As distraught parents plead, school board votes to keep Acero charter schools open, despite financial warning
The Chicago Board of Education approved an amended resolution at a board meeting Thursday requiring Chicago Public Schools to keep open several charter schools slated for closure.
After a protracted and often confusing debate on the feasibility and fine print of the amendment, the school board voted 16 to 3 with one abstention to keep open all of the seven schools slated for closure in Acero Charter Network through the end of the 2025-26 school year and incorporate five into district schools the following year. It did not provide concrete options for the other two schools.
The last-minute change in the resolution to make it mandatory to absorb all schools and costs reflects the dynamics of a divided board — with several newly elected and appointed members — that is facing serious financial challenges.
The first change in the resolution language, which CPS made in its online agenda just 48 hours before the vote, would have gone back on promises the school board made in December — when a six-member board voted unanimously to keep all Acero charter school locations open until the next school year and absorb five of them in 2026. Acero first announced closures of seven out of 15 schools last fall.
It's the second time the board voted to maintain the schools through the 2025-26 school year. In December, the board passed a resolution for the same outcome, but the agenda for Thursday's monthly meeting indicated the board would be voting to amend the resolution and close three of Acero's schools, not two.
The amendment, posted just 48 hours before the board meeting, directed the district to keep the remaining four schools open through at least the 2025-26 school year. The future of those schools in the year following, however, was uncertain.
Several of those board members spoke passionately about the financial decisions facing the board. But most of the meeting's public comment was taken up by parents and students at Acero expressing their frustration – some with raised voices and tears — about the lack of communication from Acero leadership and their discomfort with the uncertainty they have faced for weeks.
'We're broken due to this situation. I hope that no organization — be it charter or public — be so careless and reckless,' said Acero's Fuentes Elementary parent Angelica Juarez.
Acero charter schools are authorized and overseen by the district. The seven schools in question serve 2,000 students, who are predominantly Latino. News about the potential closures of the schools was first announced by Acero leadership in October. It has been the source of contention at board meetings for months since.
Acero's 11-member board initially cited funding challenges, declining enrollment and inadequate spaces to ensure compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act as reasons for the closures. They said keeping the schools open would leave the network with a $40 million budget shortfall for the 2025-26 school year.
The district has been in ongoing negotiations with Acero leadership, including CEO Richard L. Rodriguez, according to Alfonso Carmona, CPS's chief portfolio officer.
Carmona cited state law that requires school districts to give charter operators between 97% and 103% of the funding it gives district-run schools per student. Maintaining the Acero buildings would exceed that, Carmona said. It would take $4.1 million at a minimum to keep all seven campuses open, according to Carmona.
'The district does not have legal grounds to keep any of the campuses open,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Byron Allen and McDonald's Reach Settlement in Lawsuit Over Black-Owned Media Advertising Pledge
McDonald's has settled its $10 billion lawsuit levied by Byron Allen and his media companies over black-owned media advertising pledges. The settlement was reached Friday between the fast food company and Allen's companies Entertainment Studios Network and the Weather Group. The settlement both dodges the upcoming July 15 court trial and also resolves claims made in a separate but related $100 million lawsuit against the company. 'We are pleased that Mr. Allen has come to appreciate McDonald's unwavering commitment to inclusion, and has agreed to refocus his energies on a mutually beneficial commercial arrangement that is consistent with other McDonald's supplier relationships,' McDonald's said in a statement. 'Our company's unique three-legged stool model relies on mutual respect, and we look forward to ESN's contributions to the betterment of our system.' Byron's pair of media companies Entertainment Studios Network and Weather Group also commented on the settlement. During the course of this litigation, many of our preconceptions have been clarified, and we acknowledge McDonald's commitment to investing in Black-owned media properties and increasing access to opportunity,' their statement read. 'Our differences are behind us, and we look forward to working together.' The original lawsuit came out of 2021 pledge by McDonald's to more than double its spending on American media companies and production shops owned by Black, Asian, Latino, female and LGBTQ people, as well as individual content creators, by the end of 2024. Allen's lawsuit came in 2023 and called this a 'lie' and 'false promise,' largely due to what it argued was insufficient spending on Allen's companies in particular. In February 2024, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge has dismissed the $100 million lawsuit filed citing California's anti-SLAPP laws. Judge Mel Recana noted that the suit was filed nearly 2 years before McDonald's self-imposed deadline, and as such called the accusations within it 'purely speculative.' The post Byron Allen and McDonald's Reach Settlement in Lawsuit Over Black-Owned Media Advertising Pledge appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Amazon's Return-to-Office Mandate Sparks Disability Complaints
