State extends deadline to reach deal to relocate coal piles in Green Bay
Jeff Flynt, Brown County deputy executive, announced on May 30 that the state of Wisconsin has granted an extension of its previous May 30 deadline to use a $15 million state grant "due to the progress we are making in negotiations." The deadline is now 5 p.m. June 3.
The sides are trying to reach an agreement on leasing a portion of the former Pulliam Plant site to house the coal piles.
On May 23, state Sen. Eric Wimberger, R-Oconto, asked the state Department of Administration to extend its deadline for the grant to give Green Bay, Brown County and C. Reiss Co. more time to finalize a deal for "such a massive development," he said in the letter.
"Revoking the grant will seriously jeopardize a once-in-a-generation opportunity to bolster northeast Wisconsin's role in our state's supply chain and the global economy following the Covid pandemic," Wimberger said.
The state Department of Administration notified city, county and company officials in late April that the Neighborhood Investment Grant would disappear if the officials couldn't agree to a deal by the end of May.
The grant is a key source of funding to turn the former Pulliam power plant site at the mouth of the Fox River into a port site for the coal storage.
Kevin Dittman contributed to this report.
Contact Benita Mathew at bmathew@gannett.com.
This article originally appeared on Green Bay Press-Gazette: Brown County, Green Bay and C. Reiss discuss coal piles relocation
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Is UPS Stock Stuck Back at Pre-Pandemic Levels, or Is There Room for Recovery in 2025?
Key Points United Parcel Service's stock rose sharply during the pandemic as shopping from home rose. As the post-pandemic world opened back up again, UPS' business stalled and the company began to revamp its operations. UPS is preparing for the future by slimming down and refocusing on its highest-margin operations. 10 stocks we like better than United Parcel Service › United Parcel Service (NYSE: UPS) is a vital cog in the e-commerce space. That was a boon to the business during the coronavirus pandemic, but it has been a bit of a trouble spot now that the world has learned to live with COVID-19. In fact, the stock now trades at around the same levels it did prior to the stock's pandemic rally. Is this package delivery giant stuck in neutral, or is there hope for the future? Why did investors get so excited about UPS? Wall Street has a really bad habit of getting a story in its teeth and then running with it. Investors usually run too far, leading to a deep snapback in the share price of whatever investments got caught up in the story. That is the backdrop for UPS' huge price advance in 2020 and 2021. And its subsequent crash in 2022, which is still ongoing today. Essentially, the stock has made a full round trip from bull to bear, currently trading hands at around the same levels it did prior to the pandemic rally. What changed? During the pandemic, people were stuck at home and did a lot more online shopping. That led to increased demand for delivery services like the one UPS operates. Investors appear to have reasoned that demand would grow forever. It didn't. When the world moved past COVID, UPS realized it had to change things up. It started by slimming down and using more technology. At the same time, however, it had to deal with a new, more costly, union contract. As it started to get a handle on its business overhaul, it proactively chose to halve the low-margin business relationship it has with Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), its largest customer. The near term is likely to remain bumpy Here's the problem: UPS' current efforts are all near-term headwinds, even though they are likely to be long-term positives. For example, slimming down has included exiting certain businesses, which shrinks UPS and leads to volatility and uncertainty on the income statement. Closing facilities and increasing the use of technology both increase costs in the near term, even though they will likely reduce costs over the long term. The union contract's pay raises increased costs. But it creates more stability over the long term, since the dispute is resolved. And while focusing on more profitable business will likely lead to improved margins, it might also result in top-line weakness. That's particularly true with UPS' decision to materially reduce its work with Amazon. However, less revenue that is more profitable is better than growing the business by leaning into mediocre delivery niches. But, taken together, it seems like 2025 is going to be another transition year for UPS. That's likely to linger into at least 2026, as well, since the moves management is making are large and strategic in nature. Or, to put that another way, there are likely to be more bumps in the road for UPS before it sees a material recovery in its financial results or a big advance in stock price. UPS is a high-yield turnaround story At the end of the day, UPS is not going to be a great fit for most investors. There are a lot of moving parts, and the stock is likely to only interest turnaround investors. Yes, there's a huge yield on offer, noting the stock's 7.5% dividend yield. But sometimes turnarounds lead to dividend cuts, and the payout ratio has already risen to a fairly high 90%+, which materially increased the risk here for dividend investors. UPS is best suited to more aggressive investors who think in decades and not days, weeks, or even months. Should you buy stock in United Parcel Service right now? Before you buy stock in United Parcel Service, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and United Parcel Service wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 11, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon and United Parcel Service. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is UPS Stock Stuck Back at Pre-Pandemic Levels, or Is There Room for Recovery in 2025? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
UPI
2 hours ago
- UPI
Petro government seeks OK for largest budget in Colombia's history
