This isn't a Budget it's a burden: Capetonians must rise against DA's punitive tariffs
Image: Pixabay
I write this not as a politician, but as a son of this city.
Cape Town taught me resilience and pride. It raised me in the shadow of Table Mountain, on the proud Cape Flats and with the hope of its people. But today, I write with a heavy heart and a burning conviction because this uncaring DA City of Cape Town council, our home, is turning its back on the very people who built it.
Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis says this budget is 'pro-poor.' But the facts, and the pain playing out in homes across this city, tell a very different story.
Let's Be Clear: The Poor Are Not Being Carried by the Wealthy
The City tells us that wealthy households are now contributing more to uplift the poor. It sounds noble. It sounds just. But it's simply not true.
The 7 billion in national allocations from the Treasury , not local council cross-subsidies is what actually funds free basic services and sanitation.
in national allocations from the Treasury , is what actually funds free basic services and sanitation. Out of this, the City has only budgeted 7 billion for such services. That means national taxpayers not local generosity are lifting the most vulnerable.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Where is the other monies going?
In other words, the 'redistributive' claim is a myth dressed in spin. the poorest in the city are supported by national funds, not by progressive uplifts from affluent households.
The working-class, the pensioner, the young professional, and the struggling homeowner you are being made to carry the burden.
Homeowners Are Not the Enemy They're the Collateral Damage
Cape Town is one of the most unequal cities on Earth. But instead of tackling that with vision and innovation, this budget turns to the easiest target: your home.
Your rates and service charges are now tied not to your usage but to your property's market value. It is grossly unfair. By correlating fixed service charges like the new 'cleaning tariff,' water, sewerage, and electricity to property valuations, the City assumes that property value equals income. But in Cape Town, property prices have surged far faster than household incomes. Why because it has become the playground of the rich making it unaffordable to ordinary Capetonians.
Real Data shows: Draft budget proposes average property rates hikes of 7.96 %, with values over R3 million facing over 20 % increases .
New fixed charges set by valuation: Cleaning tariff: ~R477/month; Sewerage: ~R157/month ;Electricity connection fixed charge: +39 % ; Water connection fixed charge: +113 %, Crazy is it not..
Combined, this adds ~R920/month extra for a R4.2 million property regardless of usage. Specifically Bergvliet and Meadowridge, residents report this bill increases. That's nearly R11,000 per year just in extra fixed charges. This is outrageous! Where is the outcry, Capetonians???
Electricity Tariffs: Above and Beyond
The City applied to NERSA for a 14.5 % electricity tariff increase, vastly outstripping national average hikes of around 14 %, already high by global standards .Remember, in 2023/24 they implemented 17.6 % almost 2 % above the NERSA-approved 15.1 %.
Despite public opposition and legal challenges over these above-inflation increases, the City insists it's simply covering its "cost-to-supply" but we know its daylight robbery and opaque revenue grab.
Let's talk about what that really means: A retired couple in Lansdowne , living in a home they paid off 30 years ago, now face nearly R1,000 more every month not because they're using more water or electricity, but because their area's property prices have risen.
, living in a home they paid off 30 years ago, now face nearly not because they're using more water or electricity, but because their area's property prices have risen. A young family in Ottery, barely making ends meet, receives a bill increase of 28%, simply because their home was revalued.
No extra luxury. No extra income. Just extra pressure. Ons sukkel. Ons kry swaar.
This is NOT fairness, equity or redress. It's financial cruelty with a smile.
This is not creative budgeting. It's a cynical cash grab from people who cannot afford it.
What If Your Parent Lives Alone?
Imagine your mother, a widow in Mitchells Plain or Grassy Park, living on a state pension. Her home is modest, but its value has risen over time. Now, her monthly account has doubled yet she still boils one kettle, washes one load, and uses barely any electricity.
She's being punished for staying in the home she raised you in. Does that sound like justice to you?
14,000 People Spoke. Will You Be Next?
In the recent public comment process, over 14,000 Capetonians wrote in protest. Mayor Hill stop being tone deaf.
Residents' associations from across the city from Khayelitsha to Kuilsriver, from Durbanville to Wynberg have all said: this is not right.
