Samsung Profit Halves on US Chip Curbs, AI Memory Delays
South Korea's largest company reported preliminary operating profit of 4.6 trillion won in the June quarter, a roughly 56% drop from a year ago. Analysts on average had projected a 41% decline. Revenue stood at 74 trillion won.
One-time inventory-related costs contributed to the drop, and customer evaluation and shipments of its advanced memory products are proceeding, Samsung said in a statement. Operating losses in its contract chipmaking business are expected to narrow in the second half of the year on a gradual recovery in demand, Samsung said.
The company will provide a full financial statement with net income and divisional breakdowns later this month.
Samsung has been struggling to regain its footing in high-bandwidth memory chips, which are critical for powering Nvidia's AI accelerators. The company has yet to secure certification from Nvidia for its most advanced product — the 12-layer HBM3E — creating an unusually long lead time for rival SK Hynix Inc. in the highly lucrative space. Meanwhile, US competitor Micron Technology Inc. has been rapidly advancing to stake its own claim.
Analysts polled by Bloomberg News prior to the preliminary earnings release expected Samsung's chip division to post an operating profit of 2.7 trillion won in the second quarter, up from 1.1 trillion in the prior quarter but still significantly lower than 6.5 trillion won a year earlier.
In April, Samsung signaled a better outlook, saying it shipped enhanced HBM3E samples to major customers and expected that product line to contribute to revenue in the second quarter. The company also said it plans to begin mass production of HBM4 chips in the second half of the year.
Samsung is fighting to catch up to SK Hynix, which has aggressively positioned itself as Nvidia's primary HBM4 supplier. It shipped the world's first 12-layer HBM4 samples to customers ahead of schedule, followed by Micron in June, while Samsung has had to revise its 12-layer HBM3E design.
Samsung secured an order from Advanced Micro Devices Inc., joining Micron as a supplier, according to a June release. But its failure to win early certification for HBM3E chips from Nvidia — the dominant maker of AI-supporting graphics processing units — is hurting its attempts to take significant market share.
Bernstein analysts led by Mark Li, who had previously expected Samsung's 12-layer HBM3E would be qualified by Nvidia in the second quarter, trimmed their forecast for Samsung's HBM market share, saying they now expect certification in the third quarter.
'Samsung will gradually narrow the gap vs rivals,' they wrote in a June 23 research note. 'We forecast SK Hynix remains the leader in 2027, but with others catching up and SK Hynix's edge eroding, the shares held by suppliers will be more similarly distributed then than now.'
Bernstein estimates SK Hynix holds 57% of the HBM market in 2025, followed by Samsung at 27% and Micron at 16%.
At its annual shareholder meeting in March, Samsung vowed to strengthen its position in the HBM market this year, responding to concerns over its underperformance in AI. Jun Young-hyun, head of Samsung's chip business, said that Samsung's failure to secure an early lead in the HBM market contributed to it lagging behind rival SK Hynix and pledged not to repeat the mistake with HBM4. The next-generation memory is expected to be used in Nvidia's Rubin GPU architecture.
'While uncertainties remain around the time line for quality certification, we see no indication of a strategy shift and believe the company is on track for a 3Q2025 market launch,' Daishin Securities Co. analyst Ryu Hyung-keun wrote in a recent research report.
