ASX's biggest stock is tipped to make $10.3b. Will it be enough for investors?
The biggest stock on the sharemarket, CBA has had a stunning rise. The stock has soared 37 per cent in the past year, far more than rivals, as investors piled into the bank's shares as a way of gaining exposure to Australia's economy during a time of global volatility.
The surge means CBA's market value easily eclipses that of its two nearest rivals, Westpac and National Australia Bank, combined. Analysts almost universally say CBA shares are overvalued.
The Sydney-based bank comprises about 12 per cent of the ASX 200, and its result will be a key event for sharemarket investors this week, as well as providing an important bellwether for the local banking sector and the wider economy. Investors say there will be little margin for error for the bank's results, which will be delivered by chief executive Matt Comyn on Wednesday.
Analysts expect CBA's first-half profits will increase to about $10.3 billion, up from $9.8 billion last year, and investors are likely to pore over its profit margins and any sign of a worsening in its loan portfolio.
Opal Capital chief investment officer Omkar Joshi said much of the buying of CBA shares, which had inflated the stock price, was not driven by the bank's performance.
Loading
Instead, analysts have suggested the share price has been inflated by super funds and offshore investors buying the stock as a bet on Australia's economy during a period of global volatility.
Even so, Joshi said that when share prices were high, it meant there was generally less margin for error, adding this was the case across for other highly valued stocks on the ASX as well.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
37 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Revealed: Sydney's most overvalued and undervalued suburbs
Explosive property market inflation has created pockets of Sydney where house prices have become 'overvalued' and at risk of soon falling as buyers seek out cheaper, comparable homes elsewhere. This has coincided with the emergence of contrasting city areas where the opposite conditions have emerged: prices are undervalued relative to neighbours, demand is picking up and 'catch up growth' is imminent, new data shows. The SuburbData analysis exposed varying levels of suburb price imbalances when comparing neighbouring areas offering similar houses, amenities and infrastructure. Undervalued suburbs were deemed good areas to buy in because prices could soon grow, while overvalued areas posed risks for new buyers, who were in danger of overcapitalising on their purchases. The research showed prices in the most 'overvalued' suburbs were up to $250,000 higher than nearby, similar areas – often after years of rampant growth that outpaced the rest of the surrounding market. Such price gaps were unsustainable, according to the SuburbData research, with buyer demand now showing signs of dropping while the supply of available properties was rising. These factors pointed to a coming market adjustment that would result in prices stagnating for many years, or even falling, raising risks for new buyers, the study revealed. SuburbData analyst Jeremy Sheppard said a suburb being undervalued or overvalued was down to market cycle timing and the balance of supply and demand, among other things. 'Buyers are continually searching for value for money,' he said. 'One of the big mistakes people make is assuming growth will occur at a consistent rate over many years. 'It doesn't work like that. Real estate moves in cycles. Buyers spot an opportunity to get better value for money in an (undervalued) market and that drives a feeding frenzy. Prices then go up sharply. 'Rises will continue until buyers reach the stage where they no longer see value … It's at that peak when the market is generally overvalued.' Areas ranked among the 20 most overvalued Sydney markets were a mix of suburbs spread across the greater city area. They included developing suburbs around the coming Western Sydney airport, such as Rossmore and Bringelly, which have attracted ample speculative investment over recent years. Overvalued suburbs also included outer suburbs dominated by acreages and semirural properties, such as Mulgoa and Orchard Hills, south of Penrith and Ellis Lane, in the Camden area. Prices in these fringe areas were elevated during the pandemic due to increased buyer demand for spacey properties, but these areas have historically appealed to more niche buyers, with recent indicators of demand beginning to fall. There were also parts of the Pittwater region in Sydney's upper northern beaches deemed overvalued, including Great Mackerel Beach, Whale Beach and Clareville. These too were hot markets during the pandemic and the years that followed, attracting a string of 'lifestyle' buyers wanting more space and quieter coastal settings – only demand has now dropped and property supply is rising, suggesting prices may have peaked. Undervalued suburbs, where growth has been stunted over a few years and conditions have since picked up, included a string of relatively affordable areas around Strathfield and Greater Parramatta. The suburbs were Homebush West, Dundas Valley, Wentworthville, Liberty Grove and Granville, among others. Parts of the south were also considered undervalued, such as Sutherland Shire suburb Jannali and, in the southern Canterbury-Bankstown area, Revesby and Revesby Heights. Buyer's agent Andrew Hancock of My Property Pro has sourced deals for numerous families wanting to purchase in these southern areas and said most were coming from more expensive regions like the inner west. 'There is a perception that there is better value on offer and these buyers often have higher paying jobs and bigger budgets and that's pushing up the prices,' he said. 'An area like Revesby has homes that are a lot cheaper than suburbs further to the south like Kirrawee, but they offer something a bit similar. It is undervalued and these types of areas do catch up.' Other undervalued suburbs were in the inner west, including Campsie, Newtown, Alexandria and Petersham. Adrian Tsavalas, the director of inner west agency Adrian William, said Newtown was particularly good value at the moment. 'It's always been a popular area and it has had various growth spikes in the past but when you compare it to other inner city suburbs like Glebe and Annandale, its excellent value,' he said. 'Units are a really good entry point into the area because they've remained really good value for the past five years.'

