logo
55 Years Later, An Emotional Homecoming For Maharashtra Minister At 'Meghdoot'

55 Years Later, An Emotional Homecoming For Maharashtra Minister At 'Meghdoot'

NDTV15 hours ago
In a heartwarming moment, Maharashtra's Tourism Minister and Shiv Sena leader Shambhuraj Desai was seen in tears as he stepped into the government bungalow 'Meghdoot,' the very home where he was born and raised over five decades ago.
The emotional homecoming unfolded on Sunday, as Desai, accompanied by his family, officially shifted into the Meghdoot bungalow, recently allotted to him under the Mahayuti government.
What made the moment even more emotional was that the Grihapravesh (housewarming) ceremony coincided with his mother's birthday. Desai and his mother were quite overwhelmed with emotions.
The Meghdoot bungalow was once the official residence of Loknete Balasaheb Desai, the former Home Minister of Maharashtra and grandfather of Shambhuraj Desai. The Desai family lived in this house for many years, and it was during this time, 55 years ago, that Shambhuraj was born here.
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis and Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde had also accepted Desai's personal request to be allotted the same bungalow.
On Monday, Minister Desai met with Chief Minister Fadnavis to express his gratitude for the bungalow allotment. He also shared pictures from the meeting on social media platform Instagram.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Shambhuraj Desai (@mlashambhurajdesai)
In a separate post, the Tourism Minister gave a glimpse into his new beginnings, sharing images of himself commencing work from his newly allotted residence, 'Meghdoot.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jarange Patil to hold morcha to Mumbai to demand Maratha reservation
Jarange Patil to hold morcha to Mumbai to demand Maratha reservation

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Jarange Patil to hold morcha to Mumbai to demand Maratha reservation

Ahead of the local bodies' elections this year, activist Manoj Jarange Patil has planned a morcha in Mumbai to demand reservation for Marathas on August 29. Jarange Patil is touring the state to revive his network with local units and community leaders. Jarange Patil held a meeting with his followers at Dharashiv (Marathwada). Speaking to the media, he issued a stern warning to Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to not interfere with their plans nor make any attempts to scuttle it. 'Don't meddle with our morcha. You have done it in the past and paid a heavy price,' he said. 'The Maratha community is fighting for its rights. I represent the poor and oppressed Marathas who are denied quotas. Any attempt on your part (Devendra Fadnavis) will invite backlash. And it's consequences will not only adversely impact the Maharashtra government, but also the Narendra Modi government.' After the 2024 Lok Sabha and Assembly Elections, Jarange Patil has been quiet. The Maratha reservation was an important plank which went against the BJP in the Lok Sabha polls where the party won just nine seats and along with alliance partners Shiv Sena (7) and NCP (one), it's tally was restricted to just 17 seats out of 48. Whereas, the Maha Vikas Aghadi comprising Congress (14), Shiv Sena- UBT(9) and NCP (8) together made up for 31 seats. However, the Maratha reservation factor did not make much of an impact in the Assembly polls held six months later in November 2024. As OBC consolidation along with other factors saw BJP emerge as the single largest party with 132 seats. With alliance partners Shiv Sena (57) and NCP (41) it's tally added to 230 seats out of 288. With an absolute majority, the Fadnavis-led Mahayuti is on a strong footing in the state. Despite agitations and poll promises by the ruling and opposition parties over the years, Maratha reservation remains a sensitive issue which remains unresolved. During the Eknath Shinde-led government of 2022-2024, the state adopted a unanimous resolution in the state legislative assembly and council giving ten per cent reservation to Marathas in government educational institutions and jobs. The decision was rejected by Jarange Patil, who wanted Maratha reservation within the OBC quota. In Maharashtra, OBCs are entitled to 27 per cent quota. Along with other groups including Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribes, OBCs, Special Backward Category, Nomadic Tribes, it makes up for a total 51 per cent. Exactly, two years ago on August 29, 2023 Jarange Patil held demonstration at his native village Antarwali Sarathi in Jalna district in Marathwada region. At that time Shinde was CM and Fadnavis was deputy CM with home portfolio. The 43 years old Maratha activist known for his unwavering commitment to reservation for the community was then just seen as a local leader. However, police lathicharge on the protestors who were violent invited sharp reaction from community across Maharashtra. And Jarange Patil become larger than life leader representing the cause of Maratha quota. Despite strong resentment from established leaders he elicited support amongst the masses and patronage from politicians who were against BJP led Mahayuti government. Although the demand for Maratha reservation had been voiced way back in 1980s, it took the form of an organised protest in 2016 to 2018 during first tenure of the Fadnavis government (2014-2019). The agitation for reservation was organised as Maratha Kranti Morcha. The first phase of the agitation, which saw 58 silent rallies across Maharashtra, was peaceful and highly disciplined in 2016 to 2017. In the second phase of the agitation — from 2017-2018 that rocked the state following a spate of suicides — saw the state government expeditiously set up the M G Gaikwad Commission, which gave a nod for Maratha quota. It was followed by the government's decision to come out with a special legislation, The Socially and Educationally Backward Class Act, to accommodate Maratha reservation. The community, under the SEBC act, got 12 and 13 per cent reservation in education and job. Jarange-Patil played a pro-active role in all these agitations as an activist. He had not yet risen to the status of a leader during this time, a role the agitations had been missing. In the past, he had associated himself with the Congress party at the taluka level. However, he soon left the party and started the Shivba Sanghatana in 2011. His stated objective of the newly formed organisation was to campaign for the rights of Marathas. Like any other youth, he was also highly influenced by the role of the Maratha warrior kings Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj and Sambhaji Maharaj. He took the lead along with other villagers in organising the birth anniversaries of Shivaji and Sambhaji Maharaj and also addressed the rural audience. He had actively participated in organising a play on Sambhaji Raje enacted by NCP (MP) Amol Kolhe in his taluka and neighbourhood. The rape and murder of a 15-year-old girl in Kopardi village in Ahmednagar district, which led the Marathas to consolidate and plan an agitation, also had a lasting influence on him. Jarange Patil participated in long marches in Marathwada region as an activist. In 2018, the Fadnavis government announced 12 and 13 per cent quota to Marathas in education and jobs respectively. However, the quota was challenged in court through a public litigation questioning its social backwardness. The Supreme Court had in May 2021 struck down reservation for Marathas under the Socially and Educationally Backward Class Act. The reason was that the reservation violated the 50 per cent ceiling mandated for the state. Secondly, questions were also raised about the social backward status of Marathas, which was the politically dominant community with 33 per cent state population.

