Defunct nonprofit run by Mark Robinson's wife misses deadline to pay more than $100,000 owed to NCDHHS
According to the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, a final decision was issued in the case of Balanced Nutrition Inc.'s disallowances on March 24.
are deductions or monetary benefits that a person or organization files for but is not entitled to. When a disallowance is found during an audit, the individual or organization must give back the amount of money that was granted by the disallowed deduction or benefit. Balanced Nutrition Inc.'s disallowances are separate from the , which deal more with operational issues rather than financial issues.
The document, which is 25 pages long, outlines the steps that the NCDHHS took to determine how much money Balanced Nutrition Inc. owes after it improperly assessed and represented its services of connecting child care centers with federally funded meal programs.
Their initial disallowance was calculated at $132,118.86, but, upon appeal and review, that amount was adjusted to $101,142.05, and the Office of Administrative Hearings' final decision affirmed that amount.
After the final decision, a demand letter was sent to Balanced Nutrition Inc. on March 26, giving them 30 days to pay the money. As of April 28, no money has been paid, NCDHHS confirmed on Monday morning. Additionally, the window for BNI to appeal the final decision closed on April 23, and no appeal was received.
Mark Robinson drops CNN lawsuit, says he will not seek elected office in future
Balanced Nutrition Inc., which was closed by Yolanda Hill in 2024 during her husband's failed gubernatorial campaign, was officially terminated by NCDHHS on April 24. Hill, along with other people involved with BNI, including Renee Matthews-Jones and Hill's daughter Kimberly Cephas, are now disqualified from working with NCDHHS's Child and Adult Care Food Program.
Hill, Matthews-Jones and Cephas are noted as being 'responsible for the serious deficiency' for which the NCDHHS cited BNI during its closure.
In the final decision, the Office of Administrative Hearings notes Hill's concern that the scrutiny on BNI was politically motivated, which it disputes.
The final decision also noted that a review consultant texted others working on the compliance review, claiming that Hill 'had lied about being married to Lt. Governor Mark Robinson and lied about her son being on the budget.' The consultant apologized for that text, and, while OAH describes the comments as 'grossly inappropriate,' the final decision states that it did not seem to have any bearing on the findings of the nonprofit's review.
Hill's nonprofit, as 'a private nonprofit organization dedicated to helping child care providers make the most out of the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP). The food program is our only business. Our staff has over twenty-plus years of experience working with CACFP, making us well-qualified to serve the providers and the children in their care.'
The nonprofit was scheduled to face a compliance review on April 15, 2024, but, on the morning the review was supposed to take place, NCDHHS received word from Balanced Nutrition Inc.'s attorney stating 'Balanced Nutrition and Mrs. Hill respectfully decline to meet with NCDHHS officials without the presence of counsel. Furthermore, we are not available this week.' Documents provided by the state characterize Hill and others as uncooperative with this review.
The scheduled compliance review, conducted by NCDHHS following the set USDA federal policy, is a standard review for all organizations participating in the North Carolina Child and Adult Care Food Program. Per federal regulations, reviews are conducted every two to three years at a minimum, depending on the size of an institution and previous findings.
The standard 2022-2023 review of Balanced Nutrition, Inc. resulted in findings, according to NCDHHS, leading the agency to request that Balanced Nutrition, Inc. complete a corrective action plan to address those findings.
'Balanced Nutrition, Inc. completed the corrective action plan and NCDHHS put the organization back on the review schedule for the next Federal fiscal year to ensure continued compliance with state and federal rules,' NCDHHS said.
Balanced Nutrition Inc. filed to terminate its agreement with the NCDHHS on April 30, 2024.
Nevertheless, the nonprofit was still beholden to the scheduled compliance review despite the agreement termination, according to the NCDHHS. The nonprofit had been told on March 1, March 18 and April 1, 2024, about the upcoming compliance review and what documents nonprofit leaders would need.
In documents obtained by CBS17, Hill said that the compliance review felt like an attack, writing, 'As an organization, there are numerous things that have happened and been documented that makes us feel as if we are the target of some type of vendetta, be it personal or political.'
Robinson's campaign took this perspective as well, characterizing the investigation and subsequent findings as a political attack directly tied to Robinson's gubernatorial aspirations. The campaign accused because then-gubernatorial candidate Josh Stein's wife, Anna, worked as a legal specialist for the Chronic Disease and Injury Section of the NCDHHS's Division of Public Health.
The notice of serious deficiencies was sent to Balanced Nutrition Inc. on July 24, the NCDHHS wrote that it identified 'Yolanda Hill, Kimberly Cephas, and Renee Matthews-Jones as responsible for the serious deficiencies as a result of their responsibility for the overall management of Balanced Nutrition, Inc. operations.'
