The real reason a staggering 40% of U.S. homeowners are mortgage-free
Here's a stat that would likely make financial adviser and radio personality Dave Ramsey—who has long advocated for Americans to pay off their mortgages early as a key pillar of his debt-free philosophy—at least somewhat pleased: A staggering 39.8% of U.S. owner-occupied housing units in 2023 were mortgage-free, marking a new high for this data series. That's up from 39.3% in 2022 and 32.8% in 2010.
Among the 85.7 million U.S. homeowner occupied households, 34.1 million are mortgage-free. The other 51.6 million have an outstanding mortgage.
So why did I say it'd only make Dave Ramsey 'somewhat pleased'?
Well, the reason is that a higher percentage of Americans are mortgage-free isn't necessarily because so many are paying off their mortgages faster. Instead, it reflects a powerful underlying demographic shift: the aging composition of the American population.
As Americans live longer, the U.S. fertility rate declines, and the massive baby boomer generation ages into their senior years, the U.S. population has skewed older. Since older homeowners are more likely to have paid off their mortgages, the aging composition of the American population means a larger share of homeowners are achieving mortgage-free status each year.
The other thing is that when older Americans sell their house and buy another home, they're more likely to rollover their equity and purchase that next home in all-cash.
Given that most demographic forecasts expect the composition of the American population to continue shifting upward in age, the share of mortgage-free households could also continue rising in the years to come. The wild card? If reverse mortgages get more popular and more older Americans take on mortgage debt again to tap into their equity.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
18 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC Sport: The death of cable TV may be the birth of streaming sports aggregation
A version of this article first appeared in the CNBC Sport newsletter with Alex Sherman, which brings you the biggest news and exclusive interviews from the worlds of sports business and media. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox. For about a decade, media executives have heavily invested in live sports as the primary value proposition for consumers to keep subscribing to traditional pay television. While tens of millions of Americans have ditched cable for a variety of streaming services, ESPN's marquee live sports have remained exclusive to cable subscribers. The broadcast networks (CBS, NBC, ABC and Fox) have been able to charge increasingly high fees to pay TV operators because they've invested in NFL games and college football, the most-watched American programming. When ESPN launches its direct-to-consumer service (likely next month), for the first time ever, Americans will be able to consume all major sports without having to subscribe to cable. (By the way, Disney — ESPN's majority owner — reports earnings next week. Sources suggest to me and my colleague Mike Ozanian that would be a logical time for ESPN to announce not only the DTC launch date but also the finalized details of its deal for NFL Media assets, which I reported on in last week's newsletter . Spokespeople for the NFL and ESPN declined to comment.) The changes in the pay TV landscape have led to one question that's dominated the strategic choices of the biggest media companies for the last decade: Will traditional pay TV die off completely, or will it level out and exist for decades to come as a profitable, albeit smaller, business? There was an interesting data point last week in Charter Communications' earnings report that suggests the answer could be the latter. Charter's earnings results weren't good. The stock fell 18% after the company reported it lost 117,000 internet customers during the quarter. Companies like Charter and CNBC's parent company, Comcast, have largely traded on residential broadband additions (or subtractions) for many years. Still, a bit hidden in the Charter numbers, the second-largest U.S. cable company reported a decline of just 80,000 video customers in the quarter. A year ago, that number was 408,000 in the same quarter. That's a five-fold improvement. There may be two reasons for plateauing losses. First, Charter has aggressively added "free" access to streaming services for customers who pay for the full bundle of cable networks. It's, of course, not actually free – consumers are still paying for it, but it's included in the cost of the bundle. This has probably made cable subscribers less likely to cancel their plans. Now, if a customer cancels cable, that household is also giving up access to Disney's Disney+ and Hulu, NBCUniversal's Peacock, Paramount Global's Paramount+, and Warner Bros. Discovery's ( soon to be just Warner. Bros. ) HBO Max. When ESPN's direct-to-consumer application launches in the coming weeks, a cable