logo
Govt should ensure disabled-friendly infra in public places, rules Kerala HC

Govt should ensure disabled-friendly infra in public places, rules Kerala HC

Time of India06-06-2025
Kochi: High court, in a significant judgment, held that the state govt must ensure that infrastructure facilities in public places are accessible to persons with disabilities, and observed that if the govt fails to provide such facilities, a govt servant cannot be compelled to work in a manner that goes against their physical ability.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The court was considering a petition filed by the state challenging the Kerala Administrative Tribunal's (KAT) order allowing an interdepartmental transfer to T Rajeev, a senior grade typist in the motor vehicles department (MVD), Thrissur, on account of his physical disability, and dismissing the decision to reduce his salary.
Rajeev had sought a transfer to the irrigation department, citing his inability to climb the upper floor of the building where the MVD office is located.
He requested to be appointed as an LD typist in the irrigation department's Thalappilly subdivision office, which functions from the ground floor of the same building. The govt rejected his application, prompting him to approach the KAT, which in 2020 directed consideration of his request in light of the provisions under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
While the govt subsequently permitted the transfer, it reduced his salary from that of a senior grade typist to that of an LD typist, despite his claim to the higher scale.
This led to further litigation, and the tribunal held that Rajeev was entitled to retain his original salary, and any reduction would violate the provisions of the Disabilities Act. The state then moved HC against the tribunal's orders.
Examining the matter, HC observed that it was the govt's statutory duty to provide a physical environment conducive to Rajeev's abilities. Instead of addressing the issue, it was Rajeev who found a practical solution by seeking an interdepartmental transfer.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
HC emphasised that the govt cannot abdicate its responsibility under the Disabilities Act.
The division bench set aside the interdepartmental transfer. It clarified that Rajeev cannot be forced to take the staircase to the upper floor and must be provided with a working environment suitable to his condition. The court also directed the state to issue appropriate orders within a month and continue paying Rajeev the salary he is entitled to.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bombay high court dismisses election petition against BJP legislator R Tamil Selvan
Bombay high court dismisses election petition against BJP legislator R Tamil Selvan

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Bombay high court dismisses election petition against BJP legislator R Tamil Selvan

MUMBAI: Observing that the petition comprised vague and generic pleadings, the Bombay High Court on Tuesday dismissed an election petition filed against the victory of Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) legislator Captain R Tamil Selvan. He won from the Sion-Koliwada constituency in the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly elections. Selvan petitioned the HC for the dismissal of the petition filed by Ganesh Kumar Yadav, the Indian National Congress (INC) candidate who emerged with the second-highest votes. Yadav earlier this year filed the election petition and, through his counsel Premlal Krishnan, challenged Selvan's election on grounds of non-compliance with certain rules and provisions, including those governing valid nominations under Section 33 of the Representation of People (RP) Act. Justice Milind Jadhav, who pronounced the judgment on Tuesday, said, 'It is, however, prima facie seen that the Election Petition comprises vague and generic pleadings and there is a complete absence of material facts.' Krishnan argued that averments in the petition were enough to lay the foundation for the challenge. Justice Jadhav noted that Krishnan 'fairly argued that though what Petitioner will prove in evidence is not specifically in so many words stated in the Election Petition … Petitioner should be allowed to prove the same in trial. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Resmed AirSense 11 with flat 20% off ResMed Buy Now Undo ' Justice Jadhav, after hearing senior counsel Veerendra Tulzapurkar, who represented Selvan, said he did not subscribe to Krishnan's submission. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai | Gold Rates Today in Mumbai | Silver Rates Today in Mumbai The allegations, including 'non-disclosure' of an arbitration award in favour of the Railways, were of 'vague violations' by Selvan with no specific details whatsoever, the HC said, adding, 'Alleged omissions do not amount to non-compliance with provisions of Section 33 or Rule 4A so as to constitute a defect of substantial character under Section 36(4) of the RP Act.' The HC said, 'It is seen that on scrutiny, the Returning Officer has not found any ambiguity or mistake, much less, non-disclosure or falsehood which can be deemed as suppression. It is in this context that when the Election Petitioner approaches the Court, he has to make a concise material statement of facts with all details in the Petition itself at the threshold. The Petitioner cannot improve his case in further pleadings, which is the attempt of Petitioner before me. ' Once Selvan's nomination was held to be valid, it is deemed accepted and can only be rejected at the time of scrutiny. When the Returning Officer on scrutiny endorses each nomination, the nomination is considered valid, the HC held. The HC agreed with Tulzapurkar's submissions seeking dismissal of the EP as it does not contain a concise statement of material facts as mandated under Section 83(1)(a) of the RP Act. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.

