Prime Minister Christopher Luxon to announce Tāmaki Makaurau byelection date at post-Cabinet press conference
A byelection is being held in the Auckland Māori seat after the death of Te Pāti Māori MP Takutai Tarsh Kemp, who had been battling kidney disease.
It appears it will be a two-horse race between well-known broadcaster Oriini Kaipara for Te Pāti Māori and Labour's Peeni Henare, who held the seat for nine years until the 2023 when Kemp won the seat by a slim 42 votes.
Voting during byelections is open for about two weeks for people already enrolled in the electorate.
The Herald understands this afternoon's post-Cabinet press conference, held at 4pm, will also likely involve tertiary education, a portfolio led by National Minister Penny Simmonds.
Simmonds has been overseeing the dismantling of Te Pūkenga, a mega-merger of the country's polytechnics and training organisations.
The Vocational Education minister has previously described the polytech cluster as an 'abject disaster' and a 'financial mess' drowning in hundreds of millions of dollars of debt.
Te Pūkenga was established in April 2020 under the previous Labour Government and merged 25 polytechnics and industry training organisations into one national network.
Last week, RNZ reported warnings from Te Pūkenga's managers that the Government will still need to bail out the struggling polytechnics despite the reforms.
The mega-merger's chief financial officer James Smith told a Parliamentary select committee the changes being made would leave behind a 'simplistic, inefficient volumetric system' with no ability to adjust price based on scale.
'We also expect because of this that the government will be relied upon for further ad hoc financial support for ITPs (Institutes of Technology and Polytechnics) in the future,' he said.
Recently, the Universal College of Learning (Ucol) revealed plans to cut staff numbers and courses to save $7.1 million to be financially viable as a standalone institution. The disestablishment of Te Pūkenga means polytechnics, including Ucol, will now act as 'standalones'.
This morning, the Government also announced plans to double the international student sector to $7.2 billion by 2034. Under the new 'International Education Going for Growth Plan' eligible student visa holders in New Zealand will now be able to work 25 hours per week, up from the current 20.
It also wants to grow student enrolments from 83,700 in 2024 to 105,000 in 2027 and 119,000 by 2034 and increase the proportion of prospective students rating New Zealand among their top three choices from 18% in 2024 to 20% in 2027 and 22% in 2034.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
13 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Labelling rules ease for genetically-modified food made without adding new DNA
Simultaneously, the Government was considering a new regulatory regime for gene technologies used outside the laboratory, after it attracted 15,000 submissions during a select committee earlier this year. GM food or GM-free: a consumer's choice? Hoggard told RNZ last week there was some opposition to FSANZ's P1055 proposal during public consultation from those who 'don't believe in [genetic engineering]'. 'There was still some vocal opposition, so that was taken on board,' he said. 'Obviously, there was support from a lot of industry and scientific groups.' Hoggard said that in removing the requirement, producers could still choose to disclose gene technologies used throughout production on the label. 'There's nothing stopping anyone who is producing food that doesn't have any new breeding technologies to label it as such. 'We're not outlawing that people don't have to put these labels on.' He said it came down to the consumer's choice. 'So if the organic sector, for example, doesn't want to allow these new breeding techniques in their production, then people who also think they don't want to consume food that's had new breeding techniques used in them, then they can just buy organic and know that 'okay, that hasn't been used'. 'If this is something you're not worried about, then just go ahead shopping as normal. 'If it is something you are concerned about, producers who will be using the old methodologies will still be able to highlight on the packaging that, 'hey, we don't use the X, Y and Z' or 'we don't do this or that'. And you just need to go and look for that food.' Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard says producers can still choose to disclose gene technologies and label items as such. Photo / RNZ, Angus Dreaver Hoggard said to the best of his knowledge, no health issues had been raised from the consumption of GMO products, such as soya bean, for example. Meanwhile, GE-Free New Zealand spokesman Jon Carapiet said the eased labelling requirements took informed choices away from the consumer. 'It's really fundamentally unethical to take away the ordinary consumer's choice in the supermarkets,' Carapiet said. 'It's all about trust, and to say 'we're not gonna even trust you to make your own decisions anymore'... is really wrong.' He said the assertion that shoppers concerned about GM food would simply buy organic food instead was 'disingenuous'. 