'The state agency was permitted to begin the review on Balanced Nutrition, Inc., on April 22, 2024, and was able to make copies of some requested documents. However, Balanced Nutrition, Inc. did not provide all requested documents,' according to NCDHHS.
NCDHHS says it tried to contact Balanced Nutrition, Inc.'s employees, including Hill, to schedule an exit interview 'by email, telephone, and written communication, with no response.'
'A letter dated June 14, 2024, was sent to Balanced Nutrition, Inc., requesting three dates and times that an institution representative would be available to participate in an exit conference. Balanced Nutrition, Inc. was unresponsive,' NCDHHS documents said.
Noncompliance issues include the 'USDA nondiscrimination statement was not listed on the menus for all centers. Menus that were posted and obtained from Apple Tree Wee School, Inc. did not have this statement included,' 'no documentation on file to verify that sponsoring organization staff received annual Civil Rights Training within the last twelve months,' and 'monitoring records were missing; Income Eligibility Applications were missing; enrollment documents were missing.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
3 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Scientists Accidentally Discover Laser-Free LASIK Alternative
A chemistry professor trying to heat cartilage with electricity made a mistake that could change eye surgery. Michael Hill at Occidental College accidentally used too little current in his experiment—and stumbled upon a discovery that might replace LASIK with a gentler treatment that reshapes corneas without ever cutting the eye. The discovery may offer hope for the millions of people living with poor vision who want an alternative to glasses and contact lenses but are wary of LASIK's risks. While laser eye surgery is generally successful, it involves cutting into the eye and can cause complications including dry eyes, vision problems, and in rare cases, severe side effects. Happy Accident Behind the Discovery The breakthrough happened entirely by chance when Hill and his collaborator, Dr. Brian Wong, a professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at the University of California–Irvine, were frustrated with their attempts to reshape cartilage using lasers.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
5 parenting practices that have changed since you were a baby
The podcast Chasing Life With Dr. Sanjay Gupta explores the medical science behind some of life's mysteries big and small. You can listen to episodes here. Parenting is not for the faint of heart. It can take new parents a beat or two to fully tune in to what their baby's cries could mean. So many small but consequential decisions need to be made on a daily, if not hourly, basis. There are also questions. Many questions. At a time when misinformation abounds, pediatrician Dr. David Hill is the calm voice of reassurance and reason, grounded in science. He encourages new parents to ask their baby's pediatrician questions, including about any advice they find on the internet. 'People come to me with stuff all the time,' Hill said, noting the importance of forging a solid parent-pediatrician relationship. That trust, he said, is what's 'going to steer us through this swamp of misinformation and disinformation that's out there right now.' Hill is a father of five in a blended family who has been in practice for more than 25 years. He has been the associate medical editor of the American Academy of Pediatrics' book 'Caring for Your Baby and Young Child: Birth to Age 5, 8th edition,' and is slated to be the editor-in-chief for the next edition. He also cohosts the academy's podcast 'Pediatrics On Call.' 'The question I get the most often from new parents, and even those who have been at it for a while is, is this normal?' Hill told CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta recently on his podcast, Chasing Life. 'As somebody who's seen probably over 10,000 children … it is a joy for me to almost always be able to reassure, and be like, 'Yeah. That's fine. They do that. Kids do a lot of weird things, and they do a lot of things at their own pace,' Hill said. 'Normal can be all over the map.' You can listen to the podcast's full episode here. Hill said he strongly urges parents to seek out trusted, reliable sources for guidance. 'Sources of information that have been validated, that use real data,' he said. 'And honestly, talk to your child's doctor — develop that relationship, because that's what we've dedicated our lives to doing.' Hill works closely with the AAP on the organization's parent-facing information. 'I do that because I know, over decades of experience, how dedicated everybody in that group is to making sure we get this right, including being willing to get egg on our faces and say, 'You know what? We were wrong,' when we were wrong,' Hill said. 'And that's really critical. Anybody who's never wrong, I don't trust, because none of us is perfect.' During the decades Hill has been in practice, he has witnessed some of the babies he saw at the start of his career become parents themselves. During that time, he has also watched the science of child health evolve. 