I spent 31 years advising US on the Iran threat – it's the last gaps of a dying regime, Trump's next move is crucial
IRAN'S repressed nation should be encouraged to overthrow its barbaric regime by the US, an ex-Congress adviser said.
Calls for regime overhaul in the rogue nation have rumbled louder since a 12-day war broke out between Israel and Iran erupted.
7
7
7
Donald Trump unleashed the biggest blow of the conflict last Sunday when he ordered America's military to bomb Iran's nuclear sites.
The US leader even hinted at toppling the regime as he wrote on Truth Social: "If the current Iranian regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a regime change? MIGA!".
Authorities in the US insisted ousting the Ayatollah was not one of its goals - but question marks hang over whether his cruel regime can survive.
Supreme leader Ali Khamenei has led a blood-soaked reign over Iran since 1989 following the death of his ruthless predecessor Ruhollah Khomeini.
But the chorus of voices demanding regime change in Iran has amplified after decades of its people suffering a catalogue of human rights violations.
Fears have also escalated that the wounded regime could deploy a dirty bomb in desperation after its nuclear ambitions were largely obliterated by the US and Israel.
Kenneth Katzman, who spent 31 years briefing Congress on Iran as a top Middle East Analyst, believes the US should now take little action - except incentivise life under a new regime.
Merciless Khamenei, 86, has been in hiding since Israel began a campaign to destroy his nuclear sites - and many senior figures believe his rule could be on its last legs.
Katzman told The Sun: "These are the last gasps of a dying regime.
"It's still in control nominally but I personally believe this regime is basically lost. Only the real diehards right now are behind this regime.
"That doesn't mean it's going to collapse any day now, but it will eventually. This regime is in big trouble."
Katzman, who retired in 2022 but has continued to watch Iran cut a menacing figure, said if it was still advise Congress to now "do as little as possible".
The analyst, who worked at the US Congressional Research Service, added: "There is a war fever going on now, with a lot of piling on and dredging up past incidents with Iran, past grievances.
'If it were up to me I would say to send some kind of signal that if there is a new regime, the US is willing to lift sanctions, provide humanitarian aid, welcome defectors and investment from Iran.
'Signalling that if the people can get rid of this regime they can have the same future that Syria is now experiencing, where they got rid of a dictator and have had sanctions lifted.
'That would be the tone I would take. The regime can be toppled very suddenly, although it's not toppling just yet.
'If you take it from the Iranian people's perspective, there's no prospect of getting sanctions relief, they're in a war with Israel with no air defense.
Evil Ayatollah could unleash dirty bomb, exiled prince warns
Exclusive by Katie Davis, Chief Foreign Reporter (Digital), in Paris
IRAN'S brutal regime could kill tens of millions of people by smuggling nuclear material and unleashing it on Europe, the rogue nation's exiled prince told The Sun.
Reza Pahlavi warned while the US and Israel have eliminated the "immediate threat" of its atomic ambitions, barbaric leaders could still acquire a dirty bomb.
Pahlavi, the son of Iran's last Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, warned callous Ayatollah Ali Khamenei could still attempt to utilise his warped allies in a bid to get his hands on nuclear matter.
Speaking to The Sun at an undisclosed location in Paris just hours before the ceasefire this week, he said: "Terrorism has many means of hurting big time. Nobody anticipated 9/11. It was a terrorist attack.
"What keeps people not to worry about the fact that the call of these terrorist networks of sleeper cells could smuggle in a few grams of enriched plutonium, throw it in a lake in Europe, and instantaneously kill tens of millions of people who will be radioactively attacked.
"You don't need a missile or warhead for that.
"We have at least eliminated the imminent threat of the regime. Does that mean that the regime still doesn't have the capability to acquire nuclear weapons or a dirty bomb by purchasing it from the North Koreans?
"It doesn't eliminate that, that's the entire point."
Pahlavi, whose family was forced to leave Iran after the Islamic Revolution in 1979, warned unless the Islamist regime is toppled, the threat of nuclear material being weaponised looms large.
The self-styled crown prince - who has been advocating for regime change for decades - announced on Monday he is offering to lead a transitional government to make Iran a democratic, secular country.
