Army chief meets top US political, military leadership
During the visit, he has engaged in high-level interactions with senior political and military leadership, as well as, members of the Pakistani diaspora.
In Tampa, COAS attended the Retirement Ceremony of outgoing Commander United States Central Command (CENTCOM), General Michael E Kurilla, and the Change of Command Ceremony marking the assumption of command by Admiral Brad Cooper.
In meeting with COAS Munir, Trump lauds Pakistan's ongoing efforts for regional peace, stability
COAS lauded General Kurilla's exemplary leadership and his invaluable contributions to strengthening bilateral military cooperation, and extended his best wishes to Admiral Cooper, expressing confidence in continued collaboration to address shared security challenges.
COAS also met with Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Caine, where matters of mutual professional interest were discussed. He extended an invitation to General Caine to visit Pakistan. On the sidelines, COAS interacted with Chiefs of Defence from friendly nations.
During an interactive session with the Pakistani diaspora, COAS urged them to remain confident in Pakistan's bright future and to actively contribute to attracting investments. The diaspora reaffirmed their commitment to supporting Pakistan's progress and development.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
4 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Emerging India-Israel nexus in Balochistan
Feudal nomadic Baloch society is still struggling to fully integrate itself in political structure of Pakistani state. Being a frontier region for British India, administration of Balochistan was mostly franchised to tribal sardars, allowing central government to direct resources to other priority needs. After independence, perpetual political instability consumed Pakistan's rulers in political matters in country's heartland. As a result, central government continued with pre-partition policy of managing Balochistan through sardars who were kept under control through regular payouts and quasi suzerainty in their fiefdoms. Whenever any sardar attempted to step out of state's fold, the state re-asserted its authority by employing force while simultaneously playing feudals against each other. While sardars enjoyed extraordinary autonomy in their areas of influence, had final say in administrative matters and received regular payouts from government in name of royalties, bogey of exploitation was kept alive as leverage against state. And the result has been numerous area specific insurgencies since independence. However, the ongoing militancy in the province is unique in character, as its control has moved from traditional sardars to middle class militant leaders with no feudal or political background. This phenomenon is a consequence of state's refusal to negotiate with recalcitrant sardars as practiced in past, and decision to assert its authority permanently like in other settled regions of the country. Displacement of feudal authority led to vacuum which was filled by new leadership, outside of traditional feudal fold. Whatever their initial motivations, external patronisation led this group to choose militancy instead of adopting a coherent political strategy to attain their goals. Right after the onset of the current unrest in Balochistan, India hijacked militant movement to exploit this Achilles heel of its archrival. Indian support to armed groups like BLA and BLF is well documented. Pakistan has many a time shared dossiers containing evidence of Indian support to militants with Indian government, the UN and major world capitals. In 2016, the arrest of Indian RAW officer Kulbhushan Jadhav, a serving Naval Commander level officer working on an intelligence assignment, from Pakistan provided irrefutable evidence of India's covert operations in Balochistan. Jadhav confessed to collaborating with terrorist groups, as tasked by RAW, to incite Baloch youth against Pakistani state. This is an unprecedented case of state sponsorship of terrorism, where a serving intelligence officer of India was on a clandestine mission inside Pakistan. Lately, Israel has also jumped into the fray. Israel is long believed to have supported separatist/militant movements in Iran including those in Sistan-Baluchestan province. Iranian Baluchestan adjoins Pakistan's Balochistan province. Since harsh terrain facilitates militants to move across border undetected, dual-prong approach can deliver optimal effects. There is also an obvious convergence of interest between India and Israel which is likely to have catalysed pursuit of a joint strategy to target Pakistan and Iran through Baloch inhabited regions. Israel's interest in destabilising Pakistani Balochistan likely stems out of a number of drivers which can include pressurising Pakistan in response to its support to Palestinian cause, pushing it towards favourable disposition on Abraham Accords, Pakistan's nuclear capability and its clout in Muslim world. Meanwhile, India is pursuing its core interest to weaken Pakistan through any means possible and also disrupt China's BRI project. Their combined project also has the potential to deny Gwadar deep sea port to China and opening of rare earth elements for exploration by Western countries. On 18 June 2025, Meir Masri, former Israeli Deputy Minister of Defence and a lecturer at Hebrew University of Jerusalem, tweeted that "after Iran's campaign, we may seek to dismantle Pakistan's nuclear program". Probably Israeli establishment has now concluded that route to its objective runs through Balochistan. Hence, cooperation with RAW which has a plenty of experience in handling terrorist proxies like BLA and BLF