Australian lawyer apologizes for AI-generated errors in murder case
The blunder in the Supreme Court of Victoria state is another in a litany of mishaps AI has caused in justice systems around the world.
Defense lawyer Rishi Nathwani, who holds the prestigious legal title of King's Counsel, took 'full responsibility' for filing incorrect information in submissions in the case of a teenager charged with murder, according to court documents seen by The Associated Press on Friday.
'We are deeply sorry and embarrassed for what occurred,' Nathwani told Justice James Elliott on Wednesday, on behalf of the defense team.
The AI-generated errors caused a 24-hour delay in resolving a case that Elliott had hoped to conclude on Wednesday. Elliott ruled on Thursday that Nathwani's client, who cannot be identified because he is a minor, was not guilty of murder because of mental impairment.
'At the risk of understatement, the manner in which these events have unfolded is unsatisfactory,' Elliott told lawyers on Thursday.
'The ability of the court to rely upon the accuracy of submissions made by counsel is fundamental to the due administration of justice,' Elliott added.
The fake submissions included fabricated quotes from a speech to the state legislature and non-existent case citations purportedly from the Supreme Court.
The errors were discovered by Elliott's associates, who couldn't find the cases and requested that defense lawyers provide copies.
The lawyers admitted the citations 'do not exist' and that the submission contained 'fictitious quotes,' court documents say.
The lawyers explained they checked that the initial citations were accurate and wrongly assumed the others would also be correct.
The submissions were also sent to prosecutor Daniel Porceddu, who didn't check their accuracy.
The judge noted that the Supreme Court released guidelines last year for how lawyers use AI.
'It is not acceptable for artificial intelligence to be used unless the product of that use is independently and thoroughly verified,' Elliott said.
The court documents do not identify the generative artificial intelligence system used by the lawyers.
In a comparable case in the United States in 2023, a federal judge imposed $5,000 fines on two lawyers and a law firm after ChatGPT was blamed for their submission of fictitious legal research in an aviation injury claim.
Judge P. Kevin Castel said they acted in bad faith. But he credited their apologies and remedial steps taken in explaining why harsher sanctions were not necessary to ensure they or others won't again let artificial intelligence tools prompt them to produce fake legal history in their arguments.
Later that year, more fictitious court rulings invented by AI were cited in legal papers filed by lawyers for Michael Cohen, a former personal lawyer for U.S. President Donald Trump. Cohen took the blame, saying he didn't realize that the Google tool he was using for legal research was also capable of so-called AI hallucinations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
35 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Melania Trump's Message to Putin Sparks AI Claims
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Melania Trump's letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin has sparked speculation over whether the first lady used AI to pen a missive to the Kremlin chief. In a message posted to the first lady's social media, Melania Trump appealed to Putin to "singlehandedly restore" the "melodic laughter" of children caught up in the nearly three and a half years of full-scale war in Ukraine. Why It Matters President Donald Trump met with Putin in Alaska on Friday with relations soured by Russia's refusal to ink a ceasefire deal brokered by the U.S. to stop fighting in Ukraine. Although no deal was reached in Anchorage, Trump described the summit as "useful" and pivoted his position on a ceasefire, saying he would move straight to a permanent peace deal. Ukrainian President, Volodymyr Zelensky, who will visit Washington on Monday, said on Saturday that Russia's refusal to sign a ceasefire "complicates the situation." First lady Melania Trump listens as President Donald Trump delivers remarks during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 4, 2025. First lady Melania Trump listens as President Donald Trump delivers remarks during an Independence Day military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 4, To Know The message sent by the first lady, dubbed a "peace letter" on her official Instagram account, quickly prompted online commentators to question whether the letter had been generated using AI. Democrat strategist, Keith Edwards, said in a post to X the letter "says a whole lot of nothing," and "may have been written by AI." Chris