Philadelphia Eagles 2025 win total futures, over/under and odds
Eagles: Win total odds & over/under
NFL odds courtesy of BetMGM Sportsbook. Odds updated Tuesday at 4:45 a.m. ET. For a full list of sports betting odds, access USA TODAY Sports Betting Scores Odds Hub.
Eagles 2025 schedule
Eagles 2024 splits
Eagles 2024 player stats
Our team of savvy editors independently handpicks all recommendations. If you purchase through our links, the USA Today Network may earn a commission. Prices were accurate at the time of publication but may change.
Gambling involves risk. Please only gamble with funds that you can comfortably afford to lose. While we do our utmost to offer good advice and information we cannot be held responsible for any loss that may be incurred as a result of gambling. We do our best to make sure all the information that we provide on this site is correct. However, from time to time mistakes will be made and we will not be held liable. Please check any stats or information if you are unsure how accurate they are. No guarantees are made with regards to results or financial gain. All forms of betting carry financial risk and it is up to the individual to make bets with or without the assistance of information provided on this site and we cannot be held responsible for any loss that may be incurred as a result of following the betting tips provided on this site. Past performances do not guarantee success in the future and betting odds fluctuate from one minute to the next. The material contained on this site is intended to inform, entertain and educate the reader and in no way represents an inducement to gamble legally or illegally or any sort of professional advice.
Gannett may earn revenue from sports betting operators for audience referrals to betting services. Sports betting operators have no influence over nor are any such revenues in any way dependent on or linked to the newsrooms or news coverage. Terms apply, see operator site for Terms and Conditions. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, help is available. Call the National Council on Problem Gambling 24/7 at 1-800-GAMBLER (NJ, OH), 1-800-522-4700 (CO), 1-800-BETS-OFF (IA), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN). Must be 21 or older to gamble. Sports betting and gambling are not legal in all locations. Be sure to comply with laws applicable where you reside. It is your sole responsibility to act in accordance with your local laws.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
2025 NFL betting preview: Favorite bets for NFL Coach of the Year
Picking the NFL Coach of the Year isn't actually that hard. Well, at least compared to betting markets involving players. The extensive offerings require evaluation of dozens of players, whose production hinges on usage, play-calling, injuries and other factors. Meanwhile, we can rule out roughly half of the NFL's head coaches — those with no chance of winning the award. Not because they've done anything wrong, but, in many cases, they've done so much right expectations are already too high. What could Andy Reid, Nick Sirianni and John Harbaugh's teams do to make voters believe it was the coach who should get the most credit? Sure enough, that answer is so convoluted with hypotheticals that the three favorites to win Super Bowl LX are lined up at the bottom of the oddsboard for Coach of the Year. What does it take to win? The key word is expectations — the X-factor built into the calculus for this betting market. The winner needs to overcome some negative elements on the way to team success, while not being overshadowed by the outstanding play of one of his players. Example: Quarterback Jayden Daniels' excellence last season took away just enough credit from the job Dan Quinn did in his first season with Washington. Here are my favorite bets for NFL Coach of the Year at BetMGM: Pete Carroll, Las Vegas Raiders (15-1) The betting market is already aware of the hurdles that many teams face, giving their head coach the inside track at exceeding expectations. Unsurprisingly, new coaches like Ben Johnson, Mike Vrabel, Liam Coen and Aaron Glenn are the top choices in the market, since the reason they are first-year coaches is because things went so badly last season that the predecessors were fired. While each should be improved, the trick is that the Bears, Patriots, Jaguars or Jets would need to make the playoffs for their head coach to win the award, since history says that's something of a prerequisite. The Bears could show promise and still be the fourth-best team in their division, while making the playoffs in the AFC means usurping one of the Chiefs, Chargers, Broncos, Bills, Ravens, Texans and Steelers — the first six of which are favored to return to the postseason. It doesn't help the Jaguars or Jets that very little has changed from a personnel perspective, while a Patriots' playoff run likely comes with Drake Maye taking something of a leap. Meanwhile, the Raiders have a combination of low expectations (a win total of 6.5), and a veteran quarterback in Geno Smith who is good enough to affect change while not challenging for a prestigious award. Dave Canales, Carolina Panthers (16-1) Kevin O'Connell was a predictable winner last season because he was an offensive coach with a playoff team who just needed to guide Sam Darnold into enough production to replace Kirk Cousins. It was a prime case of providing voters an answer to