logo
Centre extends Home Secretary Govind Mohan's tenure until August 22, 2026

Centre extends Home Secretary Govind Mohan's tenure until August 22, 2026

The Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) has approved Mohan's extension in services as Home Secretary beyond the date of his superannuation on September 30 up to August 22, 2026
Press Trust of India New Delhi
The Centre on Friday extended the tenure of Home Secretary Govind Mohan till August 22 next year, according to an official order.
Mohan, a 1989 batch Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer of the Sikkim cadre, was named as the Home Secretary in August 2024. He took over the charge from Ajay Kumar Bhalla on completion of his tenure on August 22 last year.
The Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) has approved Mohan's extension in services as Home Secretary beyond the date of his superannuation on September 30 up to August 22, 2026 or until further orders, in terms of the provisions of FR 56 (d) and Rule 16 (1A) of the all India Services (Death-Cum-Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958, said the order issued by the Ministry of Personnel.
The rules have provisions to extend the services of such officers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SC refuses to entertain Baghel's plea against nephew's election petition
SC refuses to entertain Baghel's plea against nephew's election petition

United News of India

time2 hours ago

  • United News of India

SC refuses to entertain Baghel's plea against nephew's election petition

New Delhi, Jul 22 (UNI) The Supreme Court today refused to entertain a plea by former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel challenging an election petition filed against him by his nephew and BJP leader Vijay Baghel, which alleged violation of the mandated silence period norms during the 2023 Assembly elections. A Bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi dismissed the petition as withdrawn while granting Baghel liberty to approach the High Court-cum-Election Tribunal to raise the issue of maintainability as a preliminary issue. 'If such an application is filed, the High Court is requested to decide it after giving an opportunity of being heard to the other side and before proceeding on merits. Observations made in the said order shall have no bearing on the application sought to be moved,' the Bench clarified. Baghel had approached the apex court against the Chhattisgarh High Court's dismissal of his application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of Vijay Baghel's election petition. Appearing for Baghel, Senior Advocate Vivek Tankha, along with Advocate Sumeer Sodhi, argued that breach of silence period norms does not amount to 'corrupt practice' under election law and hence, the election petition was not maintainable. However, the Bench suggested that the issue be raised before the High Court-cum-Election Tribunal. In the 2023 Chhattisgarh Assembly elections, Bhupesh Baghel (Indian National Congress) and Vijay Baghel (Bharatiya Janata Party) contested against each other from the Patan constituency, with Bhupesh Baghel emerging victorious. Subsequently, Vijay Baghel filed an election petition alleging corrupt practices, including violation of the 48-hour silence period mandated under Section 126 of the Representation of the People Act. It was claimed that Bhupesh Baghel organised a rally or roadshow during the silence period, where slogans were raised in his favour. This was allegedly video-graphed and photographed by Vijay Baghel's election agent. In his defence, Bhupesh Baghel contended that the election petition was vague and did not disclose any triable cause of action. Upon dismissal of his application by the High Court, he approached the Supreme Court, which today declined to interfere. UNI SNG SSP

US Speaker cuts short House session to avoid vote on releasing Epstein file
US Speaker cuts short House session to avoid vote on releasing Epstein file

Business Standard

time7 hours ago

  • Business Standard

US Speaker cuts short House session to avoid vote on releasing Epstein file

Speaker Mike Johnson on Tuesday announced he was cutting short the week's legislative business and sending the House home early for the summer on Wednesday to avoid having to hold votes on releasing files related to the accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. He made the move to deny Democrats the chance to try to force procedural votes on measures that would call on the Justice Department to make the information public. It reflected how deep divisions among Republicans on the matter have now paralyzed the House, as Republicans seek to avoid a politically perilous vote on a matter that is confounding President Trump and roiling their MAGA base. 'We're done being lectured on transparency,' Johnson said at a news conference, where the typically unflappable speaker appeared frustrated. He complained about 'endless efforts to politicize the Epstein investigation' and added: 'We're not going to play political games with this,' as he wrapped up his final news conference before September. Republicans had planned votes this week on an immigration measure, a permitting bill and a rollback of some Biden-era regulations. But the House Rules Committee, the powerful panel controlled by the speaker that determines which legislation reaches the floor, has been upended by the Epstein issue, with Democrats repeatedly demanding votes on it. Democrats on the committee vowed to force such a vote again this week as part of a routine measure to allow debate on unrelated legislation. But Republicans did not want to go on the record on the matter, for fear of retribution from angry supporters who are demanding the release of Epstein files. The result is that the House cannot move ahead on any substantive legislation. Republicans now plan to wrap up votes Tuesday and early Wednesday on some noncontroversial bills and call their recess by midafternoon on Wednesday. After initially saying the material should come out, Johnson on Monday vowed that he would not schedule a vote this summer on whether to release the Epstein files, saying that Trump needed 'space' to determine how to proceed. On Tuesday, he claimed that House Republicans were united on the issue. But they appeared to be far from it. 'Crimes have been committed,' said Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia. 'If there's no justice and no accountability, people are going to get sick of it. That's where people largely are.' Representative Ralph Norman, Republican of South Carolina and a member of the Rules panel, criticized his leaders for 'stalling' on the matter. 'The American people deserve action, not excuses,' he wrote on social media on Tuesday. 'Let's vote on it before August recess and get it DONE!!' And Representative Thomas Massie, Republican of Kentucky, said he still planned to circumvent House Republican leaders and force a vote on releasing the Epstein files in September, with the help of Democrats, using a maneuver known as a discharge petition. 'He just told us in there to stick their heads in the sand about this Epstein thing,' Massie said after a Republican conference meeting, noting that Johnson had offered members no clear explanation of why a vote on the matter needed to be delayed. 'Some here are much more frustrating than others,' Johnson said, referring to Massie. 'I don't know how his mind works, I don't know what he's thinking. He could have brought his discharge petition any time. Now he's clamoring as if there's any sort of timeline.' He ended with some Southern pique: 'Bless his heart.' On Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee also voted to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell, the longtime partner of Epstein who is serving a 20-year sentence on a sex-trafficking conviction, for a deposition. Representative Tim Burchett, a Tennessee Republican who has pushed for more transparency in the Epstein case, introduced the motion to subpoena Maxwell, and several Republican members supported it. Greene also expressed skepticism about Maxwell's testimony, noting that she was likely 'bartering for something,' like a presidential pardon.

