My husband won't stop looking at explicit pics of women despite knowing it's destroying my self-esteem
It's not just what he's looking at that is getting me down, it is that he doesn't seem to care how it makes me feel.
I'm 42, he's 46, and we've been married for 14 years. We've had ups and downs, like any couple, but I always believed we were honest with each other.
I've always trusted him, and until now he's never given me any reason to worry. That was until I glanced at his screen one evening and saw him scrolling through a string of explicit social media profiles.
He knew how much it would hurt me, but carried on drooling over these scantily clad young women.
I've always been insecure about my body. After two children and difficult pregnancies, my confidence has taken a real hit.
He knows that I struggle with self-image, and I've opened up to him about it so many times.
I told him how comparing myself to younger, perfect-looking women online makes me feel inadequate.
When I confronted him, he just shrugged and said, 'All men do it'.
He insists it's harmless and that it's got nothing to do with how he feels about me.
But I can't help feeling dismissed and unseen. Now every time he's on his phone or laptop, I feel tense. I don't want to be controlling or insecure, but I feel so low and rejected.
Am I being unreasonable?
DEIDRE SAYS: No, you are being completely reasonable – although your husband doesn't want you to realise that.
Trust and emotional safety are vital in a relationship, and when one partner knowingly does something that undermines the other's confidence, it can create a deep emotional wound.
Understanding why your man's gone off sex
You've clearly communicated how this affects your self-worth, and your husband is choosing not to listen.
Try to have another honest conversation, focusing on how it makes you feel rather than what he's doing.
Speaking about boundaries will help you both understand each other's needs more clearly and whether he is truly willing to prioritise your emotional wellbeing.
You deserve to feel seen, valued and loved for who you are now – not compared to filtered strangers online.
Read through my support pack, Raising Self-esteem, to help you rebuild confidence.
WIFE GRILLED ME WHEN ALL THE TIME SHE WAS A CHEAT
DEAR DEIDRE: AFTER months of accusing me of cheating, it turns out my wife was sneaking around all along.
I'm 44, and she's 41. We've been married for 11 years and have two children.
I've never cheated on her, and I've bent over backwards to reassure her, even though her suspicion has made me feel like a criminal in my own home.
Last week, I borrowed her iPad to book a hotel for a family trip and found messages she'd forgotten to log out of – explicit ones with a man from her work.
They have been flirting, sexting and arranging to meet for drinks behind my back. I was stunned. The whole time she was pointing fingers at me, she was hiding her own betrayal.
When I confronted her, she claimed it was 'just harmless fun'.
Now I feel so hurt and betrayed.
How could she do this?
DEIDRE SAYS: Accusing someone of cheating while doing it yourself is classic distraction.
You've done everything to reassure her, and she's broken your trust.
Emotional affairs can be just as damaging as physical ones, especially when they're hidden behind lies. You're right to feel betrayed.
Decide what you want next, and consider relationship counselling.
My support pack, Cheating – Can You Get Over It?, will help you process this.
LEFT TO BRING UP BABY ON MY OWN
DEAR DEIDRE: WHEN I accidentally got pregnant, the last thing I expected was for my boyfriend to walk out on me.
He's 35, I'm 33, and we've been together for a year. He has a young daughter from a previous relationship, so I assumed he understood what it meant to be a parent.
When I told him I was pregnant, I expected shock but also support.
Instead, he shut down and told me he couldn't do it again.
He packed his bags and walked away, leaving me to raise the baby alone.
While I know another baby is a huge responsibility, I thought he loved me and that we could do this together.
He hasn't reached out since. I'm heartbroken, confused and scared.
I don't want to pressure someone who doesn't want to be a dad, but I also feel so abandoned.
DEIDRE SAYS: Your partner left you at your most vulnerable – it's understandable to feel hurt and abandoned.
His choice to walk away reflects his own fears and limits, not your value as a partner or future parent.
You don't have to do this alone – reach out to family, friends or local support services for help.
Focus on your health and wellbeing, and take things one day at a time.
Over time, you will build a strong foundation for you and your baby, with or without him.
You can find support through familylives.org.uk.
SHE THREW DAD'S ASHES IN TRASH
DEAR DEIDRE: WHEN my dad died three years ago, I was devastated, but I found comfort knowing he was finally at rest.
Now I've discovered my stepmother discarded his ashes like rubbish. I feel sick.
I'm 36. My dad was married to her for seven years after my mum died. We never saw eye to eye.
She was always cold with me and my sister, and she did her best to come in between us and our dad.
After the funeral we drifted further apart and eventually lost contact.