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
With RBA in their corner, investors are treating shares and property as sure bets — and that's risky
Asset prices are now regularly soaring to new heights. To be clear, this is not normal. Asset prices, including property and share prices, rise over time, sure, but not to brave new heights daily. Why is this happening? And are these once-risky financial markets now perceived as a sure bet? These questions and the future of the Australian economy and 15 million jobs attached to it are what worry investment experts and economists. Tracking the Australian property market's upward momentum is straightforward. On the demand side, investment tax breaks, lower interest rates and a steady flow of migrants generate plenty of demand. Indeed, the number of new investor loan commitments for dwellings rose 3.5 per cent in the June quarter, which drove overall lending activity. On the supply side, a chronic housing shortage, despite efforts from both state and federal governments to break more ground on housing, has also supported house prices. Under the government's lofty 1.2 million homes target, roughly 240,000 new homes need to be built every year to meet growing demand, but we're falling short of that mark by about 60,000 homes a year. The lack of available property is also pushing up rents, with Sydney and Brisbane leading the charge, according to property market analysis firm Cotality (formerly CoreLogic). Cotality's capital city rental value index rose 3.0 per cent in the year to July, up from 2.7 per cent in June, marking the end of a 16-month run of moderating or stable rental growth. Meanwhile, the share market has produced several record highs in recent weeks. On Friday, the benchmark S&P/ASX 200 index — the main index tracking the ups and downs of the market — surpassed 8,900 points. That's an all-time high, following several records this week and last. It means the share market is up 22 per cent since it belly-flopped after US President Donald Trump's so-called "liberation day" tariff hikes. Bitcoin and gold, too, are also consistently at or approaching all-time highs weekly. Analysts say there is a direct link between this asset price appreciation and record levels of liquidity, or cash, in the economy. Central banks can increase levels of liquidity by lowering interest rates and buying bonds — anything that puts cash in the economy. It's worth bringing up a bit of economic jargon at this point. "Moral hazard" is an economic concept that describes the pickle firms get into when they know they'll be bailed out — for example, by a central bank or government — if they make mistakes or take on too much risk. You could argue moral hazard was created in 2008 when the US government bailed out some of Wall Street's biggest banks with the "troubled assets relief program" and the Emergency Economic Stabilisation Act. It set a global precedent that implicitly stated: If you make recklessly risky financial investments that eventually sour, governments and central banks will bail you out because the alternative is too horrific. But is there more going on here? Is it possible that central bank "liquidity-at-the-ready" is not just emboldening companies to make riskier financial decisions, but a signal to investors that their investments aren't as risky as they had thought? I asked Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock on Tuesday if she accepted that the RBA had effectively underwritten financial markets, taking away significant levels of risk for investors. "The guiding light here has to be inflation and employment [in terms of monetary policy]," she said. "[The RBA] also has responsibility for financial stability matters and it will be there [to support the markets], but it's not going to come in just for the sake of protecting asset prices. "We don't aim at asset prices. "We are focused on inflation and employment." Financial stability is becoming increasingly important for Australia. Our superannuation industry is now worth more than $4 trillion and is increasingly exposed to Wall Street, which is riddled with financial risks, analysts say. But there's also a heavy concentration of ownership in a few big-name Australian stocks, too. When the price of Commonwealth Bank shares slumped this week, boss Matt Comyn highlighted that 13 million Australians, directly or indirectly, owned the stock. Montgomery Investments founder Roger Montgomery said the RBA applied this approach to policy — focusing on its financial stability responsibilities — during the global financial crisis of 2008-2009. "The Reserve Bank's actions, particularly during crises like the [2009 financial crisis] and the COVID-19 pandemic, have shaped markets but the impact on risk isn't straightforward," he said. "The RBA has a mandate to maintain economic stability, including price stability, full employment and financial system stability. "During crises, it can inject liquidity into the financial system through measures like quantitative easing or providing funding