the question, 'What did you do?' when evaluating each candidate's coaching job. Like looking at last year's record, it's human nature for voters to factor in work that might have begun before this season. Canales got hired by the Panthers in 2024 because of his work with Baker Mayfield in Tampa Bay, and we've already seen some development in Bryce Young, as the 2023 No. 1 pick accounted for 20 touchdowns to just five interceptions after being benched early last season. The narrative might be that Canales is 'coaching up' Young — a player talented enough to also have won a Heisman Trophy. While the NFC is just as competitive as the AFC in regard to its seven playoff spots, the way to sneak into the postseason as a dark horse may come from winning the NFC South. Instead of backing Carolina to steal the division at around 4-to-1, if Canales gets even more out of Young, and the Panthers skip past the Falcons and Buccaneers, he'll be hard to beat for Coach of the Year. Even if it's close, with Canales' 14-to-1 odds providing a much better payout, that's enough to make it an avenue worth taking. Kyle Shanahan, San Francisco 49ers (20-1) The other way to win Coach of the Year is to make the leap from pretender to contender, while posting an outstanding record. For many years during his tenure, Shanahan's success came with the caveat that he had a loaded roster on both sides of the ball, and, as a result, he didn't win the award. This year, the 49ers are coming off a season in which they missed the playoffs and have lost some big names, so the human beings voting for this award might be pleasantly surprised if the Niners win 13 or 14 games after a six-win season. Luckily, as bettors, we're aware the betting market has San Francisco projected for 10 wins — so in reality, the probability of a big season is more like a mild hop than a huge leap. Plus, voters aren't likely to notice the 49ers' gaudy record will come against arguably the easiest schedule in the league. Mike Tomlin, Pittsburgh Steelers (35-1) Futures markets provide a variety of low-risk/high-reward ways to bet on a high-end outlier result for any team, since there is always a price worth playing for a potential result. Aaron Rodgers searches out the spotlight, hoping for more close-ups than the directors on the most recent season of 'The Bear.' But even if you don't think he is the answer for the Steelers this season, there isn't a 0% chance a team that made the playoffs last year with Russell Wilson can win a few more games with a former MVP. Instead of betting on the Steelers to win the AFC (20-1) or the AFC North (+550), if they end up being good enough to do either, Tomlin is likely to get much of the credit for integrating the enigmatic Rodgers. Especially since voters might be willing to find any good reason to reward the longtime Pittsburgh coach (who's never won this award), as the respect Tomlin commands is the primary reason anyone thinks this relationship has any chance of working. Lastly, something will inevitably happen that provides a hurdle for a head coach (like Kevin Stefanski managing the Browns' quarterback situation in 2023) we couldn't have seen coming in the preseason. And that's what makes this volatile market one worth monitoring for betting opportunities throughout the season as well. You can find more valuable bets and analysis from Yahoo Sports betting contributor, Matt Russell, at THE WINDOW.
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Fantasy Football: Everything you need to know about the RB Dead Zone for 2025
The "Running Back Dead Zone" has been a popular phrase in the fantasy football community for over five years. The term refers to a range in your fantasy draft, roughly in the third to sixth rounds, that has historically been populated by low-upside running backs who've rarely worked out. Typically, these dead zone running backs had a few shared characteristics: they were stuck on bad offenses, relied on volume alone for fantasy production and had underrated backfield competition that challenged their role as the starter during the season. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] If we look at Yahoo's ADP this year, though, a clear dead zone tier with guys who fit the above description doesn't immediately jump out. In this article, I'll sort through running back ADP to see if a dead zone even exists in drafts for 2025, and specific players to avoid. The 'Alive Zone' I mentioned that the standard running back dead zone definition encapsulates the third to sixth rounds of drafts. Recently, some infamous dead-zone failures in that range have been Mike Davis in 2021, Alexander Mattison in 2023 and Zamir White in 2024, all of whom were drafted in the top 60 but posted well under 4.0 yards per carry and ended up being plodders on some of the league's worst offenses. With that being said, if we look at the 30th-60th overall range of drafts this year, none of the running backs really fit the profile of Davis, Mattison, White and the other RB dead zone busts. Player Yahoo ADP Breece Hall 37 Chuba Hubbard 41.1 Kenneth Walker III 43.4 Alvin Kamara 43.9 Omarion Hampton 46..4 James Conner 47.8 David Montgomery 51.3 Joe Mixon 51.7 Running through these names, I do not really see any glaring red flags. Kamara is on the worst offense of the lot in New Orleans, but provides so much value as a pass-catcher that his offensive situation has hardly impacted his fantasy floor. Just