logo
Scoop: Anti-Chinese government group launches plan to track anti-CCP legislation in statehouses

Scoop: Anti-Chinese government group launches plan to track anti-CCP legislation in statehouses

Yahoo21-04-2025
EXCLUSIVE: State Armor Action is releasing a new tool that will allow people to track anti-Chinese Communist Party (CCP) legislation across the country.
"China's communist government targets American state governments in order to undermine our homeland security. Protecting the United States from the Chinese Communist Party requires working on the front lines in statehouses across the country to combat CCP aggression and oppression," Michael Lucci, the founder and CEO of State Armor Action, told Fox News Digital.
The comment comes as Lucci's organization, which aims to help U.S. states confront emerging global security threats, releases a new tracker that allows users to see all the legislation regarding China currently making its way through state legislatures.
Trump: China Calling 'A Lot' Since Last Week's Tariff Increase, Deal Could Happen As Soon As 3 Weeks
According to the tracker, their organization is currently keeping tabs on 461 bills across the country aimed at addressing the threat posed by the CCP.
The tracker also keeps tabs on where those bills stand, with a graphic showing that 11 of the bills have been killed, 43 have been adopted, 25 have passed both chambers, 43 have crossed over from one chamber to another, and 339 have been introduced.
Read On The Fox News App
"State Armor Action's legislation tracker will serve as a crucial tool in the fight against Communist China and its nefarious partners," Lucci said. "The tracker will help educate policy leaders and inform the American public about the legislation that will stop the CCP across the country, and it will help spread legislative concepts between states."
Gordon Chang: Trump Tariffing China At The Worst Possible Time For Xi Jinping
The tracker contains graphics that track the party in control of each state government where bills have been introduced or enacted, while also displaying a U.S. map showing which states have the highest concentration of anti-CCP bills.
While the threat posed by China may traditionally be seen as in the sphere of the federal government's control, Alex Gray, deputy assistant to the president and chief of staff of the White House National Security Council, told Fox News Digital that it is critical that states also set themselves up to combat China.
"The Chinese Communist Party has its sights set on the states," Gray said. "Now more than ever, we need state leaders to step up and harden themselves against Communist China. State Armor Action's new China legislation tracker will help inform and educate leaders on legislation across the country, allow them to monitor progress, and make it easier to join the fight against the CCP's encroachment in our homeland. State and local leaders can use the tracker to model their legislation based on other successful counter-CCP bills around the country. I urge all leaders to use this tool and help counter China's malign influence."Original article source: Scoop: Anti-Chinese government group launches plan to track anti-CCP legislation in statehouses
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

20 states and D.C. sue Trump administration for tying billions in crime victim grants to immigration enforcement
20 states and D.C. sue Trump administration for tying billions in crime victim grants to immigration enforcement

CBS News

timea minute ago

  • CBS News

20 states and D.C. sue Trump administration for tying billions in crime victim grants to immigration enforcement

Twenty states and the District of Columbia sued the Justice Department on Monday for adding a new immigration enforcement rule to federal grants that assist victims of crime — arguing it's part of the Trump administration's crackdown against "sanctuary states." The lawsuit focuses on the Office for Victims of Crime, a 42-year-old division of the Justice Department that hands out more than $1 billion per year to all 50 states to compensate crime victims and fund programs like local crisis counseling centers, emergency shelters, domestic abuse hotlines and victim advocacy services. The Trump-era Justice Department added a new condition to those grants that denies funding to any program that "violates (or promotes or facilitates the violation of) federal immigration law." That includes failing to "give access to [Department of Homeland Security] agents, or honor DHS requests." But the states that joined Monday's lawsuit argue that the rule is illegal, since the Reagan-era law that set up the federal government's crime victim grant programs doesn't say anything about immigration enforcement. "The challenged conditions would force these States into an untenable position: either forfeit access to critical resources for vulnerable crime victims and their families, or accept unlawful conditions, allowing the federal government to conscript state and local officials to enforce federal immigration law," the states and D.C. argue in the lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in Rhode Island. Mostly Democratic states joined the suit, including California, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota and Colorado. Collectively, they've received more than $500 million a year in crime victim grants since 2021, according to the lawsuit. The states asked a federal judge to block the new rules and declare them illegal. They said they need "urgent relief" since applications for most of the grants are due Wednesday. The Justice Department declined to comment on the lawsuit. As President Trump seeks to dramatically ramp up arrests of suspected undocumented immigrants, his administration has taken aim at so-called sanctuary cities and states, which generally limit local police from cooperating with federal immigration agents. Within hours of his swearing-in on Jan. 20, the president signed an executive order directing officials to ensure that sanctuary jurisdictions "do not receive access to Federal funds." Weeks later, Attorney General Pam Bondi ordered the Justice Department to identify and pause grants to groups that "support or provide services to removable or illegal aliens." The administration argues that sanctuary cities and states make it harder to enforce immigration laws, especially against criminals who end up in state or local custody. Supporters of sanctuary laws, however, argue that forcing local law enforcement officers to work with immigration agents makes migrants less likely to cooperate with the police. Monday's lawsuit said the conditions on crime victim grants risk "destroying trust between law enforcement and immigrant communities that is critical to preventing and responding to crime." "The federal government is attempting to use crime victim funds as a bargaining chip to force states into doing its bidding on immigration enforcement," New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement. Earlier this year, the Justice Department cut off hundreds of federal grant programs, including money for nonprofits that help victims of hate crimes, sex trafficking and violence against children, according to a list obtained by CBS News. The heads of some nonprofits warned they would need to lay off staff or shutter crime victim hotlines. At the time, a Justice Department spokesperson told CBS News: "We are confident that these cuts are consistent with the administration's priorities while at the same time protecting services that tangibly impact victims." A group of anti-domestic-violence nonprofits also sued the Justice Department earlier this year for banning grant funding under the Violence Against Women Act to groups that promote "gender ideology" or diversity, equity and inclusion programs. A judge paused that rule.

