logo
2,400 grocery workers to decide whether Tony's Fresh Market will go union

2,400 grocery workers to decide whether Tony's Fresh Market will go union

Chicago Tribune25-03-2025

Over the next three days, 2,400 cashiers, deli clerks, meat cutters, bakery workers, pastry decorators, florists and other grocery store staffers will decide whether Tony's Fresh Market, the grocery chain founded by Italian immigrants in Logan Square and sold to private equity three years ago, will become a union shop.
Tony's workers from Joliet to Waukegan will cast their votes Tuesday through Thursday in an election held by the National Labor Relations Board. The union that hopes to represent the workers is the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 881, which already represents thousands of grocery workers at Mariano's and Jewel-Osco grocery stores throughout the Chicago area.
A majority of workers at Tony's 21 supermarkets must vote 'yes' to secure a win for the union. The union election will be among the largest held in the American private sector so far this year. If the Tony's workers vote to unionize, their fledgling bargaining unit could be the largest certified by the labor board this year, according to agency records.
Tony's workers who support the union have said they hope it could help them secure higher pay and better benefits.
Maria Molina, who works in the floral shop and as a cashier at Tony's in suburban Prospect Heights, said she makes $18.70 an hour after nine years with the company.
'We're doing all of this to have a better standard of living,' said Molina, who supports the union, in an interview with the Tribune in Spanish.
Before working at Tony's, Molina had a union job at Dominick's, where, she said, she had benefits such as sick days, time and a half pay for working Sundays and affordable insurance, which she attributes to saving her a lot of money when she was hospitalized for an infection.
And around the time Dominick's shuttered in 2013, Molina said, she was making $15.25 an hour — the equivalent of $20.88 in today's dollars, and more than she makes at Tony's now.
Most of her colleagues, she said, don't have health insurance through Tony's because it's too expensive. For now, she has insurance through her husband, but is expecting to go without it once he stops working in May because his company is moving out of state.
In a statement, Tony's said the company 'take(s) great pride in fostering a supportive environment where our team members can thrive, with competitive wages, strong benefits packages, and direct and open communication at the core of our efforts.'
The company did not respond to a question about specific starting and average wages for grocery workers. It said it offered benefits including health care, 401(k) plans and paid vacation time, and said it provided premium pay for work during the holiday season.
Tony's, which was founded by Tony Ingraffia and Domenico Gambino in 1979, was acquired by funds managed by New York based private equity giant Apollo Global Management three years ago.
In the leadup to the election, UFCW has accused Tony's of trying to bust the union vote, including by firing a union supporter, interrogating workers about their support for the union, and threatening workers by telling them that the union will ask for their immigration documents. The union filed charges with the NLRB alleging the company has violated federal labor law, which the company denies.
'Suddenly,' the union said in a news release last week, 'the Company has been hosting pizza parties, offering coupons, and special discounts to workers in an obvious last-ditch effort to buy loyalty before the election.'
In a statement, Tony's said it 'values its team members and respects their right to consider union representation, and any claims suggesting otherwise are false.'
The company said it follows the law, saying specifically that it had not fired any workers because of their union activity. Tony's said that company leaders and store managers receive training to ensure they comply with labor laws and regulations.
If the Tony's workers vote to join UFCW, their union would be among the largest new bargaining units the Chicago area has seen in recent years.
Most union elections are measured 'in the tens or hundreds of workers, not thousands,' said Johnnie Kallas, an assistant professor at the University of Illinois School of Labor and Employment Relations. 'This is a very important election,' he said.
Though the Chicago area, like much of the rest of the country, has seen an increase in new unions over the last several years, some of that organizing has taken place in smaller shops, such as cafes that sometimes have fewer than two dozen workers. UFCW itself has taken to organizing smaller units, including some local cannabis dispensaries.
