Govt reduced land allotted to Metro for real estate lobby: Min
The area falls under the Bengaluru North Lok Sabha constituency, which MoS Karandlaje represents.
Speaking to reporters after inspecting the site, where a proposed multimodal transport hub was to be developed, MoS Karandlaje said, 'We are in the Hebbal area of Bengaluru. In 2000, under the leadership of then CM late S.M. Krishna, 51 acres of land in the Hebbal-Amanikere area were acquired. After encroachments, 48 acres remain today. Just a month ago, the current government decided to hand over this land to BMRCL for the development of a multimodal transport hub.'
'However, very recently, the allotment was reduced to just 9 acres. Why was this done? Why did the government backtrack from its original decision to allocate 48 acres and now grant only 9? Who is behind this decision? Which real estate mafia is influencing this move? Let us not forget - this land is situated en route to the Bengaluru International Airport,' she said.
Emphasising the strategic importance of the location, she said, 'This is going to be a major junction. A Metro station, BMTC depot, Ring Road connection, and NHAI roads are all planned here. The area is ideal for a multimodal transport hub that can significantly ease traffic congestion on the airport road.'
'But now, the government and the minister in charge have colluded to override the previous decision. How much money exchanged hands? How much was given to Randeep Singh Surjewala? These questions need answers,' she said.
She added that local farmers, who had given up their land for development, are now demanding it back if it is going to be handed over to private parties. 'People from various states have settled here. There are Bengalis, Rohingyas. Anti-national activities are reportedly taking place. Garbage and bottles from across Bengaluru are dumped here. No one knows who these people are. Many claim to be from Kolkata and possess Aadhaar cards, some of which are fake, along with fake voter ID cards. They claim to have lived here for 10 to 15 years,' MoS Karandlaje said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Danger of thought: on the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill
The Maharashtra Special Public Security (MSPS) Bill, 2024 follows the disturbing pattern of executive overreach in the name of security. Existing laws are often misused against political opponents and critics of the ruling party, including commentators. Charges are often vague and sweeping, and the process itself becomes the punishment in many of these cases. Given this pattern, the move by Maharashtra's Mahayuti government led by the BJP to create an entire law to criminalise a certain kind of thought portends danger to freedom and democracy. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said that the new law would only target those who try to undermine the constitutional order, but the possibility — indeed the probability — of its misuse is apparent. The State says that it is seeking to prevent Maoists from brainwashing youth, professionals, and civil servants through front organisations. As in the proposed law, which is now awaiting the assent of the Governor before coming into force, the State government can declare any suspect 'organisation' as an 'unlawful organisation'. Offences under the proposed law include membership of such organisations, fundraising on their behalf, managing or assisting them, and committing unlawful activities. The Bill's focus is on people and organisations that act as a front for Maoists, and what is unlawful is so broadly defined that anyone can be its target. Among other things, according to the Bill, 'unlawful' is 'any action taken by an individual or organization whether by committing an act or by words either spoken or written or by sign or by visible representation or otherwise, which constitute a danger or menace to public order, peace and tranquility'. Offences are cognisable and the accused can be arrested without a warrant. Punishment includes jail terms of two years to seven years, along with fines ranging from ₹2 lakh to ₹5 lakh. The State argues that Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Odisha have enacted Public Security Acts and banned 48 Naxal frontal organisations. The Opposition parties offered feeble resistance to the Bill and raised some broad concerns regarding its misuse but it was passed in the Assembly through a voice vote. As an afterthought, the Congress and the Shiv Sena (UBT) protested on the floor when it was taken up in the Legislative Council. The Bill had gone through a long deliberative process, but as it turns out, all parties appeared to be in agreement, barring the lone CPI (M) MLA who protested against it on the floor of the Assembly. The idea that thought and speech, howsoever unpalatable they might be to the ruling establishment, should be policed poses a grave danger for India as an open society.