is the logical path. On 12 June 2025, a Washington-based Israeli think tank, Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), launched Balochistan Studies Project, featuring key participation from Baloch diaspora championing separatist cause. Investment in translating and analysing Urdu, Balochi, Persian and Pashto sources signals that quarters in Israel now view the Baloch region as a strategically important space with geopolitical interests. MEMRI appointed a mysterious character Mir Yar Baloch as President of the project. On 12 May 2025, Mir Yar Baloch declared independence of Balochistan via social media and called on the UN to recognise it as an independent state. Indian media identified him as a prominent Baloch dissident advocating for independence. However, the image circulated with this identity was falsely attributed and actually depicted Mazdak Baloch, the son of another Baloch activist Naela Qadri. Haribyar Marri has also published subversive content on MEMRI's website. Recently, some international websites and publications have sharply increased their coverage of Balochistan. While ostensibly highlighting human rights concerns, their narratives are in fact promoting an anarchist agenda. The Diplomat has published more than 25 stories on Balochistan since March this year. Narratives being pushed out by MEMRI and The Diplomat have striking resemblance. Both glorify acts of violence by BLA and other terrorist outfits, while projecting Pakistani state in extremely negative manner. Since the beginning of this year, Baloch activists in Europe have suddenly become much more active; holding seminars, debates and rallies and interacting with various think tanks and other organisations - something which is not possible without significant clout. Their narrative intentionally sidelines ground realities in order to garner financial and political support for specific agenda. They hide facts which can question legitimacy of their claims, like: overwhelming segment of Baloch society is patriotic and sincere to Pakistan; Baloch people have always been part of federal and provincial legislatures and other governance institutions; Baloch people have always held top executive positions in the province though Pushtuns make the second largest segment of population there; special quotas in jobs and universities are reserved for Baloch; a larger share of resources in NFC award is specially allocated for Balochistan by reducing the due share of Punjab; and a large number of Baloch people are happily serving in civil bureaucracy, armed forces and paramilitary forces, even more than their demographic share while hundreds of thousands are peacefully pursuing their occupations in different parts of the country. Misleading narratives and malafide campaigns by vested interests have blurred facts concerning Balochistan. Though state needs to play its part in addressing genuine grievances, interference by India and now Israel are there to complicate the matters.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistani diplomats ordered to vacate homes in Delhi
Listen to article India has reportedly ordered Pakistani diplomats in New Delhi to vacate their residences before the expiry of their contracts, amid continuing harassment and surveillance, according to sources cited by Express News. The sources said Pakistani diplomats are under constant watch, and their home internet services are being frequently suspended. The orders to vacate came before the official end of the diplomats' housing contracts, with four to five Pakistani officials already instructed to leave their residences. The strain in India–Pakistan diplomatic relations began after the Pahalgam attack in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), which led to a military confrontation between the nuclear-armed neighbours. Also Read: Pakistan rubbishes India's claim of 'nuclear blackmail' Earlier in May, the Indian government declared two Pakistani officials posted at the Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi persona non grata, accusing them of 'activities not in keeping with their official status.' In a tit-for-tat move, soon after India's decision, Pakistan declared a staff member of the Indian High Commission in Islamabad persona non grata and directed the diplomat to leave the country within 24 hours. After the Pahalgam attack, India immediately blamed Pakistan for the incident. However, Pakistan categorically rejected the accusation. In response, India undertook a series of hostile actions, including suspending the 65-year-old Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), cancelling visas for Pakistani citizens, closing the Wagah-Attari border crossing, ordering the shutdown of the Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi, and reducing diplomatic staff at each other's embassies. Tensions further escalated, when missile strikes hit six cities in Punjab and Azad Jammu and Kashmir, destroying a mosque and killing dozens of civilians, including women, children, and the elderly. In a swift military response, Pakistan's armed forces shot down Indian warplanes, including three Rafale jets. The confrontation intensified again in the early hours of May 10, when India targeted several Pakistani airbases with missile strikes. In retaliation, Pakistan launched Operation Bunyanum Marsoos, damaging Indian military installations, including missile storage sites, airbases, and other strategic targets. On May 10, US President Donald Trump announced that a ceasefire had been reached following intense diplomatic efforts overnight. Minutes later, the agreement was confirmed separately by Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and the Indian foreign secretary.