(Bloomberg) -- Inc.'s hard-line stance on getting disabled employees to return to the office has sparked a backlash, with workers alleging the company is violating the Americans with Disabilities Act as well as their rights to collectively bargain. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban Do World's Fairs Still Matter? NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire At least two employees have filed complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the National Labor Relations Board, federal agencies that regulate working conditions. One of the workers said they provided the EEOC with a list of 18 'similarly situated' employees to emphasize that their experience isn't isolated and to help federal regulators with a possible investigation. Disabled workers frustrated with how Amazon is handling their requests for accommodations — including exemptions to a mandate that they report to the office five days a week — are also venting their displeasure on internal chat rooms and have encouraged colleagues to answer surveys about the policies. Amazon has been deleting such posts and warning that they violate rules governing internal communications. One employee said they were terminated and another said they were told to find a different position after advocating for disabled workers on employee message boards. Both filed complaints with the EEOC and NLRB. The company's use of artificial intelligence to help it manage employee requests for disability accommodations has also stirred internal opposition and could open the company to legal challenges. Company spokesperson Zoe Hoffmann said Amazon's Disability and Leave Services team ensures employees have access to the accommodations and adjustments they need to be effective and advance their careers. The process is empathetic, and the interactions aren't automated, she said. 'Amazon respects employees' rights to organize and doesn't interfere with these rights. We don't discriminate or retaliate against employees for engaging in organizing activities,' Hoffmann said in an emailed statement. 'We're committed to supporting our employees by providing effective accommodations that meet their individual needs and the needs of the business.' Bloomberg reported in November that Amazon was making it more difficult for staff with disabilities to win approval to work from home. The company implemented a more rigorous vetting process, both for new requests to work remotely and applications to extend existing arrangements. Affected employees had to participate in a 'multilevel leader review' and some were told monthlong trials would be used to determine if accommodations met their needs. Several employees told Bloomberg then that they believed the system was designed to deny work-from-home accommodations and prompt employees with disabilities to quit, which some have done. Amazon denied the system was designed to encourage people to resign. Since then, workers have mobilized against the policy. One employee repeatedly posted an online survey seeking colleagues' reactions, defying the company's demands to stop. The survey ultimately generated feedback from more than 200 workers even though Amazon kept deleting it, and the results reflected strong opposition to Amazon's treatment of disabled workers. More than 71% of disabled Amazon employees surveyed said the company had denied or failed to meet most of their accommodation requests, while half indicated they faced 'hostile' work environments after disclosing their disabilities and requesting accommodations. One respondent said they sought permission to work from home after suffering multiple strokes that prevented them from driving. Amazon suggested moving closer to the office and taking mass transit, the person said in the survey. Another respondent said they couldn't drive for longer than 15-minute intervals due to chronic pain. Amazon's recommendation was to pull over and stretch during their commute, which the employee said was unsafe since they drive on a busy freeway. Bloomberg couldn't verify the responses to the anonymous employee survey. Amazon didn't dispute the accounts and said it considered a range of solutions to disability accommodations, including changes to an employee's commute. Hoffmann, the spokesperson, said that when appropriate, Amazon adjusts schedules, lighting and desk assignments. It also offers job coaching. If warranted, the company might provide commuting adjustments. In rare circumstances, she said, employees with disabilities are allowed to work from home full time or part time. AI Risks Using AI to parse accommodation requests, read doctors' notes and make recommendations based on keywords has also generated internal opposition. Bloomberg reviewed screenshots from an in-house coding tool showing what appeared to be prompts designed to guide AI software through the process of evaluating and pulling data from documents filled out by employees and their physicians. The bots are given context — such as the fact that injuries can occur on one or both arms — suggestions of follow-up questions and a lengthy list of potential accommodations for employees with low vision. There's also extensive guidance that may be intended to keep the software from asking unnecessary questions or generating irrelevant data. Amazon has long used automation to more efficiently manage its enormous workforce. But deploying such tools for sensitive personnel matters risks missing nuances about an employee's situation that a human might spot and take into consideration. Doing so also could lead to legal complications should employees claim the software introduced errors into the process. And the use of AI risks further alienating employees, who are already expected to engage with chatbots and automated systems, rather than colleagues, for a wide range of workplace tasks. 'It's impossible to imagine that companies will not be using AI for any number of needs, including this one,' said Chai Feldblum, a former commissioner with the EEOC. But in the event of a legal challenge, she said, Amazon would have to prove that providing an accommodation to an employee placed an unreasonable burden on the company. 