logo
5 parenting practices that have changed since you were a baby

5 parenting practices that have changed since you were a baby

Yahooa day ago
The podcast Chasing Life With Dr. Sanjay Gupta explores the medical science behind some of life's mysteries big and small. You can listen to episodes here.
Parenting is not for the faint of heart. It can take new parents a beat or two to fully tune in to what their baby's cries could mean. So many small but consequential decisions need to be made on a daily, if not hourly, basis. There are also questions. Many questions.
At a time when misinformation abounds, pediatrician Dr. David Hill is the calm voice of reassurance and reason, grounded in science. He encourages new parents to ask their baby's pediatrician questions, including about any advice they find on the internet.
'People come to me with stuff all the time,' Hill said, noting the importance of forging a solid parent-pediatrician relationship. That trust, he said, is what's 'going to steer us through this swamp of misinformation and disinformation that's out there right now.'
Hill is a father of five in a blended family who has been in practice for more than 25 years. He has been the associate medical editor of the American Academy of Pediatrics' book 'Caring for Your Baby and Young Child: Birth to Age 5, 8th edition,' and is slated to be the editor-in-chief for the next edition. He also cohosts the academy's podcast 'Pediatrics On Call.'
'The question I get the most often from new parents, and even those who have been at it for a while is, is this normal?' Hill told CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta recently on his podcast, Chasing Life.
'As somebody who's seen probably over 10,000 children … it is a joy for me to almost always be able to reassure, and be like, 'Yeah. That's fine. They do that. Kids do a lot of weird things, and they do a lot of things at their own pace,' Hill said. 'Normal can be all over the map.'
You can listen to the podcast's full episode here.
Hill said he strongly urges parents to seek out trusted, reliable sources for guidance. 'Sources of information that have been validated, that use real data,' he said. 'And honestly, talk to your child's doctor — develop that relationship, because that's what we've dedicated our lives to doing.'
Hill works closely with the AAP on the organization's parent-facing information. 'I do that because I know, over decades of experience, how dedicated everybody in that group is to making sure we get this right, including being willing to get egg on our faces and say, 'You know what? We were wrong,' when we were wrong,' Hill said. 'And that's really critical. Anybody who's never wrong, I don't trust, because none of us is perfect.'
During the decades Hill has been in practice, he has witnessed some of the babies he saw at the start of his career become parents themselves. During that time, he has also watched the science of child health evolve.
'What I tell these new parents is sometimes the complete opposite of what I said when they were babies!' he said via email.
Here are the five biggest changes Hill has seen over his career.
Safe sleep practices
Sleep guidelines literally flipped in 1994, when Hill finished medical school. That year, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development launched the first 'Back to Sleep' campaign urging parents to put their baby to sleep on their back. Before then, parents had been told to put an infant to sleep on the belly to avoid aspiration.
But that's not all. The US Consumer Product Safety Commission banned drop-side cribs from the marketplace in 2011 and warned against inclined sleepers in 2019, Hill said. And the Safe Sleep for Babies Act, signed into federal law in 2022, outright banned the sale of drop-side cribs and crib bumpers that could potentially suffocate infants.
He noted that in 1990, there were 154 sudden unexpected infant deaths per 100,000 babies, a number that fell 44% to a low of 86 in 2011. (It has since gone up to 100 deaths per 100,000 in 2022).
'While some of those deaths are from mysterious or unavoidable causes,' he said, 'many could still be prevented by following all the safe sleep guidelines, including not only placing infants on their backs to sleep, but never co-sleeping (and) avoiding soft bedding.'
Advice to prevent food allergies
Complete avoidance is out, and small exposures are in.
'I still remember in 2015 searching all the drawers in our practice for outdated infant feeding handouts that, if parents followed them, could put their babies at increased risk of developing life-threatening food allergies,' Hill said. 'These handouts told parents to avoid giving their infants and toddlers anything containing peanuts or eggs until they turned at least 2 years old, even 3 if they had eczema or a family history of allergies.'
But, Hill said, in 2015, the results of the LEAP trial confirmed what some earlier studies had suggested: 'That it wasn't early peanut exposure that had caused a doubling of peanut allergies in the preceding decade. It was the advice in these handouts!' he said.
Now parents and guardians are advised to introduce peanut-containing products and eggs along with other solid foods in the first year of life, as soon as babies are safely taking solids, usually around 6 months of age.
Preventing babies from having any exposure to potential allergens apparently left their immune systems oversensitive when they finally did encounter them later on.
Umbilical cord care
Umbilical cords used to be treated with a messy (for doctors) purple 'triple' dye — an antiseptic to keep bacterial infections at bay. Now, the recommendation in well-resourced countries and communities is to let the cord dry on its own — and to keep a close eye on it.
'The purpose of the dye was to prevent potentially dangerous infections of the umbilical cord and surrounding tissues (omphalitis),' Hill said. 'Then, a few brave souls, perhaps fed up with their dry-cleaning bills, decided to see what would happen if we used alcohol instead of the dye. It turned out … nothing.'
Hill said the next step was to just let the cord dry on its own, taking care not to trap it in a wet or soiled diaper for extended periods and to avoid soaking it at bathtime. That practice is where the guidance stands today.
Some known risk factors for omphalitis, Hill said, include low birth weight, prolonged rupture of membranes or prolonged labor, maternal infection, nonsterile delivery or home birth, and improper cord care.
'If you see the skin around the belly button turning red or notice an unusually foul discharge, get your baby seen,' he advised.
What about bathing? Should new parents avoid baths until the cord falls off? 'Advice on this one varies, but it's not clear there's any more danger from a brief immersion than from a sponge bath,' he said.
New and better vaccines
The vaccination schedule for infants and children has been updated throughout the years as new shots become available, offering better protection against childhood scourges.
'My dad is also a pediatrician, and I grew up hearing horror stories of babies suffering from meningitis and sepsis. It seems my dad was always dashing off to the hospital to perform spinal taps,' Hill recalled. 'This started to change, however, in 1985, when a vaccine against Haemophilus influenza B, one of the most dreaded infections of childhood, came out.
'In training and early in my career, I saw awful infections from another bacteria, pneumococcal pneumonia. These infections became much rarer in 2000, when the first pneumococcal vaccine for children came out,' he said. 'Since then, that vaccine has expanded from covering seven subtypes of pneumococcus to covering as many as 23.'
Just in the past year, Hill said he witnessed another infantile infection he dreaded, RSV, or respiratory syncytial virus, plummet in frequency and severity thanks to both vaccines for expectant mothers and antibody injections for babies.
Considering the big picture
Another change involves a paradigm shift in the way pediatricians think about health and well-being, Hill said.
'In pediatrics, one of those tectonic shifts hit in 1998, the year I started practice and the year the ACEs Study came out,' he said, referring to a study that looked at adverse childhood experiences. Those potentially traumatic events include physical, emotional and/or sexual abuse; the death of a parent; mental illness; or violence or substance abuse in the household, any of which can create toxic stress in a child, leading to changes in brain development and affecting future mental, physical and emotional health.
'Many people had noticed that traumatic events in childhood … seemed to impact later health,' Hill said. 'The ACEs Study measured and quantified the extent and duration of these effects, and the results were more dramatic and longer-lasting than anyone had guessed.'
An explosion of research followed, Hill said, which led to a new approach in pediatrics.
'Every child faces stressful events, some severe enough to impact their health. But the safe, stable, nurturing relationships that children build with the adults around them can protect them,' he explained. 'Understanding these interactions inspires trauma-informed care, an effort to work with families to address the stresses in their lives and to build those emotional connections that can help their children thrive.'
Under this approach, Hill said, pediatricians pivoted from asking 'What's wrong with you?' to asking 'What happened to you, and how can we help?'
'A key concept here is the 'good enough parent,'' he said. 'No parent is perfect, but perfection is not required to be safe, stable, and nurturing.'
As a parent himself, Hill said that thought 'brings me a sigh of relief.'
We hope these five tips help you catch up on the latest parenting guidance. Listen to the full episode here. And join us next week for a new episode of the Chasing Life podcast.
CNN Podcasts' Jennifer Lai contributed to this report.
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr. attacks pediatric group after vaccine recommendations
RFK Jr. attacks pediatric group after vaccine recommendations

