Emergency Anniversary: BJP Slams Congress 'Dynastic Arrogance', Recalls 1975 Crackdown on Democracy
Gadwal: On the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the Emergency imposed in India on June 25, 1975, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) organized a press meet at its Aija town office, presided over by local BJP town president Kampati Bhagat Reddy. The event marked a strong criticism of the Congress party's historical actions during the Emergency period and its continued "dynastic mindset."
Bhagat Reddy, while addressing the media, condemned what he called the "illusion of Congress" that the office of the Prime Minister is a birthright of one family and that India's freedom and future lies only within their grip. He described this mindset as a deeply rooted arrogance of the Nehru-Gandhi family.
He recounted that on the midnight of June 25, 1975, the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, based on her recommendation, had President Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed declare a national emergency under Article 352(1) of the Indian Constitution. This was in response to the Allahabad High Court's verdict on June 12, which had invalidated Indira Gandhi's election, and the Supreme Court's conditional stay on June 25, 1975. Prominent opposition leaders like Jayaprakash Narayan and Morarji Desai had then demanded her resignation.
Bhagat Reddy accused the Congress party of treating the entire country as its private property. He said, 'That family believes it has unrestricted power to crush India's independence for any reason, at any time. Their faith in their own superiority is so deep that they act as if democracy is theirs to suspend.'
He further stated, 'Just 28 years after Prime Minister Nehru spoke about the first moments of India's freedom at the stroke of midnight in 1947, his own daughter, Indira Gandhi, plunged the country into darkness, imposing dictatorship through a single stroke of the pen.'
Reddy highlighted the brutal impacts of the Emergency — mass arrests, public beatings, suppression of media freedom, forced sterilizations, and a complete breakdown of citizens' fundamental rights. He said these events reminded the people of British colonial rule, and Emergency-era policies inflicted deep psychological trauma on Indian society that still lingers.
He described how during the Emergency, the judiciary was gagged, citizens were deprived of basic legal recourse, and the freedom of the press — the fourth pillar of democracy — was crushed.
'As we mark 50 years since that dark chapter in Indian democracy,' Reddy said, 'it is a moment of reflection for all democracy-loving citizens. We must remember and analyze this history. It is the responsibility of every generation to retell the past, learn from it, and ensure it is never repeated.'
Several other BJP leaders also attended the program, including Kisan Morcha president Veeresh Goud, K. Rajasekhar, Gadiga Raghu, and Raju, among others.
The event concluded with a call to younger generations to remain vigilant and uphold democratic values, so that such an abuse of constitutional power is never repeated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
GST Council set to discuss reducing items in 12% slab
The agenda for the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council at its next meeting will include deliberations on minimising the 12% tax slab and also finalising the tax treatment on service intermediaries, which could provide the sector relief worth thousands of crores, according to informed sources. Further, while the meeting was initially supposed to be held in June, there has been some back-and-forth between members of the Council over the location of the meeting, leading to delays. It will now likely be held in July 2025, which would be more than six months after the last meeting, which was held in December 2024 in Jaisalmer. According to the rules, the GST Council is meant to meet once every quarter, or three months. 'One of the main agenda items, as part of the overall simplification and rate rationalisation effort, is what to do with the 12% slab,' an official aware of the developments told The Hindu. 'One of the internal recommendations was to minimise the slab or maybe even do away with it entirely.' Doing away with the 12% rate would reduce the number of tax rates under GST to 0%, 5%, 18%, and 28%, not counting the specialised rates of 0.25% on diamonds and 3% on gold and silver, or the additional compensation cess on items in the 28% slab. 'It is improbable that the GST Council will completely abolish the 12% tax slab,' Saurabh Agarwal, Tax Partner at EY India, explained. 'Instead, they are likely to gradually reduce the number of items in this category by shifting them to the 5% slab. Additionally, some items currently taxed at 18% may be moved to the 12% slab.' This adjustment would reflect a change in consumer behaviour, he said, since rising per capita income meant that many products that were once considered discretionary, such as toothpaste and soap, have become everyday necessities. Currently, toothpaste and soap are taxed at 18% and shampoo can be taxed as high as 28%. Input tax credit However, other tax experts say that moving items from the 12% slab to 5% might not always be a good thing for the manufacturers. At 12%, they are eligible for input tax credit, which will likely be revoked if they are moved to 5%. This means the manufacturers would not get credit for the tax they pay on inputs. The Hindu has learnt that the other major item on the agenda of the GST Council would be the taxation of service intermediaries. Currently, service intermediaries are taxed at 18% even when they provide services to companies abroad. This is likely to be removed. An increasingly common occurrence, especially in the IT space, is for the Indian arm of a multinational company to execute an order for the MNC within India. For example, suppose Company A buys a service from Firm X, an MNC based in the U.S. Firm X asks its India arm, Firm Y, to fulfil the order in return for payment from Firm X. In such a scenario, Firm Y is exporting its services to Firm X. Yet, under the current GST law, it is still taxed on those services. 'The current framework continues to tax intermediary services even when rendered to overseas clients, leading to a double whammy,' Manoj Mishra, Partner and Tax Controversy Management Leader at Grant Thornton Bharat, said. 'First, it raises costs for Indian service providers, and second, it results in double taxation since Indian importers pay duty on the full value, including what is paid to the intermediary. According to Mr. Mishra, the tax exposure from these service intermediaries is around ₹3,500 crore, making the issue a very significant one for the industry. Given that these services bring in valuable foreign exchange, there is an expectation of treating it as zero-rated supplies,' he said. 'Such treatment would not only help reduce the tax burden and compliance uncertainty but would also be consistent with the approach taken by courts.'