'The regime has now brought them into a war with the United States, although that may not continue. I think the people can only take so much.'
Last week the US bombed nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan after Iran's devastating missile exchange with Israel.
President Donald Trump has since announced a precarious ceasefire, but the world continues to nervously await what happens next.
While Iran is currently in a ceasefire with Israel, fears continue to grow as to how long this will last.
Trump was this week hailed a 'daddy' by Nato chief Mark Rutte at a landmark meeting in the Netherlands.
Iran also finally admitted the US strikes had left their nuclear facilities 'badly damaged'.
But it came after Trump made the astonishing claim on Tuesday that Israel and Iran 'don't know what the f*** they're doing' following doubts the agreement had been kept.
Katzman believes Iran is very far away from developing a nuclear weapon.
And even if it did get one, it would be extremely difficult for it to ever threaten a launch given US and Israeli intelligence.
He added: 'I think US intelligence is good enough to detect if they were actually going to try to use a nuclear weapon.
'You need a lot of steps to do that. It's not that easy to conceal, especially with the Mossad agents crawling all over the place as they are right now.
'There are radioactivity detectors. There's a lot of intelligence gathering going on.
'So I don't think it would be that easy for them to just go from where they are now with these destroyed facilities to suddenly producing a nuclear weapon.
'I could be wrong, but I don't think it's that easy.'
Asked how the Iranian people could conceivably overthrow the regime, Katzman said he doesn't expect anything to happen soon.
7
7
7
He believes the conflict must settle first.
Katzman added: 'It can be toppled. Is it close to being toppled? No, but it can be.
'Anything can really spark it. We had a partial prison break at Evin Prison.
'You can get incidents. I hear the IRGC is already cracking down by stopping every car that goes by to see if there are Mossad agents in there.
'They're sort of doubling down on their strategy in a way. That can work for a while, but the population is pretty fed up.
'Obviously the population has to get through this crisis first and then it can reassess what to do about the regime.
'So it's not going to do anything right now while the conflict is going on, but ultimately though, there's going to be a reckoning.'
On Wednesday Nato leaders pledged to increase their annual defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035.
Trump also said he no longer believes the organisation is a 'rip-off'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US Senate votes down resolution to restrict Trump from escalating Iran war
Senate Democrats failed on Friday to get a war-powers resolution passed to limit Donald Trump's ability to single-handedly escalate the war with Iran. The resolution, 'to direct the removal of United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran', was voted down 53-47. The vote on the resolution, introduced by the Democratic senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, split along mainly partisan lines. One Republican, Rand Paul of Kentucky, voted for it; one Democrat, John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, voted against it. 'Congress declares war,' Kaine said in a speech on the Senate floor. He stressed that the framers of the US constitution in 1787 were so wary of giving the power to start wars to one person that they did not even entrust it to George Washington, the first commander-in-chief. 'They decided that war was too big a decision for one person,' Kaine said. 'And so they wrote a constitution that said the United States should not be at war without a vote of Congress.' The measure would have compelled Trump to seek authorization from Congress before taking any further military action. Trump ordered airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities on 22 June. This directly followed Israel launching attacks on Iran, and Iran retaliating. Trump said that the US bombardment 'totally obliterated' key nuclear enrichment facilities and deemed the mission a success, although some initial reports said the damage was minimal. Iran condemned the attacks. Trump claimed on Friday that Iran had halted its nuclear ambitions after the bombings. But, he said, he would 'absolutely' continue to attack the country's nuclear sites if he believed it was once again enriching uranium. 'Time will tell,' Trump said at the White House. 'But I don't believe that they're going to go back into nuclear anytime soon.' Later on Friday, Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, rebuked Trump on social media. 'If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers', Araghchi wrote on X. 'The Great and Powerful Iranian People, who showed the world that the Israeli regime had NO CHOICE but to RUN to 'Daddy' to avoid being flattened by our Missiles, do not take kindly to Threats and Insults', Iran's top diplomat added, in something approximating Trump's own social media style. 'If Illusions lead to worse mistakes, Iran will not hesitate to unveil its Real Capabilities, which will certainly END any Delusion about the Power of Iran.'
