Lok Sabha adjourned till 12 noon due to Opposition protests over SIR issue
New Delhi, Aug 19 (PTI) Lok Sabha was on Tuesday adjourned till 12 noon due to strong protests by opposition parties demanding a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision exercise in Bihar and other issues.
When the House met at 11 am, Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla announced that it was a matter of happiness that now onwards the translation of the proceedings of the House will be available in all 22 languages under the 8th Schedule of the Constitution for the members.
He said so far proceedings were available in 18 languages and now onwards four more languages were included in the list.
'We should be proud of our Parliament, we should be proud of Indian democracy. On this happy occasion, I hope that members will cooperate to run the House smoothly," he said.
As soon as Birla ended the announcement, opposition MPs, including those from the Congress, were on their feet, raising slogans and showing placards with their demand for discussion on SIR.
The Speaker tried to continue the business of the House — Question Hour — by allowing members to ask three questions related to different union ministries and departments amidst din.
However, the vocal protests of the opposition continued.
After about 20 minutes of the proceedings, Birla adjourned the House till 12 noon.
The opposition has been demanding a discussion on the SIR exercise initiated by the Election Commission in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections there.
Barring discussions on Operation Sindoor in both House, Parliament has seen little business ever since the Monsoon session began on July 21 due to repeated adjournments initially due to opposition demand for discussion on Operation Sindoor and then demanding a discussion on SIR in Bihar. PTI ACB DV DV
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Loading comments...
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
a few seconds ago
- The Wire
INDIA's VP Nominee Justice B. Sudershan Reddy Has a Long History of Batting For Democratic Values
Hyderabad: The choice of Justice (retired) B. Sudershan Reddy as the INDIA bloc candidate for the vice-presidential election can be seen as a recognition for his long association with landmark judgments upholding principles of the Constitution and social justice, wherein he always stood for democratic values. The 79-year-old Justice Reddy, an eminent jurist, was appointed as a permanent judge of the high court in combined Andhra Pradesh on May 2, 1995, and promoted as the Chief Justice of Gauhati high court in 2005. He was elevated as a judge of the Supreme Court in 2007 and served on its bench till 2011. After his retirement in 2011, he was appointed as the first Lokayukta of Goa in 2013. However, he quit the post for personal reasons within seven months of the appointment. Justice Reddy belongs to the rare breed of jurists who saw the Constitution as a document providing a blueprint for the upliftment of India's poorest and most deprived, and how the State should use its powers best to attain that goal. His judgements mark a sharp departure from pedantic legalism towards a transformative constitutionalism, according to MLC and Telangana Jana Samiti (TJS) president M. Kodandaram. Influenced by socialist thinkers including Lohia Born on July 8, 1946, in an agricultural family in Akula Mylaram village of Ranga Reddy district, Justice Reddy did his primary education in the neighbouring villages as there was no school in his native village. He graduated in Arts and Law from Osmania University in Hyderabad and enrolled as an advocate with the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh in 1971. He practiced in writ and civil matters in the High Court of Andhra Pradesh and was Government Pleader in the High Court in 1988-90. He also worked as an additional standing counsel for the Union Government for a short period in 1990. The Osmania University utilised his services as its Legal Advisor and Standing Counsel from 1992 till Justice Reddy's elevation as the high court judge. He also served as secretary and president of the Andhra Pradesh high court advocates association before his appointment as high court judge. Justice Reddy came under the influence of socialist thinkers, more particularly Rammanohar Lohia, at a very early stage in his life. He actively participated in the total revolution movement led by Jayaprakash Narayan during the Emergency. Apart from being one of the most articulate and erudite judges of the Supreme Court, Justice Reddy was also one of those exceptional judges whose judgements are replete with references to works on regulatory theory, political science, economics, international trade and, of course, twentieth century classic literature. The erudition and depth of research in his judgments are typical of him as a well read and thoughtful intellectual. Justice Reddy maintained a judicial demeanor which is always with equanimity. He listened patiently and attentively, interjecting purposefully, said Kodandaram. He has not only made immense contributions to law but also stirred serious debate about where the Indian polity is heading and where it should go. During his tenure in the high courts as well as the Supreme Court, Justice Reddy rendered several landmark judgements on various branches of law, in particular on issues of criminal jurisprudence, Constitution, taxation, service law and human rights. 