Jackson, a long-time supporter of former president Joe Biden and Democrat activist, said in his own social media post that he had run the letter through AI, which had deemed the message to the Kremlin AI-generated. Grok, a tool developed by Elon Musk's company xAI, said the letter "shows strong signs of AI generation" with "minor human edits for tone." There is no concrete evidence that the letter published on the first lady's accounts was generated using artificial intelligence. Newsweek has reached out to Melania Trump's office for comment. As tools improve, it becomes harder to work out when AI is responsible for published writing. When Newsweek asked AI's opinion on the letter, it said it had "qualities that resemble AI writing," including a lofty, idealistic style. "Words like purity, innocence, humanity, love, possibility, dignity are stacked densely without much concrete policy or detail. AI models tend to default to these universal values when asked to 'sound inspirational,'" according to one AI response. But AI also said the letter did not feature the types of tonal shifts or awkward phasing often associated with content generated using artificial intelligence. Zelensky Thanks The First Lady for 'Sincere Attention' President Trump hand-delivered a letter from his wife to Putin during the summit, which focused on the fate of Ukrainian and Russian children, Reuters reported, citing two unnamed White House officials. Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Andrii Sybiha said in a post to social media that Zelensky had "conveyed his gratitude" to Trump during a conversation on Saturday for the first lady's "sincere attention and efforts to bring forcibly deported Ukrainian kids back." The version of the letter published by the first lady on her social media does not directly mention Ukrainian children taken to Russia. Ukraine has consistently said Russia has abducted thousands of Ukrainian children throughout its full-scale invasion of the country and relocated them to Russia or Russian-controlled areas. Kyiv has called this a war crime. The International Criminal Court in March 2023 issued arrest warrants for Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, Russia's children's rights commissioner, for being "allegedly responsible for the war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) and that of unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation." Moscow has said children were moved away from conflict areas to protect them. UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk said earlier this year that children had been subject to "summary executions, arbitrary detention, conflict-related sexual violence, torture and ill-treatment" in the four regions of Ukraine Russia claimed to have annexed in fall 2022. The Kremlin declared Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia were part of Russia after referendums widely condemned as a sham. Russia had seized Crimea, to the south of the mainland, from Ukraine in 2014. The first lady has released an audiobook touted as "created entirely with artificial intelligence audio technology." The seven-hour-long audiobook is narrated by Melania Trump's "official AI voice." Melania Trump faced accusations in 2016 that she had plagiarized a previous address given by Michelle Obama during a section of her own speech to the Republican National Convention. Trump's team at the time said Melania Trump had used "common words" and not copied Michelle Obama's speech. The First Lady's Letter in Full "Dear President Putin, Every child shares the same quiet dreams in their heart, whether born randomly into a nation's rustic countryside or a magnificent city-center. They dream of love, possibility, and safety from danger. As parents, it is our duty to nurture the next generation's hope. As leaders, the responsibility to sustain our children extends beyond the comfort of a few. Undeniably, we must strive to paint a dignity-filled world for all – so that every soul may wake to peace, and so that the future itself is perfectly guarded. A simple yet profound concept, Mr. Putin, as I am sure you agree, is that each generation's descendants begin their lives with a purity – an innocence which stands above geography, government, and ideology. Yet in today's world, some children are forced to carry a quiet laughter, untouched by the darkness around them – a silent defiance against the forces that can potentially claim their future. Mr. Putin, you can singlehandedly restore their melodic laughter. In protecting the innocence of these children, you will do more than serve Russia alone – you serve humanity itself. Such a bold idea transcends all human division, and you, Mr. Putin, are fit to implement this vision with a stroke of the pen today. It is time."
