Reddit surges as AI-driven ad strategy wins praise from Wall Street
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
Reddit's shares surged 15% on Friday after it reported quarterly results that exceeded Street expectations, boosting investor confidence in the platform's AI-based advertising tools and strong user engagement.The company has also posted a rosy forecast that comes on the heels of similarly upbeat results from ad industry leaders such as Meta and Alphabet, underscoring a broader sector shift as advertisers gravitate towards platforms that provide artificial-intelligence tools to create more personalized campaigns.The company expects third-quarter revenue of between $535 million and $545 million, well above analysts' average estimate of $473 million, according to data compiled by LSEG.Reddit's focus on understanding user intent through authentic community conversations positions it to unlock new monetization opportunities, said Danni Hewson, head of financial analysis at AJ Bell."Being able to home in on exactly the kind of consumer who might be open to splurge on what a seller is offering has made sites like Reddit hugely popular with advertisers," Hewson said.Reddit's results, along with those of Google and Meta, signal the ad industry's resilience in the face of growing economic uncertainty brought on by shifting U.S. trade policy.The company's diverse ad offerings, including ads inserting brands directly within conversations on its subreddit discussions, remain attractive to marketers.Reddit's daily active unique visitors increased 21%, with analysts saying stabilizing daily active user trends are bolstering investor confidence in the platform's "long-term growth narrative".Despite variable Google-driven traffic posing a headwind in the second quarter, Reddit's U.S. daily active users held steady, expressing confidence that the company's unique content was valuable to both Google and searchers, analysts at Piper Sandler said.The company has been investing in new products, search capabilities and international expansion to offset inconsistent user traffic.Reddit is currently valued at a premium compared to its peers, trading at 74.57 times its projected earnings over the next 12 months, well above Pinterest's 19.39 and Snap's 27.54.If gains hold, Reddit is set to add more than $4 billion to its market cap.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
3 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Even OpenAI's chairman struggles to keep up with AI: Bret Taylor calls the once-in-a-lifetime boom ‘insane'
Synopsis Bret Taylor, OpenAI chairman, finds it hard to keep up with AI. He sees this era as a technological renaissance. Competition is rising with Google's Gemini and others. Taylor believes computer science education is vital. Bill Gates agrees that programming will remain a human job. AI tools are helpful, but humans provide the creative blueprint. OpenAI's chairman, Bret Taylor, acknowledges the difficulty in keeping up with the rapid advancements in AI, despite his prominent position. He views this period as a historic technological renaissance, with intense competition and constant innovation. (Images: iStock, LinkedIn) If you've been struggling to keep pace with the whirlwind that is Artificial Intelligence, you're in good company. Bret Taylor, Chairman of OpenAI, the organization at the epicenter of the AI revolution, admits he too is barely able to stay afloat amid the relentless stream of breakthroughs. In a candid conversation hosted by South Park Commons with Aditya Agarwal, Taylor said, 'I am the chairman of OpenAI. I run a fairly successful applied AI company, and I have trouble keeping up with everything going on.' His words offer a rare moment of vulnerability in a world that often presents AI experts as unflappable oracles. What makes his admission particularly striking is his vantage point. Taylor is not just on the frontline — he's in the command tower. From overseeing OpenAI's advancements to observing the competition's rapid rise, his plate is full. And yet, even he finds it dizzying. 'I'm probably most well situated in the world almost to do so… So it just feels insane to me right now,' he added. — plzaccelerate (@plzaccelerate) Taylor sees this turbulent moment as historic — and oddly poetic. 'I think it's a privilege... I hope you're enjoying being in this moment because... I think our society will be very different 10 years from now,' he said, reflecting on how rare it is to consciously live through such a transformative era. 'I pinch myself every day.' Indeed, the AI domain is experiencing something akin to a gold rush — except instead of panning rivers, companies are mining data and releasing new models almost weekly. OpenAI, once the undisputed leader, is now facing heated competition. Google's Gemini, Elon Musk's Grok, and emerging Chinese open-source platforms like DeepSeek and Kimi have challenged its dominance with increasingly capable models. Even on the product side, innovation is relentless. ChatGPT has become the fifth most visited website globally, but it's far from alone. New AI tools tackling niche tasks are sprouting up daily. OpenAI reportedly even attempted to acquire Windsurf, a rising AI startup — a sign of how closely it watches the ecosystem. Despite this pace, Taylor offers a reassuring message: humans aren't being pushed out of the equation just yet. Speaking to Business Insider, he argued that formal computer science education remains more relevant than ever. 'Studying computer science is a different answer than learning to code, but I would say I still think it's extremely valuable,' he said. Taylor emphasized that such degrees instill systems thinking — a way of understanding how components interact in complex systems, which remains vital for innovation. He pointed out how topics like Big O notation, cache misses, and randomized algorithms teach the kind of structured logic that no AI model can fully Taylor's view is none other than Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates. In conversations on The Tonight Show, Gates predicted that programming will "remain a human job for at least a century.' His reason? Writing software isn't about typing code; it's about pattern recognition, judgment, and making creative leaps. Tools like GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT may streamline debugging and accelerate development, but Gates insists, 'They are power chisels, not replacement carpenters.' AI may help you shape the material, but the blueprint still comes from the human mind.
