
Vietnam wants to be the next Asian tiger and it's overhauling its economy to make it happen.
Vietnam aims to get rich by 2045 and become Asia's next 'tiger economy' — a term used to describe the earlier ascent of countries like South Korea and Taiwan.
The challenge ahead is steep: Reconciling growth with overdue reforms, an aging population, climate risks and creaking institutions. There's added pressure from President Donald Trump over Vietnam's trade surplus with the U.S., a reflection of its astounding economic trajectory.
In 1990, the average Vietnamese could afford about $1,200 worth of goods and services a year, adjusted for local prices. Today, that figure has risen by more than 13 times to $16,385.
Vietnam's transformation into a global manufacturing hub with shiny new highways, high-rise skylines and a booming middle class has lifted millions of its people from poverty, similar to China. But its low-cost, export-led boom is slowing, while the proposed reforms — expanding private industries, strengthening social protections, and investing in tech, green energy. It faces a growing obstacle in climate change.
'It's all hands on deck...We can't waste time anymore," said Mimi Vu of the consultancy Raise Partners.
The export boom can't carry Vietnam forever
Investment has soared, driven partly by U.S.-China trade tensions, and the U.S. is now Vietnam's biggest export market. Once-quiet suburbs have been replaced with industrial parks where trucks rumble through sprawling logistics hubs that serve global brands.
Vietnam ran a $123.5 billion trade surplus with the U.S. trade in 2024, angering Trump, who threatened a 46% U.S. import tax on Vietnamese goods. The two sides appear to have settled on a 20% levy, and twice that for goods suspected of being transshipped, or routed through Vietnam to avoid U.S. trade restrictions.
During negotiations with the Trump administration, Vietnam's focus was on its tariffs compared to those of its neighbors and competitors, said Daniel Kritenbrink, a former U.S. ambassador to Vietnam. 'As long as they're in the same zone, in the same ballpark, I think Vietnam can live with that outcome," he said. But he added questions remain over how much Chinese content in those exports might be too much and how such goods will be taxed.
Vietnam was preparing to shift its economic policies even before Trump's tariffs threatened its model of churning out low-cost exports for the world, aware of what economists call the 'middle-income trap,' when economies tend to plateau without major reforms.
To move beyond that, South Korea bet on electronics, Taiwan on semiconductors, and Singapore on finance, said Richard McClellan, founder of the consultancy RMAC Advisory.
But Vietnam's economy today is more diverse and complex than those countries were at the time and it can't rely on just one winning sector to drive long-term growth and stay competitive as wages rise and cheap labor is no longer its main advantage.
It needs to make 'multiple big bets,' McClellan said.
Vietnam's game plan is hedging its bets
Following China's lead, Vietnam is counting on high-tech sectors like computer chips, artificial intelligence and renewable energy, providing strategic tax breaks and research support in cities like Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, and Danang.
It's also investing heavily in infrastructure, including civilian nuclear plants and a $67 billion North–South high-speed railway, that will cut travel time from Hanoi to Ho Chi Minh City to eight hours.
Vietnam also aspires to become a global financial center. The government plans two special financial centers, in bustling Ho Chi Minh City and in the seaside resort city of Danang, with simplified rules to attract foreign investors, tax breaks, support for financial tech startups, and easier ways to settle business disputes.
Underpinning all of this is institutional reform. Ministries are being merged, low-level bureaucracies have been eliminated and Vietnam's 63 provinces will be consolidated into 34 to build regional centers with deeper talent pools.
Private business to take the lead
Vietnam is counting on private businesses to lead its new economic push — a seismic shift from the past.
In May, the Communist Party passed Resolution 68. It calls private businesses the 'most important force' in the economy, pledging to break away from domination by state-owned and foreign companies.
So far, large multinationals have powered Vietnam's exports, using imported materials and parts and low cost local labor. Local companies are stuck at the low-end of supply chains, struggling to access loans and markets that favored the 700-odd state-owned giants, from colonial-era beer factories with arched windows to unfashionable state-run shops that few customers bother to enter.