Backlash Erupts Over Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle Photoshoot Amid Political Controversy and Comparisons to 2009 Campaign
Backlash Erupts Over Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle Photoshoot Amid Political Controversy and Comparisons to 2009 Campaign

Hans India

time2 hours ago

  • Hans India

Backlash Erupts Over Sydney Sweeney's American Eagle Photoshoot Amid Political Controversy and Comparisons to 2009 Campaign

The debate surrounding American Eagle Outfitters' "Great Jeans" campaign featuring Sydney Sweeney does not appear to be slowing down. Over the course of more than 10 days, advertisements with "The White Lotus" actress are generating news coverage and social media rebukes. U.S. President Donald Trump has fueled the eugenics controversy during the weekend and David Lipman, a veteran advertising creative director on Monday, suggested to suggest that this American Eagle campaign recreated the look he created in 2009 when he collaborated by collaborating with Georgia May Jagger for Hudson Jeans. When a reporter revealed the voter registration status of Sydney Sweeney, Trump commented on Truth Social and called her the most talked about and viral ad campaign on the market. Trump acknowledged the great jeans genes ad and said it was flying off the shelves and encouraged Sydney to keep up her efforts. A media inquiry for the U.S. Office of Government Ethics seeking to know if Trump endorsement was in line the rules regarding "Endorsing Organizations, Products or Persons" was not acknowledged on Monday. American Eagle's stock surge 23.5 percent to close at $13.28. This is a significant increase compared to Friday which saw it drop by just a fraction of 1. At 27years old, Sweeney's Instagram following has risen to 25 million by Friday night, to 25.2 million. Additionally the popularity of her American Eagle campaign video has grown to 1.3 million views and attracted between 36,600 to 57,600 responses an increase of 57,600 from 5,483 posts earlier during the same time. Based on Susan Scafidi, founder and director of the Fashion Law Institute at Fordham University If Sydney B. Sweeney registered as an Republican within Florida was the exact person that is being discussed as a possible candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, then party operatives could be forming narratives that have white supremacist themes.