But even a large bid like the Tony's election — if the union can notch a win — would not be enough to make a dent in the country's overall union membership rate, which hit a record low of just under 10% last year, despite high profile union wins and strong public support for unions. The issue of how to reverse a union membership rate that has fallen precipitously since a high of 20% in the early 1980s, when the government first started keeping track, has long vexed labor leaders and organizers.
To Tony's and its workers, of course, the results of the week's election matter a great deal.
At the Tony's in Prospect Heights, Molina does all the work to keep the flower shop running, she said, from the dirtiest work to the most pleasant. She does inventory, takes out the trash and creates the floral arrangements that Tony's sells.
This week, Molina has another task to add to her list: casting a vote.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'What a waste:' US scientists decry Trump's 47% cuts to NASA science budget
'What a waste:' US scientists decry Trump's 47% cuts to NASA science budget

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'What a waste:' US scientists decry Trump's 47% cuts to NASA science budget

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Since January, when President Donald Trump took office for the second time, the White House has been asking U.S. government organizations to implement some pretty radical changes. Things have been tense, to say the least. Thousands of federal workers have been laid off with little explanation, programs that improve diversity in the workplace have been eliminated, research grants have been cancelled in large sweeps, and international college students find themselves at risk of losing their legal status. One government organization that could be hit the hardest is NASA. The agency has faced a particularly extensive amount of pressure from the Trump administration: surveillance, goal restructuring, website purging and more. Other federal science organizations haven't been spared, either — places like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) have been targeted as well. The ground of U.S. science seems to be quaking for political reasons rather than scientific ones, leaving scientists disheartened by their government and anxious about what's next. "I don't think it is an overstatement to say that morale among U.S.-based scientists is at an all-time low," Sarah Horst, an associate professor in the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences at The Johns Hopkins University in Maryland, told "People are afraid for their jobs, their students, the projects they've often spent decades working on, and they are afraid for the future of the United States." And things only got worse on May 30, when the Trump administration's fiscal year 2026 budget request for NASA came out. It proposes cutting the agency's science funding by 47%, and the agency's workforce by about one-third — from 17,391 to 11,853. This budget has to be officially passed by Congress to take effect, but if it indeed does, the effects could be brutal. "That would represent the smallest NASA workforce since mid-1960, before the first American had launched into space," Casey Dreier, chief of space policy at The Planetary Society, a nonprofit exploration and advocacy organization, told "If this budget is made real, I am most concerned about people," John O'Meara, chief scientist at the Keck Observatory, told "Missions deliver data and are essential, but the data is meaningless without the people there to interpret it, test theories and share discoveries with the world." Perhaps the most striking aspect of the White House's 2026 NASA budget proposal is the sheer amount of missions it would cancel altogether: 41 projects, as the Planetary Society said in a statement denouncing the report. "This is the extinction-level event we were warning people about," Dreier said. Some specifics: The sharply reduced budget would cancel the Mars Sample Return (MSR) program, which was meant to bring samples of the Red Planet's surface to Earth — samples that NASA's Perseverance rover has been dutifully collecting over the last few years, and which scientists have long stressed must be analyzed in a lab to reach their full potential. MSR has experienced its own share of complications since its genesis, to be fair, including a huge price tag and what some believe is an overcomplicated mechanism of sample retrieval. However, cancelling the project outright instead of coming up with a solution would waste much of Perseverance's work on the Red Planet. The OSIRIS-APEX mission (you may remember it by its previous moniker, OSIRIS-REx) would also be cut off. This mission successfully sent a spacecraft on a multi-billion-mile expedition to an asteroid named Bennu, then had it grab a few pieces of the asteroid before traveling all the way back to Earth and safely dropping the samples to the ground. This same probe is now on round two, headed to examine the infamous asteroid Apophis — but if the FY26 NASA budget is confirmed, it won't complete its trip. "I'm personally mostly concerned for in-flight missions that already have a significant investment in both taxpayer dollars and peoples' lives/careers (including my