Leave Identity Politics Behind w/ Jimmy Failla
Leave Identity Politics Behind w/ Jimmy Failla

Fox News

timea minute ago

  • Fox News

Leave Identity Politics Behind w/ Jimmy Failla

It wouldn't be Monday without Host of FOX Across America and FOX News Saturday Night, Jimmy Failla! Jimmy and Kennedalia dive right into how the chaos of the 2028 Election has already started, and why identity politics and anti-Trump rhetoric don't work. Follow Kennedy on Twitter: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@KennedyNation⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Kennedy Now Available on YouTube: ⁠ ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Follow on TikTok: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Join Kennedy for Happy Hour on Fridays! ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit

US Attorney Jay Clayton approved by judges to remain as top prosecutor in New York
US Attorney Jay Clayton approved by judges to remain as top prosecutor in New York

Associated Press

timea minute ago

  • Associated Press

US Attorney Jay Clayton approved by judges to remain as top prosecutor in New York

NEW YORK (AP) — The judges of the Southern District of New York approved Jay Clayton on Monday to remain as the top federal prosecutor in Manhattan. The outcome was announced in a release by Southern District Executive Edward Friedland. It said he will serve as U.S. attorney unless someone else is nominated by President Donald Trump and approved by the Senate. Clayton, who served as chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission between 2017 and 2020, has deep-rooted Wall Street ties and over two decades of experience at a prominent international law firm, although he never was a prosecutor before taking the position four months ago. The approval came after several other U.S. attorneys across the country who were appointed by the Trump administration were unable to gain the approval of judges in their districts. The Manhattan prosecutor's office has undergone turmoil in recent months after several prosecutors, including then interim U.S. Attorney Danielle Sassoon, resigned after refusing to carry out orders from the Justice Department to drop corruption charges against Mayor Eric Adams. The case was eventually dropped after prosecutors from Washington submitted a request to a judge. Another assistant U.S. attorney, Maurene Comey, was recently fired shortly after she handled the bulk of duties in the trial of hip-hop producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs. He was acquitted of the most serious racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking charges, though he remains jailed and awaiting sentencing for his conviction on prostitution-related charges. Clayton has maintained a relatively low profile while heading an office of prosecutors long known for its independence from Washington. The decision on Clayton came after judges in several other federal jurisdictions across the country rejected the person chosen by the Trump administration as U.S. attorney, causing the administration to employ other legal maneuvers to keep its pick in place. The administration's appointments normally would face Senate approval, but Democratic senators in their home states can block the usual process, as several have done. That lets the appointed top prosecutor serve 120 days before the district's federal judges decide whether the individual can remain in the post. The judges can also appoint a successor. In the past, it was considered rare for judges to reject the appointed top prosecutor in their district, but several rejections have occurred this year. In the Northern District of New York, which encompasses 32 counties in upstate New York and includes the cities of Albany, Binghamton and Syracuse, judges rejected the appointment of John A. Sarcone III. The administration then appointed him as the special attorney to the attorney general, enabling him to continue in his role as U.S. attorney even though he doesn't directly carry that title. In New Jersey, federal judges rejected the appointment of former Trump defense attorney Alina Habba, choosing an interim top federal prosecutor in the state instead. Attorney General Pam Bondi responded by firing the judges' chosen successor and reinstalling Habba as acting U.S. attorney. Habba's tenure still faces uncertainty, though, after a lawsuit challenging the legality of the administration's move to keep her in place awaited a ruling this week by a Pennsylvania federal judge. The Justice Department says the president is entitled to name the person he wants to the position. Unlike Clayton, who has remained relatively controversy free in the runup to the judges' vote, Sarcone and Habba attracted headlines during their tenures. In June, Sarcone said he was attacked by a knife-wielding man from El Salvador outside an Albany hotel. The man, who lacked documentation to be in the country, was initially charged with attempted second-degree murder, but prosecutors downgraded the charge after reviewing video surveillance footage and the man pleaded guilty to menacing. Habba brought a rare federal criminal case against a sitting member of Congress for allegations other than fraud or corruption when U.S. Rep. LaMonica McIver was charged with assault for allegedly making physical contact with law enforcement officials when Newark's mayor was arrested during a chaotic visit to a privately operated immigration detention center in the state's largest city. McIver denied assaulting anyone. Habba has also launched an investigation into New Jersey's Democratic governor, Phil Murphy, and attorney general, Matt Platkin, over the state's directive barring local law enforcement from cooperating with federal agents conducting immigration enforcement. The administration has run into similar troubles elsewhere in the country. Two others who have been able to remain serving in roles as top federal prosecutors without approval from the Senate or judges in their districts are Bilal 'Bill' Essayli in Los Angeles and Sigal Chattah in Nevada. ___ Associated Press Writer Mike Catalini contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store