logo
The moving target that is RTÉ's woes

The moving target that is RTÉ's woes

Irish Timesa day ago

If there were one thing to be gleaned from Wednesday's Oireachtas media committee session with
RTÉ
's leadership team, it is that the political focus has well and truly moved on since last summer.
One of the big talking points to come out of last June's session with director general
Kevin Bakhurst
and co was the issue of outsourcing. The former BBC News editor was forced at the time to deny that the national broadcaster's transformation plan – a central plank of which is a contentious move to increase spending on outsourced, 'independent' productions – was tantamount to privatisation of in-house programming. All this after he was peppered with questions on the matter by members of the committee.
Very little oxygen was expended on that issue on Wednesday. Instead, attention had largely shifted to RTÉ's latest financial foul-up: the €3.7 million or so written off on a troubled capital spending project to replace a legacy IT system in the organisation.
But outsourcing has not gone away. Just last week, RTÉ announced plans to switch production of some religious programming – specifically, 'Christian worship content', as the broadcaster put it in a statement – to outside producers. It means Masses will no longer be broadcast from Donnybrook and will, instead, be produced by churches nationwide.
READ MORE
Asked briefly about it on Wednesday, Bakhurst said RTÉ hopes to get a 'different and a better product' out of the move and denied the broadcaster is phasing out religious programming.
[
Ryan Tubridy has not repaid RTÉ €150,000 he received for Renault deal, Bakhurst tells media committee
Opens in new window
]
That will be cold comfort for staff, who are already concerned about the outsourcing of flagship programming such as Fair City and the Late Late Show, as announced last year. RTÉ's group of unions has reportedly written to the organisation's head of HR to request a meeting about last week's announcement.
Asked on Wednesday about morale within RTÉ, Bakhurst diplomatically noted that it was 'very mixed'. Change is 'very difficult', he said, and there remains 'a very high level of anger and disappointment' about the 2023 secret payments scandal.
In some areas of the organisation, however, morale is 'very good', the director general claimed. Against a backdrop of redundancies and outsourcing, it is difficult to imagine where these pockets of good feeling might be.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary hits €100m bonus target
Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary hits €100m bonus target

Irish Times

time38 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary hits €100m bonus target

Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary has qualified for share options worth more than €100 million after the airline's shares hit a key performance target, paving the way for one of the biggest payouts in European corporate history. Shares this week closed at more than €21 for a 28th consecutive day, meeting one of two conditions attached to Mr O'Leary's bumper pay deal. The 64-year-old will have to stay at Ryanair until the end of July 2028 to collect the share options – worth more than €111 million – as part of an incentive scheme agreed in 2019. Mr O'Leary, known for his pugnacious style, defended his potential windfall earlier this month after Ryanair reported a fall in full-year profits. [ Ryanair's sky-high gains fuel O'Leary's bonus ambitions Opens in new window ] [ O'Leary flies closer to €100m pay-day Opens in new window ] 'I think we're delivering exceptional value for Ryanair shareholders in an era when premiership footballers or the managers are getting paid €20 million to €25 million a year,' he said. READ MORE Ryanair shareholders, he added, were 'getting particular value out of our share options – both mine and the rest of the management team'. Mr O'Leary said that as the options would not vest for another three years, he and the 'rest of the management team have to stay here to 2028 and continue to deliver before we can actually get hold of those share options'. 'So they don't come around for another three years and a lot can happen between now and then,' he added. Mr O'Leary also signalled he could stay at the airline when his current contract expired in 2028. 'My contract runs out in 2028 and there'll have to be some discussion I presume with the board as to how my remuneration will be fixed from 2028 onwards, if they want me to stay on after 2028,' he said. Mr O'Leary's potential pay deal compares with that of József Váradi, boss of low-cost rival Wizz Air, who stands to earn £100 million if that airline's share price hits £120 by 2028. But Wizz Air has previously conceded that this was unlikely to be met with the shares trading well below that level. Bumper pay packages are more common in the US. GE Aerospace chief executive Larry Culp received $89 million in 2024, making him one of the highest-paid US executives. Some European companies, including the London Stock Exchange Group, have been pushing for higher pay rewards for their executives. Since becoming chief executive of Ryanair in 1994, Mr O'Leary has masterminded the airline's breakneck growth as it has grown from a small regional airline into a force in global aviation. The airline has cemented its position as the undisputed leader in European low-cost aviation after using the disruption caused by the pandemic to increase its market share as weaker rivals retrenched. Mr O'Leary receives a basic salary of €1.2 million a year, but also owns a stake in Ryanair worth about €930 million. Under the scheme agreed in 2019, he was granted the options to buy 10 million shares at €11.12 each if either the airline's share price hit €21 for 28 consecutive days, or it reported €2.2 billion in annual profits after tax any time up to 2028. Ryanair said: 'If the share price remains above €21 until close of play on Thurs 29 May, then the 28-day share price condition will have been met. However, this is only one of two conditions for the share options to vest.' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited