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pakistan rubbishes India's claim of 'nuclear blackmail'
Listen to article Pakistan on Monday strongly rejected remarks by the Indian Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) accusing Pakistan of nuclear blackmail, calling the allegations misleading and baseless. Responding to media queries regarding the Indian MEA's statement on remarks attributed to Field Marshal Asim Munir, the Foreign Office said Islamabad viewed the Indian accusations as "yet another demonstration of their chronic tendency to distorting facts and twisting statements out of context." 'The Indian narrative of an alleged 'nuclear blackmail' is a misleading and self-serving construct. Pakistan remains firmly opposed to the use or threat of use of force," the statement said. It criticised India's 'sabre rattling and war mongering whenever confronted,' which it said 'invite unfounded allegations bereft of rationality.' 🔊PR No.2️⃣3️⃣6️⃣/2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣5️⃣ Statement by the Spokesperson Regarding the Statement Made by the Indian Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) 🔗⬇️ — Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Pakistan (@ForeignOfficePk) August 11, 2025 Pakistan reaffirmed its status as a 'responsible nuclear weapon state with an elaborate command and control structure under full civilian control,' emphasising it 'has always exercised discipline and restraint' on issues of such gravity. The FO highlighted Pakistan's 'sustained and credible counterterrorism efforts' that have received international recognition and dismissed the Indian MEA's claims as 'spurious insinuations… without a shred of evidence.' The statement also criticised India for invoking other countries to pressure Pakistan, calling the move 'pointless' and a 'futile attempt to unnecessarily involve other countries,' which it said 'reflects India's lack of diplomatic confidence.' Pakistan vowed to 'continue to act as a responsible member of the comity of nations,' but warned that 'any act of Indian aggression or violation of Pakistan's sovereignty and territorial integrity will be met with an immediate and matching response.' 'The onus of any ensuing escalation will rest squarely with the Indian leadership,' the statement concluded. Also Read: Field Marshal Munir warns of 'forceful response' to any Indian aggression India on Monday accused Pakistan of "sabre rattling" and "irresponsibility" after media reports on alleged remarks about nuclear threats in South Asia made by COAS Munir while on a visit to the United States. Indian media reports, citing sources, quoted Field Marshal Asim Munir as saying: "We are a nuclear nation. If we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us". An excerpt of his speech shared by Pakistani security officials did not include the "nuclear nation" remarks. Randhir Jaiswal, spokesperson for India's foreign ministry, said: "Nuclear sabre-rattling is Pakistan's stock-in-trade," adding: "The international community can draw its own conclusions on the irresponsibility inherent in such remarks." He said it was also regrettable that the reported remarks should have been made while in a friendly third country. Read More: Field Marshal Asim Munir meets US defence officials In a version of the speech shared by Pakistani security officials, Field Marshal Munir was quoted as saying: "The (Indian) aggression has brought the region to the brink of a dangerously escalating war, where a bilateral conflict due to any miscalculation will be a grave mistake." He was on a visit to the US to attend a farewell event for General Michael Kurilla, the 15th commander of the United States Central Command. India previously lodged a private diplomatic protest with Washington when President Donald Trump hosted him for a lunch at the White House in June. Analysts have said that India's disagreement with Washington over the May 10 ceasefire with Pakistan, and Trump's renewed engagement with Islamabad, have contributed to a recent setback in ties between India and the US under the Trump administration.
