Discussions On Draft Joint Declaration At BRICS Summit Showing Sharp Divide
On the eve of the 17th BRICS Summit scheduled at Rio de Janeiro in Brazil on July 6 and 7, the ongoing discussions among the senior officials of the member countries for the preparation of the draft joint declaration from the Summit, are showing big divergence of views on the two major issues- Trump's tariff war and the Israeli role in the latest war in West Asia.
Right now, the tariff issue is the most important one of the majority of the BRICS members including India. The host country Brazil is interested in using strong words in the draft against President Trump's unilateral decision on reciprocal tariffs. The 90 day pause announced by the US President expires on July 9. Already, the US administration has started issuing letters to the trade partner countries who have till now not negotiated the deals. The BRICS declaration to be issued on July 7 will take into account the latest position after the issuing of letters and make its position clear in the draft decrying the unilateralism of the USA.
Presently BRICS has eleven full members the first five China, Russia, Brazil, India and South Africa and the new six Egypt, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Ethiopia and Indonesia. Brazilian President Inacio de Silva Lula, better known as Lula is taking the leading role in the shaping of the declaration along with South Africa and other members. Indian officials are keen that a special mention is made of the threat of terror to India from Pakistan in the declaration in the context of the BRICS nations fight against terrorism. It is to be seen to what extent Prime Minister Narendra Modi can reshape the draft declaration and make it tuned to India's stand on terrorism and Pakistan.
Chinese President Xi Jinping is not attending, China will be represented by the Prime Minister Li Quiang. Russian President Vladimir Putin will not be physically attending but there is a possibility that he will address the BRICS Summit through a video call. Iranian President is not attending but Iran is represented by a very senior minister. Iran has already mentioned that it wants the draft declaration to incorporate strong language against both Israel and USA. But Egyptian and Saudi officials have suggested restraint. Indications suggest that the draft has to be finalized at the Summit level as lot of divergences are expected to remain in the draft before its consideration by the Summit leaders.
As regards India, the officials taking part in the discussions for draft declaration, are finding the situation a bit delicate. Indian officials are at the final stages of discussions on trade deal. President Trump has already said that the deal will be ready shortly. It can be ready even before July 9. So India's relationship with USA and the present geo political position do not permit the Indian side to take a strong position against the US on tariff issue. India and many other members do not want to name the USA as the villain in the final declaration. The possibility is the US or Trump will not be named but the opposition to the unilateral actions will be conveyed strongly. In fact, the reality is that it is just not India or Egypt, even China and Russia also are not favouring a strong anti-US declaration. China has already concluded its trade deal with the US while President Putin is depending on President Trump to bail him out of Ukraine crisis.
Iran's forceful participation in the discussion has made the task of choosing right line on Middle East crisis tougher. Sources say that Iran has taken very one sided position pushing for a very critical stance against the USA which the other countries are finding difficult to agree. Brazilian officials are trying their best to work on a common ground on Middle East crisis. If the differences still remain, it is up to the Summit leaders to fine tune the draft and make it acceptable to all.
BRICS comprises a mix of emerging and developing economies, each with unique strengths and challenges. China has the largest economy within the bloc, while India, Brazil, and Russia also hold significant economic weight. South Africa, while smaller in terms of GDP, plays a crucial role in the African continent. BRICS economies collectively account for nearly half of world's GDP, with its rate of economic growth surpassing the global average. Two BRICS members China and India are the drivers of the growth of global economy.
BRICS has emerged as a counterweight to the dominance of traditional economic powers, contributing to a more multipolar world order. Economists hold the view that BRICS economic profile reflects a dynamic and influential force in the global economy, driven by the collective strength and diverse capabilities of the member nations. China is the second largest economy in the world after the top performer USA. India is expected to be the third largest economy after USA and China by 2027-28.Brazil's GDP is projected to be $ 2.75 trillion by 2028 making it the eighth largest economy in the world. Russia, Indonesia and Saudi Arabia also have high prospects of growth.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has got an opportunity to dominate the proceedings at the Rio de Janeiro Summit as he leads the largest democracy in the world. Following the absence of President Xi Jinping, he will also be the most prominent head of state attending this Summit. It is to be seen how the Indian PM makes use of his clout to influence the deliberations and help in making the joint declaration favourable to Indian stand on terror and Pakistan. (IPA Service)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
Sheikh Khaled, President of Brazil discuss further advancing bilateral relations
His Highness Sheikh Khaled Bin Mohamed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, President of the Federative Republic of Brazil, have discussed further advancing bilateral relations, building on the deep-rooted and longstanding ties between the two nations, which form a solid foundation for expanding cooperation across vital sectors in support of sustainable development goals and shared interests. The meeting took place at the reception of His Highness Sheikh Khaled Bin Mohamed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva on the sidelines of the 17th BRICS Summit. At the beginning of the meeting, the Brazilian President welcomed the visit of the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi and the accompanying delegation, underscoring the strength and depth of bilateral relations between the Federative Republic of Brazil and the United Arab Emirates. His Highness Sheikh Khaled Bin Mohamed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan conveyed the greetings of President His Highness Sheikh