Hanwha says US Navy chief toured Philly Shipyard ahead of Korea-US tariff deal
The visit is seen as a contributing factor in the deal, with a shipbuilding partnership between the two countries reportedly playing a key role.
According to Hanwha, Phelan and Vought toured major production facilities at the Philadelphia site, guided by Hanwha Group Vice Chair Kim Dong-kwan, alongside other senior US government officials.
The US delegation also visited Hanwha's welding training center and inspected equipment relocated from the company's Hanwha Ocean shipyard in Geoje, South Gyeongsang Province.
Hanwha said the American officials' visit focused on reviewing the company's investments to bolster local shipbuilding capacity. Phelan emphasized that establishing a robust marine industry foundation was a top priority for both the Trump administration and the US Navy.
Kim reiterated Hanwha's commitment to supporting the revitalization of US shipbuilding by establishing new shipyards and developing related industrial networks.
On the day of the visit, Korea and the US agreed to reduce the planned reciprocal tariffs on imports to the US from 25 percent to 15 percent, including on automobiles and auto parts.
Hanwha cited a US government source as saying that feedback from the delegation was delivered to US President Donald Trump and influenced the final outcome of the deal.
During negotiations, Korea proposed the "Make American Shipbuilding Great Again," or MASGA, an initiative aimed at revitalizing the US shipbuilding industry. Of the $350 billion Korea pledged to invest in the US as part of the agreement, $150 billion will be allocated to enhancing the shipbuilding partnership.
Kim also traveled to the US to support the negotiations. Hanwha's Philadelphia Shipyard, acquired for $100 million in 2024, has been positioned as a symbol of Korean support for the US shipbuilding industry.
Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo, a member of Korea's tariff negotiation team, said business leaders, including Kim, worked closely with the government by sharing strategic information and leveraging their networks.
'I believe their support definitely contributed to the success of the deal," Yeo said in a briefing after the tariff deal concluded on Wednesday.
Hanwha plans to expand the shipyard as a center for shipbuilding, maintenance, overhaul and repair for US naval vessels. The company said it will apply production and operations systems used in Korea to increase annual capacity from one ship to 10 by 2035.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
12 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Too close to Seoul to stand out? Gyeonggi bets on independent travelers to revive tourism
Gyeonggi Province, which surrounds Seoul and is home to over 13 million people, is rolling out a new strategy in hopes of attracting more international tourists. Despite being one of South Korea's most accessible regions from the capital, trouble navigating often keeps foreign visitors away. In an attempt to address the situation, the province announced its '3.3.5.5 Strategy." Despite its size, access to the DMZ, and proximity to Incheon Airport, Gyeonggi Province's share of foreign visitors dropped from 14.9 percent in 2019 to around 10 percent in 2024, according to data from South Korea's Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. Seoul's share has long held at around 80 percent. Meanwhile, the country's tourism landscape has changed. Over 80.5 percent of foreign tourists in 2024 were Free Independent Travelers — those who plan trips on their own rather than booking through a group tour. In 2019, FITs made up 77.1 percent. Gyeonggi now wants to target this growing segment. The strategy sets four measurable goals: Boost international visitor share from 10 to 30 percent. Increase average stays from 2.13 days to 3 days. Raise spending per tourist from 350,000 won to 500,000 won (about $215 to $360). Improve the repeat visitation rate from 34 to 50 percent. Why Gyeonggi gets overlooked The paradox is that Gyeonggi is geographically convenient, but functionally inaccessible. Booking regional buses and trains often requires Korean-language apps or domestic credit cards. Car rentals are available, but GPS systems and maps are primarily designed for local users. Google Maps still lacks turn-by-turn navigation in Korea. Korean apps like Naver Map and Kakao Map support English, Chinese and Japanese, but often fall short for tourists unfamiliar with Korean signage or cultural context. These barriers help explain why South Korea, despite ranking No. 14 overall in the World Economic Forum's 2023 Travel and Tourism Development Index, landed at No. 60 in tourism services and infrastructure. What the province plans to fix To address this, Gyeonggi Provinceworked with national tourism agencies, universities, and research institutes to develop a four-part action plan. It includes: Improved transportation: more shuttle buses, FIT-friendly day tours, a new tourist taxi system, and a dedicated Gyeonggi tourism center in Seoul. Better digital tools: smarter booking platforms and information services for foreign users. Expanded experiences: DMZ tours, regional food programs, and new outdoor and industrial tourism offerings. Targeted marketing: a global tourism brand and campaigns focused on younger travelers. Officials say implementation will begin in 2026, starting with high-impact projects. The province also plans to work with Seoul and Incheon to create a regional tourism network and is pushing the national government to ease lodging and transportation regulations. 'Our goal is to make Gyeonggi Province a place where international visitors can explore freely and comfortably,' said Jang Hyang-jeong, the province's tourism policy director. 'We want them to discover that Korea is more than just Seoul.'