We don't want handouts. We want fairness. We're not refusing to pay. We're refusing to be exploited. Don't Let Them Tell You This Is About Equity
Mayor Hill-Lewis says 'wealthier areas are paying more so poorer areas can get more' and 'Homes above R7 million could see increases over 20 %,' he says, 'to invest in poorer communities.'
That's not what the budget shows. In reality: Poorer areas are funded by national government grants , not through municipal ratepayers.
, not through municipal ratepayers. The City's budget increases are not tied to actual service usage . New charges appear less redistributive and more like value-based wealth extraction , muffled behind pro‑poor rhetoric
. New charges appear less redistributive and more like , muffled behind pro‑poor rhetoric Your ability to pay is not being considered. Only your area and your home value.
So, who benefits from this budget? Who gets richer, while you get squeezed? Fair taxation means paying for what you use, not how much your home is worth. It's Time to Draw a Line in the Sand
Capetonians, we are a proud people. From Bonteheuwel to Bishop Lavis, from Bo-Kaap to Bishops Court we built this city brick by brick, spirit by spirit.
This is not just a fight about budgets. It's a fight for dignity. For fairness. For a city that belongs to all who live in it not just those who can afford to survive it.
What Can You Do Now? Speak to your councillor. Demand they reject any budget that punishes residents based on property value alone. don't vote for them if they do not stand for you.
Demand they reject any budget that punishes residents based on property value alone. don't vote for them if they do not stand for you. Join your rates and residents' association like SANCO , groups like CTCRA or Bergvliet Meadowridge are submitting collective objections. They're taking legal steps. Add your voice.
They're taking legal steps. Add your voice. Spread the word. Share your bill. Talk to your neighbour. Use social media. Attend, arrange public meetings or request virtual participation
Share your bill. Talk to your neighbour. Use social media. or request virtual participation Sign the petitions. SAPOA and civil coalitions are mounting challenges support them.
SAPOA and civil coalitions are mounting challenges support them. Stay informed. Read the budget. Understand the terms. Don't be fooled by smooth DA spin and smoke and mirrors. demand a phased-in approach to tariff restructuring, volume-based billing, and targeted support for vulnerable households
Final Word: Don't Let Them Take Our City From Us
This is our city. Not theirs to manage with spreadsheets and spin. We are not ATMs. We are citizens. We are not silent. We are strong.
So stand up. Push back. Speak out.
Let us fight for a Cape Town that is fair, compassionate, and just not just for the wealthy, but for all who call this place home.
We owe it to our parents. We owe it to our children. We owe it to ourselves.
You know this , why are you not acting?
Let's act now. Before the city we love becomes unlivable for the very people who gave it life.
* Faiez Jacobs – Former Member of Parliament | Activist | Public Servant | Citizen of South Africa
** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
World's major courts take growing role in climate fight
Almost 3,000 climate cases have been filed up to the end of 2024, in nearly 60 countries, according to the Grantham Research Institute, using data compiled by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. Image: ImsoGabriel Stock via Pixabay The world's top court is poised to tell governments what their legal obligations are to tackle global warming, and possibly outline consequences for polluters that cause climate harm to vulnerable countries. Wednesday's highly anticipated advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice comes in the wake of landmark international decisions that experts say together have the potential to significantly shape climate action. How has climate litigation evolved? Andrew Raine, deputy director of the UN Environment Programme's law division, said frustration over the pace of climate action had spurred people, organisations and countries to turn to the courts. "When political systems fall short, the law is increasingly seen as a tool for driving ambition and enforcing commitments that have been made," he told AFP. These have been bolstered by increasingly precise and detailed climate science, including from the UN's IPCC climate expert panel. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Almost 3,000 climate cases have been filed up to the end of 2024, in nearly 60 countries, according to the Grantham Research Institute, using data compiled by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. While not all have been successful -- and some have tried to slow climate progress -- there have been notable cases in recent years that have pushed states to do more. Urgenda, an environmental organisation in the Netherlands, notched a win at the Dutch Supreme Court in 2019, with justices ordering the government to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 25 percent by the end of the following year. And in 2021, the German Constitutional Court found that the government's failure to sufficiently cut planet-heating pollution placed an unacceptable burden on future generations. Raine said that litigation was increasingly crossing borders, with 24 cases brought before international or regional courts, tribunals or other bodies. "This marks a turning point and it reflects the transboundary and shared nature of the climate crisis," he said. Why have recent cases been deemed historic? Two in particular have been hailed as watershed moments that will help shape how courts, governments and businesses understand and act on their climate responsibilities. Last year, an advisory opinion by the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea said carbon emissions can be