The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Struggling in politics? Consider a war – the media will help
'You furnish the pictures. I'll furnish the war,' was the storied response of the newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst to Frederic Remington after the illustrator was sent to Cuba to cover an insurrection and cabled back to the boss that there was little going on. Much has changed since that famous (if true) exchange of the late 19th century, in the heyday of sensationalism known as yellow journalism. But one thing that hasn't changed is that there's nothing like military conflict to capture the attention of the public, with plenty of help from the media. And the media – whether a tabloid newspaper or a cable news network – benefits, too. These days, Donald Trump's recent strike on Iran has proved the point once again, with the media's attention intensely focused on Operation Midnight Hammer, as it was dramatically dubbed. First the emphasis was on the threat of attacks to Iran's budding nuclear arsenal, then on the possibility of all-out global war, then on the strikes themselves and then the announcement of a supposed ceasefire. All to the greater glory of Trump, at least as he tells it. For those who are trying to bring public attention to other important matters – even matters of life and death – that's a frustrating reality. Jennifer Mascia knows this all too well. She is a founding reporter for the Trace, a non-profit news site dedicated to tracking the epidemic of gun violence in America and trying to do something about it, through exploring solutions. When elected officials in Minnesota were shot earlier this month – the former state House speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed, and the state legislator John Hoffman and his wife were wounded – it was a huge story. Huge, but fleeting. 'Pitted against a global conflict, domestic news doesn't really stand a chance,' said Mascia, who previously contributed to the now-defunct Gun Report at the New York Times, begun by the then columnist Joe Nocera. That's true for domestic news that, in an earlier era, would have commanded the media's attention for many days, if not weeks. The Minnesota violence was even more newsworthy because of an early manhunt and disinformation swirling around the apparent assassin's political leanings. Still, coverage seemed to disappear in the blink of an eye. 'The Trump era has all but ensured that important news will get smacked out of the news cycle in favor of the latest development in Trumpworld,' Mascia wrote to me in an email, after we had talked by phone. Mascia is quick to clarify that she's not suggesting that the media ignore what the chaotic president is doing. 'It's important that we cover Trump's constitutional breaches. We shouldn't become numb or complacent in the face of eroding democracy,' she said. But it was remarkable to see how quickly the Minnesota shootings faded from media attention. A CNN contributor herself, Mascia is often called in to provide perspective for 'Day Two' of coverage after the initial reporting of gun-related news. But often these days, she notes, there is no Day Two. By then, the media has moved on. 'Maybe if the Israel-Iran war wasn't going on, we'd still be talking about it,' she said. 'Anderson Cooper would be broadcasting from Melissa Hortman's funeral. But instead, he's in Tel Aviv.' And, of course, this extends to all sorts of other subjects, not just gun violence. Those who try to focus attention on voting rights, the rule of law, crucial supreme court decisions, widespread citizen action such as the vast 'No Kings' protests – to mention just a few – may get a modicum of attention. But nothing compares to a show of military force. And Trump, always attuned to how he's being perceived, is well aware of that. 'A spectacular military success,' he crowed after the strikes. 'A historic success,' echoed his defense secretary. Pete Hegseth couldn't countenance being asked actual questions and claimed the press was trying to distort the story 'for their own political reasons to try to hurt President Trump or our country'. Was the administration's bragging accurate? Perhaps not, said intelligence reports that indicated the strikes may have only added months to the time Iran needs to produce the material for a nuclear weapon. But no matter. The strikes – from the lead-up to the aftermath – sucked up all the oxygen in the media universe for many days. Even by Thursday early afternoon, the top four news articles (plus one photo) on the Washington Post mobile app, for example, were Iran-related. And Fox News, of course, remained largely a cheering section. Whatever the effect on world peace, military conflict sure is good for ratings, as William Randolph Hearst knew in his bones. 'Historians point to the Spanish-American war as the first press-driven war,' noted a PBS article accompanying the film Crucible of Empire. It wouldn't be the last. Margaret Sullivan is a Guardian US columnist writing on media, politics and culture
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Iran using social media to recruit spies ‘at scale'
