
A new Lululemon dress is stirring up the internet. Here's why
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Steven Madden to buy UK-based luxury shoe brand Kurt Geiger
The world of fashion footwear has a new pair, as shoe designer Steven Madden said it would buy UK-based luxury brand Kurt Geiger. The all-cash deal, valued at $360 million, expands Steve Madden's presence in international markets.
The internet is going crazy over a new dress, and no, it is not "the dress" from 2015. Behind the hysteria is a multi-functional athleisure maxi skirt-dress duo from trendy sportswear brand Lululemon.
Lululemon's new 2-in-1 Maxi Dress, a basic one-color dress that can be worn as an ankle-length maxi skirt or strapless dress, has garnered mixed emotions from social media users. Some believe the nearly $150 dress is worth every penny because of its versatility, enough that the dress is sold out in every size except extra large, and others think it's undeserving of the hype.
Interested to hear what people think? Here's what the internet is saying about the viral Lululemon 2-in-1 Maxi Dress.
Viral trends: 10 years later, 'the dress' still divides us. But we understand a lot more about why.
How much does Lululemon's 2-in-1 Maxi Dress cost?
The 2-in-1 Maxi Dress costs $148 on the Lululemon website, before shipping.
As of June 3, the dress was sold out in every size and color but Light Ivory in extra large. However, shoppers can sign up to be notified if and when the dress will be restocked on the Lululemon website.
What are people saying about the dress?
In a TikTok video with 83,000 views as of June 3, content creator Chantalissa models the dress, which she encourages her followers to buy.
"It takes a lot for me to buy something that I see on TikTok, but the second I saw this 2-in-1 dress from Lululemon, I literally went to the store instantly and tried it on," Chantalissa said in her video. "I actually feel like a princess in it. It's so beautiful, so flowy. I'm obsessed."
On the flip side, content creator Dasie expressed her confusion about the dress's popularity, specifically because of the price and simple design.
"Is this just for the label? Who walks into Lululemon and they're like, 'Oh my gosh, that's the cutest summer dress I've ever seen?'" Dasie said in a TikTok video with about 4,800 views as of June 3. "I'm not trying to be mean. No hate. You could walk into Walmart and get a cuter dress than that."
To 'thneed' or not to 'thneed'
Lululemon's 2-in-1 Maxi Dress quickly became deemed a "thneed" on social media. A "thneed" is a garment that can be worn multiple ways, and its name comes from the highly versatile object knitted by the Once-ler in Dr. Seuss' "The Lorax." As depicted in the original Lorax book and movie, a "thneed" can be used as a shirt, sock, glove, hat, carpet or pillow − "a fine thing that all people need."
In addition to being multifunctional, a "thneed" is cheap ($3.98, as outlined in "The Lorax") and ethically sourced, as "thneeds" are made entirely from foliage of Truffula Trees, the circular and wispy trees in the story.
While some may believe the 2-in-1 Maxi Dress is a "thneed," TikTok user Rachael, commonly known as "the Thneed Girl," disagrees.
"The garment really isn't transforming at all. It's just going from being worn down at the hip to up at like the chest. It's really not transforming like a thneed really needs to do," Rachael said in a TikTok video. "You can love this dress. You can hate this dress. You can make whatever arguments you want about the ethics of this dress, Lululemon as a company, I really don't care, but it's not a thneed."
Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@usatoday.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I've seen her name and photo - but we can't talk before the date. Will it work out?
I'm sitting - trying to look composed - in a London bar. Cocktail ordered, there's a rollercoaster knot of anticipation building in my stomach - I'm waiting for a date. Except this isn't exactly your typical dating rendezvous - because while my date and I met online, as so many people do nowadays, we matched on an app that doesn't allow users to exchange messages until a few hours before the meetup. I know my date's name and I've seen her photo, but there's been none of the usual small talk messaging - just a few words to confirm I'm looking forward to meeting, and that's it. I first started using dating apps during the Covid lockdowns - Hinge mainly, but I've also tried Tinder and Bumble. They introduced me to a vibrant mix of people - some became short-term flings, others full-blown relationships, and then there were the other indefinable in-betweens. But after a mutual new year break-up (with an ex I'd met on Hinge), I returned to the dating app scene as a 30-something tired of the cookie-cutter profiles and weird monoculture. Everyone seems to be looking for someone who "doesn't take themselves too seriously", is itching to make travel and running a personality trait, or is desperate to go hiking. As a wheelchair user, I definitely won't be doing the last two - no matter how much physio I do. I wanted something different. I was after a pasta admirer, like me So, when a friend told me about an app which cuts out pre-date chat and gets straight to the date, I was intrigued. No awkward talking stage, no wondering if you've asked someone out too early - or left it too late. Research suggests an overwhelming number of daters have online burnout - so it's no wonder dating apps are trying to reignite the spark. There's Feeld, an app for the sexually curious; Fourplay, which teams single friends together with other pairs for group dates; and Lex, an LGBTQ+ message board app, while Raya is invite-only for celeb matches. According to Ofcom, singletons aged under 25 are dating online more than any other age group – so the big dating apps are also adding functionality to try to keep them interested. In June, Tinder introduced its double date feature. Akin to the Fourplay app, it lets users create a joint profile with a friend. Tinder's umbrella company, Match Group, said it needed to keep up