Johnson cuts short house session to avoid vote on releasing Epstein files
Johnson cuts short house session to avoid vote on releasing Epstein files

Business Standard

time9 hours ago

  • Business Standard

Johnson cuts short house session to avoid vote on releasing Epstein files

Speaker Mike Johnson on Tuesday announced he was cutting short the week's legislative business and sending the House home early for the summer on Wednesday to avoid having to hold votes on releasing files related to the accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. He made the move to deny Democrats the chance to try to force procedural votes on measures that would call on the Justice Department to make the information public. It reflected how deep divisions among Republicans on the matter have now paralyzed the House, as Republicans seek to avoid a politically perilous vote on a matter that is confounding President Trump and roiling their MAGA base. 'We're done being lectured on transparency,' Johnson said at a news conference, where the typically unflappable speaker appeared frustrated. He complained about 'endless efforts to politicize the Epstein investigation' and added: 'We're not going to play political games with this,' as he wrapped up his final news conference before September. Republicans had planned votes this week on an immigration measure, a permitting bill and a rollback of some Biden-era regulations. But the House Rules Committee, the powerful panel controlled by the speaker that determines which legislation reaches the floor, has been upended by the Epstein issue, with Democrats repeatedly demanding votes on it. Democrats on the committee vowed to force such a vote again this week as part of a routine measure to allow debate on unrelated legislation. But Republicans did not want to go on the record on the matter, for fear of retribution from angry supporters who are demanding the release of Epstein files. The result is that the House cannot move ahead on any substantive legislation. Republicans now plan to wrap up votes Tuesday and early Wednesday on some noncontroversial bills and call their recess by midafternoon on Wednesday. After initially saying the material should come out, Johnson on Monday vowed that he would not schedule a vote this summer on whether to release the Epstein files, saying that Trump needed 'space' to determine how to proceed. On Tuesday, he claimed that House Republicans were united on the issue. But they appeared to be far from it. 'Crimes have been committed,' said Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia. 'If there's no justice and no accountability, people are going to get sick of it. That's where people largely are.' Representative Ralph Norman, Republican of South Carolina and a member of the Rules panel, criticized his leaders for 'stalling' on the matter. 'The American people deserve action, not excuses,' he wrote on social media on Tuesday. 'Let's vote on it before August recess and get it DONE!!' And Representative Thomas Massie, Republican of Kentucky, said he still planned to circumvent House Republican leaders and force a vote on releasing the Epstein files in September, with the help of Democrats, using a maneuver known as a discharge petition. 'He just told us in there to stick their heads in the sand about this Epstein thing,' Massie said after a Republican conference meeting, noting that Johnson had offered members no clear explanation of why a vote on the matter needed to be delayed. 'Some here are much more frustrating than others,' Johnson said, referring to Massie. 'I don't know how his mind works, I don't know what he's thinking. He could have brought his discharge petition any time. Now he's clamoring as if there's any sort of timeline.' He ended with some Southern pique: 'Bless his heart.' On Tuesday, the House Oversight Committee also voted to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell, the longtime partner of Epstein who is serving a 20-year sentence on a sex-trafficking conviction, for a deposition. Representative Tim Burchett, a Tennessee Republican who has pushed for more transparency in the Epstein case, introduced the motion to subpoena Maxwell, and several Republican members supported it. Greene also expressed skepticism about Maxwell's testimony, noting that she was likely 'bartering for something,' like a presidential pardon.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store