last year, Kamara was the RB6 in fantasy points per game despite the Saints offense ranking 22nd in offensive EPA per play. Similarly, Hubbard put together a very respectable RB12 finish last season while playing on the 25th-ranked Panthers offense that is bound to improve in 2025. While the Jets' offensive outlook isn't great this year, they should be one of the more run-heavy teams in the league this year with Justin Fields under center and an elite offensive line. Hall's floor is also boosted by his pass-catching ability, and we saw him finish as the RB5 back in 2023 on a poor Jets offense. Walker and Conner are in similar boats as players on average offenses with potential volume competition from Zach Charbonnet and Trey Benson, respectively. Both Walker and Conner, when healthy, have proven that they can be reliable fantasy assets, though, so I struggle to actively avoid them in the fourth or fifth round of my draft. Walker specifically should benefit greatly from new Seahawks OC Klint Kubiak's zone-blocking run scheme, and the Seahawks made substantial improvements to their offensive line as well. I am a big fan of Walker this year in the fourth round of drafts, and I think he has a much higher ceiling than the receivers going in this range (Garrett Wilson and/or DK Metcalf). Hampton and Montgomery are unique cases that definitely do not fit the bill of a dead zone back. Hampton is a rookie first-round pick on a solid offense who should continue to leap up draft boards, and while Montgomery is the No. 2 back in the Lions offense, he has proven to be an impact fantasy contributor from that role for two straight years. I am avoiding Mixon right now in drafts, but more so due to his injury uncertainty than his situation. If I had to pick one of these players to disappoint, I would lean towards Hubbard, as he doesn't offer the pass-catching floor of Kamara or Hall and still may be stuck in a bottom-10 offense. The Panthers also signed Rico Dowdle in the offseason as backfield competition and he had a productive year himself as the RB1 in Dallas last season. But that is more of a specific issue with Hubbard than a larger problem among this tier of running backs. Has the Dead Zone Moved Down? Even if we look at the next 30 picks of the draft (picks 60-90), the seven running backs going in that range feel fairly priced. Player Yahoo ADP RJ Harvey 65.3 Tony Pollard 65.8 Isiah Pacheco 66.1 Kaleb Johnson 68.1 Aaron Jones Sr. 72.5 D'Andre Swift 72.9 TreVeyon Henderson 80.4 Brian Robinson Jr. 88.1 It stands out that there are three rookies going in this range: Harvey, Johnson and Henderson. I think this is reflective of the fantasy community generally getting smarter with their running back decision-making. Instead of spending an eighth-round pick on a capped-ceiling dead zone back, there is a lot more value in taking a chance on a rookie with league-winning upside, like Bucky Irving last year. All three of these rookies might not enter the season as the starter, but could provide massive upside during the second half of the year and are better value picks as a result. In prior years, I would imagine that the technical Day 1 starters on these teams would be drafted in this range, like Jaylen Warren, J.K. Dobbins and Rhamondre Stevenson. The fact that they aren't is a sign that drafters have gotten sharper. Pacheco, Robinson, Jones and Swift all fall into similar tiers for me as lower usage RB1s on good offenses. They have lower floors than the tier above due to a lack of guaranteed volume, but some of that will be offset by increased touchdown upside. Since none of these four are the most talented runners out there, I do think it's worth keeping an eye on their backups, like Jacory Croskey-Merritt in Washington and Kyle Monangai in Chicago. It's a long shot that these guys end up being fantasy contributors, but they have a smaller uphill battle than other backups if they flash to start the season. Generally, I probably will not be actively targeting this tier in drafts because I am a big fan of the wide receivers going in this range — players like Tetaiora McMillan, George Pickens, Jakobi Meyers and Jayden Reed. But, I would not fault you for drafting one of these safer running backs instead. That leaves Pollard, whom I would say is the lone traditional dead zone running back in drafts this year. Pollard is by no means a bad player, but he has lost a step since his Dallas days and has limited touchdown potential in the Titans offense. Furthermore, he faces competition from Tyjae Spears, who had a down season in an injury-riddled 2024 but was rather efficient both on the ground and through the air in 2023. Unless QB Cam Ward has an amazing rookie season, I think Pollard may struggle to return on his RB24 ADP. Final Thoughts This year's drafts do not feature the classic traps that once defined the running back dead zone. The backs in the 30-60 range all have strong profiles, with a mix of pass-catching upside, secure roles and competent offenses. Even the tier after that is sharper than years past, with the draft board favoring high-upside rookies and veterans in productive situations. If there is one player who comes close to fitting the old dead zone mold, it is Pollard, given his declining efficiency, lower touchdown ceiling and potential backfield competition. Beyond that, it feels like the dead zone is more of a cautionary tale from the past than a concrete rule in 2025.
