
Caste census without economic indicators is of little value, says Congress leader Sachin Pilot
Though the Socio-Economic and Education Survey was carried out in the previous term of Siddaramaiah as the CM, its findings were never officially released. However, earlier this year, certain portions of the report were leaked, triggering protests by Vokkaligas and Lingayats.
The party's articulation of this position comes at a time when its Karnataka unit is under pressure from the politically dominant Vokkaliga and Lingayat communities, who are upset over being 'undercounted' in a survey commissioned by Chief Minister Siddaramaiah in 2015.
New Delhi: The Congress Tuesday said a caste census that merely records caste identities would hold little value, stressing that the exercise should aim to assess people's living standards and the impact of government welfare schemes on their lives.
A cornered Congress has attempted to wriggle out of the situation by ordering a re-enumeration of castes in Karnataka within the next three months. And, that is why its latest underlining that a caste census must go beyond enumeration of caste identities is significant.
'The objective of the exercise is not just to get the name and the caste of a person, that I don't think has that much value. The real value is that you understand in what condition they are living, how successful the schemes have been so far, are the targeted budgets and policy programmes reaching the ones that we are intending for,' Congress general secretary Sachin Pilot said at a press conference at the party's new headquarters in Delhi's Kotla Marg.
The former Rajasthan deputy chief minister said Rahul Gandhi's pitch for a nation-wide caste census was always about carrying out an 'x-ray' of the country, rather than simply counting castes.
'When we said, we wanted a caste census, the objective was to know exactly in what conditions people of India are living, those who are being deprived, who are not in the mainstream, how much have they got education, how much access they have to government schemes and policy programs, in what economic condition are they living, what is an expanding, household incomes, all that is required for us to do better policy combination,' he said..
The idea, he added, is not just to collect data of an individual's caste or a household's caste.
'The objective is to know exactly in what condition these families are living and how we can better curate our policies to substantially help the livelihood of those people. Unless we have tangible data, no state government and no central government can actually do targeted interventions and that is what we wanted to do.'
On 30 April, the Centre had announced that caste enumeration would be included in the next population census. And on Monday, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) issued a notification saying that the next census will be held in 2027.
While the Congress has questioned the absence of the term census in the notification, the Centre has dismissed the contention, pointing out that the MHA has already announced in multiple press statements that caste will be counted as part of the next exercise.
Pilot highlighted the issue even on Tuesday, adding that the allocation of Rs 570 crore for conducting census in the annual budget also raises questions on the Centre's intentions.
'Given the BJP government's track record of backtracking, use of distraction tactics in times of its failures and its affinity to hypocrisy, we won't be surprised if it quietly shelves the caste census once again. Also, while the census would cost about Rs 8,000 to Rs 10,000 crore, the government had allocated a meagre Rs 570 crore for the purpose, which clearly shows its intentions,' he alleged.
(Edited by Tony Rai)
Also Read: Manish Tewari on Congress's Narender Surrender jibe—'nature of politics, back-channel talks nothing new'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
20 minutes ago
- The Hindu
When clash erupted between T.N. government and Governor on appointing a Vice-Chancellor 40 years ago
Around a dozen State universities in Tamil Nadu currently do not have Vice-Chancellors, as Tamil Nadu remains embroiled in a legal tussle over shifting the authority to appoint them, from the Governor (in his capacity as Chancellor) to the State government. Interestingly, it is not the first time Tamil Nadu has witnessed a disagreement between the government and the Governor on this issue. A conflict took place four decades ago over the appointment of the Vice-Chancellor of Madurai Kamaraj University. In 1985, during M.G. Ramachandran's tenure as Chief Minister, tensions simmered over Governor S.L. Khurana's use of his authority to appoint Vice-Chancellors. That March, Education Minister C. Aranganayagam remarked that difficulties in appointing Vice-Chancellors 'seemed peculiar to States where non-Congress (I) governments were in office.' His comment came just months after the AIADMK-Congress (I) alliance swept to power in Tamil Nadu in the aftermath of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's assassination. Referring to similar controversies in Andhra Pradesh and West Bengal, Aranganayagam observed, according to The Hindu, that Governors in Congress (I)-ruled states appeared to have no issue accepting recommendations from the State government. 'This problem arose only in non-Congress (I) governed States,' he said. In the Assembly, Aranganayagam argued it would be better to vest the power to oversee universities in State governments rather than with the Governor or the Central government. Against this backdrop, in October 1985, Governor Khurana appointed S. Krishnaswamy, a well-regarded biologist, as Vice-Chancellor of Madurai Kamaraj University. The appointment caught the State government by surprise. Aranganayagam said the government had recommended C.A. Perumal, Head of the Political Science Department at University of Madras, for the post. He stated: 'The practice so far has been that the Governor consults the Chief Minister before making the appointment; in this case, the Chief Minister was not consulted. Therefore, with the Chief Minister's consent, the advice to the Governor is being forwarded. We have nothing against Dr. Krishnaswamy personally.' When asked whether the government had officially conveyed its preference to the Governor, Aranganayagam admitted that he had only informally suggested Perumal's name, but insisted the Governor ought to have consulted the Chief Minister before finalising the appointment. Later that evening, the Raj Bhavan issued a statement expressing surprise at the Minister's remarks. It emphasised that this was not the first time the Governor had appointed a Vice-Chancellor without direct consultation, noting that he had made similar decisions at least six times in the previous three years. The Governor's office stated that the process had been consistent and that in some instances — such as appointments to Madras and Bharathidasan Universities — he had disagreed with the Education Minister's recommendations and independently made the final call. The Governor's position, it said, was to choose the best candidate from the panel submitted. The Raj Bhavan also cited Section 11 of the Madurai Kamaraj University Act to support the legality of Krishnaswamy's appointment. Aranganayagam countered this by invoking Article 163(1) of the Constitution, which mandates that the Governor act on the advice of the Council of Ministers. He argued that since the Governor holds the post of Chancellor by virtue of being Governor, he cannot wield more power in the Chancellor's role than he does as Governor. He also denied that the appointment followed past practice. 