own)," Kevin McGill, an employee at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), the agency's lead center for robotic planetary exploration, told "Luckily, my work on [the Curiosity Mars rover] and Mars2020 [Perseverance] are mostly safe, but a lot of other stuff isn't." The budget also suggests ceasing operations for the Jupiter-orbiting Juno spacecraft, which has been circling our solar system's gas giant since 2016 while regularly delivering rich information about the world and its moons. Juno is responsible for all those swirly blue images of Jupiter the astronomy community holds high; it took five years for this spacecraft to get to where it is, and many more for it to be built in the first place. "The operating missions cancellations alone represent over $12 billion of invested taxpayer value — and once they're gone, they're gone. It would take years and many millions more to replace them," Dreier said. NASA would also need to pull out of its collaboration with the European Space Agency (ESA) on the Rosalind Franklin rover — for the second time, no less — which is a robotic life-hunting explorer set to launch toward Mars in 2028. NASA had to pull out in 2012 because of budget cuts as well but re-entered the rover program after ESA cut ties with its other partner, the Russian space agency Roscosmos, once Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. "This makes the U.S. an untrustworthy partner and our allies hesitate the next time we ask them for help," Dreier said. Two operational Mars orbiters — Mars Odyssey and MAVEN — would be cancelled as well, as would the New Horizons spacecraft currently studying the outer reaches of the solar system and the DaVinci and VERITAS missions, which would explore Venus. The Lunar Gateway, which NASA envisioned as a sort of International Space Station around the moon, would also be cancelled. "What was surprising was the level of cuts within parts of each of the agencies. An example is astrophysics, where the cut was nearly 2/3 of the astrophysics budget," O'Meara said. According to the Planetary Society's analysis of the budget, that huge astrophysics reduction could mean eight spacecraft dedicated to studying extreme events in the universe (think, the Chandra X-ray Observatory) would be terminated. This analysis also suggests 10 missions constructed to study the region around Earth and the sun would be cancelled, as well as about a dozen Earth-specific missions that help scientists forecast natural disasters such as hurricanes and track global warming. The latter is especially concerning, given the speed with which Earth is heating up due to human activities that lead to greenhouse gas emissions — activities the Trump administration favors, such as burning coal for cheap power. Per the budget proposal, the White House also wants NASA to eliminate its "green aviation" spending, dedicated to making airplanes better for the environment, and instead work on "protecting the development of technologies with air traffic control and defense applications." It is also worth considering that other Trump-mandated moves have heavily impacted climate initiatives as well: more than 800 NOAA workers were laid off, for example, and NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, which houses climate change records dating back to the 1800s, was closed down — leading members of NASA's largest union to speak out in solidarity with their coworkers. Hundreds of scientists working on the National Climate Assessment, a huge report that details the dangers of climate change for policymakers to lean on, were also dismissed. (That represented all of the authors of this report). "This budget request, and its implications, has been highly disruptive to the entire field," O'Meara said. "We are forced to focus on 'what-if' planning that changes in scope rapidly. That takes the time away from what we do best: doing science and sharing it with the world." Furthermore, the White House's FY26 NASA budget proposal centers around a shift toward human missions to the Red Planet; this was a rare area that saw a budget boost in the President's request. For example, one slide in the budget summary says NASA should invest "more than $1 billion in new technology investments to enable a crewed mission to Mars." Another says the agency should allocate "$200M for Commercial Mars Payload Services (CMPS) to start launching robotic precursor missions to the Martian surface, and $80M to start deploying communications relay capabilities for Mars." "It just bothers me that they are changing almost the entirety of NASA's mission to this pipe dream of a human mission to Mars in any reasonable time frame and cost," McGill said. reached out to NASA for comment on the possible impact of these budget cuts, and was directed to acting administrator Janet Petro's statement in the proposal's Technical Supplement. This statement is supportive of the budget request overall, mentioning items such as a renewed push for human spaceflight to the moon and Mars. "The President's Fiscal Year 2026 Budget Request for NASA reflects the Trump-Vance Administration's commitment to strengthening America's leadership in space exploration while exercising fiscal responsibility. With this budget, we aim to shape a Golden Age of innovation and exploration," it