with what Gen Z wanted and "build lower-pressure" ways for them to meet. Hinge has basically been charging more for a premium match-making service. Hinge X, the most expensive tier, charges £24.99 per week for "enhanced access to your type", the ability to "skip the line" and "like priority". The obvious question, of course, is how that works if multiple users are signed up - they can't all be the priority. These apps preach a tailored focus, but together respond to the same underlying sense of dating fatigue I have been feeling too. I'd been sending messages into the ether without any guarantee the algorithm would actually get them to the potential future love of my life - increasingly it felt a waste of time. And as someone who's been on the end of multiple failed talking stages in the past few months - cutting straight to the date felt a novel thing to try. Because, why not? Does online dating work? Once mocked, online dating is now a global love affair worth billions, and love at first swipe has become the generational norm. Almost 10% of Brits told a recent YouGov poll they met their partner on an app too, so that probably tells us something. But studies show cross-gender dissatisfaction, with women overwhelmed by matches, while men generally struggle and are more likely to turn to paid features to boost their chances. Add the normalisation of unhealthy dating behaviours like ghosting - suddenly cutting contact without explanation - and some drained daters are deciding: "it's not me, it's you". Last year, a class action lawsuit accused Match Group, owners of mainstream apps like Tinder and Hinge, of using addictive game-like features to encourage compulsive use. The case has since been sent to arbitration. Match Group rejected the claims calling the lawsuit "ridiculous", reports Reuters news agency. In Depth: Why dating apps could be in trouble Is speed dating the answer for Gen Zs looking for love? Tinder's height filter divides daters Yet, despite trying to keep us hooked, Ofcom data shows the UK's most popular dating apps saw usage fall by 16% in 2024. Tinder lost 594,000 users, Hinge dropped by 131,000, Bumble by 368,000 and Grindr by 11,000. In June, Bumble laid off 30% of its global staff. On Breeze, the new app I was trying, once you match a date is booked at a "partner venue" - this is partly how the app makes its money. Users pay upfront for a drink which acts as a soft deterrent to prevent no-shows – but bail repeatedly and your account will be temporarily frozen. Creating my profile, I wrote that I hoped to meet someone self-assured - able to laugh at life and themselves, while also embracing a dance floor with enthusiasm. Bonus points for cat people and pasta-admirers. My date, Rozena (not her real name), had amazing eyes - deep blue, with a purple tinge. She said she was looking for a long-term relationship, listed culture and theatre among her interests, and described the "worst idea she ever had" as the time she tried a particular dance move in heels, and ended up in an ambulance. This felt like exactly the kind of calamity I could get on board with. And that's how I found myself heading to this date. I'd flagged to Breeze that I'm a wheelchair user to make sure the venue was accessible before the booking was confirmed. The app's support team was responsive and the bar certainly seemed fine on paper. But while I could technically get in, all the indoor tables were up a few steps I couldn't navigate, meaning we would have to sit outside. The app later apologised for this and said it would work on how it audits places for accessibility in the future. Less pre-chat made us more present I messaged Rozena through the app - in the short pre-date window that opens just before that first meeting. She was understanding and said she'd brought a raincoat. Luckily, the rain held off. Less fortunately, the table leg made it difficult for me to wheel my chair under it, meaning I had to do a Tom Daley-style swan dive every time I reached for my drink. At least I didn't knock it over. Our date was fun - but there was no romantic spark. Rozena admitted her interest in music didn't extend beyond musicals. And while she claimed to be joking, I suspect her disappointment that I wasn't as aligned with her passion for theatre may have been genuine. Would we have discovered there was no chemistry had we met on an app with a pre-date chat function? It's impossible to say. But the limited pre-meet communication window seemed to make us both more engaged when we met in person. When I told Rozena I was thinking of writing an article about the app, she told me she'd been on a few dates through it. One drawback she'd discovered was that her matches weren't always close by – she'd had dates travel from hours away to meet up. Perhaps this is due to a growing user base. After finishing our drinks and saying goodbye, the app's chat window stayed open for a few hours, meaning we could check each other had reached home safely. There was an opportunity to exchange numbers via the app if both parties wished to. I received a message saying Rozena had declined, but she left a note saying she had had a lovely time. I am unable to contact her again, but it gave closure. No ghosting. Reflecting on this new approach to online dating, I wonder if we are going full circle, pining for the traditional dating culture of the pre-internet age? Sure, it didn't work out this time for me and my date, but it felt much more human, less AI. Breeze isn't unique in trying to do something different to help daters find love, but my experience on it made me realise that chatting beforehand can actually really help to build rapport ahead of a date (even if I do sometimes accidentally send essays). Even so, I'll probably continue to use Breeze, as it feels quite low effort. But my Hinge dating profile is still running and I'm chatting to four people there - who knows how many might lead to a date? Or perhaps I'll bump into the love of my life the old fashioned way - no phone, no algorithm. Imagine that. More Weekend Picks Sleep, exercise, hydrate - do we really need to stick to recommended daily doses? Not getting a summer job? Here are eight ways to change that World's thirst for matcha dries up global supplies Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2 cheap penny stocks for savvy investors to consider in August