'In all previous cases, the Governor appointed Vice-Chancellors only after consulting the Chief Minister and obtaining his concurrence; in this case, he has not done so,' he said. Aranganayagam added that the issue was not about the individual selected, but about the principle of who holds the appointing authority. Aranganayam felt persons belonging to the state were better equipped than 'others coming from outside' to select the appropriate person for a post. However, just a few hours later, the State government issued an official release, stating: 'It is most unfortunate that an unnecessary controversy has arisen over the appointment of the Vice-Chancellor of Madurai Kamaraj University. The Government, after careful consideration, holds that the appointment of Dr. S. Krishnaswamy by the Governor-Chancellor is valid and on merit. The Governor's decision is being implemented by the Government.' The Hindu reported: 'What happened between the Education Minister's assertion in the morning and the issue of the press release in the evening (putting an end to the controversy) is not quite clear. It is, however, learnt that, on behalf of the Chief Minister, an emissary (one of his Cabinet colleagues) called on the Governor at the Raj Bhavan in the afternoon and sorted out the matter.' Krishnaswamy later assumed charge as Vice-Chancellor. He told journalists he was pleased that the Education Minister had clarified, 'We have nothing against Prof. Krishnaswamy personally.' Incidentally, then Finance Minister V.R. Nedunchezhiyan welcomed the appointment, saying, 'I am happy that an internationally-known scientist has been chosen for the position.'


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Halt Goalpara eviction, give land to affected: Cong to CM
1 2 3 4 5 6 Guwahati: Senior Congress leader and leader of the opposition in Assam assembly, Debabrata Saikia, wrote to CM Himanta Biswa Sarma , urging him to stay the eviction in Goalpara and to provide alternate land to those evicted and those yet to be evicted. A total of 667 families were evicted for allegedly encroaching over 600 bighas of land at Hasilabeel village under Balijana revenue circle in lower Assam's Goalpara district. The families mostly belong to the Bengali-speaking Muslim community, officials said. Saikia urged the CM to direct the Goalpara district commissioner not to evict the people until the CM meets with the people of the village on June 18. "We have already stated that we will cooperate with the govt to free the land from encroachers, subject to compliance with various guidelines issued by the Supreme Court, and also laws and rules enacted by the Assam Legislative Assembly for eviction of landless people and rehabilitation, in case they are evicted from govt land, Khas land, reserve land, etc," he added. He said it was apparent that the people occupying the land in question were living there as they had no alternative land to build their houses and provide shelter to their families. He also directed a Congress delegation, led by chief whip of the party in the Assembly Wazed Ali Choudhury, to visit the eviction site at the earliest and submit a memorandum to the governor, urging him to ensure fair practice and extend all help for rehabilitation, in case eviction of citizens is carried out from the presently occupied land by the govt as per rules. On the other hand, an eight-member Congress delegation was stopped by Assam Police and local authorities from visiting the eviction site. Police put up barricades at Hashila Beel in Goalpara to stop the Congress MLAs from proceeding.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Shah, CM discuss issues of welfare, city's development
Chief minister Rekha Gupta on Tuesday met Union home minister Amit Shah and held what her office described as 'detailed and meaningful discussions on various public welfare and development issues related to the capital city.' CM Gupta also expressed gratitude to the home minister for his 'valuable guidance'. Describing the meeting as 'cordial, constructive and highly meaningful', the chief minister's office said the conversation focused on key governance issues. 'The chief minister informed the home minister that Delhi is effectively reaping the benefits of a double-engine government. With continued support from the Centre, the promises made for the first 100 days have been fulfilled within the set timeline,' the statement said. It added that the CM discussed her government's vision for a 'Developed Delhi' and acknowledged that central support was aiding that ambition. 'This cooperation is also serving as an inspiration for the state government,' the CM office noted. The home minister's office posted photos of the meeting on X, following which Gupta thanked Shah in a public message. 'Today, I made a courtesy visit to the Hon'ble Union Minister of Home and Cooperation, Shri Amit Shah ji, and received his guidance. His vision and leadership in national service, organisation, and good governance are a source of inspiration to all public representatives. The discussion on Delhi's public interest issues was extremely thought-provoking, guiding and intimate. Heartfelt gratitude for his invaluable time and affection,' Gupta wrote on X. Gupta also extended her best wishes on the completion of 11 years of the BJP-led central government. She said that 'under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India has strengthened its reputation at the global level and achieved remarkable progress in internal security, the cooperative movement, and the upliftment of the poor.' She added that 'the experience, guidance and leadership of the central government are extremely essential for a highly sensitive metropolis like Delhi.'