
Steven Bartlett Becomes Co-Owner Of Stan To Back Creator Founders
John Hu and Steven Bartlett
Steven Bartlett is no stranger to backing the next wave of disruptors, but his latest move is more than an investment. The entrepreneur and host of The Diary of a CEO is joining Stan, the creator commerce platform, as a co-owner to help build what he sees as 'the future of entrepreneurship, one Creator-entrepreneur at a time.' As Stan crosses $30 million in annual recurring revenue and $300 million in gross merchandise value, Bartlett's hands-on involvement signals a growing belief that the middle-class creator is the business story of the decade.
Bartlett, whose personal capital and FlightStory Fund are both behind the deal, explained that 'this is not a passive investment. I will be taking an active role in the business as a co-owner,' positioning himself not only as a strategic partner to the executive team but also as a direct contributor to the success of creators on the platform. He added that his involvement would include sharing business insights, helping shape product strategy and offering exclusive opportunities to Stan's user base. 'I am invested in Stan creators,' he said plainly.
Stan has grown to more than 70,000 users in just three years, a trajectory that founder and CEO John Hu attributes to obsessive focus on creators who are building real, sustainable businesses without massive teams, investors or platforms.
According to Bartlett, Stan stands out because 'it removes friction. It gives creators a streamlined way to monetise, engage their audience and scale all from a single link.' He added that most creators trying to scale spend too much time juggling disconnected tools, and that the most successful ones 'treat their brand like a business from day one,' focusing on systems, automation and leveraging their unique skills rather than spreading themselves thin.
Hu agreed. 'The creators succeeding on Stan aren't just influencers. They're educators, coaches, spiritual mentors, even lawyers,' he said. 'They're building lean businesses with high-leverage digital products, courses, communities and services.' Hu added that the company's edge is cultural as much as technological. 'This isn't just a business. We're building for ourselves and our peers. The bar is higher because we care more.'
For Bartlett, the appeal of Stan was not only its traction but also its mission. 'Having navigated my own journey and built businesses from the ground up, I totally get the ambition of every creator looking to work for themselves,' he said. 'Stan is the easiest and most affordable way to get started as a creator entrepreneur.'
Bartlett said that his connection with Hu was grounded in shared experience. 'My relationship with John is built on a shared experience. Both being self-made entrepreneurs who rose from disadvantaged backgrounds, we are united in our commitment to paying it forward by actively championing Stan creators.'
That alignment is core to the company's direction. Hu added that Stan was originally created to solve a problem he faced himself while growing a content business on TikTok and YouTube. 'There wasn't a single product that let you launch and monetize easily,' he said. 'So we built it.'
Since joining the company, Bartlett has been hands-on in product strategy and team discussions, particularly around AI. 'He's been texting us constantly about AI,' said Hu. 'It's like having a board member in your group chat.'
Vitalii Dodonov, Stan's co-founder and CTO, added that many of the company's current experiments with artificial intelligence emerged from conversations with Bartlett. 'A lot of the ideas sparked from Steven sharing what he's seeing across the industry,' he said. 'We're building something to help creators figure out what to launch and how, faster and more clearly.'
Bartlett sees this next phase as a shift in the industry. 'The investment will be used to further enhance the Stan experience,' he said. 'We're building a platform that supports creators at every stage, especially those just getting started.'
The investment also aligns with Bartlett's broader vision through FlightStory Fund, which backs growth-stage startups challenging conventional business models. 'The fund is dedicated to supporting disruptive founders with funding, guidance, and a network that fuels their growth,' he explained. 'Stan aligns perfectly with that thesis.'
Bartlett emphasized that Stan is not a one-off bet on the creator space, but a central piece of a longer-term commitment to entrepreneur-first infrastructure. 'We invest in missions that challenge the status quo,' he said, adding that Stan represents 'exactly the kind of company we want to scale.'
Asked how he would build a creator business today if starting from scratch, Bartlett didn't hesitate. 'I'd find a niche with a proven engaged and loyal audience. I'd post daily content to build my community and I'd use the most efficient and affordable tools to monetize as quickly as possible.' He said Stan would be part of that toolkit, especially for creators who need clarity, speed and access to mentorship.
Bartlett also spoke candidly about the biggest mistakes he sees creators make. 'They try to do everything themselves, and they burn out,' he said. 'Time is the one thing you can't scale without. Stan gives them that time back.'
While much of the attention in the creator economy has gone to celebrity influencers and big-name platforms, Bartlett and Hu are betting on the opposite: small, focused, independent creators building real businesses. As Hu put it, 'Stan was built on the belief that anyone should have the opportunity to make a living working for themselves.' For Dodonov, the motivation went even deeper. 'The foundational desire to be free… is the most core pursuit that I had,' he said.
With Bartlett now embedded in the company's leadership and strategy, Stan is positioned as the backbone of a new class of digital entrepreneurship. This partnership brings together two builders with shared backgrounds and a common belief: that anyone with a skill or story should have the tools to work for themselves.
Selected clips taken from my in-depth interview with John Hu about the investment, featured on The Business of Creators podcast.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
8 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Senate to Keep Spectrum Sales in Tax Bill, Key Republican Says
A key Republican said senators have reached an agreement to reauthorize spectrum sales to internet companies that would generate billions of dollars in revenue toward funding US President Donald Trump's sweeping tax cuts and spending bill. Spectrum sales were included in the House version of the reconciliation package but the provision had drawn objections from South Dakota Republican Senator Mike Rounds, who previously said they risked undermining the US military's communications capabilities.


CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
Why Tesla now needs the EV tax credit that Musk once said should go away
It wasn't long ago that Tesla CEO Elon Musk was advocating for ending the $7,500 tax credit for buyers of electric vehicles. 'Take away the subsidies. It will only help Tesla,' he said in a post on his social media platform X last year, adding 'Also remove the subsidies from all industries!' But now, with House budget and tax bill known as the 'big, beautiful bill' proposing to end that tax credit, he and Tesla are suddenly arguing for the continuation of those same credits as the Senate debates its own version of the bill. 'Abruptly ending the energy tax credits would threaten America's energy independence and the reliability of our grid' said Tesla's solar power unit in its own post on X late last month. 'There is no change to tax incentives for oil & gas, just EV/solar,' Musk said in a follow-up post. The turnabout may have to do with the recent financial troubles at Tesla. Many experts believed that getting rid of the EV tax credit would hurt legacy automakers, which continue to lose money on their EV operations, more than it would hurt Tesla. But Tesla's sales took a nosedive this year, and it needs the credits to maintain buyer demand. The battle over EV tax credits, and Musk's broader opposition to the Republicans' budget and taxation bill, has caused a major split between President Donald Trump and Musk – a member of the administration's inner circle as recently as last week. The outcome could endanger the key legislative priority of Trump and Republicans. It could also be affect the finances of the beleaguered Tesla. Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson have both suggested that the loss of federal support for EV's is driving Musk's opposition to the bill. 'Elon and I had a great relationship, I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters Thursday. 'I am very disappointed. Elon knew the inner workings of this bill… all of a sudden he had a problem and he only developed the problem after he found out we had to cut the EV mandate.' Despite Trump's reference to an EV mandate, there has never been a federal rule requiring Americans buy EVs rather than gasoline-powered cars. But the Biden administration did pass the $7,500 EV tax credit in an effort to spur demand for EVs. Musk immediately denied removal of the EV tax credit was the reason for his opposition to the bill. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,' he posted on X shortly after Trump's remarks. Tesla shares (TSLA) fell 14% following the exchange. Musk has focused most of his criticism on how the domestic policy bill would balloon the deficit. However, he is also no longer is arguing that ending the EV tax credit would be good for Tesla. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment. However, Musk's shift on the EV tax credit likely reflects changes at Tesla since late last year. Backlash to Musk's political activities played a major role in the company's recent sales troubles, including its first drop in annual sales in 2024 and its biggest ever drop in its sales during the first three months of the year. That resulted in a 71% plunge in net income in the first quarter. While the $7,500 EV tax credit goes to car buyers, it indirectly benefits EV makers by increasing demand. When an earlier version was phased out in 2019, Tesla was forced to cut prices to keep buyers interested. It's not just Musk who changed his opinion on the credit's important to Tesla. The same analysts who once believed removing the EV tax credit would help Tesla are now concerned over its loss. In a note to clients the day after the election, Garrett Nelson, an analyst for CFRA Research, wrote that ending the credit 'will widen Tesla's competitive moat by making competing EV models even more uneconomic, as we believe (Tesla) is the only profitable manufacturer of EVs.' But now, Nelson is expressing worry over Tesla's value if the credits go away. 'Our view is the 'Big Beautiful Bill' would be a net negative for Tesla, as tax credits for EVs, energy storage and solar would be going away,' Nelson said in response to questions from CNN. 'That, and ongoing EV market share losses in China and Europe, are some of the primary reasons why we downgraded the stock in April.' Still, despite cutting his price target for Tesla, Nelson still has a buy recommendation on Tesla shares, as does Dan Ives, another Tesla bull. The tech analyst for Wedbush Securities said the change in finances at Tesla make the tax credits more important than in the past. 'Musk has definitely changed his tune from earlier on this,' Ives told CNN. 'The reality is it will hurt Tesla less than other EV makers, but it will still hurt. And Tesla needs all of the demand help it can get.' Under current bill language, the tax credit remains in place for upstart EV makers like Rivian and Lucid but goes away for Tesla and most legacy automakers, said John Murphy, auto analyst at Bank of America. But he said the greatest challenge for Tesla is that demand for EV among American buyers appears to have stalled. 'I think 8% market share might be the high water mark for EV,' he said at a presentation Wedneday, speaking about overall demand for electric vehicles in the US market. Because of that, and the lack of new Tesla models, especially a lower-priced version that had been promised, 'I think (Musk) is going to be challenged to grow volume.'


New York Times
11 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Threatens Musk Contracts as Feud Escalates
President Trump threatened to cut billions of dollars in federal contracts and tax subsidies for Elon Musk's companies on Thursday, the latest escalation in the growing feud between the two men. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Last year, Mr. Musk's companies were promised $3 billion across nearly 100 different contracts with 17 federal agencies. Most of the contracts were for SpaceX, Mr. Musk's space technology company. Tesla, his electric vehicle company, also has contracts with the federal government. But the relationship between the two men very publicly dissolved Thursday. Mr. Musk until last week was a top presidential adviser and has since turned into a critic of one of Mr. Trump's priorities. Mr. Musk has called the president's signature legislation currently moving through Congress a 'disgusting abomination.' The two lashed out at each other from on their own social media platforms on Thursday. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social. Mr. Musk responded on X, the social media platform he owns, 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.'