Forbes
35 minutes ago
- Forbes
The U.S. Message To Australia And Japan
The United States is, not surprisingly, concerned about alliance burden-sharing and security commitments, recently focusing on Australia and Japan and their respective views toward Taiwan. U.S. Undersecretary of Defense Elbridge Colby has raised this issue in conversations with Australian and Japanese leadership, asking these two U.S. allies to clarify their security commitments to Taiwan in the event of a mainland Chinese attack. The U.S. itself has long maintained a posture of 'strategic ambiguity,' deliberately avoiding specifics about its potential response to such a scenario. Colby's initiative aimed to signal regional unity in the U.S. effort to preserve the status quo between Taiwan and the mainland. It also carried a practical appeal: encouraging U.S. allies to strengthen their defense capabilities. Burden-sharing remains a perennial challenge in alliances, driven by the natural temptation for partners to save on defense expenditures and, relatively speaking, benefit from the U.S. defense budget. Partners tend to underinvest in their own defense, relying on the U.S. security umbrella. Here lies the paradox: neither Japan nor Australia can independently defend Taiwan. Only the United States possesses the military capacity—and therefore the credibility—to deter the People's Republic of China. Only the U.S. can impose long-term costs on China. Whether Australia or Japan increases or decreases its defense spending, the sole indispensable component of deterrence remains U.S. credibility. Japan knows this. Australia knows this. The U.S. knows this. Most importantly, China knows this. So why would Japan or Australia seek to strengthen their security commitments to Taiwan when doing so offers no meaningful advantage to Taiwan but risks provoking China? While Colby's outreach stirred debate in both countries, officials reiterated their positions of not formalizing any commitment to a hypothetical conflict. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stated that Australia would not commit troops in advance to any conflict. That ambiguity reflects a desire to maintain strategic flexibility and avoid premature entanglement in a potential war. This conversation unfolds at a moment when the Trump administration is challenging or reshaping long-held positions and procedures in the Asia-Pacific and beyond. As Trump imposes higher tariffs on both Australia and Japan, the U.S. signals a shift away from its traditional role in alliance leadership and regional problem-solving—making itself a less attractive partner by reducing predictability and increasing the cost of engagement. Much of what the U.S. is attempting in its trade relationship with Australia is viewed as unnecessary, counterproductive, or even in bad faith. The U.S. has a Free Trade Agreement with Australia that eliminates tariffs on nearly all bilateral trade. In fact, the U.S. currently enjoys a trade surplus with Australia—one of Trump's stated trade goals. Rather than leading with a call for increased commitment to Taiwan, the U.S. could have pursued a less controversial approach: encouraging Japan and Australia to expand joint military exercises, enhance maritime surveillance, or simply boost defense spending without direct reference to China. By centering its request on Taiwan, the U.S. chose the approach least likely to elicit a positive response from its allies. The Trump administration's outreach to Japan and Australia appears to have resulted in diminished confidence in the U.S. and reduced credibility regarding Taiwan. The paradox is that the U.S. may still see incremental increases in both countries' defense budgets in the coming years—but driven by concern about the U.S., not concern about China.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Cherokee Nation Shows How AI Governance Can Be Sovereign
When most enterprises and governments evaluate artificial intelligence, their primary lens is return on investment such as how many processes can be automated, how many jobs restructured, and how much efficiency squeezed from the system. At the Ai4 2025 conference in Las Vegas, Paula Starr, Chief Information Officer of the Cherokee Nation, offers a very different perspective. For sovereign tribal governments like the Cherokee, ROI isn't purely financial. It is cultural, legal, and existential. 'AI must serve the collective good and uphold Cherokee values,' Starr told the audience. 'If a tool compromises that, it doesn't belong in our Nation's systems.' This perspective positions the Cherokee Nation at the forefront of a movement redefining what artificial intelligence governance means. While big tech and large governments experiment with guardrails, the Cherokee Nation is constructing a model rooted in centuries of tradition and sovereignty. From Enterprise ROI To Sovereign ROI The Cherokee Nation, with nearly 480,000 citizens and a land base of 7,000 square miles in northeastern Oklahoma, has ambitions and obligations that extend far beyond typical government IT departments. The question of AI adoption is not simply 'how much faster can a form be processed' or 'what percentage of staff hours can be reduced.' It is about protecting Cherokee data sovereignty, ensuring cultural preservation, and reinforcing treaty rights in the digital era. That shift in framing, away from efficiency and toward sovereignty, has profound implications for how AI is selected, tested, and deployed. In most enterprises, procurement is measured in business outcomes. For the Cherokee Nation, the baseline metric is trust. Citizen data must be treated with the same protection as physical sovereignty, and outcomes must