'The private sector remains heavily constrained," said Nguyen Khac Giang of Singapore's ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
Again emulating China, Vietnam wants 'national champions' to drive innovation and compete globally, not by picking winners, but by letting markets decide. The policy includes easier loans for companies investing in new technology, priority in government contracts for those meeting innovation goals, and help for firms looking to expand overseas. Even mega-projects like the North-South High-Speed Rail, once reserved for state-run giants, are now open to private bidding.
By 2030, Vietnam hopes to elevate at least 20 private firms to a global scale. But Giang warned that there will be pushback from conservatives in the Communist Party and from those who benefit from state-owned firms.
A Closing Window from climate change
Even as political resistance threatens to stall reforms, climate threats require urgent action.
After losing a major investor over flood risks, Bruno Jaspaert knew something had to change. His firm, DEEP C Industrial Zones, houses more than 150 factories across northern Vietnam. So it hired a consultancy to redesign flood resilience plans.
Climate risk is becoming its own kind of market regulation, forcing businesses to plan better, build smarter, and adapt faster. 'If the whole world will decide it's a priority...it can go very fast,' said Jaspaert.
When Typhoon Yagi hit last year, causing $1.6 billion in damage, knocking 0.15% off Vietnam's GDP and battering factories that produce nearly half the country's economic output, roads in DEEP C industrial parks stayed dry.
Climate risks are no longer theoretical: If Vietnam doesn't take strong action to adapt to and reduce climate change, the country could lose 12–14.5% of its GDP each year by 2050, and up to one million people could fall into extreme poverty by 2030, according to the World Bank.
Meanwhile, Vietnam is growing old before it gets rich.
The country's 'golden population' window — when working-age people outnumber dependents — will close by 2039 and the labor force is projected to peak just three years later. That could shrink productivity and strain social services, especially since families — and women in particular — are the default caregivers, said Teerawichitchainan Bussarawan of the Centre for Family and Population Research at the National University of Singapore.
Vietnam is racing to pre-empt the fallout by expanding access to preventive healthcare so older adults remain healthier and more independent. Gradually raising the retirement age and drawing more women into the formal workforce would help offset labor gaps and promote "healthy aging,' Bussarawan said.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
an hour ago
- Times
Tulip Siddiq ‘used influence over her aunt to acquire land for family'
Tulip Siddiq used her 'special power' as an MP in Britain to exert influence over her aunt, the former prime minister of Bangladesh, to acquire state-owned land, an anti-corruption trial was told. Prosecutors in Bangladesh allege that Siddiq applied pressure on Sheikh Hasina, who was deposed as the country's leader last year, to secure plots of land for her mother, brother, and sister. Siddiq, 42, resigned as the anti-corruption minister in Sir Keir Starmer's government in January over 'reputational risks' from her family's links with the Hasina regime. The MP is not attending the trial at Dhaka Special Judge Court 4, which formally began on Wednesday, and has described the case against her as 'persecution and a farce'. • Joy and trepidation in Bangladesh a year since ousting of Sheikh Hasina She claims to have become 'collateral damage' in a power struggle between her aunt and Muhammad Yunus, Hasina's replacement as leader in the south Asian country. Officials from the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) told the court that Siddiq played a central role in acquiring plots of land for relatives in the diplomatic zone of Dhaka in 2022. The court was told