Are Australian podcasters, not politicians, driving Gen Z's election interest?
Australian election
will be the first in which Gen Z and millennial voters - those under 45 - outnumber baby boomers.
However just how influential young voters will be on the result is far from clear, with analysis of the 2022 election by Griffth University showing many Generation Z voters only voted to avoid a fine.
Voting in Australia is compulsory.
Some commentators however believe this time might be different, as evidenced by the rise in popularity of online political influencers and podcasters who target engagement with younger voters.
One online political influencer that is making a mark in Australia is Punter's Politics hosted by former teacher Konrad Benjamin.
Punters Politics has around 415 thousand followers on [https://www.instagram.com/punterspolitics/?hl=en
Instagram]
Benjamin said his site and others are engaging young voters this time around because they focus on context and single issues that young voters care about like housing, rather than the political punditry that main corporate media stations focus on.
He said the success of online sites like his in politics is evidenced by the fact politicians are choosing to engage with online podcasters.
In the US Donald Trump is thought to have boosted his vote with young male voters thanks to appearances on sites like the Joe Rogan podcast.
Liberal leader Peter Dutton in Australia has appeared on the popular Australian podcast
Diving Deep.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Could a four-day week be the future of work for more businesses?
A four-day working week might sound like a dream, but for some businesses, it's already a reality - and the pressure to make it the norm seems to be growing on the other side of the Tasman. Now, Australia's biggest union body is calling for the model to become the norm, reigniting debate across the ditch and prompting comparisons to New Zealand's early trials. The Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) is leading the charge, saying a shorter work week without a pay cut can lead to higher productivity and a better quality of life. 'You get better performance. Workers are healthier. They've got a better life balance,' said ACTU president Michelle O'Neil. ADVERTISEMENT But the proposal hasn't landed well with everyone. Business groups are pushing back, questioning whether reduced hours are realistic without corresponding gains in productivity. 'Do you want a pay rise or do you want reduced working hours? They have to be based on the achievement of real productivity gains,' argued Andrew McKellar, CEO of the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Some Australian politicians, including the Greens, are backing the move - citing international and local examples where shorter weeks have delivered results. 'The trials that are underway in Australia and around the world tell us that you can be more productive with a shorter working week,' said Greens Senator Barbara Pocock. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is open to the discussion, but says it's not yet government policy. 'There's other measures that will feed into next year's budget… there's other things that could be for a future term of government,' he said. Australian PM Anthony Albanese is declining to commit to the idea. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT And while the concept is gaining momentum, not everyone is convinced the timing is right. 'The smaller the economy, the more the Australian people will feel poor,' said Ted O'Brien, Australia's Shadow Treasurer. Some in NZ ahead of the curve Here in Aotearoa, the idea is far from new. In 2018, Perpetual Guardian made headlines as one of the first companies in the world to trial and later adopted a four-day working week. The results showed improved productivity, better staff wellbeing and higher engagement. Since then, other New Zealand companies have experimented with different variations of flexible work. Mana Communications, a small PR agency, introduced a nine-day fortnight in 2020 and says the benefits have been tangible. 'It just gives you a day where you can do your shopping, do your laundry, do your life admin and still have a full weekend,' said managing director Caleb Hulme-Moir. ADVERTISEMENT 'I was able to do a course that I've always wanted to do on our Mondays off, something that I didn't have time for previously,' added account executive Leilani Wright. Both say they believe more businesses on both sides of the Tasman should give it a go. 'Absolutely think more businesses in Australia and New Zealand should take up this idea,' said Hulme-Moir. 'I think if we can do it, anyone can do it and just start with a nine-day fortnight and see the productivity grow,' added Wright. As Australia's unions ramp up the pressure, and trials continue to show positive outcomes, attention is once again turning to New Zealand's workplace future and whether more companies here might soon make the switch. The future of work might just start with an extra day off.