No jail term for ‘neighbour from hell' who lay in wait to pull out woman's hair
No jail term for ‘neighbour from hell' who lay in wait to pull out woman's hair

Irish Times

time40 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

No jail term for ‘neighbour from hell' who lay in wait to pull out woman's hair

A 'neighbour from hell' caught on CCTV attacking a woman by pulling out her hair has avoided a jail term. Belinda Daly (60) pleaded guilty at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court to one count of assault causing harm to her neighbour in the front garden of her home on Windmill Avenue in Crumlin, Dublin, on February 28th, 2021. The court heard there was a long-standing disagreement between the neighbours over a minor falling-out between other members of their families. In CCTV footage taken from Daly's home on the day in question, she can be seen reaching over the garden wall and grabbing her neighbour's hair. READ MORE Daly has no previous convictions, prosecuting barrister Marc Thompson told the court. In a victim-impact statement, read out previously, the injured party told the court Daly was 'a neighbour from hell'. 'Even today, I'm still terrified, afraid of being attacked again,' she said, adding that she had frequent thoughts of 'the evil unleashed on me.' The woman suffered alopecia of the scalp, with hair loss extending to seven centimetres across her head due to 'the ferocity of the attack', her GP wrote in a letter to the court. She has to have regular nerve-blocking injections to her neck and is on daily pain medication, the court heard. She suffers frequent migraines, has post-traumatic stress disorder, severe anxiety and intermittent nose bleeds. Defence counsel Brian Storan said his client regrets and takes full responsibility for her behaviour. The court heard Daly had two adult children and a grandchild. She has spent time working in domestic violence shelters. Defence counsel said Daly was struggling with anxiety issues related to her work at the time of the assault. Sentencing Daly on Friday, Judge Orla Crowe said there was clearly a long history between the parties with 'a lot of bad blood'. This was a very significant outbreak of violence, and, no matter what was going on, nothing justified Daly's shameful behaviour. The judge said Daly had 'lain in wait' for her neighbour, and the level of force used was noteworthy. She noted the parties were no longer neighbours, as the victim's house went on the market before the assault. Judge Crowe imposed a sentence of two years but suspended it in full for three years. The judge ordered Daly not to have contact with her former neighbour.

Gerry Adams v BBC libel case: What the jury didn't hear
Gerry Adams v BBC libel case: What the jury didn't hear

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Gerry Adams v BBC libel case: What the jury didn't hear