strengthen rather than erode the community's lifeways. The concept of ROI here stretches to include aspects of citizen trust, cultural preservation, and legal autonomy. The key questions to address with AI include are citizens more confident engaging with tribal services, does AI strengthen traditions, language, or practices, and does technology reinforce tribal governance authority? AI in Action: Use Cases Built on Values Starr's presentation outlined several initiatives now underway that showcase how AI can be deployed under this framework. The Gadugi Portal, named after the Cherokee value of working together, is built on Salesforce and augmented with AI to provide authenticated access to tribal services. Rather than reducing headcount, the platform allows more citizens to be served without expanding staffing, improving efficiency while broadening reach across geography. A Legal Agent developed in Microsoft Copilot Studio with assistance from MIT interns, consolidates treaty law, tribal codes, executive orders, and court rulings into a single AI-driven research system. For a sovereign government often required to defend its rights in state and federal courts, this capability accelerates legal decision-making and strengthens sovereignty. The AI Agent, as part of a website refresh launching this year, includes an AI assistant that helps citizens navigate services and applications. The expected result is higher completion rates, 24/7 accessibility, and a reduction in friction for rural citizens. In a unique blending of cultural continuity and conservation, the Nation is using AI-driven scanning to replicate turtle shells traditionally used in ceremonies, without harming wildlife by using 3D printed shells. These examples underscore a central point. AI is not replacing people, it is extending tradition and sovereignty into the digital domain. Governance: Policy Before Code Many enterprises are only now realizing the importance of governance after experimentation with generative AI has already run ahead of regulation. The Cherokee Nation has taken the opposite approach. In October 2024, Principal Chief Chuck Hoskin Jr. issued an Executive Order on Data Sovereignty and Self-Governance, creating the AI, Data Sovereignty, and Cybersecurity Task Force. Starr, as CIO, chaired this group, which produced a comprehensive roadmap earlier this year. The report's key recommendations included adoption of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework to provide a baseline for ethics, transparency, and accountability. Also recommended is the creation of dedicated AI and Data Governance Committees with clear roles for policy development, legal review, and risk mitigation. Other recommendations include institution of an AI Questionnaire for evaluating any generative AI tools under consideration, covering oversight, data privacy, bias mitigation, and risk scenarios. The document also aims for standardization of the Cherokee Citizen ID across all data systems, strengthening both sovereignty and service delivery, expansion of data literacy programs for the workforce, ensuring adoption doesn't outpace understanding, and establishment of a Tribal Innovation Summit to generate citizen-driven use cases. Community Values as a Governance Lens The framework is not just technical. It is cultural. Starr shared how Cherokee Community Values are core to the implementation and usage of AI. Principles such as 'detsadasinasdi itsehesdi', translated as live skillfully and resourcefully aims to engage with new technologies to augment talents and skills. 'Detsadageyusesdi' which is to protect each other as a mother with child aims to protect the data of our citizens as we would protect their existence and 'detsadanvwidisgesdi', encourage and instruct one another in a gentle and thoughtful way is focused on meeting the challenges of the future and staying forever resilient. When surveyed, while only 74% of Cherokee citizens said they had limited AI understanding, 70% were open to AI adoption if it was aligned with cultural and ethical standards. That conditional openness is the key, AI is welcome if it is accountable to values. By embedding these cultural guardrails, the Nation ensures that AI outcomes are not only efficient but also consistent with the community's identity. In effect, the Cherokee are demonstrating that governance frameworks grounded in culture may be more effective than those grounded solely in regulation. Broader Context: A Global Movement The Cherokee Nation is not alone in rethinking digital sovereignty. Around the world, Indigenous communities are building frameworks to ensure emerging technologies serve their people rather than exploit them. In Canada, the Indigenous Digital Sovereignty Initiative seeks to give First Nations control over data infrastructure and governance. In New Zealand, the Māori Data Sovereignty Network asserts that data about Māori people should be subject to Māori governance. The Cherokee approach, integrating AI into service delivery while grounding deployments in cultural values, adds a North American model to this growing international movement. For governments worldwide struggling with questions of digital ethics, this experiment in sovereignty-driven AI governance may provide a reference point. Where corporations often prioritize shareholder returns, sovereign nations must prioritize the well-being of citizens and future generations. As Starr put it plainly, 'AI is a tool. But it's our people, our values, and our policy that give it direction.' That framing may turn out to be the most sustainable way to harness AI, because it ties innovation not just to speed and scale but to the long-term continuity of a people.
