58.89% Delhi University aspirants opt for humanities, SRCC, Hindu college preferred
In terms of colleges, Sri Ram College of Commerce (SRCC) led the list, receiving 38,795 first preferences. It was followed by Hindu College with 31,901, Hansraj College with 15,902, St. Stephen's College with 12,413, and Miranda House with 11,403.Among BA programmes, combinations of humanities subjects were the most preferred. BA (History + Political Science) topped the list with 7,60,233 preferences, followed by BA (Economics + Political Science) at 3,88,407, and BA (English + Economics) at 3,49,367.Stream-wise, Humanities-based programmes were chosen by 58.89% of candidates, Commerce-based programmes by 20.89%, and Science-based programmes by 20.22%.The university has recorded over 5.75 crore (5,75,80,700) total Programme + College preferences across 1,549 unique combinations, reflecting the scale of participation and competition in this year's admissions.Following the announcement of Simulated Ranks, DU has re-opened the preference-editing window for candidates. Students can revise, reorder, delete, or add new preferences until 11:59 pm on Wednesday, July 16, 2025.However, they must ensure to regularly save their preferences, as only saved entries will be considered for the final allocation.The university clarified that these Simulated Ranks are tentative and are intended to help candidates make informed changes to their preferences. These ranks do not guarantee final admissions or indicate actual rank positions in the merit list.The next phase will involve final preference locking and allocation based on CUET-UG scores and saved programme-college choices.- Ends
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Undergraduate admissions in Gujarat under GCAS cross 2.6L mark in special Phase 1
Ahmedabad: The Gujarat Common Admission System (GCAS) successfully completed Special Phase 1 of undergraduate admissions, with 2,66,699 students confirming their admissions across various universities and colleges in the state by 5pm on July 15. This figure represents 77.06% of the 3,46,096 verified applicants during the current admission cycle, indicating strong participation in the centralised admission process. As per the data released, a total of 3,65,710 students registered under Phase 1, Phase 2, and the special phase. Out of these, 3,46,096 applications were verified. Based on their preferences and college intake capacities, 2,90,249 admission offers were extended to students. Among these, 2,78,649 students confirmed their admission through the online mode, while 2,66,699 students confirmed their admission by physically visiting the allotted university or college. Moving forward, students seeking UG admissions can now register for Special Phase 2 from July 14 to July 21. Additionally, students can visit the nearest verification centres for document verification between July 14 and July 22, wherever applicable. The admission process for Special Phase 2 will be conducted in five rounds, beginning on July 24. You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad At the postgraduate level, Round 7 of the second phase of PG admissions commenced on July 15 through the GCAS portal and will conclude on July 16. On the first day of this round, 56,076 PG students confirmed their admission across various institutions by 5pm. With both undergraduate and postgraduate admissions progressing efficiently, the GCAS portal continues to streamline the higher education enrolment process in Gujarat for the academic year 2025-26.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
Why Manchester United are struggling to sign players this transfer window?
With just about a week remaining before the start of the pre-season, Manchester United find themselves in a tricky spot in the summer transfer window. Despite their status as 20-time English champions, the club has only managed to make one major signing so far, Matheus Cunha. This limited activity is raising concerns among fans, especially after United's worst Premier League finish since Sir Alex Ferguson's era. So, what's holding back Manchester United from bringing in the reinforcements they desperately need? The transfer market conundrum: sales before signings At the heart of the issue lies the club's need to generate funds through player sales before they can effectively invest in new signings. Unlike some clubs with abundant cash reserves, United rely heavily on offloading unwanted players to balance their transfer budget. However, so far, there have been no significant permanent departures from Old Trafford this summer. After securing Cunha last month, United moved quickly to target Mbeumo, a striker seen as essential to bolstering their attack. Their initial £55 million offer was rejected, and a follow-up bid reportedly exceeding £60 million is still on the table. However, Brentford remain firm on their valuation, leading to stalled talks. Meanwhile, Mbeumo himself is growing frustrated by the protracted negotiations, eager to join the Red Devils. This impasse highlights the bigger problem: United cannot finalize big-money signings without first creating room in the squad and budget. Reliance on big sales to fund new arrivals United's priority list for summer departures includes high-profile names like Marcus Rashford, Jadon Sancho, Antony, and Alejandro Garnacho. None of these players are currently involved in first-team training, signaling the club's willingness to sell. Marcus Rashford is valued at around £40 million Antony is priced at approximately £32.5 million Jadon Sancho could fetch between £20-25 million Alejandro Garnacho, the most valuable of the quartet, has a price tag estimated between £50-60 million United rebuffed a £40 million bid for Garnacho from Napoli earlier this year, aiming to maximize the return for the talented 21-year-old winger. The problem is, until these sales are confirmed and funds secured, United's transfer activity will remain limited. Without money coming in, the club cannot comfortably commit to high-value signings beyond Cunha. Strengthening the squad Is urgent for Man Utd Manchester United finished a disappointing 15th in the Premier League last season and urgently need to strengthen their attack and overall squad depth. Signing Cunha, who scored 17 goals last season, was a step in the right direction, but the club still needs a proven striker to lead the line. Their negative goal difference of -10 from last season reflects just how much attacking reinforcements are needed, but that will only happen once United solve the sales puzzle. INEOS to change the United approach Over the years, Manchester United had been buying players and promising clubs to pay the transfer sum over a period of the contract, the result of which the club has accumulated over 170 million pounds in transfer money that is still owed to the clubs. The players might not be still playing for the club but the money is still owed. With Sir Jim Ratcliffe and CEO Omar Berrada having a say in the scheme of things now, they want the club to stop this practice and are trying to buy players only after they are done selling the deadwood or any major departure within the club. A long-awaited return to selling big If United can complete the sale of Garnacho or other key players for substantial fees, it would mark the first time since Romelu Lukaku's £74 million departure in 2019 that the club has raised over £50 million from a single