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Fantasy Football: Saquon Barkley headlines 2025's regression candidates
Regression is just a word, amigos. It doesn't have to be a dirty word, and sometimes it can be a happy word. Smart fantasy football managers are always trying to identify outliers from the past, with the aim of being careful with what's likely to happen next. If a player ran unreasonably hot or cold in the prior season, we know that production is likely to level out in the following campaign. Lester Bangs tried to tell us this a long time ago: You'll meet everyone again on their long journey to the middle. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] Mind you, if you identify the right positive outliers (or avoid the right negative ones), you have a strong first step towards winning your league. So today's assignment is an important one — let's find some statistical outliers from the 2024 season and try to figure out how to project those situations going forward. QB Lamar Jackson, Ravens Jackson didn't win the MVP in 2024, but he surely had his best season, setting career bests in several categories (passing yards, touchdown passes, QB rating, touchdown to interception ratio; just to name a few). But his touchdown percentage of 8.6% will be hard to repeat — consider that he had rates of 4.2, 5.2 and 5.3 in the three previous seasons. Although Jackson probably just had what will stand as the best season of his career, it's also reflective of a talented player reaching total command of the game — like many athletes, Jackson found a spike year in his age-27 season. It's foolish to expect a major drop-off given Baltimore's loaded offense and the shrewd schemes of OC Todd Monken, and Jackson rightfully will be the QB1 on many (perhaps most) draft boards. Josh Allen would never admit it publicly, but he'd surely trade supporting casts in a second. RB Saquon Barkley, Eagles You surely know the stat by now — Barkley had 482 touches last year (including the playoffs), a gigantic number. But there's another stat I can't get out of my mind — Barkley's 15 touchdowns came with a staggering average of 29.4 yards last year, and he didn't have a single score from the 1-yard line (that's tush push territory for Jalen Hurts). Barkley enters his eighth season in the league, and he's missed at least three games in four of those seasons. It's a cinch he'll lose some of last year's touches, and the long touchdown rate isn't going to repeat either. I understand it's no fun to fade a player who just turned in the monster season Barkley had, but we need to skate to where the puck is headed, not where it's been. In the first round, I'd prefer younger backs like Bijan Robinson or Jahmyr Gibbs in front of Barkley. RB James Cook, Bills By the efficiency stats, Cook had a season similar to his career path last year — his YPC bumped up slightly, his success rate dipped slightly. His yards per reception and yards per target both fell, and he had 12 fewer catches than the previous season. But Cook landed as the RB8 because of how pure he ran with touchdowns — he spiked 18 times last year, after a modest six touchdowns in the previous season. Cook is unhappy with his contract, a situation that will likely clear itself up before opening week — although it's still worth mentioning. But it's extremely doubtful Cook can match last year's touchdown count, given that Buffalo has a mobile and athletic quarterback in Josh Allen and capable understudy backs in Ray Davis and Ty Johnson. And while Cook is the obvious head of this backfield, he's not really built to be a workhorse — he checks in at 190 pounds, and averages just under 16 touches per game over the past two seasons. Tread carefully here. QB Jordan Love, Packers Love tumbled from QB5 to QB17 last year, but that was mostly driven by volume. A slew of his key efficiency stats actually improved — Love had a better touchdown rate, a better sack-avoidance rate and a healthy jump in YPA. Two missed games contributed to his fantasy drop, though Love also slotted a modest QB18 in points per game. The Packers ranked 16th in pass rate over expected back in 2023, but they slipped to 31st last year — perhaps because Love suffered an MCL sprain at the end of the season-opening loss in Brazil. The Yahoo market is giving you a QB16 sticker on Love this summer, which obviously presents a profit opportunity. It's unlikely the Packers will be this run-heavy again. WR Tyreek Hill, Dolphins It got late awfully early for Hill in 2024 — he didn't have a single reception over 30 yards after Week 1. We saw a crash landing from Hill's efficiency (his YPC fell by 3.3 yards) and volume (he lost 48 targets, 38 catches and seven touchdowns from the previous season). Hill also missed the Pro Bowl for the first time in his nine-year career. Hill's year-long slump had a lot of factors — Tua Tagovailoa dealt with concussion problems, and the Miami offensive line didn't play well, which discouraged the team from calling deep pass plays. Unfortunately for Hill, Tagovailoa remains an injury risk, and the line still looks questionable. We also have to wonder about Hill's commitment (at times it seems like he's unhappy in Miami) and his level of skill (this is a 10-year vet heading into his age-31 season). Even with the market offering a discount on Hill, this is not a play I'm likely to make. If you want to bet on a comeback in this passing game, focus on Jaylen Waddle. TE Trey McBride, Cardinals Some people are allergic to pollen, or bees or certain kinds of medication. McBride's apparently holding a touchdown allergy. Despite 221 catches over three NFL seasons, he's only caught six touchdown passes. It's not for a lack of opportunity — McBride saw 21 red-zone targets last year, second-most among tight ends. But only one of those passes from in close went for a touchdown. Perhaps the Cardinals will get more creative with McBride this year — consider he did have one touchdown run last season. But it's possible his lack of scoring is directly tied to QB Kyler Murray, who's undersized at the position and might struggle to see the field properly when things condense at the goal line. My reservations on Murray won't allow me to label McBride a proactive pick, but I understand why some fantasy managers will target McBride, focusing on a high volume floor and the likelihood of positive touchdown regression.