that Siddiq had learnt that her aunt had 'used her power' to acquire plots in the Purbachal New Town Project, a long-running land development programme operated by a government agency, Rajuk. Siddiq is then said to have 'simultaneously used her special power to exert pressure and influence on her aunt', according to Afnan Jannat Keya, an ACC assistant director. He said that this led to plots being allotted to her mother, Sheikh Rehana; her sister, Azmina Siddique; and her brother, Radwan Mujib Siddiq. • Tulip Siddiq's flyers found in palace of deposed Bangladesh leader Siddiq is also accused of seeking to influence the secretary of the Ministry of Housing and Public Works and other officials on the instructions of her aunt to acquire a plot for her sister. 'In view of this, the Ministry of Housing and Public Works issued a letter to the chairman of Rajuk to proceed with the allotment,' the court heard. Siddiq is alleged to own a flat in the upmarket Gulshan neighbourhood of the capital, Dhaka, which investigators say should have ruled her out from availing of the award of land under the scheme. The ACC is examining claims that Hasina and her family misappropriated billions of pounds of state money during her 15-year reign. Hasina, who is living in exile in India after fleeing during mass protests, faces trial in absentia for crimes against humanity during her time in power. Judge Muhammad Rabiul Alam heard the opening statements from three ACC officials relating to three cases on Wednesday. SM Rashidul Hasan, another ACC assistant director, named Tulip Siddiq among 16 people who are accused of offences, including her brother and aunt. The judge set aside August 28 for the next stage in the trial, when prosecution witnesses and evidence will be presented. In a statement published on Monday, Siddiq claimed that she had yet to receive a summons, adding: 'No fair legal process should begin with a media headline. Unfortunately that's what I have been handed out. No engagement. No evidence. Not even a response to legitimate inquiries from my lawyers.' In an interview in The Guardian, she said: 'I'm yet to see a summons … I'm supposedly days away from a showcase trial in a foreign country, and I still don't know what the charges are. 'I feel a bit like I'm trapped in this Kafkaesque nightmare where I've been put on trial and I genuinely haven't found out what the allegations are.' The ACC's prosecutor, Muhammad Tariqul Islam, said Bangladeshi authorities had served notices on each of the accused, instructing them to appear before the court as the trial began. 'If any of them want to contest the allegations, they must appear before the court,' he told reporters outside the courtroom. None of those accused has engaged counsel to represent them at the trial. Prosecutors have separately disputed Siddiq's claims not to have Bangladeshi citizenship, claiming they have unearthed her Bangladeshi passport and identity card. In 2017 she said: 'I am not Bangladeshi.' Asked about her nationality, Mohammad Sultan Mahmud, another ACC prosecutor, said all necessary documents relating to Siddiq and her family would be produced during the trial. Siddiq's lawyers, from Stephenson Harwood, denied that such documents existed and said that she has not had a Bangladeshi passport since she was a child. The MP for Hampstead & Highgate has always denied wrongdoing and accused the Bangladeshi authorities of a 'targeted and baseless' campaign against her. 'I'm collateral damage, because of this feud between Muhammad Yunus and my aunt,' she said. 'These are wider forces that I'm battling against.' She resigned from the Labour frontbench after referring herself to the ministerial standards adviser after reports that she had lived in London properties with links to Hasina. Siddiq had initially claimed that a £650,000 flat in King's Cross in London was given to her by her parents. It later transpired, however, that the flat had been paid for by a developer and associate of figures in the Awami League, Hasina's party.