to banks via facilities like the term funding facility (TFF) introduced during COVID-19. "These actions aim to stabilise markets, ensure credit availability and prevent systemic collapses." But the mere presence of this backstop now also seems to be supporting asset prices. "However, this expectation can encourage excessive risk-taking. "Investors may overweight riskier assets or overpay for stock, disregarding their price." There was an increased chance, he said, that investors would be "more inclined to FOMO [fear of missing out]". "The central bank's action may shorten the pain but it won't prevent the decline," he said. It all raises a crucial question for asset markets more broadly — has the very concept of risk changed? For example, you know if you put your cash in an Australian bank, it's very safe. You also know if you buy an Australian government security, you're highly likely to get your money back with some interest. But now it seems the more we invest in the share market or property market, and the bigger those markets grow, the more pressure builds on both the government and RBA to safeguard those markets. Why? Because a collapse in either market would be a wrecking ball through the economy. You can see why next week's economic reform round table is so important. Without robust levels of productivity, a credit crunch would be catastrophic to an economy propped up on mining, banking and the property market. The Reserve Bank can be there to support financial stability, but has it distracted us from building a strong backbone for the Australian economy?

The Australian
9 hours ago
- The Australian
ASX hits fresh peak on Friday despite China's unexpected economic shift
Australia's sharemarket continued its strong gains, setting a new record high for the fifth straight session as a strong start to reporting season outweighed weakness out of China. The benchmark ASX200 continued its march higher during Friday afternoon's trading, closing up 64.80 points or 0.73 per cent to 8,938.60, while the broader All Ordinaries finished the day up 63 points or 0.69 per cent to 9,212.10. Australia's dollar also traded 0.13 per cent higher and at the time of writing was buying 65.03 US cents. In a broad market rally, nine of the 11 sectors traded higher with only consumer staples and technology finishing lower. Australia's sharemarket jumped during the afternoon's trading. Picture Newswire/ Gaye Gerard. The big four all gained, led by Westpac which jumped 2.14 per cent to $36.81 after announcing strong quarterly results on Thursday. ANZ also had a strong day up 1.78 per cent to $33.08, while NAB finished 0.80 per cent higher to $39.19 and Commonwealth Bank traded 0.57 per cent higher to $168.17. The materials sector helped lift the market with BHP shares up 1.08 per cent to $41.96, Rio Tinto jumped 1.41 per cent to $115.05 and Fortescue closed 1.28 per cent higher at $19.84. The rise in the materials sector came despite weakness out of China which could impact Australia's major resources sector. AMP chief economist and head of investment strategy Shane Oliver said Chinese economic data for July was soft. 'Retail sales, industrial production and investment all rose less than expected and residential property investment and sales are continuing to fall as are home prices,' Dr Oliver said. 'Unemployment rose slightly although this possibly due to grad and typhoon season.' The market ignored pressures from China, focusing on reporting season which so far has been better than expected. 'Results have been good with more upside than downside surprises, although most results have been in line, and a big increase in the number of companies reporting profits or dividends up on a year ago than in the December half reporting season,' Dr Oliver said. 'Just bear in mind though that it was much like this at the start of the last reporting season as there is a tendency for companies with good results to report early so results may soften over the next couple of weeks.' Nine of the 11 sectors gained. Picture: NewsWire / Damian Shaw He also said consensus earnings expectations are for overall business profits to fall 1.7 per cent. If the results show this, it would be the third year in a row corporate earnings shrunk. In company news, shares in hearing implant maker Cochlear gained 0.99 per cent to $309.03 after announcing a 1 per cent increase in underlying net profits to $392m, while revenue was up 4 per cent. Cochlear said it aimed to help more than 60,000 people to hear using one of its devices over the next year, up from 53,000 in the last financial year. Shares in Amcor sank 9.70 per cent to $13.60 after announcing its fourth-quarter results showing weakness out of its North American businesses. Baby Bunting soared 40.54 to $2.60 on its latest earnings with the business aiming to double its store network. According to its results until June 29 sales grew by 4.7 per cent to $521.9m, while margins increased and underlying net profit under tax soared 228 per cent to $12.1m. Read related topics: ASXChina Ties