customer would also lose access to that. Charter CEO Chris Winfrey noted in last week's earnings conference call that those offerings add up to "over $100 worth of programmer apps." "That's going to be the stickiest product," Winfrey said. "It's going to be the best for customers and for programmers, us, and it's going to be the best for our broadband churn as well." Second – and this one's the biggie to look out for – it's at least possible that pay TV losses are finally subsiding after more than a decade of losses. Comcast posted its earnings release Thursday morning and reported video customer losses of 325,000, an improvement over 419,000 losses in the year-earlier period. It's possible most of the U.S. households that want to cancel cable have now canceled, and the ones remaining plan to stick around for a little while. If that's the case, cable TV may effectively morph into the primary aggregation video service for sports. You may remember Venu, the never-launched sports streaming application from Disney, Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery. For $42.99 per month, Venu planned to give customers all sports owned by Disney/ESPN, Fox and WBD's Turner Sports. Experts estimated the offering included about 60% of all sports on TV. Over time, Venu hoped to add Paramount Global and NBCUniversal to the mix, according to people familiar with the matter. That would have given consumers most sports, outside of regional sports networks and the NFL and NBA packages on Amazon. Venu's value proposition was its price – $42.99. I highly doubt we'll see a service like Venu come to market at that low of a price. Fox is getting ready to launch its new streaming service, Fox One, which will give non-cable customers access to all of Fox's pay TV programming. While Fox hasn't revealed the pricing for the service yet, it won't be cheap. "Pricing will be healthy and not a discounted price," Fox CEO Lachlan Murdoch said in May. Fox doesn't want you to cancel cable TV, so it won't incentivize churn by coming to market at a low price. "We do not want to lose a traditional cable subscriber to Fox One," Murdoch said, bluntly. Other pay TV operators have debuted skinny bundles of sports, such as DirecTV. Its MySports offering costs $69.99 per month , but it includes more than Venu would have. Comcast followed this year with a $70-per-month version of its own. The future of cable TV may slowly morph into something that resembles these skinny sports bundles. Sources tell me that once Skydance formally merges with Paramount Global next month, incoming CEO David Ellison plans to heavily invest in sports because pay TV economics still justify the spending. If video subscription losses are flattening, broadcast networks can continue to raise retransmission fees as long as they have premium programming – and sports are the most premium programming. How will he balance spending on sports when he's already promised more than $2 billion in cuts when the merger closes? What's likely to go is spending on anything that isn't sports or hit primetime (between 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. ET) programming. See: "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" as Exhibit A, which fits the strategy even if Skydance wasn't involved in that decision. Maybe we should all stop thinking about cable TV as doomed to death and start viewing it in a new way – the next-generation aggregation service for sports. In this lens, it's not surprising NBCUniversal is thinking about developing a new cable sports network even while it plans to spin off almost all of its other cable networks (including CNBC). The battle may be between the cable companies, YouTube TV and ESPN's direct-to-consumer app as the go-to destination to access all sports. To quote esteemed cable analyst Craig Moffett from his note to clients last month, "Maybe, just maybe, we're finding the long-imagined bottom for traditional pay TV, where sports and news fans are all that's left." Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of CNBC. On the record With Richard Masters , CEO of the Premier League ... This week, I spoke with Richard Masters , CEO of the Premier League. Masters is in the U.S. for the week while Premier League teams play their Summer Series – a small handful of preseason friendlies in New Jersey, Chicago and Atlanta. And yet, when I asked Masters if there's a plan in place to play regular season games in the U.S., just as the NFL has done internationally, he said there isn't. "We've got no plans to take matches abroad," said Masters, who noted U.K. soccer fans are far less tolerant of the idea than American NFL fans. "We had a look at that back in 2017. It was very controversial in the U.K.," said Masters. "The idea behind playing matches abroad is to grow the sport, to grow your league. And we've managed to do that in the intervening period by different methods, through great broadcasting partnerships, through digital technology, and