I had always assumed she'd scattered his ashes somewhere meaningful, or at least kept them.
But during a recent conversation with a family friend, I found out she took them to the tip not long after he died. Just threw them out, like he didn't matter.
I was stunned. No one told us. No ceremony, no goodbye. Nothing.
My dad was a kind, generous man who deserved better. It feels like she erased him, like he was just rubbish to be cleared.
I feel furious and hurt. If I'd known, I would have kept his ashes or scattered them somewhere special. I feel robbed of the chance to say goodbye.
Now I lie awake imagining the last of him in some landfill, and it breaks my heart.
DEIDRE SAYS: What your stepmother did is deeply disrespectful. Losing a parent is already hard enough, but finding out his ashes were discarded adds a second wave of grief.
Sadly, you can't change what's happened, but you can reclaim your connection to him in your own way. Consider holding your own small memorial or visiting a place that was special to him.
Expressing your feelings – whether through talking, writing or counselling – can help process the shock and betrayal.
My support pack, Coping With Bereavement, ought to help you with this.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
42 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Museums 'could close' over UK watchdog guidance on single sex spaces
Museums Galleries Scotland made the claim in light of guidance issued by the Equality and Human Rights Commission A publicly-funded body has claimed museums could shut over guidance about trans people and women's toilets. Museums Galleries Scotland said the 'time and resources' needed to implement new guidance by a watchdog could force closures. In a landmark decision in April, the Supreme Court ruled that "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 refers to biological sex. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) recently closed a consultation on proposed changes to statutory guidance in the wake of the ruling. An interim EHRC update said trans women should not be permitted to use women's facilities and trans men should not be allowed to use men's facilities. A response from MGS said the Commission's proposals may "risk leaving trans people with no facilities at all" if changes could not be made. It urged the UK-wide watchdog to understand the "impacts and needs of trans individuals and organisations committed to trans inclusion". A consultation response from MSG said: "We have concerns that the content and process of the EHRC Code of Practice does not uphold the spirit of inclusion. "There is no guidance on how to include trans people, there is only information on how to exclude them. This has not made sufficient effort to offer advice to organisations who wish to remain or become trans inclusive." The response added: "When there is a need to 'prove' your sex, what proof will be acceptable given gender recognition certificates are not, nor are altered birth certificates. It is likely this role would fall on front-of-house staff, which we believe puts undue pressure on them." It added: "To avoid discrimination, it would require every person using toilets to be checked, adding substantial workload and staff costs. "The guidance implies that to allow trans people to use toilets that fit their identity would put organisations at risk of legal consequences. Yet, to not check everyone could lead to individuals in museums taking decisions to exclude trans people based on subjective tests, related largely to appearance." It also warned that some museums may be forced to close "while they invest time and resources to ensure adequate facilities". The response said MSG was aware of the public "policing toilets at heritage sites by making assumptions based on stereotypes". They said this created an "environment of suspicion and policing of everyone's gender presentation'. The response concluded: "We strongly encourage the EHRC to review their processes around this guidance and take the necessary time to understand the impacts and needs of trans individuals and organisations committed to trans inclusion." However, a spokesperson for analysts MurrayBlackburnMackenzie said: 'It is deeply concerning that a major national institution signed off and submitted such an ill-informed response to the EHRC consultation. The response fails to consider the needs of women and instead repeats trans activist talking points.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Readers reply: Are there too many pets?
