Ukrainians Trust Zelenskyy Less Since Wartime Protests, Polls Finds
Public trust in President Zelenskyy hit a six-month low, per Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, after protests against his move to curb anti-corruption watchdogs' power.
Public trust in Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy fell to its lowest level in around six months, according to a prominent Kyiv-based polling agency. This comes following rare wartime protests against a move to curb the power of anti-corruption watchdogs.
The survey, by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, is the first by a major Ukrainian pollster to measure public sentiment since Zelenskyy sparked anger with a move to subordinate the agencies to a hand-picked prosecutor-general, Reuters reported.
Thousands of Ukrainians took to the streets in Kyiv and other cities late last month to protest the fast-tracked measures, leading President Zelenskyy and his ruling party to swiftly backtrack on the decision.
Last month's action against anti-corruption authorities sparked widespread discontent, largely due to what critics called the rushed process and lack of transparency in how the measures were pushed through.
Fighting corruption and improving governance are key requirements for loan-dependent Ukraine to join the European Union, a step many consider critical to fending off future Russian pressure.
While much smaller, the demonstrations had prompted comparisons to Ukraine's 2014 Maidan revolution, when protesters toppled a leader accused of graft and heavy-handed rule in favour of closer ties with the West, Reuters reported.
The KIIS survey revealed that among those who distrust President Zelenskyy, the main reasons cited were corruption (21%) and his management of the war (20%). The poll noted that trust had already been on the decline prior to the protests, but the demonstrations 'undoubtedly had an impact" on the continued drop.
Zelenskyy's lowest trust rating during the war was 52% in December 2024. The latest poll surveyed over 1,000 respondents across government-controlled areas of Ukraine.
In a research note, executive director Anton Grushetskyi stated that while Zelenskyy still maintains 'a fairly high level of trust," the steady decline should be seen as a cautionary sign.
'The persistent downward trend is a worrying signal that requires attention and thoughtful decisions from the authorities," he wrote.
After yielding to public pressure and introducing new legislation to reverse the controversial measures last month, Zelenskyy stated that he 'respects the position of all Ukrainians."
However, some protesters interviewed by Reuters said the scandal had, to some extent, changed their view of Zelenskyy. His office has also been accused of using the war as a pretext to centralise power—allegations it has denied.
'On the first day of the protests, I thought about…tattooing #12414 simply as a reminder," said 22-year-old IT worker Artem Astaf'yev, referring to the controversial law's designation.
Astaf'yev, who was attending a protest for the first time, said he would likely not support Zelenskyy's ruling Servant of the People party in future elections. Currently, all elections are suspended under martial law.
Others, like 50-year-old veteran Yuriy Fylypenko, said the public backlash demonstrated that Ukraine's traditionally active civil society remains capable of mobilising—even during wartime.
'We have been convinced that Ukraine is not sleeping, that Ukraine is full of potential to defend democratic principles."
view comments
Location :
Ukraine
First Published:
August 07, 2025, 16:33 IST
News world Ukrainians Trust Zelenskyy Less Since Wartime Protests, Polls Finds
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
28 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Indian refiners can do without Russian oil, but with trade-offs
US President Donald Trump last week announced an additional 25 per cent tariff on US imports from India -- raising the overall duty to 50% -- as a penalty for the country's continued imports of Russian oil.
New Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
European leaders urge more 'pressure' on Russia ahead of Trump-Putin summit
KYIVEuropean leaders urged more "pressure" on Russia overnight Saturday, after the announcement of a Trump-Putin summit to end the war in Ukraine raised concern that an agreement would require Kyiv to cede swathes of territory. Presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump will meet in the US state of Alaska this Friday to try to resolve the three-year conflict, despite warnings from Ukraine and Europe that Kyiv must be part of negotiations. Announcing the summit last week, Trump said that "there'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both" sides, without elaborating. But President Volodymyr Zelensky warned Saturday that Ukraine won't surrender land to Russia to buy peace. "Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier," he said on social media. "Any decisions against us, any decisions without Ukraine, are also decisions against peace," he added. Zelensky urged Ukraine's allies to take "clear steps" towards achieving a sustainable peace during a call with Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer. European leaders issued a joint statement overnight Saturday to Sunday saying that "only an approach that combines active diplomacy, support to Ukraine and pressure on the Russian Federation to end their illegal war can succeed." They welcomed Trump's efforts, saying they were ready to help diplomatically -- by maintaining support to Ukraine, as well as by upholding and imposing restrictive measures against Russia. "The current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations," said the statement, signed by leaders from France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Britain, Finland and EU Commission chief Ursula Von Der Leyen, without giving more details.