Purchasing penny stocks can supercharge the growth prospects of an investor's portfolio. But issues like limited scale, inconsistent revenues, and thinner balance sheets — not to mention the added threat of share price volatility — can also make these small caps risky stocks to buy. Investors can manage the danger they take on, however, by snapping up penny shares that command low valuations. This pricing cushion can offer protection from share price drops if the company's growth plan doesn't pan out as expected. With this in mind, here are two top shares to consider this month. Screen idol The threat to cinema operators is severe as streaming companies like Netflix change the way we consume movies. Yet Everyman Media (LSE:EMAN) continues performing strongly, even as pressure on consumers' spending power persists. Everyman — which operates 48 theatres across the country — isn't your bog-standard multiplex owner. It offers a well-rounded experience, showing niche, independent, and foreign films alongside the usual blockbusters. What's more, patrons can grab a drink at its bars and go for a meal at its in-house restaurants, too, offering everything people need for a good night out. This value-added strategy is paying off handsomely. In the 26 weeks to 3 July, group revenues leapt 21%, to £56.5m. Admissions increased 15% from the same 2024 period; ticket prices rose 6%; and food and beverage spend per head was up 5.9%. Consequently, group EBITDA shot 33% higher over the period, to £8.2m. Everyman is confident its 'whole experience' model will continue delivering the goods, and is eyeing further expansion to its estate — it 'plans to open two additional venues in 2026', it's said, and enjoys 'a strong pipeline of future developments' too. Naturally, the ongoing streaming revolution will remain a threat to businesses like Everyman for the foreseeable future. But in the case of this penny stock, my view is the danger is more than baked into the cheapness of its shares. The screen idol's enterprise value (EV) to EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortisation) ratio is just 2.8 times. Any reading below 10 suggests a share could be undervalued. Property for pennies The second top penny share to consider is Schroder European Real Estate Investment Trust (LSE:SERE). Unlike many small caps, it offers the possibility of a large passive income as well as growth, which reflects its classification as a REIT. Under sector rules, at least 90% of rental-related profits must be paid out in dividends each year. Please note that tax treatment depends on the individual circumstances of each client and may be subject to change in future. The content in this article is provided for information purposes only. It is not intended to be, neither does it constitute, any form of tax advice. That's all well and good on paper. But with eurozone economies struggling for growth and inflationary pressures persisting, the trust's returns could theoretically disappoint in the near term. Such dangers wouldn't necessarily put me off if I had cash to invest, however. Over the long term, the company — which owns retail, office, and industrial assets, among others — has the potential to deliver spectacular earnings growth. Its focus on 'winning' cities with strong economies, robust infrastructure, and attractive environments (like Paris and Berlin) gives it an edge achieving impressive rental income growth. And, today, the trust offers excellent all-round value. It trades at an 31.8% discount to its net asset value (NAV) per share. As for those dividends, its forward yield is an enormous 7.6%. The post 2 cheap penny stocks for savvy investors to consider in August appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Royston Wild has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tiny pint glasses arrive at pubs as new campaign targets Gen Z drinkers
Tiny pint glasses have arrived at pubs as part of a new campaign. The miniature glasses, just under three inches tall, have been introduced by Greene King at selected pubs across the UK to encourage younger drinkers to sample beers before committing to a full pint. It comes after research showed that 31 per cent of Gen Z pub-goers feel too nervous to ask for a taster at the bar, despite it being standard practice in pubs across the country. The tiny glasses will be used to offer samples of the brewery's new Hazy Day Fruity IPA, a 4.3 per cent ABV beer with orange, citrus, and tropical notes. The tiny glasses will be used to offer samples of the brewery's new Hazy Day Fruity IPA (Image: Dave Phillips/PinPep) Will Hemmings, marketing director for brewing and brands at Greene King, said: "We're bringing our Hazy Day Fruity IPA to hundreds more Greene King pubs, just as the summer hits its peak. "We know a huge number of customers switch up their beverage with the season and Hazy Day Fruity IPA is a perfect sunshine refreshment. "But with so many people – especially younger customers – still unsure if they can ask for a free sample of something different, we're making it crystal clear: yes, you can. "Whether you're after something fruity, refreshing or just fancy trying something new, a quick sip could lead you to your new favourite pint." Although 65 per cent of Brits describe themselves as experimental when it comes to drinks orders, 70 per cent have never asked for a sample before buying. READ MORE: McDonald's launches new menu including Jaffa Cakes McFlurry and more Where is Destination X filmed? The new BBC gameshow hosted by Rob Brydon Pair of Britain's rarest birds successfully breed for the first time in years More than 70 per cent of Gen Z and millennial pub-goers said they would be more likely to try new beers if they knew samples were available. The Hazy Day IPA is now available nationwide as part of the campaign. For more information, or to find your nearest participating pub, visit