through events like the Summer Series." I asked Masters about a wide range of topics, including his thoughts on the MLS, his plan to grow media rights revenue, and the league's controversial financial system. You can watch our entire conversation here . Or listen here and follow the CNBC Sport podcast if you prefer the audio version. CNBC Sport highlight reel The best of CNBC Sport from the past week: One believer in Major League Soccer is Walmart. The retail giant is becoming an official partner and sponsor for the league, reports CNBC's Rizzo. Saturday's MLB Speedway Classic between the Atlanta Braves and the Cincinnati Reds will likely generate the largest live audience in league history. More than 85,000 fans have already purchased tickets for a game that will take place at Bristol Motor Speedway in Tennessee. The current record for fan attendance is 84,587, set in 1954 at Cleveland Stadium for a Cleveland-New York Yankees doubleheader. Saturday's game will be the first MLB game ever in the Volunteer State. It could be a test run for future expansion – Nashville is one of the frontrunners to get an expansion team after 2030. CNBC's Jess Golden has more. One NFL employee was seriously wounded in Monday's shooting at the league's New York City headquarters, Commissioner Roger Goodell told employees in an email obtained by CNBC's Golden. "The employee is in stable condition and NFL staff are at the hospital supporting his family," Goodell wrote in the email sent Tuesday morning. The big number: 45.6 million There are 45.6 million Premier League fans in the U.S. – about 18% of all adults, according to data provided by the sports research firm Two Circles. For context, about 51% of the adult population in the U.K. is a fan, according to the surveyed data, but that amounts to just 27.9 million people. That delta between the U.S. and the U.K., combined with the massive amount of money U.S. leagues take from media companies, has led Masters to believe the U.S. is still a big growth opportunity for the EPL, even if he doesn't plan to bring regular season competition to the States. "It's one of the reasons we're here, and we brought four Premier League teams out to play in the Summer Series," Masters told me. "We're committed to growing the sport out here and to growing the Premier League." Quote of the week "Get the f--- out of our clubhouse." – How could this not be quote of the week? Philadelphia Phillies star Bryce Harper brazenly told MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred he wasn't wanted if he came to discuss a salary cap. Manfred's strategy on changing the league's spending rules appears to be to go directly to MLB players and around the union, which has steadfastly refused to discuss a cap. Here's what Manfred told me when we spoke two weeks ago: "At the end of the day, sports sell competition. We do have fans in a significant number of our markets who are really concerned with the issue of competitive balance and the competitiveness of the teams in their markets. It's something we're going to have to pay attention to." Still, Harper is one of the league's highest-paid players. It's the non-stars who Manfred may have more luck convincing if he's trying to make the case that their salaries will rise with a floor and a cap. Around the league Major League Baseball placed Cleveland Guardians closer Emmanuel Clase on paid leave while the league investigates a potential gambling matter. He's the second Guardians pitcher to be placed on leave, following Luis Ortiz . I also asked Manfred about how concerned he is about a major gambling scandal when we spoke earlier this month . Here's what he told me: "One of the good things about the legalization of gambling — not everything about it is good — is that we have partnerships and transparency that allows us to monitor what's going on down to really small, small bets by individuals not obviously associated with Major League Baseball. That system gives me confidence that we are in a good position to defend the integrity of the game. It's a factual question as to what happens going forward, but I do think that baseball and all of the major professional sports have taken steps to ensure that in a legalized environment that we did not create – the federal government created – that we're doing everything possible to maintain the integrity of sport." The Harlem Globetrotter-like Savannah Bananas have put some heat on MLB by drawing huge audiences of their own this year. The Bananas drew 81,000 fans to a game in April at Clemson's Memorial Stadium. This week, the Bananas announced TNT Sports will televise 19 games in August and September on TruTV and HBO Max. NBA Commissioner Adam Silver is in Europe this week meeting with potential backers for a new NBA European League, Sportico reports . Former NFL star-turned-broadcaster Shannon Sharpe is out at ESPN less than two weeks after settling an accusation-of-rape lawsuit from an ex-girlfriend, The Athletic reported.
