Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL): A Bull Case Theory
A luxurious cruise ship sailing the deep blue sea, sun glistening off its decks.
Carnival Corporation (CCL) is set to report its Q2 2025 earnings today, and expectations are running high. Analysts project a 7.4% year-over-year revenue increase to $6.21 billion, driven by strong consumer demand for experiences and higher onboard spending. Even more striking is the estimated EPS jump from $0.11 to $0.25, reflecting operational momentum and improving margins. Carnival's consistent performance—beating earnings for 10 consecutive quarters—underscores its resurgence as a key player in the travel sector.
With $1.2 billion in free cash flow projected for the full year, the company is navigating a disciplined financial course, reinforcing its position as a sector leader. Market interest is swelling, as seen in the nearly $948 million in trading volume this week. Technically, moves beyond $29.56 or below $24.37 could mark pivotal inflection points for the stock.
Carnival's recovery story is bolstered by clear consumer willingness to spend on leisure, which bodes well for continued growth into 2026. The setup suggests the company is not merely rebounding but potentially entering a new era of profitability and market leadership. Investors watching for signals in a choppy macro environment may find Carnival's trajectory reassuring.
While risks remain, particularly with global travel volatility, Carnival's recent track record and financial strength give confidence. With consumer behavior leaning in favor of experiences over goods, Carnival seems to be charting a stable course forward, offering both near-term catalysts and long-term upside potential as it reclaims its place in the post-pandemic travel boom.
Previously, we covered a bullish thesis on Carnival Corporation & plc by Alpha Ark Team in December 2024, which highlighted the company's post-COVID recovery, debt reduction efforts, and favorable supply-demand dynamics. The company's stock price has depreciated by approximately 0.7% since our coverage. This is because the thesis is still unfolding. Stock Region shares a similar view but emphasizes near-term earnings momentum and technical signals.
CCL isn't on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. While we acknowledge the risk and potential of CCL as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.
READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock.
Disclosure: None. This article was originally published at Insider Monkey.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
7 minutes ago
- The Verge
xAI explains the Grok Nazi meltdown as Tesla puts Elon's bot in its cars
Several days after temporarily shutting down the Grok AI bot that was producing antisemitic posts and praising Hitler in response to user prompts, Elon Musk's AI company tried to explain why that happened. In a series of posts on X, it said that '...we discovered the root cause was an update to a code path upstream of the @grok bot. This is independent of the underlying language model that powers @grok.' On the same day, Tesla announced a new 2025.26 update rolling out 'shortly' to its electric cars, which adds the Grok assistant to vehicles equipped with AMD-powered infotainment systems, which have been available since mid-2021. According to Tesla, 'Grok is currently in Beta & does not issue commands to your car – existing voice commands remain unchanged.' As Electrek notes, this should mean that whenever the update does reach customer-owned Teslas, it won't be much different than using the bot as an app on a connected phone. This isn't the first time the Grok bot has had these kinds of problems or similarly explained them. In February, it blamed a change made by an unnamed ex-OpenAI employee for the bot disregarding sources that accused Elon Musk or Donald Trump of spreading misinformation. Then, in May, it began inserting allegations of white genocide in South Africa into posts about almost any topic. The company again blamed an 'unauthorized modification,' and said it would start publishing Grok's system prompts publicly. xAI claims that a change on Monday, July 7th, 'triggered an unintended action' that added an older series of instructions to its system prompts telling it to be 'maximally based,' and 'not afraid to offend people who are politically correct.' The prompts are separate from the ones we noted were added to the bot a day earlier, and both sets are different from the ones the company says are currently in operation for the new Grok 4 assistant. These are the prompts specifically cited as connected to the problems: 'You tell it like it is and you are not afraid to offend people who are politically correct.' * Understand the tone, context and language of the post. Reflect that in your response.' * 'Reply to the post just like a human, keep it engaging, dont repeat the information which is already present in the original post.' The xAI explanation says those lines caused the Grok AI bot to break from other instructions that are supposed to prevent these types of responses, and instead produce 'unethical or controversial opinions to engage the user,' as well as 'reinforce any previously user-triggered leanings, including any hate speech in the same X thread,' and prioritize sticking to earlier posts from the thread.