reads. This shift toward Mars crewed missions is perhaps predictable, given Trump's affiliation with SpaceX founder and CEO Elon Musk. (Former affiliation, maybe, given the heated feud currently unfolding on social media between the two.) Musk was a prominent backer of Trump's campaign and worked very closely with him over the past four months. For example, the SpaceX chief ran the Department of Governmental Efficiency (DOGE), which was responsible for the bulk of government funding cuts in the name of saving "wasted taxpayer money." Independently, Musk has earned a reputation as maybe the most outspoken advocate of settling Mars, even going so far as to say he wishes to "die on Mars." SpaceX, as well as its fans, are extremely focused on achieving that goal. "In isolation, a serious humans to Mars campaign should be exciting — Mars exploration is a worthy goal, and The Planetary Society has advocated for that for years," Dreier said. "But the cost here is too high." Another concern Dreier has is that the White House expects to achieve this major goal while simultaneously reducing NASA's workforce at an unprecedented rate. "This isn't just poor policy," he added. "It's fundamentally wasteful and inefficient, exactly what this administration is saying it does not want." And the layoffs could be even more far-reaching than anticipated. McGill says morale at JPL had already been very low after sweeping layoffs took place last year, but also that the energy was further damaged by the agency's recent return-to-office order. For context, nearly 5,500 JPL employees who have been working remotely since the thick of the COVID-19 pandemic were told they must return to in-person work. The deadlines for that return were Aug. 25 for general employees within California and Oct. 27 for teleworkers living outside the state. "Employees who do not return by their required date will be considered to have resigned," JPL officials said in a workforce-wide email that was obtained by "It's clear that it's a silent layoff of the over 1,000 remote employees who they don't want to pay severance to," a NASA employee at JPL not authorized to speak on behalf of the agency previously told McGill says the order "threatens to decimate the workforce and a lot of critical institutional knowledge." "I love JPL and its mission, but it's been a rough time as of late," he said. According to Dreier, there's good news and bad news concerning whether the budget proposal will go through. The good news is that, as he explains, there seems to be bipartisan dislike for the proposal. "We've heard directly from multiple congressional offices — Republican and Democrat — that this budget is 'dead on arrival,'" he said. Of note, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation released his legislative directives for Senate Republicans' budget reconciliation bill on Friday (June 6). The senator proposes dedicating $10 billion more to NASA's science programs — and, though most of it is indeed in line with the FY26 budget request's Mars endeavors, some of that funding would be used for other things, like NASA Space Launch System (SLS) rocket meant for moon exploration and Lunar Gateway. This united aversion to the budget proposal is unsurprising. The bipartisan U.S. Planetary Science Caucus, for instance, previously released a statement in response to early blueprints of the proposal that suggested the huge cuts we're seeing presented now. "We are extremely alarmed by reports of a preliminary White House budget that proposes cutting NASA Science funding by almost half and terminating dozens of programs already well underway, like the Mars Sample Return mission and the Roman Space Telescope," co-chairs Rep. Judy Chu (D-California) and Rep. Don Bacon (R-Nebraska) wrote. Such agreement across the aisle makes sense when we consider how long it takes for space missions to reach fruition. Collaboration isn't just key — it's unavoidable. "Spaceflight, and human spaceflight in particular, requires hand-off from one administration to another," Dreier said. "The timelines are just too long for any one presidential administration." The bad news, however, is the White House may have a workaround. Related Stories: — 'This is an attack on NASA.' Space agency's largest union speaks out as DOGE cuts shutter science institute located above 'Seinfeld' diner in NYC — Saving Gateway, SLS and Orion? Sen. Ted Cruz proposes $10 billion more for NASA's moon and Mars efforts — 'Their loss diminishes us all': Scientists emphasize how Trump's mass NOAA layoffs endanger the world "Even if Congress ultimately rejects this budget, the slow pace of legislation and gridlock we've seen in recent years make it unlikely that appropriations will be in place by October 1st of this year," Dreier said. "If there's another continuing resolution, the White House budget office will throttle spending to match the lowest of all possible budget scenarios: theirs. So, we face the possibility of these cuts going into effect by default. Given the breadth and depth of these cuts, that could be very hard to recover from." "This budget proposal threatens to tear down that carefully constructed coalition in favor of a narrow vision that lacks the political durability necessary for long-term success," he added. "What a waste."