'I would not leave that final judgment to AI,' Feldblum said. Amazon's partly automated accommodation and internal job transfer processes are key elements of the employee complaints to the EEOC, with workers arguing that it is insufficiently interactive to provide a complete picture of a person's physical limitations and whether reasonable accommodations could help them do their jobs. 'If there's an indication that Amazon is using some rote artificial intelligence process to manage these requests, that's not interactive,' said David Hutt, legal director of the National Disability Rights Network. 'Courts are pretty skeptical of these kind of boilerplate accommodations that aren't specifically tailored around the person's disability and their job function.' Two employees said Amazon cited its 'solicitation' policy when deleting their posts from employee communication channels. The policy prohibits personnel from asking others for financial contributions, disseminating advertising materials or gathering signatures on petitions unless they have permission from the company, according to documents reviewed by Bloomberg. Preventing employees from discussing the workplace could backfire if the NLRB determines that doing so interferes with their protected rights to organize and debate working conditions, said Kate Bronfenbrenner, the director of labor education research at Cornell University. 'If two or more people are in any way penalized or coerced against exercising their rights, it's a violation,' Bronfenbrenner said. 'Whether this gets enforced is another question,' she added, citing budget cuts to various federal agencies. With internal communication channels being scrutinized, Amazon employees posted a petition to calling on the company to reform its policies. The dispute could affect thousands of Amazon workers. An internal Slack channel for employees with disabilities has 13,000 members, one of the people said. Amazon said it doesn't track the total number of disabled workers since employee disclosure is voluntary. The rise of remote work during the pandemic helped boost the number of disabled people with jobs to almost 23% last year, close to a record high since the US Bureau of Labor Statistics began tracking the metric in 2008. Working from home can benefit people with a range of disabilities, including chronic allergies, limited mobility and anxiety disorders. Amazon employees have lodged complaints about workplace conditions in the past. The EEOC as recently as last year was investigating allegations that the company discriminated against pregnant warehouse workers in California, Connecticut, New Jersey and North Carolina by denying their accommodation requests. An agency spokesperson declined to provide an update regarding the status of the investigation. In 2021, Amazon settled a dispute with two workers at its Seattle headquarters who alleged they were fired in retaliation for their workplace activism regarding climate change and working conditions, which included inviting colleagues to a virtual event meant to connect tech employees with warehouse employees. Their allegations led to a labor board complaint accusing Amazon of unfair labor practices. American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Not a random operation': Residents, officials alarmed after possible ICE activity in Rockford
ROCKFORD, Ill. (WTVO) — Rockford's southwest side is quiet Friday, a day after personnel from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security were confirmed in the area. 'People were confused about some things. From my understanding, that it may have been in a residential area or near a park, all of it is, with the social media posts, and not from official sources,' said 6th Ward Alderwoman Aprel Prunty (D). Prunty said she heard from residents of her ward that DHS personnel near Liberty Park. While officials if agents from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) were present, the City of Rockford released a statement saying, 'It is important to note that ICE is a federal agency operating under the Department of Homeland Security.' 'This was scary for a lot of people. And, especially if it were near a park, we know that children were probably there. I have heard that, since then, that maybe children did witness it,' Prunty said. Fernando Lopez, the station manager at Rockford's Latino radio station La Bamba Radio, said he was made aware of two individuals who were targeted due to active deportation orders against them. 'It's not a random operation of ICE. It was targeting specific people. As far as we know, they pick specific people with deportation proceedings. That's what this is. No massive raids, no random stuff,' Lopez said. According to ICE, those arrested in its operations nationwide had criminal histories, including sexual assault, robbery, drug and weapons charges, and domestic violence. In Illinois, the TRUST Act, signed by former Gov. Bruce Rauner (R) in 2017, prevents state law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities. According to the 2023 Way Forward Act Compliance Report, 88.5% of requests from federal immigration authorities were rejected statewide. City officials did not have further updates. Earlier this year, Rockford Police Chief Carla Redd on the department's policy, saying, 'The enforcement of civil immigration laws is the primary responsibility of federal agencies, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The Rockford Police Department does not participate in civil immigration-related investigations or actions.' Winnebago County Sheriff Gary Caruana said in a , 'Local law enforcement agencies are prohibited from honoring ICE detainers or acting on an individual's immigration status without a judicial warrant. These legal restrictions limit the ability of local law enforcement to collaborate with federal partners, including ICE, in addressing certain public safety concerns.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