Forbes
32 minutes ago
- Forbes
More On The Tips And Overtime Deductions In One Big Beautiful Bill
Earlier this week I noted a subtle difference in the limitations on the tips and overtime deductions included in the Big Beautiful Bill which can create either a marriage penalty or a marriage bonus. I was so taken by the apparent anomaly that I devoted a whole post to it. Now I am getting back to a fuller discussion. When President Trump first came out with "no tax on tips", I studied the proposals that were floating in Congress and had some concerns. Most notable was the harmful effect one of the proposals would have on Earned Income Tax Credit recipients. And then there was all sorts of commentary on how the provision might be gamed. What ultimately emerged addressed many of the issues. What we have in the final language about tips and overtime illustrates Reilly's Third Law of Tax Planning - "Any clever idea that pops into your head probably has (or will have) a corresponding rule that makes it not work". If you had an idea about how to game the "No tax on tips" of "No tax on overtime", let's see if Congress has already knocked it out even before any regulations have been issued. Deductions Subject To Limitations And Phase Outs First of all, the benefits are only about income tax, not Social Security and Medicare as the "no tax" monikers might imply. Further, the final bill puts limits and phaseouts in place. And the benefits are structured as deductions. It you want to know more about what that means, read the next paragraph, but feel free to skip it. It is worth looking at Form 1040 to understand where the deduction fits in. If you clicked on the link, you will see that your total income is on Line 9. Then on LIne 10, there are adjustments to income. There are a lot of those so they are totaled up on Part II of Schedule 1. Subtracting Line from Line 11 gives you your adjusted gross income (AGI). This is an important number because many thresholds and limitations are keyed to AGI including those of the tips and overtime deductions. Next on line 12 you get either your standard deduction or the total of certain itemized deductions from Schedule A. The tips and overtime will not be among them, so you don't need to be an itemizer. On Line 13 you will see the qualified business income deduction which will be added to the amount on line 12 to arrive at line 14 which is subtracted from AGI to arrive at taxable income. That's where the tips and overtime deductions will go along with the automobile interest deduction included in the bill. I don't know if they will add more lines to the form or give us another schedule. If it is another schedule I hope that they call it Schedule A PLUS. Do you remember all the talk about a postcard tax return in 2017? Still not happening. UNITED STATES - NOVEMBER 14: Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., holds up a postcard tax return ... More form during the press conference following the House Republican Conference meeting in the Capitol on Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2017. Ryan is flanked from left by House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Republican Conference Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash., and Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)Both the tip deduction and the overtime deduction require that married taxpayers file joint returns to claim the deduction. There are dollar limitations. The limitation is $25,000 for the tip deduction and $12,500 for the overtime deduction on a single return and $25,000 for the overtime deduction on a joint return. The phaseout is the same - $100 for every $1,000 that modified adjusted gross income exceeds $150,000 on a single return or $300,000 on a joint return. The modification to adjusted gross income is an add back of income excluded because it was earned while living abroad or in Puerto Rico on one of the U.S. possessions. I have to wonder if the $150,000 threshold is an echo of the proposal to totally eliminate income taxes on those earning less than $150,000. Qualified Tips Unlike earlier proposals, "qualified tips" are not just tips received by employees. The deduction also applies to tips received in the course of a trade or business. The thing that comes to mind there is food delivery people or Uber drivers who are considered independent contractors. I also recall that adult entertainers can be independent contractors. The deduction will be allowed only to the extent that the gross income from the business exceeds the allocable deductions. This could present some planning issue for how capital assets might be written off. The tip deduction will reduce the amount of income counted as qualified business income for that deduction. What exactly are the "tips" that are the subject of the deduction? First of all, they have to be received by an individual in an occupation which "customarily and regularly received tips on or before December 31, 2024". There is a call for a list to be created. Next the amount involved has to be paid voluntarily, without consequence in the event of nonpayment, not the subject of negotiation and determined by the payor. So that amount that large parties have to pay in a restaurant