
Re-arrest in Arms Act case despite procedural lapse is legal, rules Delhi HC
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma delivered the ruling while dismissing a batch of petitions filed by several accused persons, who had challenged their re-arrest in an Arms Act case being investigated by Delhi Police's special cell. They had also assailed a trial court order which had upheld the legality of the subsequent arrest.
'It would essentially mean that a serious offender may escape the process of law solely on account of a procedural lapse committed by the investigating agency, even if sufficient material exists justifying his arrest,' the court observed.
The petitioners had argued that once the trial court had held their initial arrest invalid, any re-arrest under the same FIR could not be legally sustained. They also asserted that fresh material did not exist to justify their re-arrest and that statutory safeguards had still not been followed.
Rejecting these contentions, the court noted that at the time of re-arrest, detailed arrest grounds were furnished to each of the accused, outlining their alleged roles in the organised crime syndicate.
'Therefore, at the time of re-arrest, the mandatory requirements of law, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, were prima facie complied with. Thus, this court is of the opinion that the defect which had vitiated the initial arrest was not repeated during the re-arrest,' the bench held. It added that there is no express provision in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, or the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which bars such a re-arrest.
'To hold otherwise would amount to laying down a precedent which, in the long run, may prove perilous to the administration of criminal justice. Should the procedural lapse committed by one officer, however serious, be allowed to permanently shield the accused from arrest, even after the defect has been remedied? The answer must be negative,' the court said.
The court said that allowing such an argument would effectively grant blanket immunity to accused persons from being arrested in future, even in serious offences, merely because of a previous technical defect.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Woman injured after ‘stalker' opens fire at her in Mainpuri; accused held after police encounter
Agra: A 21-year-old woman suffered serious injuries after a man, whom police suspect to be a stalker, shot at her multiple times at the Rani Ka Shiv temple in Kila-Ki-Bazaria area in Agra on Saturday. The accused, Rahul Diwakar, 24, was later arrested following a police encounter. Police said the incident took place around 8.30am when the woman, a student, was offering prayers at the temple. Mainpuri Kotwali SHO Fateh Bahadur Singh said, "Rahul opened fire at her thrice before fleeing the scene. The woman sustained at least 3 to 4 bullet wounds to her stomach and other body parts. She was taken to the Saifai Medical College, and is currently in critical condition." Mainpuri ASP Arun Kumar Singh said, "Prima facie, it appears to be a case of a spurned lover and an FIR has been registered with investigations underway." The ASP added that the woman was going to marry another man, which may have been the reason behind the attack. The accused was later arrested near Orandya Mandal village following an encounter with police. "Rahul sustained a leg injury and is undergoing treatment in custody. Two cases have been registered against him under section 109 (attempt to murder) of BNS and the Arms Act." the ASP said.


Deccan Herald
2 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
College student arrested for abetting classmate's suicide in Bengaluru
CK Baba, Superintendent of Police (Bengaluru Rural), told DH that Chiranth, who was named in the FIR, was placed under arrest and is currently in judicial custody.


Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Agra conversion racket: Girls lured via social media, linked to Pakistan, say police
Agra police investigating an alleged religious conversion racket on Saturday said that several rescued girls were found to be in contact with individuals in Pakistan who discussed Islamic beliefs and allegedly aimed to convert them. Some of the girls were reportedly influenced by Kashmiri women who criticised Hinduism and promoted Islam as part of the larger network's efforts. Arrested accused Abdul Rehman aka Rehman Chacha (Sourced) 'We have interrogated 14 arrested individuals and spoken to the rescued girls. It was found that they were in contact with people in Pakistan, who spoke to them about Islam, and with some girls in Kashmir who reportedly influenced them to adopt the religion,' Agra police commissioner Deepak Kumar said. According to officials, Pakistani individuals identified as Tanveer Ahmed and Sahil Adeem were frequently in touch with the girls through social media platforms. 'The network targeted youth, particularly those involved in online gaming, and used encrypted platforms and foreign contacts to push conversion,' a senior police officer said. The racket, according to the police, was operated by two converts, Abdul Rehman alias Rehman Chacha, earlier known as Mahendra Pal, and Ayesha, formerly SB Krishna, who are now in custody. 12 other accused arrested so far have allegedly confirmed their association with them. One accused, Rehman Qureshi, allegedly raised funds through crowdfunding and maintained transactions in cryptocurrency and foreign currency with individuals based in the Gaza Strip, according to the police. Officials further revealed that at least three members of the group were proficient with the dark web and communicated through encrypted apps and coded signals to avoid detection. According to police officials, girls allegedly targeted by the network were rescued from Dehradun, Bareilly, Aligarh, Jhajjar, and Rohtak. Police said the victims are being interviewed to gather further details. Last week, Agra police rescued a woman from Haryana and another from Uttarakhand. The latter, aged 21, gave her statement before a magistrate in Agra under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). She is now considered the main witness in the case.