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

RFK Jr. attacks pediatric group after vaccine recommendations

Hours after the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) broke with Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr and recommended COVID-19 vaccines for all young children, he blasted the association as beholden to corporate interests. The AAP on Tuesday recommended all infants and children 6 months through 23 months get vaccinated against COVID-19 to help protect against serious illness. Kennedy responded in a post on social platform X, calling the group's recommendations 'corporate friendly' because AAP receives donations to its Friends of Children Fund from vaccine companies like Pfizer and Moderna, among others. The philanthropic fund backs projects supporting child health and equity. The health secretary said the organization should disclose 'its corporate entanglements … so that Americans may ask whether the AAP's recommendations reflect public health interest, or are, perhaps, just a pay-to-play scheme to promote commercial ambitions of AAP's Big Pharma benefactors.' Susan Kressly, AAP's president, in a statement said the group would welcome an opportunity to sit down with Kennedy to review the recommendations. 'This attack on the integrity of pediatricians is unfortunate, but it does not change the facts,' Kressly said. 'We are transparent about our funders, follow rigorous conflict-of-interest disclosures and maintain safeguards to ensure the integrity and independence of our guidance.' The AAP and HHS have been at odds for months, and tensions reached a head when Kennedy dismissed all the members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and replaced them with his own handpicked representatives, including some outright vaccine skeptics. The AAP chose not to participate in the reconstituted panel's first meeting in June, calling it 'illegitimate.' Kennedy later excluded the fund along with other top medical organizations from working with the panel to research and help influence vaccination recommendations. Kennedy has long criticized the so-called medical establishment for conspiring to make Americans sick. His first ' Make America Healthy Again ' report accused doctors of being overly influenced by the pharmaceutical industry to overprescribe certain medications that don't treat the root causes of disease.

