
SUPP Youth chief urges swift action to address judicial leadership vacuum
SIBU (July 12): Sarawak United Peoples' Party (SUPP) Youth Chief Councillor Kevin Lau has called for urgent action to safeguard the independence, stability, and integrity of Malaysia's judiciary, stressing that these principles are enshrined in the Federal Constitution.
He urged the federal government to swiftly address growing concerns over a potential leadership vacuum at the highest levels of the judiciary.
Lau emphasised that this is not merely an institutional matter, but a national issue that, if left unresolved, could significantly erode public confidence in the judicial system.
'Public trust in the judiciary is paramount, and that trust hinges on a transparent, fair, and credible appointment process,' he said in a statement.
Lau pointed out that the recent retirements of the Chief Justice and the President of the Court of Appeal – along with reports indicating that over half the current Federal Court bench is due to retire this year – have raised serious concerns about judicial succession.
He acknowledged that these retirements are expected under the judicial tenure system but said the apparent absence of clear succession planning undermines public assurance in the judiciary's stability.
'We must remember that the judiciary is one of the three pillars of democracy. The moment its leadership appears uncertain or unprepared for succession, the risk of undermining the public's trust in our legal system increases significantly.
'The perception of stability, impartiality and continuity is essential for the rule of law to function effectively in any democratic society,' Lau said.
Commenting on recent interim appointments – where Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Hashim has been named Acting Chief Justice, and Federal Court Judge Datuk Zabariah Yusof is serving as Acting President of the Court of Appeal – Lau warned that holding dual roles at the top level may compromise judicial efficiency and accountability.
'While we acknowledge that interim measures are sometimes necessary, the fact that two of the most senior judges are now shouldering two top-tier judicial positions concurrently is far from ideal,' said Lau.
'These roles each demand full focus, dedication, and time. To expect one individual to bear the burden of two major national responsibilities is unsustainable and unjust to the office and to the persons carrying them.'
Lau urged the federal government to act swiftly and decisively to fill the top judicial posts through a process that upholds transparency, impartiality, and strict adherence to the Federal Constitution.
He also stressed the importance of preserving the independence and integrity of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), which plays a critical role in identifying and recommending the most qualified and impartial candidates for appointment to the superior courts.
SUPP Youth, Lau said, fully supports the recent statement by Istana Negara emphasising the importance of constitutional compliance and integrity in judicial appointments.
He lauded the King's principled stand, noting that the appointment of top judges is a national issue that must be handled with care, transparency, and without undue influence or delay.
'We hope all political parties, civil society, and legal institutions heed the wisdom in the King's message.
'This is a moment for all Malaysians to unite in defence of judicial independence and constitutional integrity. It is not about partisan politics – it is about ensuring that justice is preserved for all, without fear or favour,' said Lau. judiciary Kevin Lau SUPP Youth

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Express
40 minutes ago
- Daily Express
King must follow pardons board's advice, lawyer tells court
Published on: Thursday, August 14, 2025 Published on: Thu, Aug 14, 2025 By: V Anbalagan, FMT Text Size: The Malaysian Bar took its case to the Court of Appeal, seeking to overturn a lower court's refusal to grant leave for a judicial review against the Federal Territories Pardons Board's decision in Najib Razak's SRC International case. PUTRAJAYA: The Yang di-Pertuan Agong is required to follow the advice of the Federal Territories Pardons Board (FTPB) following a 1994 constitutional amendment, the Court of Appeal heard today. Lawyer Yeo Yang Poh said there could only be one decision in the pardon process after Article 40(1A) was added to the Federal Constitution that year. The provision stipulates that the king 'shall accept and act in accordance with' advice in the exercise of his functions under the constitution or federal law. 'The FTPB now decides for the king, which is in line with a constitutional monarchy. 'The king does not make a second decision,' Yeo said in the Malaysian Bar's appeal to reverse the High Court's refusal to grant leave for a judicial review challenging the FTPB's decision in former prime minister Najib Razak's SRC International case. The appeal was heard by Justices Lim Chong Fong, Azhahari Kamal Ramli, and Leonard David Shim. On Feb 2, 2024, the FTPB announced that the former prime minister's prison sentence following his conviction in the SRC case had been reduced from 12 years to six, and his fine from RM210 million to RM50 million. Yeo, who appeared with Zainur Zakaria, Rajpal Singh Ghai, and Ahmad Amir Mahmood, said previously that the personal decision made by the king was held to be non-justiciable. 'After Article 40(1A), the king no longer has personal discretion, without which no prerogative exists,' he added. He said the king now exercised his constitutional power by accepting and implementing the FTPB's decision, and that the constitutional change elevated the monarch above the fray of any perceived political influence or personal preference. 'A decision made by a statutory body such as the FTPB is justiciable,' he said, adding that the Bar's leave application was far from frivolous. Yeo said the courts had consistently taken the position, following the 1985 case of Sim Kie Chon v Superintendent of Pudu Prison & Others, that the decision of a pardons board is not subject to legal challenge, as they were in the UK. In November last year, Justice Ahmad Kamal Shahid held that the king's decision and the FTPB's advice were part and parcel of a single process culminating in the pardon. Consequently, Ahmad Kamal, now a Court of Appeal judge, said that the subject matter of the Bar's proposed judicial review application was not suitable or appropriate to be reviewed by the court. The judge ruled that the prerogative of mercy, under Article 42 of the constitution, involved a direct exercise of the king's personal discretion. The Bar filed its application in the High Court on April 26, 2024, naming the FTPB and Najib as respondents. It sought declarations that the FTPB's Jan 29 decision halving Najib's prison sentence and reducing his fine was illegal, unconstitutional, and invalid. Najib was convicted of misappropriating RM42 million from SRC and has been serving his sentence in Kajang prison since Aug 23, 2022. He filed a petition for a royal pardon on Sept 2, 2022. Senior federal counsel Ahmad Hanir Hambaly appeared for the FTPB, while Shafee Abdullah represented Najib. The hearing has been adjourned to a date to be fixed after case management on Aug 18. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia


The Sun
40 minutes ago
- The Sun
Proposal to separate AG and public prosecutor roles to be tabled in cabinet
KUALA LUMPUR: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has confirmed that a proposal to separate the roles of Attorney General and Public Prosecutor will be presented to the Cabinet by the end of August. This move is part of the MADANI Government's legal reform agenda, implemented within two and a half years in office. 'This separation has long been demanded, and the Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) will table it to the Cabinet at the end of this month,' Anwar said during Minister's Question Time in the Dewan Rakyat. He was responding to a question from Datuk Rosol Wahid (PN-Hulu Terengganu) regarding outdated laws under review and their implementation timeline. Anwar noted that the government has introduced 23 legal reforms, including two constitutional amendments. Key reforms include amendments to the Evidence of Child Witness Act and the enactment of the Public Finance and Fiscal Responsibility Act 2023. Other significant changes include the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023 and the Ombudsman Bill 2025. 'I must emphasise that this record over two and a half years has yet to be matched by any previous administration,' Anwar said. The Prime Minister highlighted that five new acts were introduced and 34 amended in 2023. In 2024, another five new acts were enacted and 57 amended. This year, four new acts have been passed, with six amended and two new bills introduced. On anti-party-hopping laws, Anwar stated he supports strengthening the current legislation. He recalled proposing stricter anti-defection laws as Opposition Leader, which were not included in the Federal Constitution (Amendment) (No. 3) Act 2022. 'So while new proposals are welcome, let's not forget who previously blocked such efforts,' Anwar remarked. - Bernama


Focus Malaysia
4 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
'Not easy for even TunM to sue PMX as he has great persuasive power to delay trial'
SUCH seems to be the contention of blogger and veteran journalist Datuk A. Kadir Jasin after former unity minister and lawyer Waytha Moorthy Ponnusamy filed an originating summons seeking a declaration that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim should not have been elected as a MP nor be appointed as Prime Minister (PM). Filed on Tuesday (Aug 12) which was two days after his 78th birthday on Aug 10, this would have constituted the third high-profile civil suit filed against PMX. The two existing cases are a defamation suit by Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad demanding an apology and damages of RM150 mil and that by PMX's former research assistant Mohammed Yusoff Rawther alleging sexual assault. 'With another civil suit against him (PMX), it is no wonder that he and his supporters are feeling desperate. Who knows if more civil suits will be filed,' penned Kadir in his latest Facebook post. 'However, under the Westminster system which is the model of our government, the PM possesses great power to persuade. He can use many methods to delay the trial.' No express trail for TunM's suit For the record, Waytha who is also the Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF)/Malaysian Advancement Party (MAP) founder wants the High Court to declare that PMX's election as the Tambun MP on Nov 19, 2022 and his subsequent appointment as PM on Nov 24 that year are null and void. This is on the grounds that the pardon by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong in 2018 did not state that PMX was exempted from losing the right to contest for a five-year period from the date of his release from prison. As it is, the Article 48(1)(e) in the Federal Constitution prohibits a criminal sentenced to more than one year in prison and a fine of more than RM2,000 from contesting elections for five years after his release. Recall that PMX was sentenced to five years in prison by the Federal Court in 2015 in his second sodomy case. In addition to PMX's influence, Kadir contended that judicial bureaucracy also stood in the way as has happened the trial of Dr Mahathir's suit. 'It was submitted on May 5, 2023. It has been more than two years. The judge has changed twice. Now a third one will be appointed,' recounted the national journalism laureate. 'In the Yusoff Rawther case, the trial was delayed because last May Anwar asked the High Court to allow him to refer eight questions to the Federal Court pertaining to his 'immunity' as PM. 'We've to understand that even by changing lawyers, the trial can be delayed. That is what Anwar did on May 28. He changed the line of lawyers representing him in the Yusoff Rawther suit.' 'Playing the delay game' Given the afore-mentioned circumstances, Kadir is of the view that both PMX's backers who are hoping for an immediate clean-up of their idol's name as well as opposition supporters who want him to be removed as soon as possible are bound to be disappointed. 'These cases cannot be completed in a month or two. It can even drag on for years. There're civil cases that have been going on for more than a decade but have not been resolved,' asserted the former group editor-in-chief of mainstream New Straits Times. 'So there is no big problem for Anwar's lawyers to delay the trial of these civil cases until the next general election which must be held no later than February 17, 2028.' Instead of hoping for the impossible to materialise, Kadir who was Dr Mahathir's media and communications adviser during the latter's second premiership suggested that 'the best thing for the opposition and their supporters is to use these cases as political campaign material'. 'In many ways, whether from an official or personal perspective, the PM is vulnerable. He can be reprimanded, criticised and even sued. Even to holding mass protests so that he is removed,' observed the veteran newsman. 'As a reminder, as I wrote briefly in my FB page on Tuesday (Aug 12), 'If you aspire to become a public figure, the best policy is not to be found guilty'.' – Aug 14, 2025