'The average consumer certainly can't afford to go and buy organics on an everyday basis. I wish they could, but they can't,' he said. 'So to say all the ordinary people of New Zealand don't deserve the right to choose, I think that's very wrong.' Carapiet said supermarkets could ask their suppliers to disclose the use of gene technologies throughout production to ensure transparency and to inform shoppers about the product they were buying. 'I think that in the coming months, if this does go ahead, companies will have to go above and beyond the food authority standards. 'If the food authority FSANZ says 'no, you can have GM crops and GE foods unlabelled in the supermarket', then it's going to be for the supermarkets to voluntarily label it.' Supermarkets commit to compliance In a written statement, a Foodstuffs spokesperson said it took food safety 'very seriously' and complied fully with the Australia and New Zealand Food Standards Code, including all labelling requirements. 'Customers have the right to know what's in the food they're buying,' they said. 'As part of our supplier agreements, we require partners to disclose country of origin information, and any environmental or social claims must be accurate and substantiated.' They said the same approach applied to food made using gene technologies, including GM ingredients. 'Any changes to regulation in this space will be carefully reviewed, and we'll continue to ensure our labelling provides customers with accurate and transparent information, so they can make informed choices.' A Woolworths New Zealand spokesperson said it will make sure its retail items comply with labelling rules. 'If the labelling rules in New Zealand change, then we would ensure all products comply with labelling requirements,' they said. – RNZ
RNZ News
13 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Rotorua kuia caught up in Hobson's Pledge's anti-Māori ward campaign
Don Brash said Hobson's Pledge is not pushing anti-Māori campaigns Photo: supplied / Facebook Hobson's Pledge says it will remove the image of a Rotorua kuia it used in a campaign against Māori wards. Ellen Tamati had no idea that her face was used on an anti-Māori wards campaign until it was plastered on Hobson's Pledge's billboards around the country. After she was contacted by her mokopuna at 1:40am on Wednesday, Tamati spoke to Aukaha news, revealing her devastation. "I'm lost for words, that's not me, that is not me." The billboard shows a picture of Tamati - a wāhine Māori with a moko kauae - with the words 'My mana doesn't need a mandate - vote no to Māori wards', which indicates those are her own words. "The mana is everything in those Māori wards and we need it," Tamati said. The billboards have been seen at numerous locations around the country, including Rotorua, Hamilton, Whangarei and Christchurch. The kuia from Ngāti Pikiao, Ngāti Whakaue, Ngāti Rongomai and Ngāti Tawhaki revealed the sacredness of her moko kauae, saying it meant more to her than what had been advertised. "This carries everything," she pointed to her kauae. Ellen Tamati in front of a Hobson's Pledge campaign using her face without authorisation. Photo: Supplied / Aukaha News Anahera Parata is mamae that her Nan is the main feature. "All my life, I have only ever known Nan to be pro Māori, a very staunch supporter of Te Paati Māori, everything Māori. Even at her age she's still giving back to her iwi. "To me that's damaging, not just to Nan but to our whole iwi - I can't imagine being Nan having to face our iwi when her face is being plastered over billboards supporting a message that none of us believe in. "I'm very hurt and angry. I don't know how they think it's right... it's illegal. You picked the wrong whānau," Parata said. As of 10.45am on Wednesday, the Advertising Standards Authority had received more than 30 complaints regarding this campaign. The image was taken at Waitangi Day this year by an Australian-based photographer Rafael Ben Ari who goes by 'ChameleonsEye'. It is on iStock and Shutterstock. Hobson's Pledge purchased the iStock image labelled 'Mature adult Maori woman with Ta moko tattoo stock photo'. Hobson's Pledge leader Don Brash. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly The group's leader Don Brash told RNZ they thought it "fair to use" and all rights to use it in public-facing materials were secured, although Tamati was clear that there was no consent given. Hobson Pledge said the intent was to promote an important conversation about democratic fairness and equal voting rights for all New Zealanders, and was saddened to see this billboard had caused personal upset. Brash, who had not seen Aukaha News' video, said the group were instructed to take the billboards down. "I think it is taking place, may have already taken place, but in case the instructions are taken down immediately." He said the message came from knowing some Māori who did not want Māori wards and they would be doing social media work with a group of Māori next week. "We haven't asked them to be on billboards to be honest, but that may be the next step. "We're not pushing anti-Māori campaigns of course, I mean that's totally misleading. "We simply believe all New Zealanders should have the same political rights and I think a great many Māori of course agree with that." Brash said the photo was only used for this campaign only, and would "endeavour to contact the woman concerned and offer our apologies". "Come and see me," Tamati directed towards Hobson's Pledge, "but the damage has been done," she said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