Jane Donaldson, daughter of the murdered British agent Denis Donaldson , was prevented from giving evidence during Gerry Adams 's defamation legal action against the BBC . Without the jury present, Ms Donaldson told Mr Justice Alexander Owens her family has an 'open mind' regarding who is responsible for her father's killing but does not believe the Real IRA's claim to it. The Real IRA claimed responsibility for Mr Donaldson's murder three years after his killing. On Friday, a jury found the BBC defamed Mr Adams by publishing a claim in 2016 that the former Sinn Féin leader gave the go-ahead for the Provisional IRA to kill Mr Donaldson in Glenties, Co Donegal, in 2006. The jury awarded Mr Adams €100,000 in damages. READ MORE Paul Gallagher SC, the BBC's barrister, sought to have Ms Donaldson admitted as a witness during the trial. He contended that Adams's legal side made a 'big play' about the Donaldson family's view about who is responsible for the murder. Mr Gallagher submitted they should be entitled to counter the evidence of Ciaran Shiels , a solicitor who previously represented the Donaldson family, on this issue. Earlier in the trial, Mr Shiels told the jury Mr Donaldson's family did not accept or believe Mr Adams had anything to do with his murder. Mr Adams's lawyers objected to Ms Donaldson being admitted as a witness. Mr Justice Owens did not admit Ms Donaldson's evidence, as he held that it was not relevant to the questions to be decided by the jury. The judge noted she could not recall discussing the allegation about Mr Adams with Mr Shiels. [ Denis Donaldson a 'victim' of Troubles and viewed as expendable by handlers, Gerry Adams says Opens in new window ] The BBC was also prevented from calling as witnesses historian Professor Eunan O'Halpin and campaigner Austin Stack, whose father Brian – a prison officer at Portlaoise Prison – was killed by the Provisional IRA in 1984. Led through her evidence by Mr Gallagher in the absence of the jury, Ms Donaldson referred to a recent statement she issued to a newspaper, stating: 'My family has made it publicly known that we never accepted the bogus claim of responsibility [for Mr Donaldson's killing], which lacks all credibility, by a single Real IRA source in 2009.' Asked by Mr Gallagher what her family's position is on who was responsible for the murder, Ms Donaldson said: 'Our position is that we have an open mind. We don't know who killed my father.' Asked by the judge about the Real IRA's claim, Ms Donaldson said that at the time, the family 'felt it didn't make sense'. She said details in their account 'didn't correlate' with sensitive and confidential information they had gathered from the Garda. Ms Donaldson said she couldn't recall having a conversation with Mr Shiels about the allegation made against Mr Adams. [ Justice for my Father by Austin Stack: An account of 40 years of relentless probing into prison officer's IRA murder Opens in new window ] She added that the family's view on who was responsible for the murder has 'evolved and changed over time'. 'I think we still had an open mind on it and we were reluctant to give a view on the matter [at the time of the broadcast],' she said. Ms Donaldson said Mr Shiels was never a spokesperson for the family, but did at times deal with the media on their behalf. Mr Shiels previously represented the family at inquest hearings. She said she had had no contact with Mr Shiels since 2019, and her family, as of earlier this year, no longer retained Madden and Finucane – Mr Shiels's firm – as their solicitors. Cross-examined by Tom Hogan SC, for Mr Adams, Ms Donaldson said her family was 'not in support' of either party involved in the defamation action. She said she was unaware of a meeting in April 2016 between Mr Shiels and journalist Jennifer O'Leary to discuss the Spotlight programme. [ BBC journalist behind Gerry Adams programme rejects claim she found 'yes men' to support killing claim Opens in new window ] Ms Donaldson accepted she was aware and told of a subsequent meeting in May to discuss the programme, attended by Mr Shiels, Ms O'Leary and Ms Donaldson's husband, Ciarán Kearney. In his evidence, Mr Adams said Declan Kearney, Ms Donaldson's brother-in-law, investigated Mr Donaldson when allegations first emerged that he was an informant. She accepted that following that meeting, Mr Shiels engaged in correspondence with the Spotlight team on behalf of the family. She also accepted Mr Shiels spoke for the family – 'as our solicitor' – in comments he made to the media directly after the broadcast of the Spotlight programme. Ms Donaldson told the judge that their family's focus was on pursuing the truth about the murder. She said that for 19 years, her family had been seeking information on who exposed Mr Donaldson as a British spy, and who conspired to murder him. She said it was a matter of public record that the identity of the British agent known as Stakeknife – the Belfast man and IRA member Freddie Scappaticci – was protected. Her father, however, was 'thrown to the wolves', she said. In a statement issued after the trial, Ms Donaldson said her family's tragedy was 'trivialised' by Mr Adams, who 'prioritised his own financial and reputational interests over any regard for traumatising my family'. 'No one spoke for my family in court,' she said. 'We supported neither side in this case.' She called for a public inquiry, with a cross-Border dimension, into her father's death.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store