand the urgency. So what does this actually mean for founders building companies right now in the UK? These policy announcements signal the Government's attention. These are the sectors which Ministers, policymakers and Treasury officials will be prioritising in the coming years. If you're a pre-seed founder, building for alignment with UK capability priorities is a very sensible idea. These are the sectors where decisions will be made faster, and budget will be more available. Here's the practical bit: start with your local Catapult centre - they're your fastest route into government procurement conversations. Then work backwards through Innovate UK and UKRI. Don't pitch your product; pitch the problem you solve. If you're building AI for fraud detection, lead with "we can save the public sector £2.6bn annually" not "we've built a great ML model." Founders become adept very quickly at speaking the language of their core customers. Founders learn to speak 'corporate' early on if they are selling to enterprises and global organisations. The same should be true for founders speaking to Government. Learn their language and frame things in terms of outcomes, resilience and productivity. The UK is hungry for globally ambitious founders building 'infrastructure layers' in every sector. If founders can demonstrate they are building national capabilities to increase UK digital sovereignty they will be welcomed with open arms by Government. Rightly so, international events have overshadowed many of the policy announcements. But to my mind they are the most significant combination of Government policies for UK founders in many years. This won't last forever. Political priorities shift, budgets get cut, Ministers move on. But right now, for the first time in years, government and private markets are aligned on what Britain needs to build. The founders who move fast on this will have a structural advantage that lasts decades. The question isn't whether you can build a billion-dollar company in this environment. It's whether you can afford not to try.