Are there too many pets? Pet ownership goes up and up, particularly dogs and cats. But how many is too many? Gene Leonard, London Send new questions to nq@ This needs to be qualified: 'There are too many pets … for people who dislike dogs so much they can't enjoy green spaces, cafes and other public areas.' rewilder As I get older, I find myself questioning pet ownership. A pet exists for the sole purpose of pleasing its owner, giving it comfort, pleasure and companionship but also putting it at risk of abuse, pain, displeasure and abandonment. They are bred (often conforming to a human-designed ideal) or captured in order to perform human-pleasing duties. So, yes, there are too many pets for their human masters. 02Dscythe This is probably true unless you live with a cat, in which case the roles are reversed. kiramango I think there are too many abandoned pets, too many pets in rescue, too many designer pets with health problems because of their breed standards and too many dogs tied up outside leading lonely, deprived lives. We have one rescued dog, who is adored. He is walked on a lead three times daily, enjoys off-lead time playing in the fully fenced back yard, is fed the best possible food and is treated like a member of the family in all ways. I love cats, but I also love birds; I wish people would keep their cats indoors to protect the birds. The worst problem in our world is too many irresponsible humans, not too many animals. MythKenner From an ecological point of view there are too many of everything associated with humans, so yes, there are definitely too many pets. I doubt there's an easy way to solve that, though. unclestinky There are certainly far too many people involved in the selling of mindless rubbish surrounding the keeping of animals at home. Cat and dog fashion, cosmetics, toys: too many containers of senseless junk being shipped around the world. There are way too many nonsense pet food brands as well: 'Delicious morsels lovingly selected and served with rosemary and green beans.' What? It's a pooch, or a moggy; it can't read, it doesn't understand infantile advertising slop and it's not Jay Rayner. Pets are for companionship, a haven from loneliness for many, also to assist in teaching children about caring, responsibility, kindness, life, death and how not to develop into cruel, selfish brutes who think only of themselves and the next fix of cheap entertainment. bricklayersoption How many is too many? Well, I did a house-sit with 17 cats and I can tell you, categorically: that's too many. (Now, I ask people to define 'a few cats'.) Leoned There are far too many dogs now. Every public space, outdoor and indoor, is overrun with them. It's time to reintroduce the dog licence at a realistic (high) level and set some rules and expectations around dog ownership, as there are currently none. So, one dog a household. On leads in all public spaces except enclosed dog fields, which would be funded by the licence fee. Breeding banned. Tougher rules on dangerous dogs. Some basic hygiene requirements on cafe and pub owners who allow dogs. Ownership banned if you fail to pick up dog mess – no excuses. This'll do for starters. Dennis1970 'Every public space, outdoor and indoor, is overrun with them'? They really aren't. And cafes and pubs already have to meet hygiene standards. And there are rules and expectations around dog ownership. You can argue they need strengthening, but saying there are none is just untrue. Oldhairynose Too many inconsiderate dog owners use those extending leads in public spaces and expect others to get out of the way or else trip over them, or let their dogs foul the public spaces they insist on using for their dog's toilet needs. Add to that letting poorly trained dogs off their leads and then saying: 'He won't hurt you, he just wants to play!' Sundaygal NYC has too many. The streets reek of dog urine and too many owners don't clean up faeces – especially in Brooklyn – so walking is a dangerous hopscotch around smears of festering mess. It can't be very friendly for the dogs, either, which are kept locked up most of the day, against their nature. 80xd35 Dogs are an environmental disaster, from the contamination of waterways from improperly disposed waste – and how long will it take for those plastic poo bags to degrade even if they're used properly? – to the harmful effects on wildlife. Dylan Dog ownership is shown to improve people's physical health, pet ownership improves mental health and many people socially benefit from pets. The frustration is those few who mistreat their pets, have too many pets, don't pick up after their pets, let their cats out to kill birds – and those who spend all their time moaning about other people's pets. But the majority, who own pets with kindness and with social benefit, shouldn't have to be judged by the minority. specklefreckle We need dogs. They take us out, even in the rain. They help us to relax. They are true friends. It would be a sad world without them. Anne Meile I'd welcome a ban on the 'exotic pet' trade. Murdomania
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Kirkleatham Church View children's home praised by Ofsted
A children's home has been praised by inspectors for its "outstanding leadership and strong support", an inspection has View Children's Home in Kirkleatham, near Redcar, was rated as "good" overall after Ofsted inspectors visited in May and June. The home, which is owned and managed by Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council, was judged good at building trust with children and keeping them secure and Laura Wedgewood, who was praised in the inspection, said the work was "stressful" but "so rewarding". She said: "When you feel you've made that difference to a young person, well, it's a wonderful feeling." The home provides residential care for up to six children with social, emotional or mental health difficulties and four were living there at the time of the described the overall experiences and progress of residents and the support and protection offered as "good", while the effectiveness of leadership and management as "outstanding."Ms Wedgewood was praised for her proactive and collaborative approach, with the report stating: "The manager has built highly effective working relationships with other professionals involved in the children's lives. "She ensures that all professionals are acting in the best interests of children and challenges appropriately when plans are not being progressed." Inspectors highlighted the strength of communication with families and professionals, as well as children benefitting from trusted relationships with staff who provide emotional support and a sense of belonging. The home's outreach work was also commended, with parents valuing the support provided and reporting improved relationships with their said children are helped to understand risks such as substance abuse, exploitation and extremism. When children go missing, "staff act swiftly and coordinate with relevant agencies to ensure their safe return", the report said. Councillor Bill Suthers, cabinet member for children and families, said: "One of the real positives of 'in-house' care by the council's own dedicated professionals within our borough is it can help maintain a child's relationship with their own communities and families when appropriate."That can have enormous benefits for a child." Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