'What I tell these new parents is sometimes the complete opposite of what I said when they were babies!' he said via email. Here are the five biggest changes Hill has seen over his career. Safe sleep practices Sleep guidelines literally flipped in 1994, when Hill finished medical school. That year, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development launched the first 'Back to Sleep' campaign urging parents to put their baby to sleep on their back. Before then, parents had been told to put an infant to sleep on the belly to avoid aspiration. But that's not all. The US Consumer Product Safety Commission banned drop-side cribs from the marketplace in 2011 and warned against inclined sleepers in 2019, Hill said. And the Safe Sleep for Babies Act, signed into federal law in 2022, outright banned the sale of drop-side cribs and crib bumpers that could potentially suffocate infants. He noted that in 1990, there were 154 sudden unexpected infant deaths per 100,000 babies, a number that fell 44% to a low of 86 in 2011. (It has since gone up to 100 deaths per 100,000 in 2022). 'While some of those deaths are from mysterious or unavoidable causes,' he said, 'many could still be prevented by following all the safe sleep guidelines, including not only placing infants on their backs to sleep, but never co-sleeping (and) avoiding soft bedding.' Advice to prevent food allergies Complete avoidance is out, and small exposures are in. 'I still remember in 2015 searching all the drawers in our practice for outdated infant feeding handouts that, if parents followed them, could put their babies at increased risk of developing life-threatening food allergies,' Hill said. 'These handouts told parents to avoid giving their infants and toddlers anything containing peanuts or eggs until they turned at least 2 years old, even 3 if they had eczema or a family history of allergies.' But, Hill said, in 2015, the results of the LEAP trial confirmed what some earlier studies had suggested: 'That it wasn't early peanut exposure that had caused a doubling of peanut allergies in the preceding decade. It was the advice in these handouts!' he said. Now parents and guardians are advised to introduce peanut-containing products and eggs along with other solid foods in the first year of life, as soon as babies are safely taking solids, usually around 6 months of age. Preventing babies from having any exposure to potential allergens apparently left their immune systems oversensitive when they finally did encounter them later on. Umbilical cord care Umbilical cords used to be treated with a messy (for doctors) purple 'triple' dye — an antiseptic to keep bacterial infections at bay. Now, the recommendation in well-resourced countries and communities is to let the cord dry on its own — and to keep a close eye on it. 'The purpose of the dye was to prevent potentially dangerous infections of the umbilical cord and surrounding tissues (omphalitis),' Hill said. 'Then, a few brave souls, perhaps fed up with their dry-cleaning bills, decided to see what would happen if we used alcohol instead of the dye. It turned out … nothing.' Hill said the next step was to just let the cord dry on its own, taking care not to trap it in a wet or soiled diaper for extended periods and to avoid soaking it at bathtime. That practice is where the guidance stands today. Some known risk factors for omphalitis, Hill said, include low birth weight, prolonged rupture of membranes or prolonged labor, maternal infection, nonsterile delivery or home birth, and improper cord care. 'If you see the skin around the belly button turning red or notice an unusually foul discharge, get your baby seen,' he advised. What about bathing? Should new parents avoid baths until the cord falls off? 'Advice on this one varies, but it's not clear there's any more danger from a brief immersion than from a sponge bath,' he said. New and better vaccines The vaccination schedule for infants and children has been updated throughout the years as new shots become available, offering better protection against childhood scourges. 'My dad is also a pediatrician, and I grew up hearing horror stories of babies suffering from meningitis and sepsis. It seems my dad was always dashing off to the hospital to perform spinal taps,' Hill recalled. 'This started to change, however, in 1985, when a vaccine against Haemophilus influenza B, one of the most dreaded infections of childhood, came out. 'In training and early in my career, I saw awful infections from another bacteria, pneumococcal pneumonia. These infections became much rarer in 2000, when the first pneumococcal vaccine for children came out,' he said. 'Since then, that vaccine has expanded from covering seven subtypes of pneumococcus to covering as many as 23.' Just in the past year, Hill said he witnessed another infantile infection he dreaded, RSV, or respiratory syncytial virus, plummet in frequency and severity thanks to both vaccines for expectant mothers and antibody injections for babies. Considering the big picture Another change involves a paradigm shift in the way pediatricians think about health and well-being, Hill said. 'In pediatrics, one of those tectonic shifts hit in 1998, the year I started practice and the year the ACEs Study came out,' he said, referring to a study that looked at adverse childhood experiences. Those potentially traumatic events include physical, emotional and/or sexual abuse; the death of a parent; mental illness; or violence or substance abuse in the household, any of which can create toxic stress in a child, leading to changes in brain development and affecting future mental, physical and emotional health. 'Many people had noticed that traumatic events in childhood … seemed to impact later health,' Hill said. 'The ACEs Study measured and quantified the extent and duration of these effects, and the results were more dramatic and longer-lasting than anyone had guessed.' An explosion of research followed, Hill said, which led to a new approach in pediatrics. 