LS passes Indian Ports Bill, 2025 amid unprecedented ruckus by Oppn
The Bill, moved by Union Minister for Ports, Shipping and Waterways Sarbananda Sonowal, seeks to consolidate and modernise the legal framework governing India's ports, with an emphasis on cooperative federalism and strategic maritime development.
The House reassembled at 3 PM with Jagdambika Pal in the chair, who invited Sonowal to move the Bill for consideration. The Minister outlined the Bill's objectives, stating that it would facilitate ease of doing business, ensure optimal utilisation of India's coastline, and empower State Maritime Boards for effective management of non-major ports.
He also highlighted the Bill's provisions for managing pollution, disaster response, port safety, navigation, and data governance, while aligning domestic regulations with India's international obligations.
A key feature of the legislation is the statutory establishment of the Maritime States Development Council (MSDC), which has existed since 1997 through executive notification.
The Bill expands MSDC's mandate to include major ports under central control, enabling a consultative and collaborative framework between the Centre and coastal states. The minister Sonowal said the Council would advise on long-term planning, issue non-binding guidelines, and foster structured growth across the port sector.
Despite the Minister's address, proceedings were repeatedly interrupted by Opposition members who stormed the Well of the House, shouting slogans such as 'We want justice.'
The Chair made multiple appeals for order, assuring members that everyone would be given a chance to speak, but his voice was largely drowned in the din.
Participating in the debate, BJP MP Dilip Saikia (Darrang-Udalgudi, Assam) described ports as 'engines of employment' and urged Opposition members to engage constructively.
He noted that port capacity had increased by 87 per cent over the last decade under the Modi government, and said the Bill would open new gateways to Southeast Asia, enhancing regional connectivity and trade.
TDP MP Sribharat Muthukumilli (Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh) also spoke in support of the Bill, emphasising its potential to strengthen coastal infrastructure and empower state-level port authorities.
BJP's Darshan Singh Choudhary (Hoshangabad, Madhya Pradesh) echoed similar sentiments, calling the legislation a timely intervention for maritime reform. The Bill includes provisions for adjudicatory mechanisms to resolve port-related disputes and mandates conservation measures to protect port ecosystems.
It also addresses emergency preparedness, security protocols, and compliance with international maritime instruments.
In passing the Bill, the government signalled its intent to recalibrate Centre-State relations in port governance, especially in light of shifting political equations following the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.
The consultative framework embedded in the legislation is seen as a response to coalition compulsions and the need to accommodate regional aspirations, the minister said and urged the house to pass the Bill.
Following the passage of the Bill by voice vote, the Chair adjourned the House till 4:30 PM.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Speculations fuel over fracture in Mahayuti as Shinde, Gogawale skip cabinet meeting
The Maharashtra government's decision to have NCP minister Aditi Tatkare and BJP minister Girish Mahajan hoist the national flag in Raigad and Nashik on Independence Day, bypassing Shiv Sena hopefuls has triggered a fresh controversy. A day after, Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde and senior Sena MLA minister Bharat Gogawale, who has been lobbying for the Raigad guardian minister's post, skipped the state cabinet meeting on Tuesday, fuelling speculation of discontent within the ruling Mahayuti alliance. The move comes against the backdrop of long-pending appointments of guardian ministers in two districts- Raigad and Nashik. Sena ministers Gogawale and Dada Bhuse both have been lobbying for these posts. On Monday, the state's General Administration Department issued a circular naming Tatkare for Raigad and Mahajan for Nashik for the flag hoisting for Independence day. Sena leaders say this was perceived as a political snub to their claimants. Opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) leaders seized the opportunity, with Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut alleging that Shinde had been 'shown his place' by the local BJP leaders and Shinde had even complained to Union Home Minister Amit Shah about being sidelined. Shinde-led Sena leaders however denied having any fissures in the alliance and said that Shinde could not attend the meeting since he is currently in Srinagar after attending a blood donation camp in Jammu, and Gogawale is in Delhi and hence both were absent from the cabinet meeting. Sena functionaries insisted both had informed the CM's office in advance and had officially taken leave. Gogawale reiterated his ambitions for the Raigad post but denied any personal animosity. 'I am 100 percent committed to the guardian ministership. There is a difference between hoisting the flag and the guardian ministership. Just because someone hoists the flag doesn't make them the guardian minister. Whatever decision the seniors take, we will accept. I have no objection to Aditi Tatkare hoisting the flag,' he said, adding that he hoped the decision on guardian ministerships would come 'after the flag-hoisting.' The discontent within the Shinde camp is not limited to the guardian minister row. In recent weeks, Sena MLAs — including Sanjay Gaikwad — have openly complained of not receiving development funds for their constituencies for over 10 months. Gaikwad, considered a close aide of Shinde, said that while Dy CM Shinde, CM Devendra Fadnavis and Ajit Pawar had assured that the situation would improve, the lack of funds had created frustration among legislators. Minister Pratap Sarnaik, however, dismissed these claims, saying funds were being allocated for departmental works such as transport infrastructure. In Nashik, the decision to assign Mahajan the flag-hoisting duty over Sena's Dada Bhuse has sparked similar murmurs. Sena minister Uday Samant attempted to calm the waters, saying the Independence Day list was 'only about flag-hoisting' and not a declaration of guardian ministers. He also stressed that in his personal view, 'Dada Bhuse should be Nashik's guardian minister and Bharat Gogawale for Raigad,' but that the final decision rests with Shinde, who will consult the alliance leaders.