The Print
28 minutes ago
- The Print
50 yrs since Emergency, Congress's journey from justification to admission of ‘mistake'
'When elections were held (in 1980), she returned to power. People were in no mood to rake up the past. The Congress came back with a nearly two-thirds majority,' Kharge told a press conference, echoing a line many party leaders have taken over the years when confronted with the Emergency's uncomfortable legacy. 'They (BJP) put her in the dock over the Emergency, but she acknowledged it was a mistake and also apologised,' Kharge said Wednesday, noting that the former prime minister even voted in favour of the 44th Amendment, which reversed many constitutional changes introduced during the Emergency. New Delhi: On the 50th anniversary of the Emergency declaration, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said that Indira Gandhi had admitted the imposition of the Emergency was a 'mistake' for which she had apologised to the people. However, flipping through the pages of history reveals a more nuanced picture. Until Rahul Gandhi's unequivocal admission in 2021 that the Emergency was a mistake, no Congress leader had explicitly apologised for its imposition without qualifiers. Kharge's claim that Indira Gandhi had called it a mistake appears to be a reference to her January 1978 'apology'—which addressed the 'excesses' committed during the 21-month period, but not the act of imposing it itself. In a 1978 interview to Jonathan Dimbleby of UK-based Thames Television, Indira had, in fact, defended her decision, saying it was needed as her political rivals 'were destroying democracy.' 'Because they felt they could not win an election, they said we must take the battle to the streets. Morarji Desai is on record in an interview having said 'we are going to surround the PM house, the parliament, and we will see that no business is done'. … Another member of the opposition, now a minister, said if we cannot win by the ballot we will win by the bullet…India would not have survived. It was as serious as a war period,' Indira said. Her son Rajiv Gandhi, who took over as the prime minister following her assassination in 1984, also employed similar arguments in defending her move when the issue came up in the Lok Sabha on 23 July, 1985. That day, Rajiv, who had a brute majority of 414 seats in the Lok Sabha, found himself cornered in Parliament, with opposition leaders pressing for an adjournment motion to discuss the 'possibility of a proclamation' of a fresh Emergency in the country. Despite Speaker Balram Jakhar rejecting the demand, stating there was no basis for it, socialist leader Madhu Dandavate, along with CPI leader Indrajit Gupta and a few other opposition MPs, compelled Rajiv to intervene. Dandavate argued that certain remarks made by the Prime Minister at a press conference earlier that month had 'created apprehensions about the possibility of a proclamation of Emergency in the country.' With Jakhar struggling to restore order in the House, Rajiv stood up. 'I will answer that,' he said. His subsequent remarks—recorded in the official Parliament proceedings—are telling. 'I was asked a very specific question. One, whether I thought the Emergency when it was proclaimed in 1975 was correct? I said 'yes', I think it is correct and I stand by that statement,' Rajiv said. 'The second part of the question I was asked was 'if conditions similar to those in 1975 were to repeat themselves would I do the same thing?' My answer was that it was highly unlikely that any given set of conditions can repeat themselves. I said that 'if conditions do occur that require an emergency to be proclaimed, I will not hesitate to proclaim an Emergency',' he said. He argued that there was no bigger danger in any country than a 'vacillating government'. 'And that was the type of government we had when you were sitting on this side. That is why you are afraid to talk about the Emergency. There is nothing wrong with an emergency if it is applied when it is required. The Constitution tells us when it is required,' Rajiv said, invoking Indira's return to power in 1980. 'The ultimate people whom the Prime Minister is responsible to are the people of India. And the people of India will decide what they want, irrespective of what the honourable member might feel. And in 1980, they realised their mistake!' Months later, addressing a session of the All India Congress Committee (AICC) in Mumbai (then Bombay), Rajiv once again justified the imposition of Emergency, stating that it was imposed to 'meet an unprecedented threat to the nation's stability'. The move, he said, boosted India's socio-economic development. 'The process of socio-economic change gathered momentum with the promulgation of the bold and dynamic 20 Point Programme. A democrat to the core of her being, Indiraji called elections in 1977. She accepted the verdict of the people who defeated her and the Congress. She knew it was an angry reaction to some mistakes that had been committed, but that the people were still with her and with the Congress…,' he said. In 2004, in an interview to ThePrint founder and editor-in-chief Shekhar Gupta, who was then the editor of The Indian Express, Sonia Gandhi said that the very fact that Indira called elections in 1977 was a sign that she had a rethink on the Emergency. 