Social media platforms are being widely used by intelligence services across the Middle East to recruit spies, counter-intelligence specialists have said. The platforms, which unlike traditional media are not generally liable for the content they publish, are being exploited by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) to ensnare vulnerable Israelis like 'sardines', said a former Israeli spy chief. Iranian authorities in turn allege that Israeli intelligence services are using Persian-language social media platforms to recruit and gather intelligence from Iranian citizens. 'The b------s have infiltrated everywhere,' an Iranian official told The Telegraph this week. Israeli police and Shin Bet internal security agents arrested three Israelis suspected of spying on Iran's behalf last week – the latest in a string of espionage incidents linked to the Islamic Republic over the past two years. The three had no known connection to one another and are said, like dozens of others, to have been recruited via social media. One of the suspects, Dmitri Cohen, a 28-year-old from Haifa, gathered intelligence on the future daughter-in-law of Benjamin Netanyahu, local media reported last Monday. The wedding of Avner Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister's son, and Amit Yardeni, his partner, was supposed to have taken place two weeks ago but was postponed following the outbreak of open conflict with Iran. Talking to The Telegraph on Friday, Oded Ailam, a former head of the counter-terrorism division of the Mossad, Israel's foreign intelligence agency, said Iran had adopted a 'new concept' in spy recruitment, which targeted tens of thousands of Israelis via social media. Historically, spymasters of the 'Le Carré mould' would spend months, sometimes years, identifying potential recruits. However, social media platforms have allowed Iran to turn recruitment into a 'numbers game,' said Mr Ailam, who spent 24 years in the Mossad and is now a researcher at the Jerusalem Centre for Security and Foreign Affairs. 'Their concept, their basic concept, is big numbers,' he said. 'They say, 'OK, we are going to approach 10,000 different targets, in Israel or abroad'. Out of the 10,000 targets, maybe 30 per cent will respond to the initial approach, and from that maybe 10 per cent will be willing to move forward, and 2 to 5 per cent will say 'yes'.' He added: 'It's big numbers; statistics rather than pinpoint. In that sense, you are not a fisherman. You are a hunter … they're not going after sharks. They're going after sardines.' Mr Ailam, who learnt his trade-craft in the old school, warned that the dragnet concept was 'primitive' but a real threat. It was 'cheap and cost-effective' and the Iranians did not worry about failure because they were not concerned about diplomatic blowback, he said. Targets were normally Jewish immigrants to Israel from lower socio-economic groups who did not have an 'ideological affiliation to Israel' and needed money, he added. Mr Ailam warned that, once ensnared in conversation on social media, the 'ladder was quick' and the chances of being caught 'enormous' because of the digital trail that social media leaves. 'It's instant, it's fast food … the assets are dispensable. The Iranians don't care if [the] asset is caught. They don't even care if he double crossed them … it's just numbers,' he said. There was an element of grooming, he said, adding: 'They start with soft assignments, just to see, to feel the guy, to see whether he's willing to cross online. It usually starts with graffiti, against Netanyahu or against whatever. Then it starts with small sabotage of puncturing [tyres] and stuff like this. 'They go from the soft one to the harder one, and then it goes to actually providing intelligence on Israeli bases, Israeli strategic places, and even the assassination of Israelis.' Mr Ailam said he had no doubt that those recruited know what they are getting into but that clever defence lawyers were muddying the water at trials and court sentences were too lenient at seven years on average, reduced by 30 per cent for good behaviour. 'We face an existential crisis … [but] the court is looking on those poor, miserable people who are standing in front of them with their head down and saying, 'I'm sorry. I didn't know' … they buy this bulls---,' he said. But at least Israel has due process and a transparent legal system. In Iran, the security forces arrested more than 700 people accused of various forms of collaboration with Israeli intelligence services during the recent 12-day conflict alone, and executed at least six people that they alleged were spies. Three men – Idris Aali, Azad Shojaei and Rasoul Ahmad Rasoul – were executed at dawn at Urmia prison on charges of 'corruption on Earth through cooperation with hostile foreign states in favour of Israel', according to state media. Iranian officials also reported the execution of Mohammad Amin Mahdavi Shaysteh, described as 'the leader of a cyber network linked to Mossad,' last Monday. An Iranian official told The Telegraph: 'There's a lot of concern, which is why they had cut off the internet. Many of those who had been working with the enemy were still connected like that [through social media]. 