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Lok Sabha papers thrown at Chair amid heated protests; Jagdambika Pal reproves
Amidst persistent Opposition protests concerning the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, the Lok Sabha passed the Indian Ports Bill and the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill. The House faced repeated disruptions and adjournments due to the uproar. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Lok Sabha passed two bills and referred one to a select committee amid continued protests and sloganeering by the Opposition over the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in House witnessed repeated adjournments as the Opposition demanded a discussion on SIR. In the post-lunch session, minister Sarbananda Sonowal moved the Indian Ports Bill for consideration and passing. It was passed by a voice vote within 25 minutes. The House was adjourned for an hour till 4.30 pm. Minister G Kishan Reddy moved the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Opposition members continued their protests despite repeated appeals by Jagdambika Pal, who was presiding over the House. The Opposition threw some papers while protesting and the Chair took a grim view of the conduct. Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju said, "How can you throw papers at the chair?... You should be ashamed." Pal observed that Congress' deputy leader in the Lok Sabha had been "instigating" people to enter the well and throw papers. While not naming anyone, he said the conduct was not appropriate.
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Respect food habit, diversity, says Ajit Pawar after 3 civic bodies ban meat sale on Aug 15
Hours after the Nagpur Municipal Corporation (NMC) on Tuesday announced that all slaughterhouses and meat shops within city limits would remain closed on August 15 on the occasion of Independence Day and Janmashtami, Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar on Tuesday admonished the decision taken by some civic bodies that also invited severe criticism from the Opposition. The civic bodies of Kalyan Dombivli, Nagpur and Malegaon have issued an order for closure of all slaughterhouses and meat shops in their jurisdictions for 24 hours on August 15. The Kalyan-Dombivli Municipal Corporation (KDMC) had issued the order on Monday. Deputy CM Ajit Pawar, also the president of ruling ally Nationalist Congress Party, disapproved the decision and said, 'It is an individual's choice what one should eat or not eat. Nobody has the right to impose the decision. There are some people who are vegetarians and others who are non-vegetarians. It is part of an individual's habit, culture and inheritance and geographical conditions.' 'While it is important to keep public sentiments and faith in mind on certain religious occasions such as Ashadi Ekadhasi or Mahavir Jayanti…, there is no reason why there should be a ban on meat and non-vegetarian food on Maharashtra Day, Independence Day or Republic Day,' Pawar said. Pointing out that in rural Maharashtra, people indulge in non-vegetarian delicacies during celebrations, Pawar said, 'If we look at the coastal Konkan region, people mostly eat seafood. The tribals are used to non-vegetarian food. The food habit and diversity has to be respected.' He also assured that he would take up the matter within the government. Later in the day, following hue and cry from Opposition and alliance partners, the ruling BJP issued a statement saying the decision was not new and has been a part of the administration since 1988. 'Some municipal corporations across Maharashtra have ordered the closure of slaughterhouses and meat shops in its jurisdiction for 24 hours on August 15, Independence Day. This is not a new decision. It was taken way back on May 12, 1988. It has been in practice since then. Every year an individual civic body takes a call,' said the BJP in its statement. While a senior BJP leader said it was a 'foolish decision' and wondered 'whose idea was it', Maharashtra BJP Media cell incharge Navnath Ban said, ' The decision to keep slaughterhouses and meat shops closed on some important days such as Independence Day, Gandhi Jayanti, Mahavir Jayanti, Ram Navmi, etc. was taken by the then government in 1988. Since then some civic bodies follow it.' According to the BJP spokesperson, 'Even during the rule of Maha Vikas Aghadi when Uddhav Thackeray was the CM, such a decision was implemented. The Nagpur Municipal Corporation, which was under state administrator, had enforced the ban on slaughterhouses and meat shops in 2021 and 2022.' Criticising the move, Opposition NCP (SP)'s Jitendra Awhad questioned why residents were being told what to eat on Independence Day, while Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Aaditya Thackeray demanded the suspension of KDMC commissioner. 'Who is the commissioner to tell us what to eat and what not to? Bridges are collapsing, roads are in terrible shape, and instead of fixing them, the administration is busy banning food,' Thackeray said.