Korea Herald
12 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Hyundai's US tariff headache, explained in 2 minutes
The new 15 percent tariff deal between South Korea and the US is forcing Hyundai Motor Group to fundamentally rethink its strategy in its second-largest market. With the loss of its zero-tariff edge under the South Korea-US free trade agreement, the Korean auto giant is now grappling with tough choices — from adjusting vehicle prices to relocating production of key models from Korea to the US. Tariff impacts New 15% US tariff on Korean car exports replaces previously threatened 25% duty. Hyundai Motor and Kia export 1.5 million vehicles to the US annually — about 25% of total global sales. Estimated 3-4% hit to overall profit margin, prompting strategic overhaul. No room for big price hikes Raising prices by over 3% would be needed to offset losses. But Hyundai risks losing competitiveness if it increases prices more than rivals like Toyota, which has already raised prices by $200–$270. Hyundai's pricing strategy likely to focus on regional customization, option flexibility, including removal of some standard features. Production shift on the table Hyundai is in talks with labor unions to shift production of high-demand models — especially hybrids and SUVs — from Korea to the US. All Hyundai Motor and Kia hybrid models are currently made in Korea despite surging US demand. Labor union hurdle A 1999 labor agreement requires union approval for any overseas production shift. Experts say this will need to be renegotiated due to what's described as a 'life-or-death threat' to Hyundai's export-driven business model. What's at stake Hyundai sold 28,733 hybrid vehicles in the US in July, up 38% year-on-year. Shifting hybrid production could help avoid tariffs and protect market share, but labor resistance could delay plans.
Korea Herald
13 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul's adjustment to S. Korea-US military drill could put alliance to test: think tank
Despite Seoul floating talks of adjusting the scale and timing of the annual South Korea-US military exercise scheduled for mid-August, doing so would weaken Washington's trust in its decadeslong ally, a report by a local think tank said Wednesday. The report, published in Korean by the state-affiliated Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, said that under current circumstances, an adjustment to the Ulchi Freedom Shield drill could undermine 'the efforts and willpower expressed by the US Forces Korea to continue the S. Korea-US joint military exercises." This could weaken both Washington's and the USFK's trust in Seoul, it noted. The think tank also warned that a potential one-sided concession from Seoul in the area of defense, without a proper negotiation with Pyongyang, could devalue the South's efforts and, later, even its negotiating power. The report addresses Unification Minister Chung Dong-young's remarks in July to reporters, saying that he plans to recommend to President Lee Jae Myung to 'make adjustments' to the large-scale drill scheduled for mid-August. The Lee administration has repeatedly gestured for an inter-Korean thaw, including removing the South's anti-Pyongyang loudspeakers installed across the border. Chung's remarks closely followed comments from North Korean leader Kim Jong-un's influential sister, Kim Yo-jong, in July. She said Pyongyang was not interested in reviving talks with Seoul and denounced the 'aggressive' military exercises jointly conducted by South Korea and the US. The North has routinely condemned the joint military drills as a rehearsal for invasion and a provocation. There is a possibility that the North is aiming to establish a favorable environment when potentially reviving talks with both the US and the South, according to KIDA. Adjustment to the scale of the South Korea-US military exercises would be one of Pyongyang's conditions to achieve such an environment, alongside a USFK troop reduction, a declaration to end the 1950-53 Korean War and official admission of the North's status as a nuclear power. Aligned with these likely goals, Kim Yo-jong's latest comments were aimed at testing the alliance between the Lee administration and the Donald Trump administration and their willingness to carry out the annual joint military exercise, according to the KIDA. The report released Wednesday was titled 'North Korea's negotiation strategy shown through Kim Yo-jong's comments and how (South Korea) should respond.'