'No one even thought they would become as reckless as to come and target everyone in their homes, but in the past day, they've arrested some people from within the IRGC itself. The b------s have infiltrated everywhere.' According to Iranian security officials, Israeli intelligence services are using Persian-language social media platforms to recruit spies and gather intelligence from Iranian citizens. Iranian authorities say Israel's military Unit 8200, known for its cyber warfare capabilities, has intensified operations across Persian-language social media channels and messaging apps since the war between the two countries began. The unit creates fake accounts to pose as ordinary Iranians while seeking to collect sensitive information about military installations and government activities, according to Iranian media. 'These individuals establish fake accounts and present themselves as ordinary people while seeking to gather information,' an Iranian security official told the state-run Mehr news agency. The sophistication of Israel's social media espionage extends beyond simple intelligence gathering, they added. Iranian officials describe a methodical approach where Israeli operatives spend months or even years building authentic-looking online personas before activating them for intelligence purposes. 'Some of these fake accounts have been established for a long time and have undergone what we call identity building,' one security official said. 'They have had normal activity on Persian-language social networks for months to create a track record of activity so they can be recognised and trusted as ordinary citizens.' This patient approach allows Israeli intelligence to embed deeply within Iranian social media circles, gaining access to information that might be shared casually among trusted community members, it is claimed. The accounts often share cultural content, participate in discussions about daily life, and slowly build networks of followers who view them as legitimate Iranian citizens. Iranian authorities say they have documented cases where the operatives engage in seemingly normal conversations about local events, gradually steering discussions toward topics of intelligence value such as military movements, government facilities, or economic conditions. Beyond creating fake personas, Iranian officials say Mossad operatives hack accounts to directly message individual Iranian users on social networks, particularly Telegram. Iranian security services have warned citizens to 'never open links received from unknown accounts' and to immediately block any accounts that send unsolicited messages or links. Threatening text messages Iran's response has been swift and severe. Citizens reported receiving threatening text messages from the judiciary on the first day of a US-brokered ceasefire, warning they could face prosecution for 'following or joining pages affiliated with Israel'. The authorities have warned about espionage risks from Meta applications, including WhatsApp and Facebook, urging citizens to be aware that 'the results of information gathering by the Zionist regime could lead to assassination, bombing, or new crimes against Iran.' Others suspect the Iranian crackdown has more to do with stifling internal descent than genuine fears over spying. Legal experts have criticised the threats to Iranian citizens as having 'no judicial or legal value' and designed primarily to 'create fear and terror and suppression' among the population. During the peak of the recent Israeli strikes, only 3 per cent of Iranians had access to the global internet, as some opposition groups outside Iran were calling for people to 'rise against the regime.' Iran has repeatedly cut internet access during major protests, using digital blackouts to hide the scale of violence against demonstrators and prevent documentation of human rights violations. The pattern emerged during fuel price protests in November 2019, when Iranian authorities implemented a near-total internet shutdown that lasted for days. During that blackout, security forces killed at least 304 protesters, according to Amnesty International, though the real death toll is believed to be much higher – some rights groups say the number is 1,500. The government used the same tactic during the 2022 Woman, Life, Freedom protests that erupted after 22-year-old Mahsa Amini died while being held in custody by the morality police. In a post on its Persian-language X account on Thursday, the Mossad offered medical assistance to ordinary Iranian citizens hurt in the recent conflict, encouraging them to reach out via WhatsApp, Telegram, or Signal for assistance. 'At this moment, the regime is focused on its senior percentages, not on caring for its citizens,' read the message. 'We stand with you and have formed a team of specialized doctors, including experts in cardiology, diabetes, pulmonary diseases, infectious diseases, oncology, as well as support for pregnant women and psychological support. 'All doctors speak Persian, and you can communicate with them in Persian or English. However, we suggest that you reach out to us via VPN [an online technology that masks the user's location]'.