'Every child faces stressful events, some severe enough to impact their health. But the safe, stable, nurturing relationships that children build with the adults around them can protect them,' he explained. 'Understanding these interactions inspires trauma-informed care, an effort to work with families to address the stresses in their lives and to build those emotional connections that can help their children thrive.' Under this approach, Hill said, pediatricians pivoted from asking 'What's wrong with you?' to asking 'What happened to you, and how can we help?' 'A key concept here is the 'good enough parent,'' he said. 'No parent is perfect, but perfection is not required to be safe, stable, and nurturing.' As a parent himself, Hill said that thought 'brings me a sigh of relief.' We hope these five tips help you catch up on the latest parenting guidance. Listen to the full episode here. And join us next week for a new episode of the Chasing Life podcast. CNN Podcasts' Jennifer Lai contributed to this report. Solve the daily Crossword
CNN
a day ago
- CNN
Parenting practices that have changed since you were a baby
The podcast Chasing Life With Dr. Sanjay Gupta explores the medical science behind some of life's mysteries big and small. You can listen to episodes here. Parenting is not for the faint of heart. It can take new parents a beat or two to fully tune in to what their baby's cries could mean. So many small but consequential decisions need to be made on a daily, if not hourly, basis. There are also questions. Many questions. At a time when misinformation abounds, pediatrician Dr. David Hill is the calm voice of reassurance and reason, grounded in science. He encourages new parents to ask their baby's pediatrician questions, including about any advice they find on the internet. 'People come to me with stuff all the time,' Hill said, noting the importance of forging a solid parent-pediatrician relationship. That trust, he said, is what's 'going to steer us through this swamp of misinformation and disinformation that's out there right now.' Hill is a father of five in a blended family who has been in practice for more than 25 years. He has been the associate medical editor of the American Academy of Pediatrics' book 'Caring for Your Baby and Young Child: Birth to Age 5, 8th edition,' and is slated to be the editor-in-chief for the next edition. He also cohosts the academy's podcast 'Pediatrics On Call.' 'The question I get the most often from new parents, and even those who have been at it for a while is, is this normal?' Hill told CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta recently on his podcast, Chasing Life. 'As somebody who's seen probably over 10,000 children … it is a joy for me to almost always be able to reassure, and be like, 'Yeah. That's fine. They do that. Kids do a lot of weird things, and they do a lot of things at their own pace,' Hill said. 'Normal can be all over the map.' You can listen to the podcast's full episode here. Hill said he strongly urges parents to seek out trusted, reliable sources for guidance. 'Sources of information that have been validated, that use real data,' he said. 'And honestly, talk to your child's doctor — develop that relationship, because that's what we've dedicated our lives to doing.' Hill works closely with the AAP on the organization's parent-facing information. 'I do that because I know, over decades of experience, how dedicated everybody in that group is to making sure we get this right, including being willing to get egg on our faces and say, 'You know what? We were wrong,' when we were wrong,' Hill said. 'And that's really critical. Anybody who's never wrong, I don't trust, because none of us is perfect.' During the decades Hill has been in practice, he has witnessed some of the babies he saw at the start of his career become parents themselves. During that time, he has also watched the science of child health evolve. 'What I tell these new parents is sometimes the complete opposite of what I said when they were babies!' he said via email. Here are the five biggest changes Hill has seen over his career. Sleep guidelines literally flipped in 1994, when Hill finished medical school. That year, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development launched the first 'Back to Sleep' campaign urging parents to put their baby to sleep on their back. Before then, parents had been told to put an infant to sleep on the belly to avoid aspiration. But that's not all. The US Consumer Product Safety Commission banned drop-side cribs from the marketplace in 2011 and warned against inclined sleepers in 2019, Hill said. And the Safe Sleep for Babies Act, signed into federal law in 2022, outright banned the sale of drop-side cribs and crib bumpers that could potentially suffocate infants. He noted that in 1990, there were 154 sudden unexpected infant deaths per 100,000 babies, a number that fell 44% to a low of 86 in 2011. (It has since gone up to 100 deaths per 100,000 in 2022). 'While some of those deaths are from mysterious or unavoidable causes,' he said, 'many could still be prevented by following all the safe sleep guidelines, including not only placing infants on their backs to sleep, but never co-sleeping (and) avoiding soft bedding.' Complete avoidance is out, and small exposures are in. 'I still remember in 2015 searching all the drawers in our practice for outdated infant feeding handouts that, if parents followed them, could put their babies at increased risk of developing life-threatening food allergies,' Hill said. 