The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Parliamentary panel faults Centre's move to disengage 7-decade-old NIRDPR
In a scathing attack on the Union government, the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Rural Development and Panchayat Raj has faulted the Union Ministry of Rural Development's (MoRD) move to disengage the Hyderabad-based seven-decade-old National Institute of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj (NIRDPR). The 10th report of the panel, headed by Saptagiri Sankar Ulaka, on the functioning of NIRDPR tabled in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha on Tuesday (July 22, 2025), raised several pertinent questions on the move to disengage the reputed autonomous organisation which has been known for its expertise in building capacities of rural development functionaries, elected representatives, financial institutions and community-based organisations. In its 35-page report, the panel minced no words in pointing that any move to delink NIRDPR from MoRD represents not only an administrative change but a fundamental shift away from core national priorities. It pointed out that the institution has grown under the aegis of MoRD with global recognition, a highly qualified faculty, vast infrastructure and an expansive reach. Undermines credibility 'Hence, the Committee opines that any disengagement as decided by the government undermines its credibility and authority in policymaking likely to dilute the quality of long-term research and training, divert it into unrelated or short-term consultative activities and sever its intellectual alignment with the rural development ecosystem,' it observed. It did not stop at that and wondered that it was at a loss to understand that such a centre of excellence instrumental in nation building and national development especially in rural areas since the last 70-years, has to be abruptly disengaged by the government with the sole aim of furthering 'minimum government and maximum governance'. The panel opined that disengagement will not reduce government expenditure. Instead, it will shift costs to various agencies with disparate mandates, further increasing the burden on MoRD officers for oversight and coordination. 'Moreover, the financial instability due to disengagement may force the institution to drift away from supporting the flagship programmes/schemes of rural development,' it mentioned in the report. Stating that rather than disengagement, the need of the hour is to forge deeper strategic collaboration between MoRD and NIRDPR through structural reforms, decentralised decision making, adequate allocation of budgetary grant-in-aid and with greater autonomy, allow the institute to thrive and grow within the existing MoRD framework. Keeping in view the immense contribution of NIRD & PR, it wanted MoRD to take the lead and come out with a strategic plan/new roadmap and prevail upon the Department of Expenditure to halt the disengagement and allow the institute to continue and sustain itself. Flags lack of internal review A serious lapse it found was how the disengagement plan submitted to MoRD was neither internally reviewed nor externally validated, making it the work of a single individual rather than a collective institutional vision. 'Infrastructure has been poorly maintained under the guise of cost-cutting, leading to declining training ratings and a diminishing brand image,' the report mentioned and pointed out how the faculty morale is at an all-time low due to ad hoc inter-centre transfer policy, unresolved vigilance cases (non-financial in nature), long-pending promotions through Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) and lack of leadership trust. It did not mince words in stating that the over the past four years, the institute got paralysed by the present administration. Finally, the panel also disapproved the attitude of the present executive council towards the problems being faced by the employees serving and retired who are not able to get their salary/pension in time. In view of the above, the Committee strongly recommend the MoRD to expeditiously constitute a committee under its supervision to oversee 19 administrative and governance matters so as to prevent the situation from going bad to worse. In order to ensure effective leadership and institutional stability, the Committee wanted immediate review and replacement of the current administration, which has failed to maintain faculty trust or organisational coherence and till then grant already extended by the government may be continued. It favoured constitution of a MoRD led Committee to oversee administrative and governance matters at NIRD&PR.
India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
Why chase someone who won't fight: Smriti Irani's 'tone shift' on Rahul Gandhi
Union Minister Smriti Irani, once known for her fierce criticism of Rahul Gandhi, now appears markedly more conciliatory toward the Congress leader. In an exclusive interview with India Today Group's Anjana Om Kashyap, Irani was asked why she no longer takes an aggressive stance against Gandhi. Her response was direct and pointed: 'Because the Gandhi family refused to fight me in 2024.'advertisementIrani, who famously defeated Rahul Gandhi in 2019 in his long-held Amethi constituency, said that with Gandhi opting out of contesting from Amethi in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, there was no political battle to engage in.'If they aren't even stepping into the battlefield, what am I supposed to say? I can't go chasing after them,' Smriti Irani said. During the interview, Smriti Irani also pointed out that the Gandhi family moved to contest from Wayanad due to its favourable social demographics.'No intelligent leader willingly chooses a seat where defeat is certain,' she said. 'If a seat like that is given, it's only out of duty to the party. But in 2019, I turned the impossible into possible.'Irani also reflected on her journey and recalled her defeat in Amethi in 2014. She said that she spent the next five years working tirelessly on the ground.'I cleaned drains myself, brought electricity to villages, built over a lakh homes, set up a medical college, a 200 bed hospital, a collector's office, a police line and even a fire station,' she Anjana Om Kashyap asked whether Irani could have defeated Rahul Gandhi again if he had contested in 2024, Irani responded with a smile, 'Absolutely, that's why he didn't contest.'Irani also spoke about the emotional toll of being removed from Amethi, calling it a place she is deeply connected with. 'If I had not worked and people had said I did not deliver on my promises, that would have hurt more. But I did everything I could,' she asked why she lost, Irani responded, 'Because there's a diference between work and political equations. Those who are in politics understand this – electoral politics isn't the same as national service.'When asked whether stepping away from Amethi and the government left her feeling uprooted, she admitted, 'Maybe.''Because I defeated the national president of Congress, I had to tolerate a few barbs,' she Irani clarified that her return to television does not signal a retirement from politics. Dismissing speculation, she said, 'Who retires at 49? At 49, most people's careers are just beginning and I have already been a Member of Parliament three times,' she added with a Irani is making her comeback on the screen with the same show that made her a household name 25 years ago, Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi.- EndsMust Watch