CNBC
18 minutes ago
- CNBC
JPMorgan marks 1,000th branch opening since 2018 expansion plans
JPMorgan Chase has built 1,000 new branches in seven years. That's more locations than most of its competitors operate in total. The bank is marking the milestone opening in Charlotte, North Carolina, on Thursday where Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon is attending a ribbon-cutting ceremony. The firm has roughly 5,000 branches, the most of any American bank, according to Federal Reserve data from March. "It's a great marker for us to be able to say, you can see our commitment over time and we're on a marathon with regard to this expansion," said Jennifer Roberts, the CEO of Chase Consumer Banking, in an interview. "A thousand [branches] is significant – a thousand is bigger than many regional competitors have at all." In 2018, JPMorgan operated bank branches in 23 U.S. states and said it would expand into as many as 20 new markets over the following five years with about 400 new locations. By 2021, the firm said it had branches in all 48 lower states. And last February, JPMorgan announced a new, multibillion-dollar investment to open another 500 new locations by 2027. JPMorgan said over the past seven years, Chase has opened more bank branches than all of its large bank peers combined. However, many of JPMorgan's competitors have recently announced plans to expand their own footprints as the quest for deposits heats up. Bank of America recently announced a branch expansion, with plans to open 150 new centers by 2027. And Wells Fargo plans to add branches, especially now that it's fulfilled a regulatory consent order that had been constraining its growth. The industry-wide growth plans could help reverse a trend dating back to the 2008 financial crisis in which the U.S. has seen the net number of bank branches plummet. The combination of fewer overall banks and the advent of online banking has broadly made brick-and-mortar locations lower priority. However, in recent years, especially amid the population migration during and after the pandemic, banks have been reorienting their footprints to capture more deposits. Expanding in Charlotte puts JPMorgan head-to-head with rival Bank of America, which is headquartered there and has 71% market share in the city, according to KBW and S&P Global Market Intelligence data. Roberts said after this latest opening, Chase will have about 75 branches in North Carolina. She said that the bank is expanding there due to its "young, fast-growing population" and that there's a "lot of wealth coming into that area" as well. JPMorgan said at its investor day in May that its newer branches are expected to ultimately contribute more than $160 billion in incremental deposits. The firm said each new branch breaks even within four years. JPMorgan said when its expansion is complete, Chase will have added more than 1,100 branches, renovated 4,300 locations and entered 80 new markets. It also expects that 75% of the U.S. population will be able to reach one of its branches within an "accessible drive."
Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Shein and Fast Fashion Giants Face Major US Disruption After Trump Move
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's latest move could send shock waves through the fast-fashion industry, and threatens to upend the business models of companies like Shein and Temu while increasing the price of foreign-made goods for U.S. consumers. On Wednesday, the president signed an executive order ending the de minimis tariff exemption for shipments valued at under $800, which the White House said will close the "catastrophic loophole" used to evade customs duties and "funnel deadly synthetic opioids" into the United States. Why It Matters The move deals a significant blow to the e-commerce sector, in particular companies such as Shein and Temu, which one expert previously told Newsweek had "built their entire business model" around utilizing this loophole. The suspension of de minimis, which the White House said will minimize "national and economic security risks," could see the prices of foreign products rise on these platforms as well as other sites such as eBay, Etsy, and Amazon. Newsweek reached out to Shein and Temu via email and their websites for comment. Beyond e-commerce companies such as Shein and Temu, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) estimates that de minimis shipments account for 92 percent of all cargo entering the U.S., meaning the decision will impact a swathe of low-cost consumer products from phone accessories and beauty products to small electronics and household items. The Shein and Temu logo displayed on screens on February 20, 2025, in London, England. The Shein and Temu logo displayed on screens on February 20, 2025, in London, England. Photo Illustration byWhat To Know In Wednesday's executive order, Trump said that the exemption had allowed shippers worldwide to "exploit the de minimis privilege in an effort to evade duties, inspection, and U.S. law." The order is set to take effect on August 29, after which these shipments will be subject to "all applicable duties." This follows Trump's decision in May to suspend the provision for cargo from China and Hong Kong, which accounted for the majority of de minimis shipments to the U.S. The White House said that the exemptions had