What is clubbing provision in Income Tax Act? When is it applicable?
Clubbing provisions
When is clubbing not applicable?
If money or assets are transferred to wife or daughterin-law before marriage.
If any gifts are received at the time of marriage. The income from these are also not clubbed for the transferor.
If one stays with parents and gives them rent, or offers a monetary gift, or if they invest this amount, it will not invite clubbing provisions.
If money is invested in the PPF for spouse or child.
If money is saved by wife from the household expense funds given by the husband.
As the term suggests, clubbing means combining the income of another person with one's own for tax calculation purposes. However, many people club the incomes of their family members and close relatives in order to evade tax or minimise their tax liabilities. To prevent tax evasion and encourage compliance, the government has laid down rules for clubbing of incomes under Sections 60-64 of the Income Tax Act , 1961.These rules, or clubbing provisions, specify the types of incomes, relationships and circumstances under which incomes can be clubbed for tax benefits. So, not all relationships or money transfers qualify for clubbing provisions. Spouses, children, daughters-inlaw, Hindu Undivided Families, and specific close relatives typically invite these provisions. For instance, if a parent invests in a fixed deposit (FD) in his child's name, clubbing provisions apply and the interest generated from this FD is clubbed with the income of the parent who earns more. However, the parent can avail of `1,500 per child tax deduction under the old tax regime . Besides, clubbing provisions won't apply if a minor child earns an income through manual work, or by using his own skill and talent, or if he suffers from a disability.The incomes that are considered for clubbing can be from various sources and investment avenues like property, interest, mutual funds and bank deposits, among others. Since the taxable income increases after clubbing, it also impacts the ITR form that is chosen to file tax returns.Clubbing provisions among relatives and family members don't apply under these specific conditions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Income Tax: Only evaders should fear invasive tax probes
Next Story Mint Editorial Board India's Income Tax bill is broadly welcome for simplifying this direct levy, but it has also raised some concern over digital privacy. We should tighten the operating framework under Section 247 to reassure earnest taxpayers. To minimize the scope for Section 247 to become a tool in the hands of venal elements, the taxman's bar for search and seizure operations should be set high. Gift this article When finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced during her 2025-26 Budget speech that the government was planning to overhaul the existing Income Tax Act and introduce a new tax bill, there was a round of applause from all taxpayers. When finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced during her 2025-26 Budget speech that the government was planning to overhaul the existing Income Tax Act and introduce a new tax bill, there was a round of applause from all taxpayers. The old Act had become cumbersome, difficult to navigate and abstruse across many parts, leading to differing interpretations and irreconcilable disputes. 'The new bill will be clear and direct in text," promised the finance minister, '[…] close to half of the present law, in terms of both chapters and words." This commitment was roundly welcomed, given the difficulties taxpayers and tax authorities faced in dealing with confusing provisions. The revision's basic aim was to simplify the law's language and retire redundant parts, while retaining the extant tax rates, definitions and framework for offences and penalties. Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | Income tax: How close should authorities look? When the new bill's draft was unveiled, it came as a breath of fresh air: it proposed to reduce the number of chapters from 47 to 23 and of sections from 819 to 536. But then, on closer scrutiny of the draft, alarm bells started going off in various accounting shops and law firms. Accompanied by lobby groups, they started raising a red flag over Section 247, which was viewed as a potential breach of the right to privacy. This contentious section empowers the taxman to access an assessee's digital assets and online spaces during search and seizure operations with the authority to override any password or access code. This would cover email servers, social media accounts, online investment and trading accounts, and also cloud storage of asset ownership details. The bill was referred to a select committee of Parliament headed by Bharatiya Janata Party member Baijayant Panda. In their depositions to this panel, Indian tax authorities and finance ministry officials argued that even the current Act allows officials to not only enter and search buildings, but also to break open locks of physical storage spaces for closer scrutiny of their contents. Given the proliferation of virtual spaces and digital assets, the same provision needs an upgrade to help tax officers ferret out undisclosed income. The authorities also argued that Section 247 does not conflict with the right to privacy, especially if we apply the three-fold test laid down by the Supreme Court's nine-judge bench that heard the K.S. Puttuswamy vs Union of India case. While the select committee has approved Section 247, with Parliament now expected to debate its fine details, it must be pointed out that history is witness to many such well-intentioned provisions turning into slippery slopes in the absence of sufficient guard-rails. In its present form, the bill appears to grant too many officers the authority to sanction forced access under a diffused command and accountability structure. This framework could prove prone to misuse, as the past has shown, and should be tightened. For example, publicly revealed instances of phone tapping have shown the innovative misuse of standard operating procedures whose original intent was noble. To minimize the scope for Section 247 to become a tool in the hands of venal elements, the taxman's bar for search and seizure operations should be set high. This would reassure earnest taxpayers and honour the five-letter foundation of India's proposed Income Tax law: trust. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Karnataka MP says new amendment to Income Tax Act will impact services of Chartered Accountants
Member of Parliament G. Kumar Naik believes that the new amendment to the existing Income Tax Act proposed by the Central Government would adversely impact services providing by Chartered Accountants. He was speaking during a discussion held by the District Commerce and Industries Association and Chartered Accountants Association about new amendments to the Act, in Yadgir on July 26. 'The Central Government has proposed amendments to the Income Tax Act. But, it could have conducted a wide discussion with experts before taking a decision,' he said, and added that if Chartered Accountants provide a detailed report on how the new amendment would impact their work, he would raise the issue in the Lok Sabha. Most of the chartered accountants, who spoke at the event, said that digital device technology would impact their personal lives, and therefore, the Central Government should keep this in mind while amending the Act. Dinesh Kumar Jain, Chairman of YDCCI, Vivek Totloorkar, Tax Committee Chairman, and Channamallikarjun Akki were among those present at the event.
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
What is clubbing provision in Income Tax Act? When is it applicable?
What is clubbing of income? Clubbing provisions When is clubbing not applicable? If money or assets are transferred to wife or daughterin-law before marriage. If any gifts are received at the time of marriage. The income from these are also not clubbed for the transferor. If one stays with parents and gives them rent, or offers a monetary gift, or if they invest this amount, it will not invite clubbing provisions. If money is invested in the PPF for spouse or child. If money is saved by wife from the household expense funds given by the husband. As the term suggests, clubbing means combining the income of another person with one's own for tax calculation purposes. However, many people club the incomes of their family members and close relatives in order to evade tax or minimise their tax liabilities. To prevent tax evasion and encourage compliance, the government has laid down rules for clubbing of incomes under Sections 60-64 of the Income Tax Act , rules, or clubbing provisions, specify the types of incomes, relationships and circumstances under which incomes can be clubbed for tax benefits. So, not all relationships or money transfers qualify for clubbing provisions. Spouses, children, daughters-inlaw, Hindu Undivided Families, and specific close relatives typically invite these provisions. For instance, if a parent invests in a fixed deposit (FD) in his child's name, clubbing provisions apply and the interest generated from this FD is clubbed with the income of the parent who earns more. However, the parent can avail of `1,500 per child tax deduction under the old tax regime . Besides, clubbing provisions won't apply if a minor child earns an income through manual work, or by using his own skill and talent, or if he suffers from a incomes that are considered for clubbing can be from various sources and investment avenues like property, interest, mutual funds and bank deposits, among others. Since the taxable income increases after clubbing, it also impacts the ITR form that is chosen to file tax provisions among relatives and family members don't apply under these specific conditions.