26 minutes ago
- Scoop
Greenpeace Turns On NZ First Over Its Support For Corporate Land Grab Bill
During today's public submission hearings on the ACT Party's Overseas Investment Amendment Bill, Greenpeace took direct aim at NZ First, highlighting the hypocrisy of NZ First's support for the Bill at first reading - despite its long-standing opposition to foreign ownership. The party's sole representative was notably absent for most of the hearing. Greenpeace accused the party of abandoning its values and backing a law that would see some of the country's most ecologically sensitive land sold to multinational corporations, even if those corporations have a criminal history and have broken environmental laws in other jurisdictions. "If NZ First does bend the knee to another of ACT's ideological policies then so be it," said Toop. "The voters' cards will fall as they may, and they may very well fall under 5%, but that will be the bed that NZ First makes for itself by signing up to a Bill that would see New Zealand being sold off to the highest bidding foreign corporation." The organisation opposed the bill on several grounds including that it removes the requirement that the Government check whether a foreign buyer of sensitive land has committed serious crimes abroad, such as breaking environmental or labour laws, or evading paying taxes. Sensitive land is outlined in Schedule 1 of the Bill and includes the conservation estate, offshore islands, lake beds, the marine and coastal zone, wāhi tapu and other culturally significant sites, and land adjoining these areas. "The Bill makes it harder for the government to decline the sale of lake beds, offshore islands and the conservation estate to multinational corporate cowboys," says Toop. "If this Bill is enacted the Government will no longer be able to impose the bare minimum of environmental conditions on the sale, things like biodiversity protection, heritage preservation, and allowing ongoing public access to public lands." The organisation also condemned the move to scrap the special tests for foreign forestry investment, pointing out that much of the devastation caused by the forestry slash and erosion, such as during Cyclone Gabrielle, is caused by foreign-owned forestry companies. Toop pointed out that Global Forest Partners, the 8th largest landowner in New Zealand in 2019 was registered in the Cayman Islands and asked whether the committee thought the forest industry had paid their fair share to rebuild bridges and roads destroyed by their industry. She suggested they hadn't and "were instead metaphorically - or literally - bathing in the Cayman Islands' warm, tax-free waters while New Zealand taxpayers footed the clean-up bill." "Greenpeace believes that all corporations, whether New Zealand owned or overseas owned, should be regulated to ensure that they don't harm the environment, but the Overseas Investment Act currently provides an additional tool that enables the Government to regulate overseas corporations, in particular, to achieve better environmental and community outcomes." "It is simply not reasonable to pass an amendment bill that says offshore forestry investments - which have already brought such demonstrable harm to the country - will receive less scrutiny and have fewer conditions imposed on them," Toop said. In a pointed moment during the hearing, Toop held up a placard reading NO, referencing Winston Peters' infamous "NO" placard and stated: "If the NZ First member of the committee had shown up he might recall that sign. Or perhaps it's been forgotten - as NZ First does seem to have forgotten a few things lately, like what it is they purportedly stand for." "This ACT party bill literally removes the benefit to New Zealand test so that it is easier to sell off New Zealand to multinational corporations. You'll have to forgive me for failing to see how that, by any stretch of the imagination, puts NZ First." Toop also criticised the Government's rushed consultation process - with the Government only allowing five hours of oral submissions on the Bill, all via Zoom. "It is undemocratic, but it's not surprising - especially from a Government who recently engaged in voter suppression. Add to that the new FBI office in our capital city, and you'd be forgiven for thinking you hadn't woken up in Aotearoa - you'd woken up in Trump's America." "Is it really too much to ask that this Government start governing for New Zealanders, not governing in service of foreign corporations and their offshore shareholders?"
