Ex-lawyer for El Chapo wins judge position in Mexico
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) -Silvia Delgado, a former lawyer for drug kingpin Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman, has won a criminal judge position in Mexico's controversial judicial elections, results showed on Tuesday.
Delgado's candidacy drew scrutiny from opponents to the judicial overhaul, one of the most radical to be enacted by any country in the Western Hemisphere in recent years, stoking concerns that the vote could threaten Mexico's rule of law.
Civil rights group Defensorxs highlighted Delgado, a Chihuahua state-based attorney who represented the notorious former chief of the Sinaloa Cartel in 2016, as a "high risk candidate" for her past ties to El Chapo, a characterization she vehemently rejected.
Critics saw Delgado's bid to become a criminal court judge in the border town Ciudad Juarez as emblematic of broader fears about the vote's threat to Mexican democracy, and the possible removal of checks and balances on the ruling Morena party and the increasing influence of organized crime groups over the judiciary.
The June 1 vote, which stemmed from a sweeping constitutional reform in September 2024, was the first-of-its-kind with Mexico's electorate voting for more than 840 federal judge and magistrate positions, including Supreme Court justices, and thousands more local positions.
Analysts say the newly elected Supreme Court leans heavily towards Morena.
An online vote tally by Chihuahua state electoral body IEE, with 100% of ballots accounted for, showed Delgado netted the second-highest number of votes, securing her a judge position. The results had not yet been formalized on Tuesday afternoon.
As an attorney on El Chapo's legal team, Delgado visited him weekly in prison to share updates before he was extradited to the United States and eventually sentenced to life in prison.
Delgado said she would not comment until her win was formally confirmed.
Defensorxs President Miguel Meza called on Delgado's competitors to file a lawsuit to block her victory on the basis that she does not meet a Constitutional requirement that candidates be of "good reputation."
Defensorxs also flagged a number of other candidates it said should not have been allowed to run, and Meza said the organization had filed complaints for about 20 winning candidates to Mexico's federal electoral authority INE. Meza said the authority had so far not disqualified anyone.
"What INE is doing is basically eliminating the good reputation requirement which is in the Constitution," Meza said in an interview with Reuters.
A media representative for INE declined to comment. The authority has said it would investigate complaints and invalidate any winning candidates deemed unfit for office.
(Reporting by Cassandra Garrison; editing by Stephen Eisenhammer and Leslie Adler)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Paetongtarn denies damaging PM's dignity in Constitutional Court submission
BANGKOK: Suspended Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra submitted an explanation to the Constitutional Court, denying the allegations that her actions tarnished the dignity of the Prime Minister's position. Paetongtarn's submission follows the case where the Constitutional Court is set to deliver a ruling on Aug 29 regarding a request from the Senate President to decide whether Paetongtarn's tenure as a minister has ended, based on Articles 170, paragraph 1 (4), and 160 (4) and (5) of the Constitution. The Court will also hold hearings for two witnesses, Paetongtarn and the Secretary-General of the National Security Council, on Aug 21, with closing statements due by Aug 27. Isranews Agency reported receiving Paetongtarn's submission in response to the case concerning her audio conversation with Cambodian Senate President Hun Sen. In her submission, Paetongtarn affirmed that her actions, as alleged by the petitioner, did not violate or breach the 2021 Civil Service Code of Ethics. Moreover, she argued that her actions did not cause harm to the dignity of the Prime Minister's office or undermine public confidence in the integrity and appropriateness of her position. Paetongtarn has also requested the Court to allow the hearing of five expert witnesses to provide a comprehensive understanding of the case, taking into account the geopolitical context and the history of Thai-Cambodian border conflicts. She has asked the Court to consider the following individuals: Chatchai Bangchuad, Secretary-General of the National Security Council, as a key figure involved with the military chiefs and who understands her intentions in the conversation with Hun Sen. Unsit Sampuntharat, Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Interior, responsible for border governance. Gen Puchong Rattanawan, retired expert on Cambodia, with extensive experience working in Cambodia alongside Gen Surayud Chulanont. Lt Gen Puttipong Cheepsamut, Deputy Judge Advocate General, expert in military security law and national sovereignty issues. Thanathip Uppatsrung, former Thai ambassador to Japan, the Philippines, and Russia, with expertise in foreign relations and diplomatic practices. Paetongtarn emphasised that these five witnesses have profound expertise in national security, border issues, and international diplomacy, and possess knowledge of her true intentions during her conversation with Hun Sen. She explained that her actions were in line with national security protocols and aimed at maintaining Thailand's sovereignty, rather than the alleged motives claimed by the petitioner. Paetongtarn requested the Court to allow the examination of these witnesses to ensure a thorough, fair, and unbiased hearing of the case, thus preserving her legitimacy and status as Prime Minister. In light of the potential damage caused by her suspension, Paetongtarn argued that continuing her duties as Prime Minister would serve the national interest and sovereignty. She asserted that this would also reinforce the government's collaboration with the military, sending a strong message to Cambodia regarding Thailand's resolve to protect its borders. She has requested the Court to lift the interim measures that would otherwise bar her from performing her duties until a final ruling is made. This would allow her to continue her role as Prime Minister in the interim. Paetongtarn's request includes two points: First request: That the Court consider the testimony and evidence from the five expert witnesses in the examination and ruling process, in accordance with the 2019 Constitutional Court Procedure and the 2018 Constitutional Court Law. This would allow the Court to explore all facts comprehensively, whether in her favour or otherwise, and to evaluate all types of evidence, as mandated by the Court's regulations. Second request: That the Court reconsider the interim measures under Section 71 of the 2018 Constitutional Court Law, lifting the order that suspends her from her duties. This would allow her to continue performing her Prime Ministerial duties until the Court renders its final decision. - The Nation/ANN