With assistance from Shinhye Kang.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Brutal CEO cut 80% of workers who rejected AI - 2 years later he says he would do it again
When most leaders cautiously tested AI, Eric Vaughan, the CEO of IgniteTech, took a gamble that shocked the tech world. The IgniteTech CEO replaced nearly 80% of his staff in a bold move to make artificial intelligence the company's foundation. His decision, controversial yet transformative, shows the brutal reality of adapting to disruption. Vaughan's story shows that businesses must change their culture, not just their technology, to thrive in the AI era. In early 2023, IgniteTech CEO Eric Vaughan faced one of his toughest decisions. Convinced that artificial intelligence was not just a tool but an existential shift for every business, he dismantled his company's traditional structure. ALSO READ: Orca attack mystery: What really happened to marine trainer Jessica Radcliffe Why did IgniteTech face resistance to AI? Live Events When Vaughan first pushed the company to use AI, he spent a lot of money on training. Mondays turned into "AI Mondays," which were only for learning new skills, trying out new tools, and starting pilot projects. IgniteTech paid for employees to take AI-related courses and even brought in outside experts to help with adoption, as per a report by Fortune. However, resistance emerged rapidly. It was surprising that the most pushback came from technical employees, not sales or marketing. A lot of people were doubtful about what AI could do, focusing on what it couldn't do instead of what it could do. Some people openly refused to take part, while others worked against the projects. Vaughan said that the resistance was so strong that it was almost sabotage. His experience is backed up by research. According to a 2025 report on enterprise AI adoption, one in three workers said they were against or even sabotaging AI projects, usually because they were afraid of losing their jobs or were frustrated with tools that weren't fully developed, as per a report by Fortune. ALSO READ: Apple iPhone 17 Air and Pro get surprise release date change — here's the new timeline How did Vaughan rebuild the company? Vaughan came to the conclusion that believing in AI was not up for debate. Instead of making his current employees change, he started hiring new people who shared his vision. He called these new hires "AI innovation specialists." This change affected every department, including sales and finance, as per a report by Fortune. Thibault Bridel-Bertomeu, IgniteTech's new chief AI officer, was a key hire. Vaughan reorganized the company so that every division reported to AI after he joined. This centralization stopped things from being done twice and made it easier for people to work together, which is a common problem when companies use AI. The change was expensive, disruptive, and emotionally draining, but Vaughan says it had to said, "It was harder to change minds than to add skills,' as per a report by Fortune. What can other companies learn from this? Even though it hurt, IgniteTech got a lot of benefits. By the end of 2024, it had released two AI solutions that were still in the patent process. One of them was Eloquens AI, an email automation platform. Revenue remained in the nine-figure range, with profit margins near 75% Ebitda. During the chaos, the company even made a big purchase. ALSO READ: Alien Attack in November? Harvard scientists warn mysterious space object could be advanced technology Vaughan's story teaches us a crucial lesson: using AI is as much about culture as it is about technology. While companies like Ikea focus on augmenting workers instead of replacing them, Vaughan chose radical restructuring to ensure alignment. Both methods show how hard it is for businesses to find a balance between trust and innovation. FAQs Why did Eric Vaughan fire so many people at IgniteTech? He thought that people who didn't want to use AI would hurt the company's future, so he decided to rebuild with people who shared his vision. What happened after IgniteTech changed its AI? The company introduced new AI products, set up a central AI division, and made more money, even though the change was hard.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Trump Administration To Discuss Taking 10% In Intel: Report
The Trump administration is said to discuss taking a 10% stake in American chipmaker Intel, Bloomberg News reported on Monday, citing a White House official and other people familiar with the matter. Shares of the company were down 3.8%. The federal government is considering a potential investment in Intel that would involve converting some or all of the company's grants from the U.S. Chips and Science Act into equity, the report said. Trump, who met Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan on August 11, has taken an unprecedented approach to national security. He has pushed for multibillion-dollar government tie-ups in semiconductors and rare earths such as a pay-for-play deal with Nvidia and an arrangement with rare earth producer MP Materials to secure critical minerals. Tan, who took the top job just over six months back, has been tasked to turnaround Intel. Federal backing could give Intel more breathing room to revive its loss-making foundry business, analysts said, but it still suffers from a weak product roadmap and challenges in attracting customers to its new factories.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