transfer. Historically, Manchester United have struggled to extract top fees for their players, which has limited their ability to reinvest heavily. This summer, the club must break that pattern if they want to compete at the highest level again. All in all, Manchester United's transfer struggles this summer boil down to one simple problem. Until they successfully sell key players and free up funds, the Red Devils will remain stuck, unable to bring in the reinforcements they desperately need. The clock is ticking, and the pressure is mounting on the club's transfer strategy ahead of the new season. Will Ruben Amorim have a say in the transfers? Manchester United manager Ruben Amorim has maintained the same authority he has wielded since his arrival. Not long after taking charge, he made the bold decision to drop Marcus Rashford from the squad, and has now reportedly informed Alejandro Garnacho, one of the few remaining bright sparks in attack, that he doesn't fit into his plans either. Amorim is also significantly influencing the club's transfer strategy. United appear to be focusing on signing players who are already proven in the Premier League and familiar with the 3-4-2-1 formation that Amorim prefers. How the squad adapts to his methods—and whether there will be further tensions between him and key personalities—remains to be seen. This is, after all, the same coach who once smashed a television in frustration after a loss to Brighton and publicly called his squad one of the worst in the club's history. He is likely eager for the pre-season to begin, as United are still struggling to fully implement his tactical approach. Pre-season also gives him a crucial window to address the squad's sub-par fitness, something he identified early on as lagging behind their league rivals. With four friendlies against Premier League opposition scheduled over the next month, Amorim will gain valuable insight into his team, but those fixtures also bring added pressure. A string of poor results could set a troubling tone before the competitive matches even start.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Detroit schools at risk of losing over $16 million as US federal education funds are withheld
Detroit schools at risk of losing over $16 million in US federal funding freeze. Detroit Public Schools, already grappling with some of the highest poverty rates in the country, are facing a major financial setback as more than $16 million in federal education funding is being withheld. The White House has paused the release of $6.2 billion in education funds across the country, impacting hundreds of school districts. But Detroit ranks among the hardest hit, raising urgent questions about how schools will prepare for the upcoming academic year without the support they were legally promised. Although the funds were approved by Congress and signed into law under the Trump administration, the delay in distribution is now threatening key programs that support teacher development, after-school learning, mental health services, and English learners. What programs are being affected The withheld funding covers five major federal education programs: Educator development (Title II) Student enrichment and support (Title IV) Migrant education Support for English language learners 21st Century Community Learning Centers While full data for migrant education is not available, the other four programs account for a projected $81.6 million loss in Michigan. This equals about $65 per student statewide, according to data compiled by the education policy group New America. Detroit alone stands to lose more than $16 million, with some of the steepest losses nationally in programs aimed at supporting low-income and vulnerable students. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Elevate Business Writing With This Desktop App Grammarly Learn More Undo Detroit's poverty rate and high dependency on federal aid Detroit Public Schools serve one of the most economically disadvantaged student populations in the country. The district has the highest school-age poverty rate (46.9 percent) among 46 states. These schools heavily rely on federal programs to fund after-school services, academic enrichment, teacher training, and student wellness initiatives. Because many of these programs are tied to poverty-related formulas, Detroit is more dependent on them than wealthier districts. A pause in this funding puts not only programs but student learning and staff planning at immediate risk. Democratic districts bearing the brunt in Michigan In Michigan, the funding freeze is hitting school districts represented by Democrats harder than those represented by Republicans. Democratic districts are projected to lose $45 million, compared to $36.6 million for Republican districts. Average loss per district in Democratic areas: $7.5 million Average loss in Republican areas: $5.2 million On a per-student basis, Democratic-led districts are expected to lose $84 per student, while Republican-led ones would lose $51 per student. This pattern is a sharp contrast to the national trend, where Republican-led districts are seeing larger per-student cuts. The unique situation in Michigan is partly due to Detroit's heavy dependence on federal aid and its inclusion among the top ten districts at highest risk. The hardest-hit districts: Detroit takes centre stage The congressional district represented by Rep. Shri Thanedar (D-Detroit) is facing the highest per-student funding loss in the country: $210 per student. Rep. Rashida Tlaib's district, also in Detroit, is next in line, with a projected loss of $87 per student. These losses are especially concerning given that these districts already contend with widespread poverty, staffing shortages, and limited local funding alternatives. The funding freeze comes at a time of added financial instability. The Republican-controlled Michigan House of Representatives failed to pass the state's education budget by the July 1 deadline, compounding the uncertainty. With federal and state budgets unresolved, school districts are unable to plan effectively. Even if they attempt to temporarily cover program costs using local or reserve funds, federal regulations may prevent them from reallocating those funds later when and if the federal money is finally released. What this means for students and educators The loss of funding could lead to scaled-back after-school programs, reduced access to mental health services, delays in curriculum development, and less training for teachers. These setbacks may be most deeply felt in Detroit's most vulnerable communities, where such support is essential. Beyond the financial impact, there is also a symbolic cost. The delay sends a discouraging message to students and families in already underserved areas, especially as they prepare to return to school in just a few weeks. A school year clouded by uncertainty With over $16 million at stake and the school year fast approaching, Detroit Public Schools are caught in a storm of political delay and financial ambiguity. For students already navigating the challenges of poverty and educational inequity, the funding freeze could not come at a worse time. Unless urgent action is taken at both the federal and state levels, Detroit's students and educators may find themselves starting the academic year with fewer resources, reduced support, and more uncertainty than ever. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