'I think she did think that it was a mistake. Because don't forget that at least the Indira Gandhi I knew was a democrat at heart, to the core. And I think circumstances compelled her to take that action but she was never quite at ease with it,' she said, adding that it was a lesson that no future government should repeat any such measure. However, that statement came with the caveat: 'Those were different times.' Also Read: Rajnath, Shivraj & Javadekar. How jail term during Emergency shaped leaders of today's BJP What Pranab, Manmohan & Rahul said In his 2014 book, 'The Dramatic Decade: The Indira Gandhi Years', former president and the late Congress stalwart, Pranab Mukherjee, claimed that Emergency brought 'discipline in public life', a growing economy, controlled inflation, a reversed trade deficit for the first time, enhanced developmental expenditure and a crackdown on tax evasion and smuggling but 'it was perhaps an avoidable event'. 'Suspension of fundamental rights and political activity, including trade union activity, large scale arrests of political leaders and activists, press censorship, and extending the life of legislatures by not conducting elections were some instances of Emergency adversely affecting the interests of the people. The Congress and Indira Gandhi had to pay a heavy price for this misadventure,' wrote Mukherjee. Former prime minister Manmohan Singh, who died in December 2024, is also quoted in his daughter Daman Singh's book 'Strictly Personal: Manmohan and Gursharan' that 'some good things happened' during the Emergency but 'the atmosphere in the whole country was one of fear. There were arbitrary arrests and detentions.' It was only in March 2021 that Rahul Gandhi, in an interaction at Cornell University in the US, said that what happened during that period was 'wrong' and that his grandmother's decision was a mistake. 'I think that was a mistake. Absolutely, that was a mistake. And my grandmother said as much,' Rahul said, when asked about his thoughts. But, he promptly added that there was a fundamental difference between what happened during the Emergency and the prevailing situation in the country. 'The Congress party at no point attempted to capture India's institutional framework and frankly, the Congress party does not even have that capability. Our design does not allow us that and even if we want, we cannot do it,' Rahul said. (Edited by Tony Rai) Also Read: 50 years since Emergency: How judges, lawyers enabled & resisted Indira Gandhi's crackdown
The Print
28 minutes ago
- The Print
Kharge's ‘Modi first' swipe at Tharoor. Congress MP responds ‘wings are your, sky belongs to no one'
However, he left no room for doubt that the party's ties with Tharoor have soured to an extent that no efforts are being made to mend it. Kharge, who faced a barrage of questions on Tharoor's future in the Congress at a press conference held by the party to counter the BJP's narrative on the 1975 Emergency, avoided a clear-cut response on whether the Lok Sabha MP will face any disciplinary action. New Delhi: Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge Wednesday made known the party leadership's displeasure with Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor, saying unlike the Congress's 'country first' motto, 'some say Modi first, country later'. 'The opposition together said they were with the armed forces that were fighting (during Operation Sindoor). We (the Congress) said the country comes above all and we will work together (with the government). We said 'country first, party later'. But some people say 'Modi first, country later'. What can we do about that?' Kharge said. He was responding to a question on Tharoor's The Hindu opinion piece on the success of Operation Sindoor's global outreach achieved through the visits of multi-party delegations. In the piece, published 23 June, Tharoor—who led a nine-member delegation to the US, Panama, Guyana, Brazil and Colombia—lauded the outreach, piloted by the Centre, saying it was 'vital in shaping global perceptions and consolidating international support.' Tharoor also praised Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the piece, stating that the PM's 'energy, dynamism and willingness to engage remains a prime asset for India on the global stage, but deserves greater backing.' The Prime Minister's Office had shared the article on 'X'. At the press conference, Kharge also took a jibe at Tharoor. 'I can't read English well. His (Tharoor's) language is very good and that's why we have made him a Congress Working Committee member,' Kharge said. A four-term MP, Tharoor is a member of the CWC, the party's highest-decision making forum. Asked if the leadership was wary of the pitfalls of acting against Tharoor, Kharge said the Congress had no reason to be bothered about all that. 'There are nearly 34 working committee members, 34 permanent invitees, and nearly 30 special invitees in the CWC. People can write as they wish. We are not bothered about it. We are concerned about the country and its interests. If somebody is concerned about something else, you can ask him about that,' Kharge said. Tharoor, who is attending the Primakov Readings global summit on international relations and world economy in Moscow, made a cryptic post on 'X' soon after Kharge's remarks. He essentially posted an image of a bird with the caption: 'Don't ask permission to fly. The wings are yours. And the sky belongs to no one.' (Edited by Tony Rai) Also Read: New twist in Congress-Tharoor saga—PMO shares Kerala MP's article on Op Sindoor global outreach