The Sun
8 hours ago
- The Sun
US appeals court lets Trump cut billions in foreign aid
WASHINGTON: A federal appeals court on Wednesday lifted an injunction that required the U.S. State Department to continue making foreign aid payments, handing a victory to President Donald Trump. In a 2-1 decision, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said a lower court erred by ordering the Trump administration to restore foreign assistance payments previously approved by Congress. Trump imposed a 90-day pause on all foreign aid on January 20, the same day he was inaugurated for a second term in the White House. His executive order was followed by aggressive moves to gut USAID, the main U.S. foreign aid agency, including by placing much of its staff on leave and exploring bringing the formerly independent agency under the State Department. Two nonprofit groups that receive federal funding, AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition and Journalism Development Network, brought litigation alleging Trump's funding freeze was unlawful. U.S. District Judge Amir Ali, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, ordered the Trump administration to pay nearly $2 billion in outstanding aid to its humanitarian partners worldwide. Writing for the two-judge majority, Circuit Judge Karen Henderson said the nonprofit groups 'lack a cause of action to press their claims' and therefore failed to satisfy the requirements for an injunction. Henderson wrote that only the U.S. Government Accountability Office, a watchdog agency, could challenge the president's efforts to withhold foreign aid funding. Henderson, who was appointed to the appeals court by President George H.W. Bush, said the court was not addressing the question of whether Trump's foreign aid freeze violated the U.S. Constitution by infringing on the spending power of Congress. Henderson's opinion was joined by Circuit Judge Gregory Katsas, a Trump appointee. Circuit Judge Florence Pan, a Biden appointee, wrote in a dissenting opinion that her colleagues were allowing the Trump administration to disregard federal law and the separation of powers outlined in the Constitution. 'The court's acquiescence in and facilitation of the Executive's unlawful behavior derails the carefully crafted system of checked and balanced power that serves as the greatest security against tyranny - the accumulation of excessive authority in a single Branch,' Pan wrote. A spokesperson for the Office of Management and Budget, the White House's budget office, said the ruling stops 'radical left dark money groups' from 'maliciously interfering with the president's ability to spend responsibly and to administer foreign aid in a lawful manner in alignment with his America First policies.'- REUTERS
The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
Mexico, under pressure from Trump, transfers 26 more cartel members to US
Members of Mexico's federal forces escort a prisoner wanted in the U.S. for ties to drug-trafficking groups at the Altiplano high-security prison, before transferring them to Toluca International Airport, amid pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump to dismantle drug cartels, in Almoloya de Juarez, Mexico, August 12, 2025. Gabinete de Seguridad de Mexico/Handout via REUTERS MEXICO CITY (Reuters) -Mexico sent more than two dozen suspected cartel members to the U.S. on Tuesday, amid rising pressure from President Donald Trump on Mexico to dismantle the country's powerful drug organizations. Authorities shipped 26 prisoners wanted in the U.S. for ties to drug-trafficking groups, Mexico's attorney general's office and security ministry said in a joint statement. Mexico said the U.S. Department of Justice had requested their extradition and that it would not seek the death penalty for the accused cartel members. The transfer is the second of its kind this year. In February, Mexican authorities sent 29 alleged cartel leaders to the U.S., sparking a debate about the political and legal grounds for such a move. That Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum permitted yet another large-scale extradition of Mexican nationals underscores the balancing act she faces as she seeks to appease Trump while also avoiding unilateral U.S. military action in Mexico. In a statement, the U.S. Embassy said among those extradited were key figures in the Jalisco New Generation Cartel and the Sinaloa Cartel, which are Mexico's two dominant organized crime groups. 'This transfer is yet another example of what is possible when two governments unite against violence and impunity," U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Ronald Johnson said in a statement. "These fugitives will now face justice in American courts, and the citizens of both our nations will be safer.' Trump has tied tariffs on Mexico to the deadly fentanyl trade, claiming the country hasn't tackled drug cartels aggressively enough. Last week, he directed the Pentagon to prepare operations against Mexican drug gangs that have been designated global terrorist organizations. Sheinbaum has said the U.S. and Mexico are nearing a security agreement to expand cooperation in the fight against cartels. But she has flatly rejected suggestions by the Trump administration that it could carry out unilateral military operations in Mexico. (Additional reporting by Mrinmay Dey in Bengaluru; Editing by Chris Reese, Cassandra Garrison and Lincoln Feast.)