Mohamed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, along with best wishes for the President's continued health and wellbeing, as well as enduring progress and prosperity for Brazil and its people. Sheikh Khaled attends the meeting. His Highness Sheikh Khaled Bin Mohamed Bin Zayed also expressed sincere appreciation for the generous hospitality and warm welcome extended to His Highness and accompanying UAE delegation. His Highness Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed Bin Zayed reaffirmed the UAE's pride in its strategic relationship with Brazil, a pioneering partnership built on decades of cooperation, mutual respect, and shared interests. He underscored that the 50-year bond reflects the vision of both nations' leadership in fostering collaboration across vital sectors, advancing inclusive and sustainable development for the mutual benefit of both nations. In turn, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva asked the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi to convey his sincere greetings to the President of the UAE, along with his best wishes for the enduring success and development of the UAE and its people. The meeting reviewed the progress of UAE-Brazil relations, a five-decade journey marked by sustained coordination and fruitful cooperation, underpinned by a shared commitment to advancing the partnership in priority sectors in line with mutual interests and evolving development objectives. The meeting was attended by Reem Al Hashimy, Minister of State for International Cooperation; Dr Thani Bin Ahmed Al Zeyoudi, Minister of Foreign Trade; Ahmed Ali Al Sayegh, Minister of State; Saif Saeed Ghobash, Secretary-General of the Abu Dhabi Executive Council and Chairman of the Office of the Crown Prince; Maryam Eid AlMheiri, Chairperson of the Abu Dhabi Media Office and Advisor of Strategic Relations at the Crown Prince Court, and Saleh Ahmad Salem Alsuwaidi, Ambassador of the UAE to Brazil. WAM
Gulf Today
2 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Get off your hobby-horses, face reality
Iran has suspended its relationship with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). It said that the visit of an IAEA team to inspect Iran's nuclear sites will have to get a nod from Iran's Supreme National Security Council. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi wrote on X: 'Our cooperation with the IAEA will be channelled through Iran's Supreme National Security Council for obvious safety and security reasons.' President Masoud Pezeshkian signed into law legislation passed by the Iranian parliament. IAEA said, 'We are aware of these reports.' Iran blames IAEA for playing a partisan role. It was the vote of the UN agency's board of governors declaring Tehran to have violated the NPT clauses that led to Israel's attack on Iran on June 12. Iran said that the IAEA had been siding with the Western powers. When the German foreign office said that Iran should get back to the IAEA, Iran hit back at Germany saying that it had been supporting Israel. Araqchi accused Germany of 'explicit support for Israel's unlawful attack on Iran, including safeguarded nuclear sites.' There is not much doubt that the IAEA is not the neutral UN body it is meant to be. It yields to pressure from Western powers, and especially so from the United States. The IAEA had said in its report that the grade of uranium was more than that needed for producing electricity, and that the enrichment was nearer the weapons grade target. This has been the case on several earlier occasions too, where the enrichment of uranium was more than the limits needed for generating electricity. But the personal equation between the IAEA inspectors and the Iranian officials is a key aspect of the process. The issue is that Iran has not enriched uranium to weapons grade, even according to the IAEA team. So Iran cannot be said to have breached the NPT. There is also the fact that Iran's denunciation of Zionism and the declaration that it considers Israel to be the enemy has more bark than bite in it. So, Israel can use the pretext of Iran's rhetoric that Tehran wants to destroy Israel is good enough for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to launch an attack on Israel's nuclear facilities. Of course, Netanyahu was responding to the political crisis he was facing on the home front,. There is growing anger among the Israelites about Netanyahu's failure to get all the hostages of the October 7, 2023 attack back. Israel claims to have other motives to attack Iran. It was Iran's support for Hezbollah in Lebanon and Iran's declared support for Hamas in Gaza. And then there was the Iranian support for the Houthis in Yemen. Iran then is perceived in the Israeli security establishment as a threat to Israel. Netanyahu of course indulges in exaggeration when he says that Iran poses an existential threat to Israel. The 12-day clash between Israel and Iran has proved that Israel does not have the military wherewithal to decisively attack Iran. It needed American intervention. The reports now say that the American bombing of the nuclear centres in Iran has only pushed back Iran's bomb plan by two years. So, the Americans too failed to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities and capabilities. The need of the hour is that Iran, Israel and the United States must stop making these rhetorical statements which are so much hot air and nothing more. They should get down to sober diplomatic dialogue. It will be a slow process. There will be no quick fixes. The three countries have to get off their hobby-horses and look reality in the face.
Gulf Today
2 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Whale of a tax break
Tax bills are rarely exciting reading but the Trump 'Big, Beautiful Bill' contains an odd, probably unique tax break. Inuit whaling captains are able to claim costs of repairing their boats and the weapons they use up to $50,000. It could seem to be a reasonable work related claim but it is given as a charitable contribution. Don't bother finding it in the 940 pages, it doesn't make it any more sensible until you consider it in the light of the Alaskan Republican senators, Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan, needing support to help them retain their seats. The charitable component arises in the idea that they are supporting their communities but it isn't very charitable to the whales who will be killed by exploding harpoons. This bill has been attacked on the bug issues, tax breaks for rich people and Medicare breaks for poor people but how many other odd, and actually offensive, issues are hidden in the 940 pages. Even the idea of tax breaks for weaponry should be condemned. How will history, and Mother Nature, remember Trump and his big, beautiful bill? Dennis Fitzgerald, Melbourne, Australia