allowed "fentanyl and related precursor chemicals" to be more easily exported to the U.S. This decision, as well as the escalating tariffs placed on China over April, saw the number of Americans using Shein and Temu plunge. Daily active users of Temu and Shein dropped 52 percent and 25 percent, respectively, between March and May, according to data from Sensor Tower, cited by CNBC. In late April, the two companies also announced that they would be raising prices as a result of "recent changes in global trade rules and tariffs." The truce signed between the U.S. and China in May, which has seen tariffs temporarily lowered as the pair attempt to negotiate a fully fledged trade agreement, prompted both companies to drop this change. However, the decision to suspend de minimis exemptions universally could once again pose a challenge to the e-commerce giants, as well as the entrepreneurs who rely on them for their own "drop-shipping" businesses, and customers who have come to enjoy their discount products. "The end of de-minis shipping will raise consumer prices for certain as effectively, many goods that may presently enter tariff free will now be subject to higher average tariff rate," Thiemo Fetzer, a professor of economics at the University of Warwick, told Newsweek. "U.S. consumers may have fewer choices and goods will become persistently more expensive," he said. "Conventional wisdom will dictate a price increase," said Z. John Zhang, a professor of Marketing at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. "But such an increase can easily be the beginning of the end for fast fashion companies from China." Zhang told Newsweek that closing de minimis will be "devastating for companies whose sole business model is based on the loophole," but added that Shein and Temu had received enough "warning shots" to begin making adjustments to their business models ahead of the decision. Fetzer said that one "mitigation strategy" would be to develop their network of U.S. warehouses in the U.S., and use these to "ship goods intra-U.S.," but acknowledged that this may prove challenging and prohibitively expensive. "This would require a major pivot in operations that nevertheless should be feasible for Temu to achieve," he said. "Yet it could then be that certain goods simply become too expensive due to the higher tariffs rates; increased costs from warehousing and storage; and higher compliance cost associated with customs procedures." What People Are Saying The White House, on Wednesday: "Today, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order suspending duty-free de minimis treatment for low-value shipments, closing the catastrophic loophole used to, among other things, evade tariffs and funnel deadly synthetic opioids as well as other unsafe or below-market products that harm American workers and businesses into the United States." Z. John Zhang, a professor of marketing and pricing strategy expert, told Newsweek: "The companies have no choice now but to adjust in a fundamental way and find a new way to do fast fashion. Time will tell if [Shein and Temu] will be as competitive as many other capable retailers in a new environment." Sheng Lu, a professor of fashion and apparel studies at the University of Delaware, told Newsweek: "In the short to medium term, [Shein and Temu] may still be able to maintain their competitiveness in the smaller e-commerce companies may not even survive their business with the policy shift, which in turn helps reduce competition." "At the same time, conventional brands and retailers are also grappling with rising tariffs and ongoing policy uncertainty," he added, "which could create a temporary grace period for Shein and Temu to adapt and experiment with new business models." Rob Handfield, a professor of Supply Chain Management at North Carolina State University, told Newsweek: "Shein and Temu have relied on de minimis shipments as a core feature of their business model. This will likely not only impact their revenues and profitability, but will also increase the cost of their products, making them less appealing to customers in the U.S." "They will be able to partially absorb the tariffs on these goods, depending on the outcome of the negotiations between Trump and China," he said. "They may also push on their suppliers in places like India, Bangladesh, and Vietnam to even further reduce their costs, even though these parties are stretched thin. As such, they will still remain competitive, but much less so than in the past." Nicholas Lardy, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, previously told Newsweek that closing the de minimis exemption could prove challenging for customs authorities. "There are millions of these packages coming in every day," he said. "And the customs services doesn't have the manpower to assess them and charge a tariff. So, you know, after two days, they have to give it up." "There's no way that customs can investigate the ownership of millions of companies every day," he added. "So it's whack-a-mole." What Happens Next Trump's suspension on "reciprocal tariffs" will end on Friday, meaning most countries that were unable to secure a trade deal with the U.S. will see their rates revert back to the levels announced on April 2. The 90-day tariff pause on China is due to end on August 12, with no indications of a further extension.