Hindustan Times
35 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Anthropic CEO mocks Mark Zuckerberg's poaching tactics: ‘Something that can't be bought'
Amid reports of Meta's recent poaching attempts on Apple, OpenAI and Google staff, AI startup Anthropic has claimed that it is not matching competing offers to retain its employees. Speaking on the "Big Technology Podcast", Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei revealed he recently sent a Slack message to all his employees and told them that the company would not "compromise our compensation principles" or "principles of fairness" when any of them receive offers from other countries. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has said that his goal was to bring superintelligence to every individual.(AFP) Calling Meta's poaching attempts a "unifying moment," he added that matching such offers would be unfair to the other employees. "If Mark Zuckerberg throws a dart at a dartboard and it hits your name, that doesn't mean that you should be paid 10 times more than the guy next to you who's just as skilled, just as talented," he said. He also added that compared to other companies, Meta's offers had captured fewer Anthropic employees, with some refusing to "even talk" to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. However, the tech giant did poach Anthropopic software engineer Joel Pobar. According to media reports, Meta has offered more than $200 million in compensation to one Apple AI researcher to work on his superintelligence team. Amodei also attacked Zuckerberg, accusing him of "trying to buy something that can't be bought", referring to the AI company's mission. The Meta CEO, meanwhile, has said that his goal was to bring superintelligence to every individual through his new lab and not use AI to automate the workforce like "others in the industry".
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Employee gets asked to work every weekend. Netizens react: ‘They are stealing her labour'
A startling exchange between a manager and an employee has been making waves online, particularly on the Indian Workplace subreddit, where it has reignited discussions around work-life boundaries and unreasonable employer demands . The incident centers on a professional who was caught off guard when her manager insisted she be available to work every single weekend without employee, in a WhatsApp message shared with the subreddit, clearly communicated her unavailability for weekend work. She explained that she was currently in her hometown without access to her work laptop, making it impossible to log in over the weekend. Looking ahead, she stated that she wouldn't be able to commit to weekend hours moving forward that, she assured her team that all tasks and responsibilities would be completed within regular business hours during the workweek. She also expressed gratitude for the team's support and requested that any urgent matters be flagged in advance so she could prioritize them at the start of the manager, however, didn't take this lightly. He responded by stating that the current working arrangement wasn't viable in the long term and that changes needed to be implemented. He announced that a team meeting would be held on Monday to address the issue and chart a way alternatives were put on the table: either team members would need to put in full eight-hour shifts at the office every Saturday and Sunday or add two extra hours to their daily schedules during the weekdays for the next three weeks. The manager ended the conversation by asking everyone to be mentally ready to resume duties under the new guidelines starting situation ignited strong reactions from Reddit users. One user remarked that what was happening amounted to exploitation and advised the employee to stand firm. Others echoed similar sentiments, warning against giving in to weekend work unless it was due to personal negligence during the week. A user questioned whether this demand stemmed from unmet deadlines or if it was an arbitrary increase in expectations. The original poster clarified that the demand applied to the entire team and was likely a result of increased workload—though the message had been conveyed more as a directive than a request.