Supreme Court collegium recommends names of 14 advocates for Bombay HC Judgeship
Supreme Court collegium recommends names of 14 advocates for Bombay HC Judgeship

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Supreme Court collegium recommends names of 14 advocates for Bombay HC Judgeship

MUMBAI : The Supreme Court Collegium on Tuesday issued two resolutions and recommended 14 names, all advocates, to be appointed as Judges of the Bombay High Court. Their actual appointment would happen only once the Centre clears the names and a final notification of appointment under the seal of the President of India is issued. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan Gavai who leads the Collegium, since his elevation in May, has already ensured the appointment of five new Judges for the Bombay HC, taking the Judge strength to 69-includes 19 additional Judges. If all 14 get appointment the HC Judge-count will cross 80 for the first time and be 83, 11 short of the sanctioned strength of 94. Bombay HC is second largest after Allahabad HC in Judge strength. Judges when appointed, take oath as Additional Judges and usually after two years are appointed as permanent Judges. The names in one resolution include advocates Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre, Mehroz Ashraf Khan Pathan, Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale, Sandesh Dadasaheb Patil, Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat, Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar—the present public prosecutor of Maharashtra and often represented ED, Rajnish Ratnakar Vyas and Raj Damodar Wakode. Patil and Shirsat work with quiet dedication at the Principal bench of the HC representing Central agencies like Enforcement Directorate (ED) and Central Bureau of Investigation. The second set is of advocates Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande, Amit Satyavan Jamsandekar, Ashish Sahadev Chavan, Vaishali Nimbajirao Patil-Jadhav, Abasaheb Dharmaji Shinde, and Farhan Parvez Dubash. Chavan has been practicing criminal law and is a special public prosecutor for State in several matters as well as an empaneled counsel for ED and Dubash has been a secretary for one of India's oldest Bar Associations—the Bombay Bar Association. Deshpande, based in Nagpur has been the assistant Solicitor General of India for the Nagpur bench of the HC. Jamsandekar has been a lawyer for 26 years, genial and a leading commercial litigation Counsel with a keen focus on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR).

Civet Brings Kerala High Court To A Halt After Causing Concern At Houses Of CM & Opposition Leader
Civet Brings Kerala High Court To A Halt After Causing Concern At Houses Of CM & Opposition Leader

News18

time3 hours ago

  • News18

Civet Brings Kerala High Court To A Halt After Causing Concern At Houses Of CM & Opposition Leader

Last Updated: The proceedings before a division bench of Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji were disrupted due to a stench left behind by a common palm civet News18 The Kerala High Court (HC) witnessed bizarre scenes on Tuesday morning after judges, lawyers and court staff were forced to leave the Chief Justice's courtroom due to a strong stink. The proceedings before a division bench of Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji were disrupted due to a stench left behind by a common palm civet. Due to the horrible smell, the division bench adjourned all matters that were listed before it. Court number 1, where the Chief Justice hears matters, rose after less than 30 minutes of sitting. A common palm civet, also known as the Asian palm civet or toddy cat, believed to have strayed into the HC premises from the Mangalavanam bird sanctuary close to the court, was found to have urinated at night. Known for its pungent urine, the animal often makes its presence felt in enclosed spaces. More than a year ago, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and Leader of Opposition VD Satheesan had narrated the troubles due to civet cats at their official residences, both old mansions in the state's capital. Vijayan had said the animals were disturbing his sleep by hurrying across the tiled roof at night and could not leave a glass of water uncovered in the bedroom at Cliff House, while Satheesan has faced the same issue at his official residence, Cantonment House, some 2.5 km away from the former. Its proximity to the 2.74-hectare protected bird sanctuary is one of the issues that were raised by those who called for moving the HC from Kochi city to the suburb of Kalamassery. The mangrove located in the heart of Kochi is routinely visited by migratory birds. Asian Palm Civets, also known as toddy cats, a nocturnal mammal species found both in forests and urban areas, are protected animals. Known for its ability to adapt to all kinds of habitats, the animal is widely found in South and Southeast Asia. The Asian Palm Civet is a nocturnal mammal usually found near palm groves and fruit-bearing trees. In Kerala, it is commonly spotted in old houses with tiled roofs as it takes refuge between the roof and the wooden ceiling structure. Termed harmless by zoologists, it is an omnivore and feeds mostly on fruits and berries and occasionally small mammals and insects. It is known to be most active between dusk and dawn. view comments First Published: August 20, 2025, 14:14 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store