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Not just military's job': Army Chief urges citizens, scientists to join nation's defence
Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi on Saturday said India's future security would rest on a 'whole-of-nation' approach, where soldiers, scientists, industry, academia, and citizens work in unison. Speaking at IIT Madras for the inauguration of the Indian Army Research Cell, he described how technology, civil preparedness, and public participation were as vital as military action. He also spoke about Operation Sindoor — the precision strikes launched in May inside Pakistan and PoK in response to the Pahalgam terror attack. Dwivedi's address drew heavily on his service's internal post-action assessments, which have focused on both technology integration and narrative management. 'Victory is in the mind,' he said. He pointed to Pakistan's success in convincing its domestic population that it had prevailed — aided, he suggested, by symbolic acts such as the promotion of its army chief to field marshal. India's answer was a deliberate, coordinated information campaign. 'If you ask a Pakistani whether you lost or won, he'd say, my chief has become field marshal, we must have won only,' Dwivedi said, adding, 'The first messaging we did was, 'Justice done.' That hit the maximum, I am told, in the world today in terms of the number of hits.' The Army paired that message with visible briefings, including press conferences by two women officers — one from the Army, another from the Air Force. Even the operation's logo, now widely circulated online, was designed in-house by a Lieutenant Colonel and a non-commissioned officer. Dwivedi framed modern defence as a shared responsibility, and highlighted initiatives from community bunkers along the border to advanced drones built with Indian institutes. Drawing attention to all modern war fronts, he noted how some nations have insulated their civilian life from the visible effects of war. Citing Moscow during the ongoing Russia–Ukraine conflict, he said that despite the scale of fighting, 'you don't realise that the war is on' when you are in the Russian capital. Elaborating on the importance of shielding the population from panic and disruption, even in times of heightened military operations — Dwivedi said Operation Sindoor was fought like a game of chess, not in the open-field conventions of 20th-century warfare, but in the 'grey zone,' where operations are calibrated to fall just short of full-scale war while still inflicting strategic damage. 'We did not know what is the next move the enemy is going to take and what are we going to do. This is something we called the grey zone… Somewhere, we were giving him a checkmate and somewhere we were kind of going in for the kill at the risk of even losing our own — but that's what life is all about,' he said. By April 25, Northern Command had planned and executed strikes on seven of nine identified targets — hitting what Dwivedi called 'the heartland' for the first time, destroying terror training infrastructure and killing large numbers of militants. Two additional targets, located deeper in Pakistan, were struck with Indian Air Force assets because of the extended ranges required. Early on May 7, aerial attacks eliminated over 100 fighters at camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. 'This was the first time we hit the heartland and of course our target was the nursery and the masters.' The operation, he said, was anchored in three factors: a rare clarity of political will, integrated tri-service planning, and the rapid fusion of intelligence with technology. 'All three chiefs were very clear that something had to be done,' Dwivedi said. 'A free hand was given — you decide what is to be done. That kind of confidence, political direction, and political clarity we saw for the first time.' The Army Chief framed Operation Sindoor not merely as retaliation but as a demonstration of India's evolving capability to operate in multi-domain conflict — land, air, cyber, and space — with tight integration between agencies and services. For the first time, he said, a single operational name was used by the Army, Navy, and Air Force, replacing the earlier practice of separate codenames. He said when he was briefed about the operation's name, he thought it was Operation Sindu — the Indus River. 'I said excellent sir, Indus Water Treaty has just been frozen by you. Then I am told, it is not Sindu but Operation Sindoor. Just see this one name has connected the whole nation together,' he said, adding that every time a woman applies Sindoor, 'she will always remember the soldier.' Narrative shaping, he said, is no longer secondary to battlefield success; it is part of the operation's architecture from the outset. 'It is about influencing the domestic population, the adversary's population, and the neutral population,' he said, describing a 'narrative management system' that tracked social sentiment, countered disinformation, and used trusted voices to reinforce the official account. Much of the speech was devoted to the technological backbone of Operation Sindoor. India's forces, Dwivedi said, are moving from 'muddy trenches to the internet of military things,' where data, sensors, and autonomous systems shape battlefield decisions in real time. On the intelligence side, the Army sought to unify its picture with the Navy and Air Force, layering surveillance data into a common operational view. The operation employed a mix of manned platforms, commercial satellite imagery, and 'pseudo-satellites' — high-altitude platforms capable of loitering over target areas — to track activity before and during the strikes. Tethered drones were used to overcome jamming, maintaining persistent eyes over critical zones. Social media and open-source data also played a role. Dwivedi alluded to 'good Samaritans' in India's global diaspora who helped gather relevant imagery and signals. Light-mapping analysis, which tracks night-time illumination patterns, was used to detect changes in activity. The campaign also tested India's capacity for 'federated' versus centralised data flows — balancing the resilience of distributed systems with the efficiency of unified command networks. A secure communications platform, developed with IIT Madras and known as Sambhav, allowed real-time coordination but also revealed the dangers of overloading channels during crises. In the air and on the ground, he said, the operation underscored the accelerating drone-counter-drone cycle. Indian units employed modified commercial drones, some adapted in partnership with the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), for both reconnaissance and strike missions. Counter-drone systems, including soft-kill jammers and hard-kill interceptors, were integrated into the defensive plan. 'Drone and counter-drone is a ratcheting effect,' Dwivedi said. 'Both have to keep overcoming each other's strength.' Precision-guided munitions, converted from 'dumb' bombs, were a major factor in the operation's cost-effectiveness. Extended-range artillery and rocket systems were employed with circular error probabilities as low as two meters, according to the Army Chief. The doctrine, he argued, is shifting from attrition to precision: 'When the precision has increased, the cost does not make a difference — the impact does.' Talking about the civilian dimension of the border conflict, he said that India's population density near the Line of Control is lower than on the Pakistani side — a fact he suggested acts as a deterrent against large-scale attacks on civilian areas. Still, he said, the Army invests in civil defence exercises, construction of community bunkers, and coordination with the National Cadet Corps and local authorities to ensure awareness and readiness. The general's broader message was that future wars will require the 'whole-of-nation' approach — not just military forces, but academia, industry, government research agencies, and even citizen volunteers. He cited the Army's creation of a Technology Committee with 16 clusters, partnerships with IITs and the Indian Institute of Science, and an internship programme to draw engineers into military projects. Dwivedi urged faculty and students of IIT-Madras to contribute to priority areas including advanced composites, microelectronics, secure communications, artificial intelligence, quantum computing, robotics, and synthetic biology.