considered a marine pollutant and that countries have a legal duty to take measures to reduce their effects on oceans. The tribunal made clear that the work of defining countries' obligations is not limited to the Paris climate agreement or the UN body that runs climate change negotiations. Major polluters have argued that the UN framework is sufficient and against courts taking climate decisions. Another major advisory opinion was issued this month, with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights reaffirming the right to a healthy climate system and acknowledging the rights of nature. But perhaps the court's most profound statement was to place protection against irreversible climate harms on the same level as international prohibitions on genocide and torture, said Cesar Rodriguez-Garavito, Professor of Law and Director of the Climate Law Accelerator at New York University. The court said "massive and serious harm to the climate system through emissions, through deforestation and so on, is absolutely forbidden by international law," he said. In his view this made it the strongest statement yet by any international court on states' duty to avoid causing severe ecological destruction. All eyes are now on the ICJ. What could be the impact? Vanuatu, one of many low-lying islands threatened by sea level rise, has asked the ICJ to give its opinion on states' obligations to reduce emissions. But the potentially more controversial request is what -- if any -- legal consequences there might be for major polluters who cause severe climate damages. "These are questions of global justice," said Rodriguez-Garavito, potentially touching on contentious issues of "reparations for climate harms" to those least responsible for emissions. While advisory opinions like the ICJ are not legally enforceable, Raine said they carry significant weight. "They clarify how international law applies to the climate crisis, and that has ripple effects across national courts, legislative processes and public debates," he said. "It doesn't force states to act, but it shows them where the law stands and where they should be headed." AFP
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
IFP stands firm on KwaZulu-Natal's controversial decision to place ANC-led municipality under administration
IFP president Velenkosini Hlabisa has defended KwaZulu-Natal government's decision to place the ANC-led municipality under administration. Image: Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs / Facebook The IFP has vowed to defend the KwaZulu-Natal government's decision to place the struggling ANC-led Umkhanyakude District Municipality under administration despite the ANC's defiance. In a media briefing on Monday afternoon, President Velenkosini Hlabisa dismissed ANC's assertion that the provincial government is targeting municipalities under its leadership for political reasons. There was a drama last week when IFP's Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs MEC Reverend Thulasizwe Buthelezi was physically prevented from entering the premises of the municipality, in the north of the province, to formally introduce the appointed administrator, Bamba Ndwandwe. Hlabisa stated that the government's decision remains firm and will not be influenced by political pressures. 'This is not a political intervention. This is a Cabinet decision. As long as municipalities are passing unfunded budgets, Section 139 will apply. You can go and check the financial audit outcome of that municipality. It is not good; therefore, it qualifies for an intervention of this kind,' said Hlabisa. Premier Thamsanqa Ntuli, who was at the briefing, said there was a unanimous decision in the Cabinet with all MECs, including the three from the ANC; therefore, he did not understand why the leadership is challenging it. He said Umkhanyakude was placed under administration alongside two IFP-led district municipalities, so the assertion by the ANC that it is targeting its municipalities was unfounded. 'We removed an ANC-led Mooi Mpofana Local Municipality from the administration in the same Cabinet meeting, so we do not understand why the ANC is complaining in Umkhanyakude,' said Ntuli. He also announced that the municipality has taken the government to court for the matter. In a statement last week, the ANC said it vehemently rejected the unwarranted and politically charged decision by MEC Buthelezi to invoke Section 139(1)(b) of the Constitution in the uMkhanyakude District Municipality. It said the so-called intervention is nothing short of abuse of constitutional provisions for political gain, adding that it lacks merit, rationale, and integrity. 'The ANC is appalled by the continued misuse of Section 139(1)(b) by the MEC, who has turned what should be a last-resort mechanism into a political weapon, one that is selectively and cynically deployed against ANC-led municipalities, regardless of their performance. 'The uMkhanyakude District Municipality has made tangible progress in governance, financial recovery, and service delivery. There is no objective basis for this draconian step, which appears designed not to improve governance, but to score narrow political points and destabilise a functional administration,' read the statement. The party said it stands with the Council of uMkhanyakude District Municipality in resisting the opportunistic, mischievous, and dangerous actions of a power-mongering MEC who is hell-bent on destabilising a functional municipality and undermining service delivery to communities. It vowed to actively mobilise its supporters and communities to resist the advances of an MEC who the party described as having clearly defined himself outside of the Government of Provincial Unity (GPU). There are fears that the continued souring of relations between these two major partners of the GPU may create instability in the province, which is known for its political complexities. [email protected].