NZ Autocar
3 days ago
- NZ Autocar
Electric car RUCs coming for Australia
Australia is considering a road-user charge (RUC) system for electric vehicles (EVs) to help offset falling fuel excise revenue. Currently EVs don't pay excise tax or road tax. And they now account for around one in ten new car sales. Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers has met with the transport and infrastructure industries to propose the RUC plan, and organise a timeline for its implementation. Once up and running, all electric cars will pay a tax based on distance travelled, or at least that is the plan. Currently, the government adds a 52c fuel excise at the pump, with the sum aimed at maintaining and improving roads. However, BEVs are exempt on account of not needing fossil fuels. So a road-user charge would mean owners of non-ICE vehicles will also contribute to ongoing road maintenance. The fine details of the tax have yet to be ironed out. It is unclear whether rural EV owners will pay less than urban dwellers. Victorian Treasurer Tim Pallas said: 'You've got to be conscious of the fact that there are areas that will be disadvantaged by a purist model of road use…so you have to make allowances for that,' according to a report in the Australian. Whatever happens, the new tax looks to be a while away. Chalmers is suggesting it won't happen until 2028. Victoria tried to introduce a RUC system for EVs and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) in mid-2021. However, only the Federal Government has the power to impose such a charge so it was scrapped. The NSW Government wants to implement a similar system from July 1, 2027 but again it would not be enforceable unless adopted nationwide. Whether Australia follows New Zealand in implementing a road-user charge system that includes all light vehicles is unclear. No country or state has yet introduced a scheme where all powertrain types pay RUCs. More information on the Australian plan will be announced soon.
Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Whether to recognise a grey waste of dust and rubble
Christopher Luxon has announced that by late September 2025, New Zealand might be ready to recognise Palestinian statehood. This curiously equivocal statement contrasts sharply with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's firm commitment to recognise that unfortunate entity. Australia's pledge matches those already given by France, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Of New Zealand's Five Eyes partners, only the United States stands unequivocally behind Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu's list of reliable allies grows thin. Does New Zealand's reticence merit the criticisms levelled at it by supporters of the Palestinian cause? When Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong can tell journalists Australia is moving to recognise Palestine "while there is still a Palestine to recognise", then, surely, New Zealand awaiting the outcome of the monstrous events convulsing Gaza and the West Bank is wise? It might also be prudent to ascertain exactly what sort of "state" New Zealand is being called upon to recognise. If we are talking about the partitioned territory offered to the Palestinians in 1947, the boundaries of which the Palestinian authorities, such as they were at the time, emphatically rejected, then the harsh truth of the matter is that, within those boundaries, there is precious little left out of which a recognisable state of any kind could be fashioned. As anyone who watches the news networks is only too aware, the Gaza Strip (as it was known in 1947) has been turned into a grey waste of dust and rubble. In their biblically ferocious quest for vengeance, the Israeli Defence Force has done its best (and its best is terrifying) to leave not one stone standing upon another. Indeed, not since Rome conquered Carthage has the victors' determination to utterly destroy their enemy been so openly displayed. Roman historian Tacitus famously observed: "Rome makes a desert and calls it peace." Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu goes one better. He will not even talk of peace until he has made a desert strewn with the bones of Hamas' fighters out of Gaza. The West Bank is larger than Gaza, but only marginally more favoured. Bisected by walls, bedevilled by endless checkpoints, its people are hemmed in on every side. Israeli soldiers and their bulldozers flatten whole blocks of the West Bank's beleaguered towns. The flower of Palestinian youth — those whose slingshot stones have not been repaid with the explosive bullets of Israeli snipers — rot in Israeli jails. Their grandparents' olive groves burn in the night, their livestock are driven off. Those who venture out bravely in search of their stolen goats are beaten, stabbed, shot. Because not all the hills of the West Bank have been disfigured by the Israeli occupation. Cascading down some hillsides are the gleaming homes and lush gardens of the settler communities. As beautiful as they are illegal these settlements are peopled by fanatics every bit as bright-eyed and implacable as Hamas. When it comes to their Palestinian "neighbours", there is only one state these settlers wish to recognise — their absence. There was a time when the "two-state solution" promoted by the United Nations seemed a viable prospect. So much so that, with generous donations from the backers of a free, democratic, and independent Palestine, its presumptive rulers commenced constructing an impressive parliamentary complex for its legislators to sit in. Elegant of line, impressive in its austere functionality, the structure took shape in Abu Dis a neighbourhood of East Jerusalem — the designated capital of the Palestinian state. In 2003, however, construction ceased. The Second Palestinian Intifada (uprising) was in the process of suffocating the Oslo Peace Accords in tear-gas, shrapnel and blood. The Israelis responded by building their infamous "Separation Wall". From the river to the sea there would be only one state. Palestine's half-completed Parliament is still there, a dark and cavernous testimonial to diplomatic and moral failure. The building's grey concrete walls are stained, as if by the tears of all those on both sides of the conflict who were forced to abandon their dream of a peaceful two-state future. Nations presenting Palestinian recognition as a panacea should be made to argue their case from the cold concrete platforms of that doomed and gloomy monument. Hopefully, Christopher Luxon knows better than to sit there with them. ■ Chris Trotter is an Auckland writer and commentator.