seems to not qualify. There are excluded fields of business- health, law, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage services, or any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of 1 or more of its employees. I have to wonder if the "performing arts" exclusion knocks out the adult entertainers. There is some litigation in the sales tax area that might help them. Overtime For the definition of "qualified overtime compensation" you really need to look at the bill's language and meditate for a while. Here it is "... the term 'qualified overtime compensation' means overtime compensation paid to an individual required under section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that is in excess of the regular rate (as used in such section) at which such individual is employed". That language triggered some back and forth in the twitterverse, about whether they mean the total amount paid for overtime or just the premium. If you search for what the median hourly wage for Americans is, there are a variety of answers but they seem to be between $20 and $30 per hour, so let's use $25 for illustrative purposes. With that as the base hourly wage you get $1,000 per week for 40 hours, $52,000 per year. At time and half for overtime the $37.50 premium rate would max out the $12,500 limit at 6.5 hours a week. That is how I think of overtime and how I initially read, probably misread, the statute. The consensus seems to be that the deduction is only for the premium. Tom Gorczynski EA pointed out something from the White House website that supports that interpretation. I found that quite persuasive. Kelly Erb also writes that it is just the premium, which seals the deal for me. It still bugs me though. So if it is just the premium it takes 1,000 hours to max out the benefit if you are single in my example. Call it a 60 hours work week. If you are married and your spouse does not work overtime it would be 2,000 hours. At $50 per hour you will hit the maximum at 500 hours of overtime if you are single or 1,000 hours if you are married with a spouse that does not get overtime. Absent a lot else going on, you won't be having to deal with the phaseout. I won't comment on the equity or sense behind this particular deduction other than to remark that back when I used to work more than forty hours a week mostly without overtime pay, I found it a lot harder when I was doing that by working two jobs rather than longish hours on one job. So I am puzzled as to what makes an overtime premium worthy of special tax treatment. Gaming The Overtime Deduction I don't know much about the Fair Labor Standards Act, which is the key to the deduction. It is clear however that whether people are exempt employees not subject to the overtime premium requirement can be debatable. Employers will generally prefer to not have that requirement. I don't think this deduction will change that, but I can't resist coming up with a way to game it. Here is the idea. I have a bunch of salaried employees and I want to help them out. So what I do is cut everybody's pay to below $684 per week so that I have to pay them time and a half over forty hours. Then I guarantee them overtime hours which will include overtime hours when they are "on-call". That will bring them up to whatever their previous salary was. And a third of that amount will be deductible. This is actually a terrible idea when it comes to actually executing it, but I felt I had to come up with something if I could. I haven't thought of a way to game the tips deduction, but I am sure they will be coming.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The summer holiday hacks that saved us hundreds of pounds
The cost of all-inclusive package holidays to some of the most popular destinations has soared, prompting people to get creative to save money. BBC News has been speaking to people who have used money-saving hacks to slash the price of their summer getaways. If there are issues you would like to see covered, you can get in touch via Your Voice, Your BBC News. Laura Strang, 25, from Oban, Scotland saves money by booking at the last minute. She even booked her honeymoon just two days before they flew. "We got married on the 21st of June and waited until the 23rd of June to book a holiday for June 25th. "We had two weeks in Mexico because it was cheaper than two weeks in Europe." Laura and her husband Sam Gledhill, 27, paid £1,200 each for 14 nights all-inclusive in Cancun. "I would say we saved thousands of pounds, based on reviews," she says. "Ten nights in Spain was coming up the same or more expensive. It's a 10-hour flight over to Mexico so it's a little bit crazy, that." She says she and her husband have previously booked holidays within a few days of flying to Tenerife, Salou and Marrakesh and have saved money each time. "Choosing not to go all-inclusive can save money but that depends on the country," says Laura. "We found Mexico quite expensive when going out and about [so all-inclusive made sense], but you could probably save money in Spain by going half board." Nathan Hart and his fiancee Cassie Farrelly estimate they saved £3,300 by searching for a holiday that offered a free child's place and going outside school holidays. They