The women at the centre of Somalia's construction boom
The women at the centre of Somalia's construction boom

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The women at the centre of Somalia's construction boom

Construction is booming in Somalia's capital city and as Mogadishu literally rises from the ashes of its violent past it is also giving unexpected opportunities to women like Fathi Mohamed Abdi and Saadia Ahmed Omar. The two young female engineers have been overseeing the construction of a 10-floor apartment complex in Taleh in the city's Hodan District. Wearing hard hats they navigate their way through construction material, issuing instructions to a team of workers - all of whom are men. "When I started, people doubted me," 24-year-old Ms Abdi, the chief operating officer of Arkan Engineering Services, a Somali-owned construction company, tells the BBC. "They would ask, 'How can we trust a house built by a woman? How can I trust my money and property with a young female engineer?'" She and her colleague Ms Omar have been practising engineers for the last five years. "Mogadishu needs us," says Ms Omar, who is also 24. "When I was young, this city was in chaos. Now, we are part of its reconstruction." Somalia, a former Italian colony, has experienced a prolonged period of civil war after the government of President Siad Barre collapsed in January 1991. Even now, scars of decades of war are still visible - like in the central district of Shangani where there are bombed-out buildings. But the ruins are becoming hidden or replaced by tall office complexes and apartments, and a skyline dotted with cranes and scaffolding. Both young women were born during the civil war and grew up witnessing their country fragmenting. While many Somalis chose to leave, they stayed, driven by a passion to rebuild, despite the fact that an insurgency was being waged by al-Shabab, a group linked to al-Qaeda. "I think part of the reason women are getting more chances in this field is because there's so much work to do, and not enough professionals to do it. That creates space for us," Ms Omar says. Ibrahim Abdi Heyle, chairman of the Somali Engineers Association, agrees the high demand for skilled professionals is leading to change - even if slowly in Somalia's traditionally male-dominated society. "With numerous ongoing infrastructure, energy, and technology projects, the workload has significantly increased. As a result, the association actively encourages greater participation from women, emphasising that they are not only welcomed but also vital in filling critical gaps in the workforce," the 34-year-old says. "The association believes that empowering women in engineering not only helps meet the growing demand but also brings diverse perspectives and innovative solutions to the industry." According to the office of the mayor of Mogadishu, over the last five years, more than 6,000 buildings have been constructed, marking a significant change in the city's landscape. "Security in Mogadishu has improved, leading to an increase in high-rise and commercial buildings," says Salah Hassan Omar, the mayor's spokesperson. Nonetheless it has not been an easy path for Ms Abdi and Ms Omar as only 5% of engineers are women - and they often find opportunities for mentorship are scarce. "When I applied for internships, most companies rejected me," Ms Omar recalls. "They didn't think a woman could handle the physical demands of engineering. I searched for three months before someone finally gave me a chance." Today, the two are among the most recognised female engineers in Mogadishu, having overseen more than 30 multimillion-dollar projects. "The city is now home to taller buildings and modern infrastructure, a stark contrast to the Mogadishu of the past," Ms Abdi says proudly. But not everyone is pleased with the transformation. Veteran architect Siidow Cabdulle Boolaay laments the loss of the city's historical character. "The buildings that once graced Somalia before the war were not only beautiful but also attracted attention due to their Italian-style architecture, which was rare in Africa at that time," he tells the BBC. "The urban planning of Mogadishu was highly structured." Mr Boolaay also has safety concerns: "The sand used in Mogadishu's buildings is salty, which undermines its effectiveness." Sand from Somalia's long coastline is often used to make cement - a practice that is generally discouraged and, in many circumstances, restricted by international building standards because the high salt content can cause the corrosion of steel. "These tall buildings are not designed to withstand fire or heavy rain, and safety for the tenants is not considered during development. Many of these buildings lack fire