iPhone 13 still rules, but Samsung's new threat could shatter Apple's grip on the market
Apple market share vs Samsung market share 2025: A recent report indicates that a significant 16.3% of iPhone users still use the iPhone 13, suggesting consumers prioritize value over frequent upgrades. Consequently, Apple's market share has seen a decline, with Samsung experiencing growth, particularly in the US due to its diverse pricing options and popular foldable phones. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Apple Fans Aren't Rushing to Upgrade iPhones Apple's Market Share Stalls as Samsung Surges Worldwide Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Wider Pricing Options Give Samsung the Edge Apple Faces Innovation Pressure Amid Rising Competition Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs : Apple's commonly owned iPhone today is not the latest version, it's the iPhone 13, which was released back in 2021, as per a report. That says a lot about how consumers perceive value in upgrading, as it amounts to tweaks rather than overhauls, according to The Street on recent figures from Telemetry, 16.3% of all iPhone users in existence are using iPhone 13s, reported The Street. Even with new iPhones arriving annually, users seem reluctant to upgrade, likely due to the fact that the latest models don't feel like game-changers, as per the report. That level of sticking to older phones is setting the stage for competition, primarily, Samsung, according to The the second quarter of 2025, Apple shipped 44.8 million iPhones, down 2% from the same period last year. Samsung shipped 57.5 million phones, a 7% increase year over year, as per The Street READ: Social security windfall: Retirees could see up to $5,108 deposited this week - who qualifies for the payout That increase has moved Samsung to the top in world market share, while Apple's share remained unchanged at 16%, Samsung increased to 20%, reported The difference is even more stark in the US, Apple's home market share fell from 56% to 49%, while Samsung surged from 23% to 31%, according to the report. That momentum is largely due to high demand for Samsung's new foldables, such as the Galaxy Z Fold 7, which reportedly had 25% more preorders than any of its predecessors, as per The Street report. Samsung reports sales of the Fold 7 are close to 50% ahead of its last model, according to the READ: Meet Nick Molnar: The man behind Afterpay's buy now, pay later platform, who sold it for $29 billion A key reason Samsung is making headway is that it has a wide range of products at various price points, as per The Street. Senior Analyst at Omdia, Aaron West said that 'Samsung has refocused its strategy on 'smart volume,' aiming to profitably scale its mass market Galaxy A series while continuing to grow its premium models," as quoted in the instance, Galaxy A36 begins at $399.99, whereas the high-end Galaxy S35 costs $799.99, those options allow Samsung to cater to more customers, according to The Client Devices Vice President Francisco Jeronimo said that, 'Samsung was able to consolidate its market leadership and outperform the overall market, achieving strong growth in the quarter driven by the sales of its new Galaxy A36 and A56 products,' as quoted in the report. Jeronimo added, 'These new products introduce AI-enabled features to mid-range devices, which have been effectively used in retail stores to drive sales, as more consumers become curious about AI,' as quoted in The Street READ: Is Google's AI revolution a threat to website traffic for digital publishers? Here are strategies to stay ahead When Apple was led by founder Steve Jobs, it was known for a period of innovation that included the launch of the iPod, iPhone, and iPad, according to the report. But, since CEO Tim Cook took over, the tech giant has made fewer big splashes, instead focusing on smaller tweaks like better cameras rather than any massive changes, as per The popularly considered major iPhone launches include the iPhone 6 in 2014, which had a larger screen, and the iPhone X, which had an edge-to-edge display, according to the report. But after that, there have been changes under the hood with more powerful chips, but nothing has changed dramatically enough to cause a massive rush by Apple loyalists to upgrade, as reported by The lack of innovation contradicts Apple's long-time reputation for reshaping design and how consumers use and interact with its devices, according to the report. The recent iPhone also look very similar to the previous generations, and the company has yet to launch a foldable display like Samsung's, reported The Street. Even Apple's Intelligence features are not as up to the mark compared to Google's Gemini, found in Samsung smartphones running on Android, reported The READ: 10 must-change iOS 18.6 settings that'll make your iPhone feel like day one again Roughly 16.3% of iPhone users, according to Telemetry especially in the US, where Samsung's share rose to 31% while Apple's fell to 49%.