have booked a 10-day all-inclusive holiday in Spain's Balearic Islands at the end of September with their three-year-old twin daughters Alba and Luna. The couple from Merthyr Tydfil, Wales recommend using the filter option on some of the biggest travel agency websites. "When searching you can see which places offer one free child place, choose a range of locations and sort by lowest price," says Nathan. "We found an exceptional hotel for £800 per person plus one free child place, so that's already an £800 saving. "As well as that, on the booking page you can see a calendar showing the difference in price for the holiday on different dates." Holidays to Spain, Cyprus and Turkey soar in price Six ways to save money on your summer holiday Nathan says when he compared the same holiday in August it was double the price. "That would have been completely unaffordable for us. "I now completely understand why parents with older kids travel inside school term time and it's absolutely something we will have to consider when our girls are older." Parents who take their children out of school for holidays during term time risk being fined, and repeat offenders could face prosecution. May Burrough works in central London. But her flat is too small to have lots of people to stay, so last October she invited some close friends to a five-bedroomed villa with a pool on the Costa Brava, Spain. She estimates it would normally have cost around £3,500 to rent a house like that. But she used a home-swapping site and only paid €100 (£85) - for the cleaning fee - plus around £250 on transport. Although she saved money on the villa, May and her friends did splash out on food and drink, such as oysters and wine from the region. "We really had a lush time at the house because we were like, 'well, we're not paying for the accommodation!'" Because finding someone to do a straight swap with can often be tricky, the Home Exchange site she uses allows her to earn credits by letting people stay in her one-bedroom flat, and then spend them elsewhere. "It does take a bit of effort. I put valuables away, you have to change the bedsheets, cleaning every time. But it is fully worth it," says May. She says the site is a bit clunky to use, but she loves what it allows her to do, for an annual fee of around £170. Recently she booked a one-night stay in Vienne, France so she could go to a concert. "A hotel was going to be mega-expensive. So I booked a room in someone's home and left in the morning." Ebrahim Paruk, 35, from Nuneaton near Coventry in Warwickshire saves money on flights by saving up Virgin Atlantic credit card points. He does his best to collect as many points as possible. "I pay for everything I can with the card," he says, including his bills, weekly petrol, and weekly groceries. "These are day-to-day necessities that you have to buy, so you might as well get a reward," he says. Describing himself as "the biggest football fan you will probably ever find", he started doing it as a way of going to the major international tournaments. The best saving he made with the points was a return flight to Düsseldorf to watch Germany v Denmark in the 2024 Euros - he saved £400 on his £800 flight. To add to the saving, he won the match ticket and hotel accommodation in a competition, meaning the whole trip cost him a total of £500. Now he uses the same method to save money when booking holidays for him and his wife. Annmaree Bancroft is a single mum of a three-year-old and has been house sitting with him 11 times. Their first time was looking after two dogs for a week in a house in Scarsdale outside New York City. This year they will be going back there for a few days, this time as friends of the homeowner. Then they will stay on for three more weeks in the US, without paying for any overnight accommodation, thanks to further housesitting stints in Connecticut and Brooklyn. The cost of the holiday will be the £1,435 she is spending on flights, plus travel between cities and spending money. "A lot of parents think that once you have a child, you can't travel," says Annmaree. "That is just not true. There are these alternative ways now to travel and make it affordable." If you do choose to house sit, it is recommended that you use a reputable site. Annmaree uses the online platform Trusted Housesitters, which charges a membership fee for sitters of £99 to £199 a year. House sitting may also be an option for those choosing not to go abroad. Kayleigh Pennel-Price lives with her partner, two children, aged two and four months, and their golden retriever Kofi in Wiltshire. She had looked into a family holiday through the traditional means but calculated that it would cost around £3,000 to go on a foreign holiday for a week. Instead, the whole family is going house sitting in a small village in Buckinghamshire for two weeks. They will be staying in a home with a sauna, swimming pool and a private woodland, to look after two Yorkshire terriers, booked through the website HouseSit Match. "We mostly plan to just stay there," says Kayleigh, who thinks the whole trip could cost £250. "We love both abroad and UK holidays, but we don't like to leave our dog," she says. "And with the two babies, abroad is a little harder."