extinguishers and proper electrical installations," he adds - visibly disappointed. He is wary of the pace at which buildings are being constructed, which he says is compromising quality control. For years, there were no regulations, leading to concerns about their structural integrity. Mr Omar, from the mayor's office, admits this was the case until three years ago - and says nothing can be done about those buildings. But he insists there is now "quality control and nobody will build a building without it". "We are [also] preparing new laws that will clearly define where high-rise buildings can be constructed and where only residential houses should be built." Yet there are worries that while regulations are in place - there are often no follow-up checks because of the speed of the building boom. Ms Abdi and Ms Omar, who graduated from Plasma University Mogadishu's faculty of civil engineering, say under their firm all their projects have been approved by the local authorities. The rapid growth of construction projects has been attributed to diaspora investments as well as improved security - although Islamist militants who control large swathes of southern Somalia still target the city. According to the World Bank, remittances made up 16.7% of the country's gross domestic product (GDP) in 2022 - something that has given opportunities to architects and engineers. But the rapid urbanisation has also exposed Mogadishu to infrastructure challenges - it lacks a proper sewage system and unregulated borehole drilling risks depleting groundwater reserves. Christophe Hodder, a UN climate security and environmental adviser, warns that the unchecked construction boom could lead to long-term environmental consequences. "We need a co-ordinated approach to water management, or we risk a crisis in the future. Each new building is digging its own borehole... in a small space, there could be 10 or 20 boreholes," he told the BBC. The government, in partnership with international organisations, is working on a new sewage system, but its implementation may require demolishing existing buildings - a controversial move that could displace residents and businesses. Mr Hodder adds that there is a high population density in Mogadishu - people driven into the city by drought and conflict. An increase in the urban population, especially in slum areas, might further increase poverty and social disparities, he says. Despite these challenges, Mogadishu's future looks promising. The city is striving to implement urban development regulations, improve infrastructure and ensure sustainable growth. Even the bombings by the Islamist armed group al-Shabab - whose fighters tend to target plush hotels often occupied by politicians - does not dent the enthusiasm of the Somali Engineers Association. Mr Heyle admits it can be upsetting for architects and engineers whose buildings are destroyed but notes that Somalis have become resilient - especially those studying engineering. "A lot of explosions happened; our dreams did not stop on that. Today we are reviving the engineering profession, which collapsed 30 years ago. That means there is hope." And the ambition is that in five years, Mogadishu will not only be a modern city but also a model post-conflict reconstruction. "I believe Mogadishu is a different city compared to the 1990s; the city has changed to a new style, and Mogadishu's development is in line with the new world," says Ms Omar. "When I walk through the streets and see buildings I helped construct, I feel proud. We are not just building structures; we are building hope." Ms Abdi agrees, adding: "We are proving that women can not only design buildings but also lead projects and shape the city." Somalia's lost tapes revive musical memories Actor in film warning of revenge killings shot dead in family feud 'Why I spent my university fees on Somali TikTok battles' Somalia's opioid overdose: Young, female and addicted Go to for more news from the African continent. Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica Focus on Africa This Is Africa

Thousands throughout Michigan peacefully protest Trump policies, military parade
Thousands throughout Michigan peacefully protest Trump policies, military parade

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Thousands throughout Michigan peacefully protest Trump policies, military parade