The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
In our first year Labour fixed the foundations – now we must build a stronger economy for a renewed Britain
These past few weeks I have met dozens of businesses from across the United Kingdom. Pub and restaurant owners in Cornwall and Kent. Defence manufacturers in Belfast and Moray. Investment opportunities in Aberdeenshire and Port Talbot. I have seen an economy that has the ingredients for success – a skilled and committed workforce, world-class universities, innovative businesses. You don't hear Reform or the Conservatives talk of this success. They want you to believe the economy is broken. That our best days are behind us and that the path of decline is inevitable. I fundamentally reject that. It is not the country I see around us, and it is not the future I believe in. Britain's economy is not broken, but I know that in recent years it has got stuck. Austerity, a chaotic Brexit and Liz Truss's disastrous mini-budget led to more than a decade of stagnation. Our economy became trapped in a cycle of low growth, repressed investment and stagnant income that weakened our competitiveness on the global stage. The months and weeks before any budget are filled with people speculating about – or claiming to know – what tax and spend decisions I will take or what the Office for Budget Responsibility will conclude. This budget is no different – I get that. I will set out the decisions I take in a responsible manner. But just as my focus over the past 12 months has been about kickstarting economic growth for the benefits of working people, so will my next. Because Britain's productivity problem is not an abstract, technocratic one – it directly affects every working family in Britain who feel they are squeezing every penny to make ends meet. When businesses can't grow, wages stagnate and there is less money in the pockets of working people. When infrastructure is inadequate, costs rise, and opportunities are lost. When skills do not match economic needs, potential goes unfulfilled. With lower productivity, tax revenues go down and our public services face cuts. And with the world changing, Britain has been left too exposed to global shocks. Working people across Britain are striving and grafting, but they haven't had the tools they need for the job. They have not seen their incomes rise as a reward for their hard work. There is that sinking feeling that families and businesses across the country feel at the end of every month that they are working hard, but getting nowhere. There is nothing progressive – nothing Labour – about an economy that is not productive and does not reward those who contribute. Since I became shadow chancellor and then chancellor, I have known that breaking this cycle will require our sustained effort across many fronts. Because if renewal is our mission and productivity is our challenge, then investment and reform are our tools. It's investment into our infrastructure, from the train lines and roads that connect businesses and communities to each other to the building of new houses that working people need to fulfil the dream of owning a home. It's investing in British workers and raising skills in this country, so we end business reliance on cheap migrant workers. We are providing that investment and unblocking the barriers to it too. Breaking down the planning system to get Britain building, cutting the unnecessary red tape that has stifled innovation rather than enabled it, and filling the skills gaps that are leaving businesses unable to expand and working people unable to progress. We are making progress: wages grew faster in our first 10 months in power than the first 10 years of Conservatives, 384,000 more jobs have been created, trade deals now struck with the United States, India and the European Union, the cost of a representative new variable rate mortgage lower than when we were elected, and millions of working people getting a pay rise from a boost to the national minimum wage. But I know there is more to do – and that is what this autumn will be about. Because I do not accept decline as inevitable. If Labour's first year in power was about fixing the foundations, then the second year is about building a stronger economy for a renewed Britain. A renewed economy that works for working people – and rewards working people. That is my priority. That is my mission. That is what I am determined to deliver. Rachel Reeves is chancellor of the exchequer


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Beijing E-Town sues US firm Applied Materials alleging trade secrets leak
BEIJING, Aug 13 (Reuters) - Beijing E-Town Semiconductor Technologies ( opens new tab, a semiconductor equipment firm backed by Beijing's government, on Wednesday said it has sued U.S. chip equipment supplier Applied Materials (AMAT.O), opens new tab over alleged trade secrets infringement. Applied Materials had illegally obtained and used Beijing E-Town's core technology secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, the Beijing-based company said according to a filing on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. The company, which is seeking 99.99 million yuan ($13.94 million) in compensation, alleged that Applied Materials had disclosed technical secrets by applying for a patent in China and claiming the patent's application rights. Applied Materials did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In 2016, Beijing E-Town acquired Mattson Technology, a California-based semiconductor wafer processing equipment designer and manufacturer. Applied Materials sued Mattson in 2022, alleging that it had hired its former employees with the intention of stealing trade secrets. In 2023, Mattson countersued Applied Materials making similar accusations. In the new case filed with the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, Beijing E-Town alleged that Applied Materials had hired two former Mattson employees, who were later listed as the principal inventors behind a patent filed by Applied Materials in China. The patent, filed with China's intellectual property administration, disclosed confidential technical know-how jointly held by Beijing E-Town and Mattson, Beijing E-Town said. Applied Materials' actions, the Beijing firm said, violated China's fair competition law and constituted infringement of its trade secrets. The Beijing court has accepted the civil case but no court hearing has yet been held, Beijing E-Town said. ($1 = 7.1746 Chinese yuan renminbi)