Colombian president Gustavo Petro's government has proposed a national general budget bill that totals $138.4 billion that, if approved, would be the largest in the country's history. Photo by Carlos Ortega/EPA Aug. 13 (UPI) -- Colombia's Congress has begun to debate the 2026 national general budget bill, a proposal from President Gustavo Petro's government that totals $138.4 billion -- equal to 28.9% of the nation's gross domestic produce. If approved, it would be the largest in the nation's history. The proposal calls for a 6% to 8% increase over the 2025 budget and prioritizes social spending, debt service and public investment programs. Debate over the proposal comes amid strong criticism from oversight agencies and analysts because $6.53 billion of the budget depends on a tax reform that has yet to be approved. The Comptroller General's Office warned the shortfall poses a significant fiscal risk, especially since the government already has invoked an escape clause in the fiscal rule through 2028, allowing it to temporarily expand the deficit and debt beyond legal limits. In early August, the International Monetary Fund said Colombia's economy "is navigating a complex landscape." The IMF noted that "although growth has strengthened and inflation has declined, fiscal challenges remain and private investment continues to be restrained." The government's deficit rose from 4.2% of GDP in 2023 to 6.7% in 2024. As a result, gross public debt reached 61.2% of GDP at the end of 2024, approaching the fiscal rule's ceiling of 71% of GDP. "This underscores the need for sustained medium-term efforts," the IMF said. While the imbalance was not caused solely by Petro's administration, public spending has increased considerably during his tenure, particularly in operating expenses, as reflected in national budgets. This has kept government spending at levels similar to or higher than during the COVID-19 pandemic, but without any extraordinary event to justify it -- a predicament that worsens the deficit. In Colombia's current situation, boosting state revenue is among the most urgent priorities. Officials have discussed a more efficient and equitable structural tax reform, which could include changes to the value-added tax in certain sectors and a review of the personal income tax. José Manuel Restrepo, who served as commerce and finance minister under former President Iván Duque, criticized the activation of the fiscal escape clause. Regarding the tax reform needed to support the budget, he said it will not pass Congress. "So where will the $6.53 billion come from? Most likely from reduced investment," he said. "The country does need its wealthy to pay taxes, because the excessive debt left by Duque must be paid -- and not with the money of working people," Petro said on X. Another key factor is building confidence among markets and credit rating agencies. "For this, the government must be transparent in its fiscal projections and actions. Implementing a credible fiscal strategy with achievable goals is crucial to maintaining macroeconomic stability," economist Juan Carlos Gainza of Trading Colombia said. "The fiscal rule plays a vital role as the main tool for disciplining public finances and preventing excessive debt. But compliance is becoming increasingly difficult amid spending pressures and the need to finance a range of social and economic programs," Gainza said.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
The corporate tax-break spree meets federal austerity. Here's what states should do.
Chasing the next big things in manufacturing and tech, states and localities have given out special corporate tax breaks at record levels over the past several years. But federal austerity is about to force a long-overdue reckoning upon this form of corporate welfare. In 2022, the U.S. set an all-time record for individual factories receiving state and local subsidies of more than $1 billion each. That year, eight factories were given an average of $2 billion each. Engorged by five federal stimulus bills totaling $6.5 trillion, states and localities squandered some of their COVID-19 windfalls, enacting or expanding subsidies to industries such as data centers and movie production that are guaranteed economic losers. Others lavished subsidies on factories already gold-plated by Uncle Sam, such as electric-veh i cle battery plants in Tennessee, Kansas and Georgia, and microchip fabrication facilities in Ohio, New York and Texas. More states have enacted sales and use tax exemptions for d a ta centers, the capital-intensive server farms that threaten to drive up consumer electricity prices while creating very few permanent jobs. States such as Virginia and Texas are already losing $1 billion per year that way. In some states, data centers get local property tax abatements as well. Amazon Web Services has received two such awards totaling more than $5 billion. States such as Illinois have enacted new incentive programs by which workers will effectively pay their personal state income taxes to their employers — terrible policy that fuels structural deficits. Some states have enacted 'lard on' giveaways on top of the federal opportunity zone program — trickle-down economics by census tract. But now comes a winter of austerity. Trump and the Republican Congress are implementing deep cuts to scores of federal programs for education, job creation, small businesses, affordable housing, infrastructure, agriculture and workforce training. The full damage of the fiscal 2026 federal budget is not yet apparent, but state and local leaders will be forced to protect public services by taking a cold, hard look at all the ill-advised tax breaks they have on their books. Thanks to a new reporting rule, taxpayers will be able to help politicians find the money. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board's Statement No. 77 on Tax Abatement Disclosures requires most states and local governments, including independent school districts, to report each year how much revenue they lose to such tax-break programs. With seven years of abatement-loss data visible now, we can see some big losers and scary trends. Among those most harmed will be urban school districts; places with a lot of data centers; states such as Michigan that are still paying out tax credits for programs they long ago discontinued; and states such as Georgia, with its uncapped television and film production giveaway. But these places also have the most to gain from reform. Here is what to save and what to fix. Do sustain investments that benefit the most employers, such as infrastructure, K-14, workforce development and small business development. Don't subsidize industries that don't need aid, especially those that cost far more in tax revenue than they generate. Topping that list are data centers and television and film production. Never enact — in fact, repeal — any incentive that effectively means workers pay their state personal income taxes to their employers. Repeal any 'lard on' tax break you may have enacted on opportunity zones, and decouple your state income tax code from the federal definition of adjusted gross income to protect your revenue from the opportunity zones' capital gains exclusions. Amend your state enabling legislation for property tax abatements and tax increment financing to take the school share of the property tax off the table. For every other affected taxing body (such as transit agencies or fire districts), give them full autonomous control over their share of the property taxes (or other revenues) that might be abated or TIF-diverted. These safeguards will help the U.S. economy weather the coming federal austerity. Plus, they will reduce the risk inherent in economic development spending by curbing the 'too many eggs in too few baskets' problem of mega-deals.