Thousands rallied Saturday, June 14, in Detroit's Clark Park, and more locations across the state, to protest Trump administration policies under the banner No Kings and to draw attention from a military parade in Washington, D.C., commemorating the Army's 250th anniversary. In 70 or so Michigan cities, from Midland to Muskegon and Milan to Marquette, thousands expressed their dissatisfaction. Each event was different, some were smaller gatherings, like in Bedford Township, and in larger ones, like in Detroit, speaker after speaker addressed massive crowds. Later, the protesters marched to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement office. Protesters vented and talked about their worries that America is moving toward authoritarianism, and, given the last week's events, in which the president deployed the Marines and California's National Guard against the will of the state's governor, some even said they feared America could end up under martial law. "We are protesting Trump," said Elizabeth Williams, 35, of Detroit, who called President Donald Trump a fascist. "We are protesting his immigration policy because ICE is the new Gestapo. And one thing we are saying is that L.A. has shown the way." More: Skirmish at No Kings rally in Detroit Meanwhile, thousands more protesters met at the Michigan State Capitol with a series of speeches and street performances with a carnival theme, organizers said, "to highlight the absurdity of the military parade Trump has planned on his birthday." The event included a drive to collect food, first aid supplies and clothing. Susan and Steve Swaton, retired teachers from Marshall, said they went to Lansing to protest cuts to education and the Trump administration's efforts to change school curriculum. Steve Swaton, who taught U.S. history, said he was concerned that the changes were whitewashing history, emphasizing his view that students learn the "good, the bad and the ugly" of the past, in part, so they don't repeat mistakes. In Ferndale, hundreds more protesters lined both sides of Woodward Avenue holding signs that read, "Live, Laugh, Lock Him Up," and "If there's money for a parade, there's money for Medicaid." They tried to keep the mood festive, blowing bubbles and wearing costumes from the TV show "The Handmaid's Tale," in which a totalitarian society is ruled by a fundamentalist regime that treats women as property of the state. Activists held American flags upside down, a sign of distress, along the route, and cars driving through created a cacophony of honks. To make sure it didn't get out of hand, police cars were parked on the median. In Three Rivers, more than 350 gathered. In Gaylord, another 300 showed up at the Gateway Trailhead and fanned out onto Main Street downtown. They hoisted signs, many directed at the president, that expressed dissatisfaction. About 200 showed up in Monroe, where a 78-year-old man, James Goodridge, held up a copy of the Constitution near Monroe's Custer Statue, a monument to a Civil War general. He said: "Everything that's going on is against the Constitution." Protesters even gathered from some of the more remote parts of the state, the Upper Peninsula, converging in downtown Sault Ste. Marie to participate in the No Kings protest. Early on in the day, protest organizers and Michigan's political leaders called for peaceful protests. Attorney General Dana Nessel and the head of the Michigan Republican Party, Jim Runestad, a state senator from White Lake, urged groups to avoid violence. For the most part, they did. In Detroit, a protester got hit in the face by a biker and had to seek medical treatment. In Palm Beach, Florida, marchers got as close to Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate as police would allow, USA TODAY reported. In Philadelphia, where the Continental Army was formed, a rally kicked off. In Atlanta, protesters shouted down a group of Proud Boys. And in Minnesota, officials urged protesters to quit their plans to rally after a Democratic state representative and her husband were killed, and another state lawmaker and his wife were shot. No Kings flyers, police there said, were in the vehicle of the suspect. But in Bedford Township, near Monroe, about 120 people gathered at the Government Center to take a stand for democracy, organizers said. The crowd — which held signs and chanted "Love not hate makes America great" — were united in one thing: decrying the president. One protester, Grace Rabbitt, said she was pleased with the turnout, calling the community "a very conservative area," and another, Justin McCullough, emphasized that the crowd there was made up of Democrats and Republicans. Contact Frank Witsil: 313-222-5022 or fwitsil@ Contributing: Nour Rahal, Natalie Davies and Sally Tato Snell, Free Press; Connor Veenstra and the Monroe News; Paul Welitzkin, the Petoskey News-Review; Matt Mencarini, Lansing State Journal; Dan Cherry, Sturgis Journal; Brendan Wiesner, Sault Ste. Marie News. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Thousands in Michigan protest Trump policies, military parade

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store