'The whole idea of distributive justice is to empower the weaker sections of the society' In one of his judgements, Justice Reddy, while dealing with the question as to whether the assignees of government land are entitled to payment of compensation equivalent to full market value of the land and other benefits on par with other land holders in the event of resumption for a public purpose, said "in the matter of distribution of material resources of the community to the vulnerable sections of the society by the State in furtherance of its constitutional obligations, no argument can be heard from the State contending that the recipient of the benefit may either accept with the restrictions or not to accept the benefit at all. The whole idea of distributive justice is to empower the weaker sections of the society and to provide them their share of cake in the material resources of the community of which they were deprived from times immemorial for no fault of theirs." "Having resolved to extend the benefits as a welfare measure, no unconstitutional condition can be imposed depriving the recipients of the benefits of their legitimate right to get compensation in case of taking over the benefit even for a valid public purpose. The recipients cannot be at the mercy of the State forever". In yet another important judgement dealing with the power of the government to deal with the public property, Justice Reddy observed that "there is nothing like a government property. It is a public property of which the government as a day is only a trustee. The public properties cannot be parted away by the government in its discretion as it pleases". As a Supreme Court judge, in his landmark judgment on Salwa Judum, which was floated in Chhattisgarh as an anti-Maoist force, Justice Reddy highlighted the importance of human rights and declared the appointment of tribal youth as special police officers by the Chhattisgarh government as illegal and unconstitutional . His judgement was widely hailed as a landmark restatement of constitutional values, demonstrating Justice Reddy's enormous moral strength to uphold social justice. In another significant judgement, he criticised the Union government for its slackness in probing black money cases. He observed "from mining mafias to political operators who, all too willingly, bend policies of the State to suit particular individuals or groups in the social and economic sphere, the raison d'etre for weakening the capacities and intent to enforce the laws is the lure of lucre. Even as the state provides violent support to those who benefit from such predatory capitalism, often violating the human rights of its citizens, particularly its poor, the market begin to function like a bureaucratic machine dominated by big business and the State begins to function like the market where everything is available for sale at a price". Headed panel on caste survey in Telangana Expressing his strong reservations about the government's efforts to deal with the black money issue, Justice Reddy had constituted a special investigation team (SIT) to investigate unaccounted money unlawfully kept in bank accounts abroad. While dealing with a dispute between Ambani brothers concerning the supply of gas from KG basin, he raised a question in Supreme Court as to whose gas it is. He stated that "a small portion of our population, over the past two decades has been chanting incessantly for increased privatisation of the material resources of the community, and some of them even doubt whether the goals of equality and social justice are capable of being addressed directly". Justice Reddy had become the obvious choice as the head of an additional bench announced by then Supreme Court Chief Justice S.H. Kapadia to hear cases related to environment and mining. He participated in various national and international conferences and delivered keynote addresses on interconnectivity between law, economic and social sciences. He was a strong votary of the agitation for a separate Telangana prior to the bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh in 2014. He provided inputs to the Andhra Pradesh State Reorganisation Bill, 2014. He was also the chairman of a committee constituted by Telangana government to conduct the caste survey and suggest measures to improve the living condition of the poor. The other members of the panel had included noted economists Sukhdeo Thorat and Thomas Pickety, among others.
Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- Indian Express
Trump admin turns up the heat as Treasury secretary calls India's Russian oil purchase ‘unacceptable'
Ratcheting up pressure on India, another Trump administration official has criticised the country for its ties with Russia. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC in an interview that 'Indian arbitrage of Russian oil is unacceptable,' underlining Washington's stand that New Delhi was fuelling Moscow's 'war machine,' Reuters reported. 'This … Indian arbitrage – buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product has just sprung during the war – which is unacceptable,' he said. The US earlier this month slapped 50 per cent tariffs on India, half of them for buying Russian oil, catapulting the country to one facing the highest import duties among Washington's trade partners. New Delhi called the tariff action 'unfair, unjustified and unreasonable', and said it would take 'all actions necessary' to 'protect its national interests'. India is the world's third-largest consumer of crude oil and meets 88 per cent of its oil demand from imports. Before Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Moscow's share in New Delhi's oil imports was less than 2 per cent. That has now risen to nearly 40 per cent. Higher tariff revenue to be used to pay down federal debt Bessent said that he expected a substantial increase in tariff revenues from the $300 billion he forecast earlier this year, with the money to be used to start paying down the US federal debt, Reuters reported. He declined to give a specific new revenue forecast, but said he and President Donald Trump were 'laser-focused' on paying down the debt. 'I've been saying that tariff revenue could be $300 billion this year. I'm going to have to revise that up substantially,' he said. India should start 'acting' like strategic partner: Trump aide Bessent's comments came close on the heels of White House trade advisor Peter Navarro saying that India needed to start acting like a strategic partner of the US if it wanted to be treated like one. 'India acts as a global clearinghouse for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs,' he wrote. Navarro also claimed in an opinion piece in the Financial Times that India was 'now cozying up to both Russia and China'. Navarro wrote: 'Here's how the India-Russia oil mathematics works. American consumers buy Indian goods. India uses those dollars to buy discounted Russian crude. That Russian crude is refined and resold around the world by Indian profiteers in league with silent Russian partners — while Russia pockets hard currency to fund its war machine in Ukraine. As Russia continues to hammer Ukraine, helped by India's financial support, American (and European) taxpayers are then forced to spend tens of billions more to help Ukraine's defence.'
Time of India
a few seconds ago
- Time of India
Harjinder Singh, the illegal migrant truck driver suspected in Florida crash once received work permit under Biden after Trump denial
A devastating crash on the Florida Turnpike last Thursday has sparked renewed debate over immigration policies after it was revealed that the truck driver involved, an Indian national living illegally in the United States, had been granted work authorisation under the Biden administration. Tragedy on the Florida Turnpike The driver, identified as Harjinder Singh, allegedly attempted a sudden U-turn through an 'Official Use Only' median, cutting across lanes of traffic. A minivan travelling at full speed collided with the trailer, leaving three people dead. Authorities confirmed that the victims included a 37-year-old woman from Pompano Beach, a 30-year-old man from Florida City, and a 54-year-old man from Miami. Two passengers died instantly, while the driver was taken to a hospital but later pronounced dead. Singh and his passenger escaped unharmed. Immigration history of Harjinder Singh raises questions According to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Singh first crossed the southern border into California in September 2018, during the Trump administration. He was placed in expedited deportation proceedings but was able to remain in the United States after claiming asylum, citing fear of returning to India. In January 2019, Singh was released on a $5,000 immigration bond while awaiting a decision on his asylum application. In September 2020, under the Trump administration, his work permit request was rejected. However, DHS confirmed that his application was later approved under the Biden administration in June 2021. This authorisation allowed Singh to apply for and obtain a Commercial Driver's Licence (CDL) in California. DHS and California officials clash online The case sparked political controversy when California Governor Gavin Newsom's office suggested that Singh's work authorisation had been granted during the Trump years. DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin responded sharply, clarifying that the permit was rejected under Trump but approved under Biden. McLaughlin added that while the federal government handles work authorisation, states like California are responsible for issuing Commercial Driver's Licences, pointing out there is no national CDL system. Arrest and charges of Harjinder Singh Singh was arrested in California by US Marshals on Saturday on a warrant linked to the Florida crash. He faces three counts of vehicular homicide. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has also lodged a detainer to ensure Singh remains in custody while deportation proceedings continue. Authorities said dashcam footage from inside Singh's cab showed him appearing calm and unfazed at the time of the crash, turning off the engine immediately after the impact. Florida Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Director Dave Kerner said Singh's reckless driving directly caused the deaths and left families shattered. He described the tragedy as both shocking and criminal, emphasising the devastating consequences of the driver's actions. Broader concerns over policy and public safety The case has intensified scrutiny over how immigration decisions intersect with public safety. Critics argue that granting work authorisation to individuals with unresolved asylum cases poses risks, while others stress the need for due process and humane treatment of migrants. For now, Singh remains behind bars, awaiting trial for vehicular homicide, while also facing the possibility of deportation. The families of the victims continue to mourn lives lost in what officials have described as a preventable tragedy.