Bombay high court rejects bail application of former BJP MLA Ganpat Gaikwad in police station firing case
Bombay high court rejects bail application of former BJP MLA Ganpat Gaikwad in police station firing case

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Bombay high court rejects bail application of former BJP MLA Ganpat Gaikwad in police station firing case

Kalyan: The Bombay high court on Tuesday rejected the bail applications of former BJP MLA Ganpat Gaikwad and three other accused in the sensational case of firing inside a police station on Shiv Sena politician Mahesh Gaikwad last year. Later, Mahesh Gaikwad held a press conference in Kalyan, welcoming the court decision. He urged that the case be transferred to a fast-track court, citing its seriousness, to ensure swift justice. According to the prosecution, on the night of Feb 2 last year, members of two rival political groups—supporters of Ganpat Gaikwad and Mahesh Gaikwad—gathered at the Hill Line Police Station in Ulhasnagar, seeking registration of criminal cases against each other. Around 9.30 pm, while Mahesh Gaikwad, who was the Kalyan president of the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena, was inside the cabin of senior police inspector Anil Jagtap along with two others, Ganpat and his associates entered the cabin. A heated argument broke out between the factions. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai As Jagtap stepped outside to manage the situation, Ganpat allegedly pulled out a concealed revolver and opened fire at Mahesh Gaikwad and his associate Rahul Patil. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like AI in video surveillance: game-changer or challenge? Axis Read More Undo He also reportedly aimed at Chainu Jadhav, an informant. Multiple bullets struck Mahesh, who collapsed on the spot. The prosecution further claimed that Ganpat then sat on Mahesh and struck him repeatedly on the head with the butt of the revolver. One of the co-accused, identified as Kene, allegedly entered the cabin later and fired four rounds at Mahesh, slapped Jadhav, and, along with another accused, identified as Patil, assaulted Mahesh's bodyguard and attempted to snatch his firearm. All four accused were arrested on charges of attempt to murder, unlawful assembly and conspiracy to create terror within the police station premises. The advocate appearing for Ganpat Gaikwad argued that the act was not premeditated and that Ganpat had no prior intention to visit the police station or harm anyone. However, opposing the bail plea, Mahesh Gaikwad's lawyers, Abhishek Kulkarni and Sagar Vakale, pointed to the gravity of the offence and supported the prosecution's claim with evidence such as CCTV footage and forensic reports. Justice Amit Borkar noted: "Considering the totality of circumstances, including the gravity of the offence, nature of the allegations, prima facie evidence such as CCTV footage, ballistic and forensic reports, and serious apprehension of tampering with evidence and influencing witnesses, the court is of the considered view that this case does not warrant the exercise of discretionary powers in favour of the applicant. " The judge said: "If ultimately proved, the offence is not only heinous but also reflects a complete disregard for the rule of law and public safety. The location of the offence—inside a police station—and the conduct of the accused raise serious concerns about obstruction of justice if bail is granted." The high court said the principle of parity, though well-settled in bail jurisprudence, is not an absolute or inflexible rule. It said it is a guiding consideration which must be applied judiciously and with caution. Merely because bail has been granted to one of the co-accused does not, by itself, create a vested right in favour of another accused to claim similar relief, said th ecourt. It said the court must be satisfied that the role, nature of allegations, degree of involvement, and surrounding circumstances of the applicant are identical or similarly situated to those of the accused who has been granted bail. It said engaging in such violent acts within the precincts of a police station, that too against a bodyguard, strikes at the very foundation of the rule of law. The court said it creates an atmosphere of fear and lawlessness and sends a wrong message that even the police machinery can be rendered helpless in the face of political power or group violence. It said such actions, if left unchecked or viewed leniently at the stage of bail, may seriously erode public confidence in law enforcement agencies and in the justice delivery system. "Therefore, looking at the nature and gravity of the allegations, the location of the incident, the role played by the applicants, and the potential impact on public confidence in the rule of law, I am not inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the applicants for grant of bail at this stage," the judge said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store