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
IFP reaffirms GNU role, slams NPA and urges reforms within justice system
The IFP reaffirmed its commitment to the GNU while demanding action on political killings and faster prosecutions. Inkatha Freedom Party president Velenkosini Hlabisa is seen at the IFP's Health and Welfare Summit, 14 July 2023, in Fourways. Picture: Michel Bega/ The Citizen The Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP) has reiterated its commitment to remaining a 'vocal participant' in the government of national unity (GNU) as it took aim at the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). IFP leader Velenkosini Hlabisa said the party remains a vocal participant within the GNU, holding the government to its promise of transparency and swift justice. The party president said this during an IFP media briefing on Monday afternoon. The party reflected on matters pertaining to South Africa's governance, the GNU and the government of provincial unity (GPU). IFP reaffirmed its GNU role 'The IFP is in the GNU or GPU in order to govern or be part of governance. But this does not dilute the image of the IFP,' Hlabisa said. Hlabisa reiterated the IFP's commitment to the GNU and GPUs, saying that they embody a vision of healing the wounds of the past while working towards a brighter and inclusive South Africa. ALSO READ: Steenhuisen has made a bad situation worse with tactical blunders 'After one year of participating in the GNU, the Gauteng GPU and leading the KwaZulu-Natal GPU, we believe our impact can be felt at every level, but particularly on crime reduction and economic development,' the leader said. Speaking of crime, the party addressed allegations of political interference made by KwaZulu-Natal's police commissioner, Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. The IFP said President Cyril Ramaphosa's decision to place Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on special leave and to establish a judicial commission of inquiry aligns with the party's recommendation to the president. Party calls for full-scale investigation Hlabisa said this demonstrates the party's influence in the GNU, adding that problems within the South African Police Service (Saps) lie at the core of political violence and the failure to resolve political murder cases. The IFP also called for a full-scale investigation into political interference and disruptions that have hindered the progress of political killing investigations. ALSO READ: National dialogue is being used as the beating stick for ANC, DA 'The allegations by Lieutenant General Mkhwanazi have entrenched a trust deficit between the Saps and the country, which must be reversed through due process and through investigation,' Hlabisa said. The party believes that a Saps-led investigation is not an option under the circumstances, given the focus on the Saps in investigations. The IFP also took aim at the NPA, saying it needs to do more and better, refocusing itself on speedy prosecutions, especially on the findings of the Zondo Commission of Inquiry into state capture. NPA needs to do 'more and better' IFP President Velenkosini Hlabisa says: "The work of the NPA so far does not inspire any confidence, and it is a bleeding ground for public mistrust. Restoring public trust in our security and legal system remains our priority." — SABC News (@SABCNews) July 21, 2025 'The work of the NPA, so far, does not inspire any confidence, and it is a bleeding wound. It is a bleeding ground for public mistrust,' Hlabisa said. The party leader added that restoring public trust in the security and legal systems remains the IFP's priority when it comes to the question of the National Dialogue. ALSO READ: National Dialogue: Ramaphosa slams DA 'hypocrisy', says party will miss out on 'biggest show in SA' He recalled the vision of IPF founder Prince Mangosuthu Buthelezi, who emphasised the importance of a National Dialogue on issues like land reform, traditional leadership, poverty and social cohesion. Hlabisa said the party believes that South Africa's future depends on an open, inclusive and honest dialogue amongst its citizens. IFP supports National Dialogue As a result, the IPF supports the upcoming National Dialogue, recognising that genuine nationhood can only be achieved when leaders listen to the cries of the people and work together. 'South Africa needs more than just hope. We need a united effort to rebuild and transform our nation,' Hlabisa said. 'This requires a sense of genuine urgency, decisive reform and active participation for all sectors of our society. The current moment demands that we go beyond mere talk.' Watch the IFP media briefing here: NOW READ: The DA must decide to stay in GNU or step aside