Scientists Accidentally Discover Laser-Free LASIK Alternative
Scientists Accidentally Discover Laser-Free LASIK Alternative

Epoch Times

timean hour ago

  • Epoch Times

Scientists Accidentally Discover Laser-Free LASIK Alternative

A chemistry professor trying to heat cartilage with electricity made a mistake that could change eye surgery. Michael Hill at Occidental College accidentally used too little current in his experiment—and stumbled upon a discovery that might replace LASIK with a gentler treatment that reshapes corneas without ever cutting the eye. The discovery may offer hope for the millions of people living with poor vision who want an alternative to glasses and contact lenses but are wary of LASIK's risks. While laser eye surgery is generally successful, it involves cutting into the eye and can cause complications including dry eyes, vision problems, and in rare cases, severe side effects. Happy Accident Behind the Discovery The breakthrough happened entirely by chance when Hill and his collaborator, Dr. Brian Wong, a professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at the University of California–Irvine, were frustrated with their attempts to reshape cartilage using lasers.

RFK Jr. Attacks Pediatricians for Daring to Recommend Covid-19 Vaccines for Kids
RFK Jr. Attacks Pediatricians for Daring to Recommend Covid-19 Vaccines for Kids

Gizmodo

timean hour ago

  • Gizmodo

RFK Jr. Attacks Pediatricians for Daring to Recommend Covid-19 Vaccines for Kids

RFK Jr. is officially waging a war against pediatricians. This week, he went after the American Academy of Pediatrics for rebuffing the federal government and continuing to endorse covid-19 vaccines for children. In an X post Tuesday afternoon, the health secretary and longtime anti-vaxxer accused the AAP of bowing to corporate pressure in making the recommendations. He also claimed that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recent decision to oppose pediatric covid-19 shots represented a return to 'gold-standard science.' The AAP, by contrast, has maintained that covid-19 remains a serious health threat to children, particularly younger kids. In May, RFK Jr. announced that the CDC would remove its recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women to receive the covid-19 vaccine, including annual booster shots. Though Kennedy was flanked by NIH director Jay Bhattacharya and FDA chief Marty Makary, the announcement featured no actual CDC staff. Several days later, the CDC officially updated its language to state that these groups may get these vaccines in consultation with their doctors (the previous guidance said they should). RFK Jr.'s Baseless Purge of CDC Vaccine Panel Alarms Public Health Experts Some countries have started to ease off their covid-19 vaccine recommendations for children. And the CDC's vaccine advisory panel (outside experts who guide vaccine policy in the U.S.) was set to discuss their recommendations for the fall vaccination schedule in June, which would have included the covid-19 shots. Kennedy rushed ahead of the panel, however, and he provided no evidence at the time to justify the change. The next month, he unilaterally removed all members of the advisory panel and replaced them with members more supportive of his anti-vaccination views. On Tuesday morning, the AAP issued its own vaccine guidance, which, for the first time in 30 years, differs significantly from the CDC's stance. The AAP strongly recommends that all children ages 6 through 23 months old receive at least one covid-19 shot, citing their generally higher risk of having a severe infection. Older children are also recommended to get vaccinated if they fall into certain groups, including children at higher risk of severe covid-19 (such as those with weaker immune systems), children who have never been vaccinated at all, and children living with other people at high risk of severe covid-19. The AAP also took another swipe at HHS for its recent decision to recommend against vaccines containing thimerosal, a preservative that anti-vaxxers have long alleged causes autism despite many studies finding otherwise. It continued to endorse the small minority of vaccines made with the ingredient and recommended against delaying this year's flu shots to remove these products from the market. 'We extensively reviewed the most recently available data about covid-19 risks in kids, as well as safety and effectiveness of available COVID-19 vaccines. It's clear they are very safe for all populations,' said Sean O'Leary, chair of the AAP's Committee on Infectious Diseases, in a statement from the AAP. 'Among the reasons we decided to move to a risk-based recommendation for healthy older children is the fact that the hospitalization rate for young children and children with underlying medical conditions remains high, in line with rates for many of the other vaccine-preventable diseases for which we vaccinate.' Kennedy, however, alleged in his X post that the AAP's decision was possibly a part of a 'pay-to-play scheme to promote commercial ambitions of AAP's Big Pharma benefactors.' And he called for the AAP to disclose any potential conflicts of interest. For starters, the AAP does disclose its funders, some of which do include vaccine manufacturers like Pfizer. These funders don't change the reality that while covid-19 is generally less dangerous to children than older adults, it isn't harmless. Covid-19 has sickened children, sometimes severely, and in rare cases, has even been fatal. Meanwhile, reams of scientific data have consistently shown that covid-19 vaccines greatly reduce the risk of severe illness. RFK Jr. Made a Million Dollars From His Anti-Vax Work He Previously Claimed Was 'Unpaid' Kennedy is also hardly one to talk about financial conflicts of interest, given that he has greatly profited from crusading against vaccine makers. And in fact, many of RFK's ideological allies and anti-vaccination proponents promote their own, often unregulated, health products and alternative treatments. In the battle between the AAP and the revamped HHS under RFK. Jr, I'd much rather back the side that doesn't demonize vaccines every chance it gets.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store