'These handouts told parents to avoid giving their infants and toddlers anything containing peanuts or eggs until they turned at least 2 years old, even 3 if they had eczema or a family history of allergies.' But, Hill said, in 2015, the results of the LEAP trial confirmed what some earlier studies had suggested: 'That it wasn't early peanut exposure that had caused a doubling of peanut allergies in the preceding decade. It was the advice in these handouts!' he said. Now parents and guardians are advised to introduce peanut-containing products and eggs along with other solid foods in the first year of life, as soon as babies are safely taking solids, usually around 6 months of age. Preventing babies from having any exposure to potential allergens apparently left their immune systems oversensitive when they finally did encounter them later on. Umbilical cords used to be treated with a messy (for doctors) purple 'triple' dye — an antiseptic to keep bacterial infections at bay. Now, the recommendation in well-resourced countries and communities is to let the cord dry on its own — and to keep a close eye on it. 'The purpose of the dye was to prevent potentially dangerous infections of the umbilical cord and surrounding tissues (omphalitis),' Hill said. 'Then, a few brave souls, perhaps fed up with their dry-cleaning bills, decided to see what would happen if we used alcohol instead of the dye. It turned out … nothing.' Hill said the next step was to just let the cord dry on its own, taking care not to trap it in a wet or soiled diaper for extended periods and to avoid soaking it at bathtime. That practice is where the guidance stands today. Some known risk factors for omphalitis, Hill said, include low birth weight, prolonged rupture of membranes or prolonged labor, maternal infection, nonsterile delivery or home birth, and improper cord care. 'If you see the skin around the belly button turning red or notice an unusually foul discharge, get your baby seen,' he advised. What about bathing? Should new parents avoid baths until the cord falls off? 'Advice on this one varies, but it's not clear there's any more danger from a brief immersion than from a sponge bath,' he said. The vaccination schedule for infants and children has been updated throughout the years as new shots become available, offering better protection against childhood scourges. 'My dad is also a pediatrician, and I grew up hearing horror stories of babies suffering from meningitis and sepsis. It seems my dad was always dashing off to the hospital to perform spinal taps,' Hill recalled. 'This started to change, however, in 1985, when a vaccine against Haemophilus influenza B, one of the most dreaded infections of childhood, came out. 'In training and early in my career, I saw awful infections from another bacteria, pneumococcal pneumonia. These infections became much rarer in 2000, when the first pneumococcal vaccine for children came out,' he said. 'Since then, that vaccine has expanded from covering seven subtypes of pneumococcus to covering as many as 23.' Just in the past year, Hill said he witnessed another infantile infection he dreaded, RSV, or respiratory syncytial virus, plummet in frequency and severity thanks to both vaccines for expectant mothers and antibody injections for babies. Another change involves a paradigm shift in the way pediatricians think about health and well-being, Hill said. 'In pediatrics, one of those tectonic shifts hit in 1998, the year I started practice and the year the ACEs Study came out,' he said, referring to a study that looked at adverse childhood experiences. Those potentially traumatic events include physical, emotional and/or sexual abuse; the death of a parent; mental illness; or violence or substance abuse in the household, any of which can create toxic stress in a child, leading to changes in brain development and affecting future mental, physical and emotional health. How to get help Help is available if you or someone you know is struggling with suicidal thoughts or mental health matters. In the US: Call or text 988, the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. Globally: The International Association for Suicide Prevention and Befrienders Worldwide have contact information for crisis centers around the world. 'Many people had noticed that traumatic events in childhood … seemed to impact later health,' Hill said. 'The ACEs Study measured and quantified the extent and duration of these effects, and the results were more dramatic and longer-lasting than anyone had guessed.' An explosion of research followed, Hill said, which led to a new approach in pediatrics. 'Every child faces stressful events, some severe enough to impact their health. But the safe, stable, nurturing relationships that children build with the adults around them can protect them,' he explained. 'Understanding these interactions inspires trauma-informed care, an effort to work with families to address the stresses in their lives and to build those emotional connections that can help their children thrive.' Under this approach, Hill said, pediatricians pivoted from asking 'What's wrong with you?' to asking 'What happened to you, and how can we help?' 'A key concept here is the 'good enough parent,'' he said. 'No parent is perfect, but perfection is not required to be safe, stable, and nurturing.' As a parent himself, Hill said that thought 'brings me a sigh of relief.' We hope these five tips help you catch up on the latest parenting guidance. Listen to the full episode here. And join us next week for a new episode of the Chasing Life podcast. CNN Podcasts' Jennifer Lai contributed to this report.
